Compensation advice over PTSD caused by Afghan war
Q: My husband and I were on the brink of divorce, but after having counselling that revealed he is suffering from PTSD I have decided to stay and support him. He served in the armed forces in Afghanistan, finishing his last tour in 2010. Afterwards he was a different person, withdrawn, unstable, prone to violent outbursts over nothing.
Over the years things have got worse and, on occasions, he has hit me. I begged him numerous times to get help but he wouldn't accept anything was wrong with him until I said I was leaving. Now he has a diagnosis I feel angry, and I believe we should get compensation for what he went through. He says he would have needed to apply within seven years. Is this right?
A: Whilst the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) generally requires compensation to be claimed within seven years, delayed-onset PTSD is recognised and therefore does not necessarily negate the potential for making a claim after that time. In fact, there is evidence of a significant number of veterans who have experienced delayed symptoms and diagnoses, which often get worse after they have left the disciplined environment of the military.
The AFCS provides compensation regardless of fault, meaning your husband could claim compensation for his PTSD, even if this was not caused by negligence on the part of the MOD. A specialist lawyer can help him to access the scheme.
The key to a successful claim is to establish the link between your husband's PTSD diagnosis and his experiences in Afghanistan. Reports from the medical professionals he has seen, together with evidence of his treatment plan will help to strengthen the viability of a claim.
PTSD in military personnel who experienced the horrors of combat can have devastating and life-changing effects on both the sufferer and their family. Proving the severity of those effects will be fundamental to gaining the right level of compensation.
• This question has been answered by Claire Parfitt, a solicitor with GHP Legal. If you would like to speak to someone about this or any other legal matter, please visit our website www.ghplegal.com and use the contact us form, or call us on: Wrexham 01978 291456, Llangollen 01978 860313, Oswestry 01691 659194.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
6 days ago
- Leader Live
Compensation advice over PTSD caused by Afghan war
Is it too late to claim compensation from the military for PTSD caused by Afghan war? Q: My husband and I were on the brink of divorce, but after having counselling that revealed he is suffering from PTSD I have decided to stay and support him. He served in the armed forces in Afghanistan, finishing his last tour in 2010. Afterwards he was a different person, withdrawn, unstable, prone to violent outbursts over nothing. Over the years things have got worse and, on occasions, he has hit me. I begged him numerous times to get help but he wouldn't accept anything was wrong with him until I said I was leaving. Now he has a diagnosis I feel angry, and I believe we should get compensation for what he went through. He says he would have needed to apply within seven years. Is this right? A: Whilst the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) generally requires compensation to be claimed within seven years, delayed-onset PTSD is recognised and therefore does not necessarily negate the potential for making a claim after that time. In fact, there is evidence of a significant number of veterans who have experienced delayed symptoms and diagnoses, which often get worse after they have left the disciplined environment of the military. The AFCS provides compensation regardless of fault, meaning your husband could claim compensation for his PTSD, even if this was not caused by negligence on the part of the MOD. A specialist lawyer can help him to access the scheme. The key to a successful claim is to establish the link between your husband's PTSD diagnosis and his experiences in Afghanistan. Reports from the medical professionals he has seen, together with evidence of his treatment plan will help to strengthen the viability of a claim. PTSD in military personnel who experienced the horrors of combat can have devastating and life-changing effects on both the sufferer and their family. Proving the severity of those effects will be fundamental to gaining the right level of compensation. • This question has been answered by Claire Parfitt, a solicitor with GHP Legal. If you would like to speak to someone about this or any other legal matter, please visit our website and use the contact us form, or call us on: Wrexham 01978 291456, Llangollen 01978 860313, Oswestry 01691 659194.
Daily Mail
29-07-2025
- Daily Mail
Teenage soldier, 19, dies after collapsing during physical training session at North Yorkshire barracks
A 'proud and passionate' teenage soldier collapsed and died during a physical training session with his battalion, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) has announced. Private Harry Johnson, 19, was just three months into his military career when the tragedy occurred at Vimy Barracks in Catterick, North Yorkshire, last Thursday. The youngster had only signed up to the 2nd Infantry Training Battalion in April, with his superiors revealing that he had already shown 'enormous potential' as a soldier. Pte Johnson, who had passed basic training earlier this month, had been awarded Best Shot at his pass off parade before joining the Bruneval Platoon to begin training as a paratrooper. Paying tribute to the Doncaster-born teenager, the MoD today released a statement describing Pte Johnson as 'one of the hardest working members of the platoon,' as well as being 'reliable and disciplined'. The MoD continued: 'In 13 weeks, the only fault his training team could find was one day spotting some loose threads on his uniform. 'Pte Johnson's determination and selflessness were highlighted on field training exercises, being the first to volunteer to help those around him and making them laugh with his reaction to the thought of wet and dry drills. 'Despite not being the biggest soldier, his high standards of physical fitness, coupled with his determination and courage, meant he often punched above his weight, consistently performing at the top of the platoon.' It went on to describe the young soldier as someone who carried out tasks 'with a smile on his face and a genuine love for the job,' and showed 'evident love for his family and girlfriend, with whom he spoke regularly.' His death, the statement added, was 'a tragic blow' to his colleagues and loved ones. Lieutenant Colonel Ben Jesty, commanding officer of the 2nd Infantry Training Battalion, said the army had been left 'heartbroken' by his death. 'Tipped to be a future P Company Champion, he was the kind of young soldier that the country needs: fit, determined, disciplined and selfless. 'Vitally, he had the sense of humour to laugh at the eccentricities of Army life. He was a credit to his friends and family, to whom we offer our most heartfelt condolences at this awful time.' Pte Sam Birbeck, who trained alongside him in Bruneval Platoon, recalled the teenager's 'quiet yet engaging personality' and said: 'Harry was a genuine, talented, and caring individual who made a positive impression on those around him.' Another of his peers, Pte Cayden Dalgity, described Harry as 'a good guy who was always willing to help others. He was someone you could rely on.' Sergeant Foreman, Platoon Sergeant, said the young soldier was on track to 'becoming one of Britain's finest.' He added: 'His quiet resilience, determination, and the grit required to even begin that journey are not ordinary. They are qualities found in the best of us. 'Those who trained beside him will remember his loyalty and integrity.' Infantry recruits typically spend 28 weeks at the Infantry Training Centre (ITC) at Catterick. The MoD said in a statement: 'It is with immense sadness we confirm the death of Private (Pte) Harry Johnson of the 2nd Infantry Training Battalion on 24th July 2025. 'He died following a physical training session at Vimy Barracks, Catterick. He was 19 years old. Our thoughts are with Pte Johnson's family and friends at this sad time.'
Daily Mirror
23-07-2025
- Daily Mirror
MoD admits Britain's troops could have brain damage caused by their own weapons
Senior British officers and scientists admit British troops may suffer 'brain damage' caused by low impact blasts from their own weapons while fighting on the frontline Thousands of UK troops could have brain damage caused by their own weapons, defence chiefs have confirmed. Blast waves repeatedly caused by explosions from weapons could have led to life-long health issues, it has been revealed. The Ministry of Defence's lead officer on Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Lt Col James Mitchell admitted exposure to weapons blasts could cause the injuries. He told ITV News that in Iraq and Afghanistan, TBI and concussion was caused by larger explosions and blasts. But in fact low level blasts may cause health problems. Lt Col Mitchell told ITV News: "Over especially the last five to ten years, we're starting to appreciate the role of what we call low level blasts.' He said low level blasts were predominantly being caused by "the exposure of our service personnel to blast over-pressure from their own weapons systems." Lt Col Mitchell said 'thousands' of personnel may have been exposed to harmful blasts. Most at risk are troops exposed to heavy weapons like mortars, shoulder-launched anti-tank weapons, 50-calibre rifles and machine guns, or explosive charges. Explosions create a wave of 'overpressure', a spike in the surrounding air pressure above normal atmospheric levels caused by a blast wave. The force is so strong it enters the skull and can cause microscopic damage to blood vessels and neurons. Repeated exposure means the brain may not heal itself, causing serious long-term neurological damage. Symptoms of blast-related TBI overlap with those of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), making it difficult to diagnose. They are severe headaches, sight problems, sensitivity to noise and light, memory loss and a sense of personality change. Scientists are probing the causes of TBI, with financial support from the MoD. The University of Birmingham is playing a key role in the mild TBI study in partnership with the MoD, which aims to estimate what kind of brain damage veterans have. Professor Lisa Hill, a neuroscientist at Birmingham University said: 'If somebody gets injured, it changes the structure and function of the brain, but it also releases chemicals that you wouldn't normally see,' she said. 'So if we can measure things in blood or in their saliva, that can tell us how potentially bad their injury has been and what symptoms they might go on to get.' Hugh Keir, a Para Regiment sniper who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, now runs the H-Hour podcast which is popular with veterans in the UK and abroad. He volunteered to undergo a trial scan to see if his years of exposure to blast have left a mark. The results showed normal brain activity overall, but there were some signs that may indicate damage. Professor Mullinger also plans to study soldiers in real time, to see which activities are highest risk. 'We can scan these soldiers before they go and do a training exercise and then immediately after, then we get a baseline which is specific to them,' she said. 'If the 'wire paths' have been damaged by blasts or whatever else it might be, then the function is going to change.' The information collected from these trials could shape policy, such as modifying the most damaging weapons or reducing blast exposure in training exercises. British troops throughout the Afghan and Iraq wars were repeatedly exposed to firefights, explosions from bombs and mortars, especially being fired by their own side. Thousands have suffered hearing loss from the blasts but the new research suggests lower-grade blasts may have caused long-term issues. Sources said the research into the issue is ongoing and may result in protective gear used by soldiers may be investigated and further improved in a bid to protect against the blast waves. An estimated 300,000 armed forces personnel suffering with hearing loss caused by the relentless noise of military life. Hearing loss and tinnitus is much more common in the military population than the general public. In fact, by the age of 75, service personnel are 3.5 times more likely to experience hearing difficulties than the general public. The UK Armed Forces has a number of compensation schemes for serving and former serving personnel who have been injured as a result of their service in the armed forces. If the injury was caused prior to April 6 2005 and the person is no longer serving this would be the War Pension Scheme (WPS). The Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) was established for soldiers injured after 2005 who are still in active service. However the criteria to claim for both schemes is arduous and in-depth.
