Ford sponsors bill to confront ‘unfair' pricing
With the Trump administration indicating little interest in the federal government's consumer protection role, it could be up to states to prohibit and prevent corporate landlords from using algorithm software to inflate rents via price fixing.
Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford has brought forward Assembly Bill 44 to regulate price fixing of essential goods and services, including shelter, food and medicine.
Ford's office declined to say how the legislation, if passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the governor this year, would specifically address alleged practices by real estate software companies, like RealPage, that are being investigated for price fixing rents.
'We can't address hypotheticals about specific companies but to the extent any business' operation violates the provisions as laid out in AB 44, our office will not hesitate to utilize the statute to protect Nevada's consumers,' the office said in an email.
The White House Council of Economic Advisors under former President Joe Biden released an analysis in mid-December that found RealPage and other firms that market rent price algorithms r likely cost renters more than $3.8 billion in 2023.
Rent-pricing algorithms added on average $92 a month for units in Las Vegas that use such software, according to the report. The national average was $70 per month.
'Our analysis indicates that if price coordination was eliminated, there would be an economically meaningful decrease in price mark-ups for rental units using pricing algorithms,' the report found.
The White House has since removed the analysis from the website after President Donald Trump returned to office last month.
A ProPublica investigation from 2022 found rental pricing software by RealPage used algorithms to collect lease transaction data and advertised rates. The data was used to effectively tell landlords the highest rent an apartment applicant is able to pay, and then charge it.
Greystar, one of the nation's largest property management firms, featured prominently in the investigation. Greystar lists 44 apartment complexes under its management in Southern Nevada and five in the Reno area.
Currently more than 30 lawsuits nationwide allege RealPage has colluded with corporate landlords to inflate rent prices
The U.S. Department of Justice, along with Attorneys General of North Carolina, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Minnesota, Oregon, Tennessee, and Washington, filed a lawsuit against the company in August 2023 alleging it violated antitrust laws.
The department expanded its antitrust lawsuit in early January, prior to Trump's inauguration.
'RealPage will continue to aggressively defend itself in the remaining, previously filed civil lawsuits, which we believe are wholly without merit,' RealPage said in a statement in December. 'RealPage's revenue management software is purposely built to be legally compliant, enhances competition throughout the rental housing ecosystem and is highly configurable by our customers.'
The future of the lawsuit remains uncertain under the new administration.
Ben Iness, the coalition coordinator for the Nevada Housing Justice Alliance, said the state needs to take 'a bold and brave stance' to regulate the practice.
Some states, including Washington, have introduced bills to specifically prohibit landlords from using software that collect rental data to fix prices.
Lawmakers in New Jersey sought to make algorithmic systems unlawful, noting it would violate the New Jersey Antitrust Act.
In an email to Nevada Current, Ford said 'AB44 is designed to curb unfair methods of increasing prices' in general and would attempt to regulate price fixing essential goods and services under the Nevada Unfair Trade Practice Act.
The legislation, Ford added, stemmed from 'several investigations and litigations my office has been active in during my time as Attorney General.' He said details of those investigations are not yet public.
'These investigations and litigations have to do with the prices of essential goods and services like food, medicine, shelter, and the ability of companies to raise those prices to levels that impact consumers ability to purchase them,' he said.
The threshold for violating the law under the bill is when a person pays 'more than $750 for the good or service over a 30-day period or $9,000 for the good or service over a 1-year period.'
When asked about the threshold amounts, Ford said he was looking to 'balance the concerns of various industries with the need to curb the unfair practices that take advantage of consumers who must have regular, continual access to essential goods and services.'
He anticipated 'further discussions on these thresholds to occur throughout the legislation session.'
Iness noted that while the legislation is significant and has the potential to rein in rent-price fixing, the bill 'in the current form is broad and vague.'
He urged lawmakers to 'explicitly name' the practices they are looking to regulate.
'I would love, during that hearing, that they talk about housing scarcity, cost fixing and the exploitative factors around renting,' he said.
Lawmakers are expected to introduce a variety of bills this session to address the state's housing shortage and costs, as well as a landlord-tenant regulatory framework in Nevada that critics say is uniquely landlord hostile compared to most states.
Gov. Joe Lombardo named housing as one of his top legislation priorities in his state of the state address last month, and called on $1 billion in new attainable housing units, supported by some direct state spending, the Nevada State Infrastructure Bank, and bonds. The details of that legislation have yet to be released.
Iness said addressing the housing crisis needs to go beyond building more units and include expanding tenant protections.
'If folks are going to take our housing crisis seriously they need to look at all sides of it and not just the one-dimensional supply and demand approach,' Iness said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Boeing in Talks to Sell as Many as 500 Planes to China
(Bloomberg) -- Boeing Co. is heading closer toward finalizing a deal with China to sell as many as 500 aircraft, according to people familiar with the matter, a transaction that would end a sales drought that stretches back to US President Donald Trump's last visit in 2017. The two sides are still hammering out terms of the complex aircraft sale, including the types and volume of jet models and delivery timetables, according to one of the people, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential matters. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Neom's Desert Ski Resort Strains Saudi Prince's $1.5 Trillion Plan The mega sale to China, years in the making, is contingent on the two nations defusing the trade hostilities that hark back to Trump's first term in office — and could still fall apart, they said. Chinese officials have already started consulting domestic airlines about how many Boeing aircraft they'll need, the people said. The transaction taking shape is similar in scope to the order for as many as 500 jets that China's central planners have struck with Airbus SE, but haven't yet announced, they added. The Boeing order is expected to be the centerpiece of a trade agreement that would benefit both Trump and China's President Xi Jinping, the culmination of long-running and sometimes contentious negotiations. The nation's leaders were close to a similar announcement in 2023, but then-President Joe Biden and Xi left a San Francisco summit without consummating an aircraft sale. Complicating matters for Boeing is a leadership void in China. Alvin Liu, its top executive in China and a fluent Mandarin-speaker with extensive government contacts, left the company in recent weeks. Carol Shen has been named interim president of Boeing China, said people familiar with the matter. Boeing declined to comment on any potential deal or management changes. Shares of the US planemaker advanced less than 1% in New York on Thursday following Bloomberg's report, as most members of the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined. The stock had risen 27% this year amid a turnaround under Chief Executive Officer Kelly Ortberg. Aircraft orders for Boeing have figured large in US diplomacy since Trump returned to the White House in January, with nations touting new, tentative and existing deals for airplanes, which are as expensive as skyscrapers, to narrow trade imbalances with the US. The US and China have engaged in several rounds of talks since de-escalating tit-for-tat tariffs that soared to as high as 145%, but have yet to reach a final trade deal. Earlier in the summer, Xi, in a phone call, invited Trump to China at an unspecified date. One opportunity for the pair to meet is in late October, ahead of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea. For China, the deal would secure aircraft delivery slots that are hard to come by at both Boeing and Airbus, which are largely sold out into the 2030s. The world's second largest aviation market is expected to more than double its commercial fleet to 9,755 airplanes over the next 20 years, by Boeing's estimation, far more than China's homegrown planemaker Comac could manufacture. While Boeing slots are scarce, the company likely has some flexibility in its delivery schedule to accommodate strategic customers, Jefferies analyst Sheila Kahyaoglu said in a research note. The country's top economic planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, recently sought input from Chinese carriers about how many jets they want, one of the people said. Talks centered on the 737 Max series of aircraft, Boeing's popular single-aisle jet, in a sign Beijing is laying the groundwork for a major order. Boeing's last Chinese deal was unveiled in November 2017 during Trump's first state visit to China. The deal amounted to orders and commitments for 300 single-aisle and twin-aisle planes valued at $37 billion at the time. The next year, Boeing's China deliveries peaked, when a quarter of its jets ended up in the mainland. Airbus has dominated sales and deliveries to China since 2019, when the nation's regulators were the first to ground the 737 Max after two fatal accidents. Boeing has notched only 30 orders with Chinese carriers and leasing companies since the start of 2019, according to the company's website. In an interview with Bloomberg in January, CEO Ortberg was optimistic that years of talks with Beijing would finally pay off. 'We certainly hope that there's an opportunity for some additional orders in the next year with China,' he said. --With assistance from Jenni Marsh. (Updates with Jefferies comment in 12th paragraph) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined Volkswagen EVs Outsell Tesla in Europe a Decade After Dieselgate What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Miami Herald
23 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Who is Tina Peters? Trump calls for her to be released from prison ‘RIGHT NOW'
President Donald Trump demanded the immediate release of Tina Peters, a former Colorado election official who is currently in prison. 'FREE TINA PETERS, a brave and innocent Patriot who has been tortured by Crooked Colorado politicians,' Trump wrote in an Aug. 21 Truth Social post. 'Let Tina Peters out of jail, RIGHT NOW,' he added. 'She did nothing wrong, except catching the Democrats cheat in the Election. She is an old woman, and very sick. If she is not released, I am going to take harsh measures!!!' The president previously called for Peters' release in May. Peters, 69, served as the county clerk of Mesa County, Colorado, from 2018 to 2023, where she oversaw elections. In 2021, state officials began investigating Peters after sensitive voting information from Mesa County surfaced online, according to Colorado Public Radio. It was alleged that she provided unauthorized access to voting equipment undergoing a software update to an individual connected to Mike Lindell, the MyPillow CEO, who has argued that the 2020 election was stolen. Peters, herself, was a prominent election denier. In Aug. 2024, a jury found Peters guilty of several criminal charges, including first degree official misconduct and failure to comply with secretary of state requirements. 'Today's verdict is a warning to others that they will face serious consequences if they attempt to illegally tamper with our voting processes or election systems,' Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said at the time. Two months later, Peters was handed a 9-year prison sentence. During her sentencing hearing, Peters asked the judge for leniency, saying she 'never did anything with malice' and that she believed she was doing right by the people in her county, according to ABC News. 'I really am remorseful,' she added. Attorneys for Peters are currently appealing her conviction at the Colorado State Court of Appeals. In May, Trump also directed the Department of Justice to take action in order to secure the release of Peters, whom he said exposed fraud in the 2020 election. For years, Trump has claimed without evidence that the 2020 presidential election was stolen or 'rigged' due to voter fraud. Neither an attorney for Peters nor Colorado officials immediately responded to requests for comment from McClatchy News.
San Francisco Chronicle
23 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump
NEW YORK (AP) — An appeals court has thrown out the massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, ruling Thursday in New York state's lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth. The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump more than $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was 'excessive.' After finding that Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr. — now exceeds $527 million, with interest. 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. Engoron also imposed other punishments, such as banning Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and he was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last fall. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state's behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating, and staggering fraud.' Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a monthslong trial, Trump proclaimed in January 2024 that he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, who are both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney, Abbe D. Lowell, has said that investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing in September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old, an assertion they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defense also contends that James misused a consumer-protection law to sue Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state contends that the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans than they knew, and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net-worth numbers. The state has argued that the verdict rests on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comports with Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favorable terms offered to wealthy borrowers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider; he still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. ___
