logo
BRICS+ Series: Nigeria's Pivot to BRICS Trade Deepens Amid US Tariff Threats

BRICS+ Series: Nigeria's Pivot to BRICS Trade Deepens Amid US Tariff Threats

IOL News2 days ago
In the first quarter of 2025, Nigeria's trade with BRICS nations dramatically increased to ₦5.41 trillion, significantly surpassing the ₦1.54 trillion in exports to the United States during the same period.
Image: /
In the first quarter of 2025, Nigeria's trade with BRICS nations dramatically increased to ₦5.41 trillion, significantly surpassing the ₦1.54 trillion in exports to the United States during the same period. This surge signifies a strategic pivot in Nigeria's trade policy, prioritising emerging markets in its commercial endeavors.
Nigeria's latest foreign trade report from the National Bureau of Statistics highlights a significant shift in its economic diplomacy. India is the leading destination for BRICS-bound exports, importing ₦2.84 trillion in Nigerian goods. Following India are Indonesia (₦1.19 trillion) and South Africa (₦708 billion). Brazil and China also remain important trade partners, with figures of ₦369 billion and ₦301 billion, respectively. Egypt, the newest member of the bloc, currently accounts for a modest ₦1.6 billion.
Nigeria's economic diversification and global alliance recalibration are evidenced by a significant, though understated, increase in trade with BRICS nations. This surge in trade volume is likely even higher when factoring in exchanges with Russia, Iran, Ethiopia, and the UAE, all members of the expanded BRICS group, as these figures are currently excluded. US Tariff threats
While exports to the United States saw a respectable 65.5% quarter-on-quarter increase, reaching ₦1.54 trillion primarily due to oil, agro-based, and petrochemical products, this recovery may be temporary. Washington's potential imposition of an additional 10% tariff on exports from nations perceived as aligning with BRICS poses a significant threat to Nigeria's trade with the US.
Former US President Donald Trump, currently campaigning for the 2026 midterms, stated on Truth Social that BRICS nations are "undermining American interests" through their de-dollarisation agenda and anti-hegemonic stance. He proposed a tariff that would raise Nigeria's average exposure on US exports from 14% to 24%. Trade analysts caution that such a move could significantly harm Nigeria's competitiveness in vital sectors.
Given Nigeria's heavy reliance on export earnings to stabilise its currency, a decrease in US trade inflow could prove destabilising. This would likely compel the Central Bank to bolster the naira, further depleting reserves amidst ongoing inflation and monetary tightening.
The proposed US tariffs pose significant concerns for Nigeria's private sector, according to Dr. Femi Egbesola, President of the Association of Small Business Owners of Nigeria. He warned that increased global trade tensions could negatively impact Nigeria's import-dependent manufacturing sector. Specifically, higher costs for raw materials and machinery from countries targeted by the US tariff scheme, such as the US, South Korea, and Japan, could lead to reduced productivity and an exacerbated trade deficit for Nigeria.
Opportunities amid global trade realignments
Abuja officially maintains its non-aligned stance, as stated by Ademola Oshodi, the President's senior aide on foreign affairs. Oshodi clarified on Channels Television that Nigeria is a BRICS+ partner, not a full member, and therefore does not participate in the bloc's decision-making. He characterised BRICS as a practical platform for strategic South-South cooperation, while underscoring Nigeria's ongoing engagement with Western entities like the Commonwealth, the EU, and the G20.
Evidence points to increasing commercial ties. The rapport between President Bola Tinubu and Brazil's President Lula da Silva has led to enhanced energy cooperation. Nigeria's export volumes to India, its primary trading partner, have doubled within six months. Concurrently, China has increased its investments in Nigerian infrastructure, including port development in Lekki and railway expansion projects in the north.
Egbesola identifies a significant opportunity for Nigeria. Given BRICS' increasing collaboration with Africa, particularly through initiatives supporting the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), Nigeria is strategically positioned to emerge as a central trade hub on the continent. Its substantial population, large consumer market, and logistical strengths could enable Nigeria to act as a crucial entry point for BRICS investments aiming to access Africa's expanding middle class.
To leverage this momentum, Nigeria needs to prioritise investments in trade infrastructure, minimise non-tariff obstacles, and synchronise its regulatory frameworks with the goals of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). Additionally, it is crucial to support domestic industries in becoming globally competitive and prepared for export.
Written By:
Dr Iqbal Survé
Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN
*Sesona Mdlokovana
Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group
African Specialist
* MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE https://bricscg.com/
** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alaska: a source of Russian imperial nostalgia
Alaska: a source of Russian imperial nostalgia

eNCA

time19 minutes ago

  • eNCA

Alaska: a source of Russian imperial nostalgia

Alaska, the US state that will host the meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump on Friday, is a source of imperial nostalgia and often less-than-serious territorial claims in Russia. The territory that Russia sold to the United States in 1867 is now a symbol of the entwined history of the countries, whose relations have been severely damaged since Russia launched its offensive in Ukraine in 2022. To some experts, the summit in Alaska evoked memories of the thaw between the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War. "It's a classically orchestrated summit, like in the era of detente," Russian political scientist Fyodor Lukyanov said on Telegram. "Its symbolic significance is the absence of intermediaries: the powers, so to speak, decide for themselves," he added, saying that China is "not close" to Alaska and that Europe is "as far away as possible". - Fur trading hub - But beyond being a unique meeting place, Alaska also fuels Russian memories of the Tsarist empire, the historic predecessor of the Soviet Union. "For Russia, Alaska symbolises the peak of an expansion," Alexander Baunov, senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, said on the centre's website. It was "when the Russian continental empire had, for the only time, succeeded in crossing an ocean like the European empires", Baunov said. A Russian colony since the 18th century, Alaska was eventually sold to the United States for $7.2 million in 1867 by Tsar Alexander II. The remote territory was economically very difficult for the Russians to exploit and at the time its sale was welcomed by the Imperial Court as the country was struggling economically. But the transaction later came to be seen as a regrettable bargain after what formerly was a fur trading hub turned out to house crucial natural resources: gold and oil. - 'Our bears' - In recent years, the price at which Alaska was sold, considered by some to be ridiculously low, and the legal validity of the transaction have become regularly recurring debates in Russia. In July 2022, in the midst of patriotic fervour in Russia and as tensions soared between Moscow and Washington following the offensive against Ukraine, the Alaska issue resurfaced. The speaker of the Duma, the lower house of the Russian Parliament, Vyacheslav Volodin, spoke of "lands to be returned", describing Alaska as a "disputed territory". Russia's authorities are apparently not interested in reclaiming it. In 2014, Vladimir Putin, asked by a pensioner about the possibility, replied: "My dear, why do you need Alaska?" adding the territory was "too cold". Still, the idea of reclaiming Alaska is an endless source of memes widely circulating on Russian social media. One of the most famous claims that "our soul" suffered from the loss of Alaska because "it's where our bears live". The recapture of Alaska is even mentioned in a 1990s hit by a rock band Putin likes, Lyube, with the lyrics: "Stop messing around, America... And give back our Alaskan lands." bur/phz

BRICS+ Series: The link Between the G20, BRICS & The Global South
BRICS+ Series: The link Between the G20, BRICS & The Global South

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

BRICS+ Series: The link Between the G20, BRICS & The Global South

This photo taken on July 3, 2025 shows welcome banners for the BRICS Summit on a street in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Image: XINHUA The G20 (Group of 20) was established in 1999 in the wake of the 1997–1998 Asian financial crisis as an informal platform bringing together Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors from the world's leading developed and emerging economies to address global economic and financial stability. While its early discussions centred primarily on broad macroeconomic concerns, the G20 has since broadened its scope to cover a wider range of global priorities, including trade, climate action, sustainable development, health, agriculture, energy, environmental protection, and anti-corruption efforts. BRICS was established in a similar fashion, as quoted by Cole Jackson: 'The BRICS grouping has, to a large extent, grown naturally considering the global climate during its formation and in today's context. BRICS was formed in 2009. Its formation follows the 2007/08 financial crisis, caused by a period of dramatic economic downturn in the United States (US)--due to the housing market collapse and a subprime mortgage crisis–leading to a global recession. Many countries, the world over, bore the brunt of this recession, especially those countries in the Global South already battling economic difficulties.' The G20 comprises BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Saudi Arabia) and other countries in the Global South (Argentina & Mexico). These presidencies and officials often overlap between countries in the Global South, G20, BRICS (and its associated institutions like the New Development Bank (NDB)). This in essence, means more than a quarter of members are BRICS or Global South affiliated. However, due to the United States (US) & Canada, for example, being part of the G7 they need to collaborate and deliberate with many of these countries having BRICS/Global South agendas to fulfill. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The intersection: Reforming Global Governance G20: Includes both developed and emerging economies and increasingly acknowledges the need for reform in global financial institutions (like the IMF and World Bank). BRICS: Actively pushes for a multipolar world and reform of institutions to reflect the voices of emerging powers and developing nations. Global South: Wants a fairer system where their voices are heard and interests are not sidelined by traditional Western powers. Promoting Inclusive and Sustainable Development G20: Advocates for sustainable development, climate finance, and reducing inequality, especially through multilateral cooperation. BRICS: Prioritises development-led growth, infrastructure financing (e.g., through the New Development Bank), and South-South cooperation. Global South: Seeks development financing and capacity building on their terms, focusing on health, education, and infrastructure. South-South Cooperation G20: While not centered on the Global South, it increasingly includes dialogues on cooperation between developing countries. BRICS: Champions South-South cooperation as a means to share resources, technology, and strategies among developing nations. Global South: Sees South-South partnerships as more equitable alternatives to Western aid or conditional loans. Multipolarity and Economic Sovereignty G20: Includes rising powers like India, China, Brazil, and South Africa, reflecting a shift away from unipolar dominance. BRICS: Promotes a multipolar world order with diversified centers of power. Global South: Seeks to reduce dependency on the West and build regional blocs and alternative financial institutions.

Bitcoin hits new peak touching $124 500
Bitcoin hits new peak touching $124 500

IOL News

time4 hours ago

  • IOL News

Bitcoin hits new peak touching $124 500

Bitcoin hit a new peak during early Asian trading, with the cryptocurrency briefly exceeding $124 500 (R2.2 million) before retreating. Image: AFP Bitcoin hit a new peak during early Asian trading, with the cryptocurrency briefly exceeding $124 500 (R2.2 million) before retreating, driven by favourable US legislation and a rise in US equities. "The crypto market is enjoying a period of highly favorable fundamentals," said Samer Hasn, senior market analyst at AFP reported. The world's largest cryptocurrency has now risen more than 31% since the start of the year and is up around 60% from April's market lows. The move strengthens global financial advisory giant deVere Group's projection that Bitcoin could hit $150 000 before the end of 2025. A combination of unprecedented inflows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs, balance-sheet allocations from major public companies, pro-Bitcoin policies from President Donald Trump's administration, and rising national-level profits from BTC adoption are driving the latest rally. Nigel Green, the CEO and founder of deVere Group, said: 'We're seeing multiple, powerful forces converging to push Bitcoin to new highs. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading "Institutional capital is pouring in through spot ETFs at record volumes. Public companies are treating Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset. The White House is actively supporting the asset class. Nation states are already in profit on their Bitcoin positions. These aren't isolated developments; they're part of a deep, systemic shift in the global financial system.' Green said that while price volatility is inevitable, the structural drivers for Bitcoin remain overwhelmingly positive. 'There will be periods of profit-taking. That's natural in any fast-moving market. But the underlying factors are strong and getting stronger. 'Institutions are committing long-term capital; corporate treasuries are diversifying into Bitcoin; and national adoption is delivering measurable returns. Also, Washington is shifting from resistance to integration. This is why we are currently maintaining our $150 000 target for year-end,' he said. Meanwhile, El Salvador's government revealed that it holds unrealized Bitcoin profits of more than $468 million. The country's investment of $300.5m is now valued at over $768m, underscoring the potential for sovereign adoption to generate significant returns. BUSINESS REPORT

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store