WWE in the West Wing: How Elon Musk got beaten up by a gay banker; during Pride Month
Elon Musk
, the richest man in the world, did lose at fisticuffs to Scott Bessent, an openly gay member of the Trump cabinet.
And it happened in the West Wing—which is fitting, because Donald Trump is the first WWE Hall of Famer to have served as President of the United States.
"Stone Cold" Steve Austin Stunner President US Donald Trump
Musk, once Trump's most powerful private-sector ally, had entered the Oval Office to lobby for his pick to head the IRS. Bessent, a Yale-educated hedge fund veteran and one of the highest-ranking openly gay officials in the Republican Party, had other plans. What began as a policy disagreement spilled into the hallway.
By the end of it, Musk had to be escorted out of the White House—visibly injured and politically diminished.
The IRS Faceoff That Sparked the Breakdown
The tension had been building for months. In mid-April, Musk and Bessent met with President Trump to argue over who should become acting IRS Commissioner. Musk supported Gary Shapley, a former IRS investigator known for his role in the Hunter Biden whistleblower case. Bessent pushed for Michael Faulkender, a MAGA-aligned economist with prior experience at the Treasury.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Keep Your Home Efficient with This Plug-In
elecTrick - Save upto 80% on Power Bill
Learn More
Undo
Trump ultimately sided with Bessent.
That single decision triggered a rapid unravelling. For Musk—who had spent months trying to position himself as the federal government's chief efficiency czar—being overruled on IRS leadership was a stinging blow. But the real damage came after the meeting.
Blow by Blow
After leaving the Oval Office, Musk and Bessent exchanged words in the hallway. According to multiple accounts relayed by Stephen K.
Bannon, the former Trump adviser, Bessent accused Musk of failing to deliver on his promise to uncover 'more than $1 trillion' in government waste. 'You're a fraud. You're a total fraud,' Bessent reportedly said.
Musk, furious, slammed his shoulder into Bessent's rib cage 'like a rugby player.' Bessent hit back. The clash escalated until aides rushed in to separate the two, just outside the national security adviser's office.
Musk was then escorted out of the building. Trump, informed moments later, was overheard muttering, 'This is too much.'
Days later, Musk appeared at a press event with a black eye, which he claimed came from 'play-fighting with his son.' White House officials, however, made no effort to deny the hallway brawl.
Elon Musk sported a black eye at the Oval Office press meet and blamed his son X for it.
A Partnership Implodes
The fight marked the symbolic collapse of one of the most unconventional political alliances in modern American history.
Musk, who had moved into the Lincoln Bedroom and assumed a major role in shaping Trump's government reform agenda, quickly fell from grace.
His early moves—including a mass email demanding that all federal employees submit weekly 'five accomplishments' reports—alienated agencies and judges alike. His DOGE initiative (Department of Government Efficiency), which aimed to cut federal bureaucracy with AI audits and massive layoffs, drew resistance from seasoned staffers and even MAGA loyalists.
By April, Musk had become a lightning rod. Protesters outside federal buildings held signs reading, 'No One Voted for Elon Musk.' Inside the White House, his influence waned. Bessent's quiet but effective resistance, grounded in budget discipline and political capital, began to prevail.
Pride, Power, and the Politics of Ego
That all this happened just weeks before Pride Month lent the episode a layer of cultural symbolism.
Bessent, long respected for his economic acumen, had already broken barriers as an openly gay Republican in the highest echelons of financial policymaking.
But the confrontation with Musk—and the fact that he walked away with Trump's confidence and no public reprimand—cemented his role as a formidable power player in the second Trump administration.
While Musk's methods relied on spectacle, Bessent operated through strategy—and, in this case, personal resolve.
The Fallout: Contracts, NASA, and the 'America Party'
The West Wing brawl was just one rupture in a broader collapse. By May, Trump began actively distancing himself from Musk—questioning his drug use, threatening to review federal contracts with Tesla and SpaceX, and yanking Jared Isaacman's NASA nomination, which Musk had championed.
Musk, meanwhile, lashed out online. He attacked Trump's landmark tax and spending bill and teased the launch of a third party, calling it The America Party. He also doubled down on claims that Trump had ties to Jeffrey Epstein—a charge he has not substantiated.
Trump responded with silence at first, then blunt disappointment. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon,' he told reporters. He reportedly told aides he was considering selling his Tesla Model S, which had been parked outside the White House since March.
Final Thought
What started as a collaboration between two disruptors—one from politics, the other from tech—ended in recriminations, hallway brawls, and the exposure of vastly different worldviews. Musk came to Washington to dismantle the system. He left having been outmanoeuvred, outpunched, and—quite literally—shown the door.
Scott Bessent didn't tweet. He didn't gloat. He just walked away, still Treasury Secretary, with his pick running the IRS and his credibility enhanced.
In Washington, strength isn't measured in followers or stock price. It's measured in who the President trusts when things get messy. And during Pride Month 2025, amid a mess of egos, algorithms, and ambition, it was the gay banker who kept his footing—while Elon Musk lost his.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Treasury's Bessent urges ban on congress members trading individual stocks
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is calling for a ban on single-stock trading by members of Congress. The move could add momentum to growing bipartisan efforts to outlaw the not the first Washington figure to back such a ban, Bessent's remarks come as House and Senate GOP leaders face pressure to act on proposals that have gained traction in recent is the credibility of the House and the Senate that you look at some of these eye-popping returns — whether it's Rep. [Nancy] Pelosi, Sen. [Ron] Wyden, every hedge fund would be jealous of them,' Bessent said in a Bloomberg interview on Wednesday. 'And the American people deserve better than this.' Speaker Mike Johnson resisted Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's (R-Fla.) push for a floor vote on a ban in September. While the measure has bipartisan support, it has also drawn bipartisan opposition, with members voicing concerns during the August spokesperson Ian Krager said she 'does not own any stocks and has no knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions.' Wyden's office pointed to a social media post in which the senator reiterated his support for a ban and accused Bessent of deflecting from the Treasury Department's handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related bank records.'Bessent is fuming that I blew the whistle on the fact that he's hiding a huge Epstein file at the Treasury Department,' Wyden wrote. 'Thousands of pages worth of Epstein's bank records with names. Until he releases it, he's just running interference for Epstein's paedophile ring.'The stock trading issue has become a political weapon for both parties. In April, House Democrats criticised Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) for purchasing stocks shortly before President Donald Trump reversed part of his tariff same month, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) introduced the PELOSI Act, which would bar lawmakers and their spouses from trading individual stocks.'People shouldn't come to Washington to get rich, they should come to serve the American people,' Bessent said. 'And it brings down trust in the system. Because I can tell you that if any private citizen traded this way, the SEC would be knocking on their door.'- EndsWith inputs from agencies Must Watch
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Bessent Warned on Ethics Compliance, Granted Extension to Divest
(Bloomberg) -- Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been granted an extension after failing to fully divest all his assets in compliance with an ethics agreement, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg. The Office of Government Ethics, or OGE, gave Bessent until Dec. 15 to complete the divestiture of assets he identified ahead of his confirmation by the Senate earlier this year. A Treasury spokesperson said the date was mutually agreed upon by Bessent, the office of Treasury ethics and OGE. Bessent said in a statement that those remaining assets represent 4% of his required divestitures and that he is working toward selling them before the end of the year. He said much of the remaining assets are farmland, 'an inherently illiquid asset.' 'Serving President Trump and the American people is the honor of a lifetime,' Bessent said in an emailed statement. 'I gladly divested from more than 90% of the assets I was required to sell before I even assumed office.' 'I am committed to full transparency and disclosure in my personal finances,' he said. Bessent, a former hedge fund manager, was nominated by Trump in November 2024 and confirmed by the Senate on January 28. He disclosed assets worth at least $521 million in his personal financial disclosure, which was made public by OGE ahead of his confirmation hearing. The total value of his portfolio is potentially worth far more, as nominees list the value of their assets within broad ranges that top out at 'over $50,000,000.' The Treasury secretary's failure to fully divest by an earlier deadline in April was cited in a letter sent Monday by OGE to Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, signed by the agency's Deputy Director for Compliance Dale Christopher. Christopher subsequently wrote to Crapo again Wednesday, setting out the December timeline and saying that Bessent will continue to recuse himself from matters that could involve the undivested assets. A Treasury spokesperson said Bessent has already divested from 96% of the assets slated to be sold by the end of the year and that more than 90% of the $1 billion in total divestitures were made before January 20. Treasury ethics officials said Bessent's remaining undivested assets 'are illiquid and are not readily marketable,' the second Christopher letter reads, in part. 'They add that excluding the farmlands, the assets also have significant restrictions on who can acquire them.' The letters were first reported by the New York Times. Bessent has made reference in public appearances to the farmland he owns in North Dakota, sometimes referring to himself as a farmer or saying that he listens to farm radio. In addition to the farmland, he has also disclosed stakes in a private equity fund, a privately held sparkling water company and a privately held clinical stage drug development company. --With assistance from Bill Allison. More stories like this are available on
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's harassment claims denied in court
A federal judge on Tuesday denied Elon Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's claims of a "years-long harassment campaign" by the Tesla CEO against the company he co-founded in 2015 and later abandoned before ChatGPT became a global phenomenon. Musk sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman last year over the company's transition to a for-profit model.(REUTERS) In the latest turn in a court battle that kicked off last year, US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Musk must face OpenAI's claims that the billionaire, through press statements, social media posts, legal claims and "a sham bid for OpenAI's assets" had attempted to harm the AI startup. Musk sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman last year over the company's transition to a for-profit model, accusing the company of straying from its founding mission of developing AI for the good of humanity, not profit. OpenAI countersued Musk in April, accusing the billionaire of engaging in fraudulent business practices under California law. Musk then asked for OpenAI's counterclaims to be dismissed or delayed until a later stage in the case. OpenAI argued in May its countersuit should not be put on hold, and the judge on Tuesday concluded that the company's allegations were legally sufficient to proceed. A jury trial has been scheduled for spring 2026.
