China weighs exempting some US goods from tariffs as costs rise
[NEW YORK] China's government is considering suspending its 125 per cent tariff on some US imports, sources familiar with the matter said, as the economic costs of the tit-for-tat trade war weigh heavily on certain industries.
Authorities are considering removing the additional levies for medical equipment and some industrial chemicals such as ethane, the sources said, asking not to be identified as discussing private deliberations.
Officials are also discussing waiving the tariff for plane leases, the sources said. Like many airlines, Chinese carriers do not own all of their aircraft and pay leasing fees to third-party companies to use some jets – payments that would have become financially ruinous with the additional tariff.
The exemptions China's mulling mirrors similar moves on the part of the US, which excluded electronics from its 145 per cent tariff on Chinese imports earlier this month. The pullbacks reflect how deeply intertwined the world's two biggest economies are, with some key industries grinding to a halt after the trade war escalated.
While the US imports far more from China than the other way around, Beijing's move spotlights the areas of its economy that remain reliant on US goods. China is the world's largest plastics manufacturer but some of its factories depend on ethane, which is mainly imported from the US. And its hospitals rely on advanced medical equipment such as magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound machines made by US firms such as GE Healthcare Technologies.
China's Ministry of Finance and General Administration of Customs did not respond to requests for comment.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The list of exemptions is still in flux and discussions may not progress. Companies in vulnerable sectors have been asked by authorities to submit the customs codes of US goods that they need to be exempt from the new tariffs, other sources familiar with the matter said. At least one Chinese airline has been notified that payments to aircraft leasing companies located in free trade zones will not be subject to the new levy, one source said.
Traders have also been circulating purportedly tariff-exempt lists of customs codes that correlate to key chemicals and chip-making components. Bloomberg News could not independently verify the lists.
Beijing is also preparing to waive additional tariffs on at least eight semiconductor-related products, Caijing reported on Friday (Apr 25), citing anonymous sources. Those categories do not include memory chips for the time being, the outlet said, in a potential blow to Micron Technology, the world's No 3 memory chipmaker.
Investors are looking for signs that the two countries will engage to lower tariffs, but relations appear to still be at a standstill. On Thursday, Chinese officials publicly demanded the US revoke all unilateral tariffs before agreeing to trade talks. President Donald Trump has tried to get President Xi Jinping on the phone since he returned to office, but the Chinese leader has, so far, resisted, pushing instead for lower-level talks to work out a deal.
On the US front, Trump's administration has exempted smartphones, computers and other electronics from its so-called reciprocal tariffs – a major reprieve for global technology manufacturers including Apple and Nvidia, though potentially a temporary one. The exclusions apply to smartphones, laptop computers, hard drives and computer processors and memory chips as well as flat-screen displays. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Navigating private credit – how it compares with T-bills and publicly issued bonds
[SINGAPORE] Private credit is rapidly gaining traction among retail investors as regulators around the world are giving these individuals more access to private markets in general. Private credit refers to a type of debt negotiated between non-bank lenders and companies that are often below investment grade and unlisted. The asset class flourished after the global financial crisis, when banks cut lending amid fears that they would not be able to recover the debt. Since 2009, the global private-credit market has grown more than 10 times, with assets under management exceeding US$3 trillion as at end-2024. In Singapore, the size of retail demand for private credit could grow to as much as S$100 billion, said Hugh Chung, chief investment officer at Endowus. This is assuming that 5 per cent of the S$1.9 trillion of total household financial assets is allocated to the asset class. How should retail investors navigate this asset, particularly as the Monetary Authority of Singapore is assessing feedback to its proposal to broaden access to it? First, let us have a look at how private credit usually works. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Assuming you are the chief executive officer and majority owner of an unlisted company, with earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation of between US$50 million and US$100 million. You want to raise capital but cannot access traditional bank lending because your business is too small. You may not have an extensive credit history, which would limit your ability to raise funding through debt markets. You also want to keep your ownership, so you do not want to sell a stake to private-equity firms or investors. Why borrowers turn to private credit In such a scenario, the most feasible option is private credit. This is where you negotiate a loan with lenders such as insurers, pension funds, or high-net-worth individuals who are more comfortable with your risk profile than banks are. Listed companies may choose private credit as well, such as when they want to finance a project in a politically unstable country. In uncertain economic environments, such as the current one in which US tariffs and their frequent changes are complicating business planning, demand for private credit may still be robust. Sally Yim, managing director of financial institutions at Moody's Ratings, told The Business Times: 'There might be a more volatile environment, causing banks to be more cautious about lending to borrowers of lower credit quality... so private credit can help fill the gap.' Private credit also enables borrowers and lenders to structure more tailored deals than traditional lending. Creditors often price the loans at a premium to the prevailing benchmark interest rates, as these loans are seen as being more risky than those taken up by bigger corporates with more extensive credit histories. As with other private assets, private-credit investors also receive the illiquidity premium, to compensate for the lack of liquidity in holding such alternative investments. Debtors are willing to pay higher rates, given that they have limited access to other funding routes in the first place. They can also get loans tailored to their needs, with more flexible terms. In theory, this results in a win-win situation for lenders and borrowers. Returns vs risk Mark Glengarry, Blackstone's head of Asia-Pacific for private-credit strategies, said: 'Private credit can offer companies a more direct and efficient way to access capital, resulting in greater speed, certainty in execution, and flexibility of structure. For investors, there's a broader receptivity to private markets, with more (of them) recognising that assets such as private credit can be a core portfolio building block, potentially helping to improve returns, to lower volatility and diversify portfolios.' While private-market players position private credit as long-term investments that generate high yields, they caution that, ultimately, returns are not guaranteed. Investors may also not recover their full investment if the borrower defaults. In contrast, government-backed Treasury bills (T-bills) guarantee capital and typically present the lowest risk, with a nearly zero chance of default. Investment-grade corporate bonds are also less risky than private debt, since the issuers tend to have higher credit quality. Asset manager Schroders pegs the average annual default rate of such debt at 0.1 per cent over the long run. Shihan Abeyguna, managing director for South-east Asia at Morningstar, said: 'The risk for private-credit funds is high simply because of the risk of default by companies that could be sub-investment-grade.' In the United States, the 25-year average of leveraged loan default rate is 2.4 per cent, said US private-markets investment firm Hamilton Lane. As with most investment tools, higher risks are usually accompanied by higher returns. A US middle-market debt offering, while illiquid and unrated, can generate a potential return premium of 400 to 600 basis points over US high-yield bonds, together with added protections such as covenants and collateral, said Dennis Quah, head of Singapore wealth at BlackRock. According to MSCI, global private-credit funds generated returns of 10.2 per cent in 2023, and 6.9 per cent in 2024 – higher than their private-equity counterparts. They also outperformed investment-grade bonds, which yielded returns of 8.3 per cent and 2.5 per cent for those two years, respectively. However, during those two years, private-credit funds underperformed the MSCI high-yield corporate bond index, which tracks US dollar-denominated bonds that are not investment grade. One-year Singapore T-bills, on the other hand, averaged 3.75 per cent in 2023 and 2.78 per cent in 2024. In the latest auction in April, the yield fell further, to 2.29 per cent. Buyer beware While the higher returns are tempting, investors need to bear in mind that private-credit funds are long-term investments, with the maturities of the underlying debt going beyond a decade. In contrast, T-bills can mature after a month. BlackRock's Quah said 'private-credit instruments are still generally longer-dated investments than public equity and bonds, so investors should seek investment managers with deep expertise and experience navigating multiple market cycles'. Private-credit funds are also less liquid than investment-grade bonds that are publicly traded. Moody's Yim said: 'It's something that we need to be more cautious about when retail investors get into these private-credit funds – whether they understand the differences in terms of liquidity risk.' To lower such risks, retail investors could consider allocating 5 per cent of their portfolios to private credit, with at least a six to 10-year horizon, said Abeyguna. 'These assets can complement traditional fixed income by offering differentiated sources of income and risk, but should be sized carefully, based on an individual's overall objectives and risk tolerance.' To generate resilient incomes, Blackstone's Glengarry said the firm targets high-growth and low-loss sectors. It also structures its loans as senior secured, 'with significant equity cushion or credit enhancement'. Secured by collateral, senior secured loans are at the top of a company's capital structure, meaning they are repaid first in the event of bankruptcy or liquidation.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Xi takes push for global sway to Central Asia with Kazakh visit
Chinese President Xi Jinping is heading to Kazakhstan for talks with Central Asian leaders, providing a counterpoint to a Group of Seven summit by visiting a vast region at the nexus of competing interests from Washington to Beijing. Mr Xi, who's making only his third overseas trip this year, will meet with Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev on June 16 and attend the second gathering of the leaders of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan the following day. The summit in the Kazakh capital Astana is taking place in parallel to the G-7 event in Canada, and comes days after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio met Kazakhstan's foreign minister in Washington. Mr Xi hosted the inaugural China-Central Asia Summit in the Chinese city of Xi'an two years ago. A key objective for Mr Xi in Kazakhstan, where he launched the sprawling Belt and Road infrastructure initiative more than a decade ago, is 'future-proofing' China's economy for a potential rift with the US, according to Ms Kate Mallinson, a partner at PRISM Strategic Intelligence Ltd. in London. 'China has come out of the last three years significantly stronger in Central Asia,' she said. 'Having observed the West's attempts to use its economic influence to isolate Russia since 2022, China continues to make efforts to safeguard its economy and supply chains against any future confrontation with the US.' US President Donald Trump's tariff war is likely to be high on the agenda as Mr Xi cultivates alliances in Central Asia, where jockeying for resources and political influence has intensified between major powers. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni visited last month and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made a trip in April. The region, which is home to vast reserves of uranium and oil, as well as rare earth metals, has grown in importance for China, providing overland routes for exporting to Europe. At the same time, Russia's historical influence over the former Soviet republics has been undermined by President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine, now well into its fourth year, allowing China to ramp up exports to a region with a gross domestic product of about US$500 billion. The Chinese leader is visiting Kazakhstan for the third time since 2020, making the country of 20 million people one of his favorite destinations in the years after Covid-19 curtailed his global travels. Mr Tokayev, who's been Kazakhstan's president since 2019, is a Mandarin speaker who once worked as a diplomat in China. His government has set the target of attracting US$150 billion in investment by 2029, when Mr Tokayev's term in office should come to an end. It's a goal that may require greater involvement from China, given Russia's diminishing role in the region. China has committed a total of $26 billion in capital, according to official Kazakh estimates, making it a top 5 investor behind the likes of the US and Switzerland. 'China's development needs a thriving Central Asia,' Mr Liu Jianchao, who heads the Communist Party's diplomatic arm, said in a speech in March. 'China welcomes Central Asian countries to take a free ride from China's growth and opening up.' China has sought to counter the US-led global order – a goal it shares with Russia – in part by courting the Global South. In recent months, Mr Xi has attended summits with regional blocs, using meetings with countries from Latin America and Africa to push for closer ties. China has also used rival groups to the G-7, such as the BRICS club of nations, named after early members Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, and to which Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are partners. The group, which was considering a common currency, will meet in July. At a seminar in Shanghai this month, Chinese academics highlighted the significance of Beijing's cooperation with Central Asia in curbing ethnic conflicts and separatism, according to a state media report. China has meanwhile made economic inroads into Central Asia, increasing bilateral trade as well as expanding investment into areas ranging from energy to railways. Since 2023, China has outstripped Russia as Kazakhstan's largest trading partner. That's despite the fact that Central Asia's largest economy is, along with neighboring Kyrgyzstan, a member of a Moscow-led customs union. China's exports to the five Central Asian countries rose by more than 40 per cent in both 2022 and 2023 as its firms, such as Huawei Technologies Co. and BYD Co., expanded market share. That growth slowed last year, but it was almost three times the level in the same period in 2021 – the year before the Ukraine invasion – through the first four months of 2025. More business deals will likely be on the table as the Chinese and Kazakh leaders meet. China's East Hope Group seeks to build an aluminum smelter capable of producing 1 million tonnes of the metal a year in Kazakhstan. It's part of a large industrial project with an estimated price tag of over $12 billion, according to the state-run Kazakh Invest company. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved, sources say
President Donald Trump said that the handshake deal reached in London between American and Chinese negotiators was a 'great deal". PHOTO: BLOOMBERG BEIJING/SINGAPORE - The renewed US-China trade truce struck in London left a key area of export restrictions tied to national security untouched, an unresolved conflict that threatens a more comprehensive deal, two people briefed on detailed outcomes of the talks told Reuters. Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialised rare-earth magnets that US military suppliers need for fighter jets and missile systems, the people said. The United States maintains export curbs on China's purchases of advanced artificial intelligence chips out of concern that they also have military applications. At talks in London last week, China's negotiators appeared to link progress in lifting export controls on military-use rare earth magnets with the longstanding US curbs on exports of the most advanced AI chips to China. That marked a new twist in trade talks that began with opioid trafficking, tariff rates and China's trade surplus, but have since shifted to focus on export controls. In addition, US officials also signalled they are looking to extend existing tariffs on China for a further 90 days beyond the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva last month, both sources said, suggesting a more permanent trade deal between the world's two largest economies is unlikely before then. The two people who spoke to Reuters about the London talks requested not to be named because both sides have tightly controlled disclosure. The White House, State Department and Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to requests for comment. China's Foreign and Commerce ministries did not respond to faxed requests for comment. President Donald Trump said on June 11 that the handshake deal reached in London between American and Chinese negotiators was a 'great deal,' adding, 'we have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too.' And US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said there would be no 'quid pro quo' on easing curbs on exports of AI chips to China in exchange for access to rare earths. But China's chokehold on the rare earth magnets needed for weapons systems remains a potential flashpoint. China dominates global production of rare earths and holds a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. A deal reached in Geneva last month to reduce bilateral tariffs from crushing triple-digit levels had faltered over Beijing's restrictions on critical minerals exports that took shape in April. That prompted the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. At the London talks, China promised to fast-track approval of rare-earth export applications from non-military US manufacturers out of the tens of thousands currently pending, one of the sources said. Those licenses will have a six-month term. Beijing also offered to set up a 'green channel' for expediting license approvals from trusted US companies. Initial signals were positive, with Chinese rare-earths magnet producer JL MAG Rare-Earth, saying on June 11 that it had obtained export licences that included the United States, while China's Commerce Ministry confirmed it had approved some 'compliant applications' for export licences. But China has not budged on specialised rare earths, including samarium, which are needed for military applications and are outside the fast-track agreed in London, the two people said. Automakers and other manufacturers largely need other rare earth magnets, including dysprosium and terbium. The rushed trade meeting in London followed a call last week between Mr Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Mr Trump said US tariffs would be set at 55 per cent for China, while China had agreed to 10 per cent from the United States. Mr Trump initially imposed tariffs on China as punishment for its massive trade surplus to the United States and over what he says is Beijing's failure to stem the flow of the powerful opioid fentanyl into the US. Chinese analysts are pessimistic about the likelihood of further breakthroughs before the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva. 'Temporary mutual accommodation of some concerns is possible but the fundamental issue of the trade imbalance cannot be resolved within this timeframe, and possibly during Mr Trump's remaining term,' said Mr Liu Weidong, a US-China expert at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. An extension of the August deadline could allow the Trump administration more time to establish an alternative legal claim for setting higher tariffs on China under the Section 301 authority of the USTR in case Mr Trump loses the ongoing legal challenge to the tariffs in US court, one of the people with knowledge of the London talks said. The unresolved issues underscore the difficulty the Trump administration faces in pushing its trade agenda with China because of Beijing's control of rare earths and its willingness to use that as leverage with Washington, said Mr Ryan Hass, director of the John L. Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution. 'It has taken the Trump team a few punches in the nose to recognise that they will no longer be able to secure another trade agreement with China that disproportionately addresses Trump's priorities,' Mr Hass said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
