South west bakery chain turns its workers into owners
Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs) are a Government initiative aimed to promote employee ownership by giving business owners the opportunity to sell their shares to an employee owned trust free from capital gains tax. According to global accounting firm Price Waterhouse Cooper EOTs do not involve direct share ownership by employees, rather a controlling interest in company is transferred to an all-employee trust which is then held for the benefit of employees.
The first Parsons Bakery was opened in Clevedon nearly a century ago, followed by a second in Nailsea.Now the third-generation, family-run business, has shops in Gloucestershire, Wiltshire, Somerset, Oxfordshire, Worcestershire, Berkshire, Bath, Bristol and in Wales.But in the last few years, majority share holders Nick and Nicola Parsons have stepped back from the business.Now it is hoped a John Lewis-style trust will ensure the bakery will remain independent and "rooted in the communities it has served" for 99 years."For generations, our family has been at the heart of this business, but we've always known that our employees are what truly make it thrive," said Mr Parsons."Now, as we take a step back, we do so knowing Parsons is in the best possible hands - those of the people who bake, serve and keep it running every day."
'New energy'
Retail director Lee Insull-Griffith, said the Parsons family have "put their trust into the employees" and staff are feeling "more united then ever" by the move."There's a new energy because for hundreds of years [employees] have represented the Parsons brand but today we are the Parsons brand," he said."The trust will make sure that everything we do is in the interest of the employees and ultimately the results we achieve as a business are shared amongst those employees."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Why a capital gains tax raid is the last thing homeowners need
A new tax on the sale of expensive homes would cause the property market to grind to a halt, and would be unlikely to raise much revenue, experts say. The government is said to be considering a shake-up of property taxes in the budget this autumn as it tries to fill a multibillion-pound black hole in the public finances. Many options seem to be under discussion, according to widespread reports this week, but most appear to be aimed at those selling high-value homes. The Times reported on Wednesday that the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, was considering charging capital gains tax (CGT) on the sale of main homes worth £1.5 million or more. This would be on top of stamp duty paid by buyers, which raised £13.8 billion in the 2023-24 tax year. CGT raised £13 billion in that year. Jonathan Brandling-Harris from the London estate agency House Collective said: 'Handing sellers a large CGT bill on sale will simply discourage them from moving.' Geoff Wilford from the estate agency Wilfords London said: 'It would be the single worst decision any government could make for the housing market. It would grind activity to a halt. Instead of boosting Treasury receipts, it would kill them off completely.' At the moment the sale of your main home is exempt from CGT. If it wasn't, the Treasury would make an estimated £31 billion a year. CGT is charged at 24 per cent for higher rate taxpayers and 18 per cent for basic rate taxpayers on the sale of assets including second homes, shares and art, for example. HM Revenue and Customs said that not charging CGT on the sale of main homes costs it £31 billion a year. Heather Powell from the accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg said: 'Abolishing this relief would be hugely controversial and would mean the end of the principle that no tax is payable on the sale of your family home.' Tom Bill from the estate agency Knight Frank said that because CGT is only charged on sales, many homeowners would simply decide to stay put. He said: 'If CGT applied from when the property was last bought, it would divide sellers into two groups: those sitting on a gain and those who are not. 'Anyone with a taxable gain would think twice before selling, which would reduce transaction numbers. That's despite the government seeming to want a predictable flow of revenue that is skewed towards the wealthiest homeowners.' • Ben Wilkinson: This tax policy chaos does not bode well Homes worth more than £1.5 million make up about 1 per cent of the 1.2 million property sales in England every year, and about 5 per cent of the sales in London, according to Hamptons. The average gain on the sale of a £1.5 million-plus home in England and Wales in the past 20 years was £836,219 — a rise of 71 per cent. The CGT bill on that gain for a higher-rate taxpayer would be £199,973. Aneisha Beveridge from the estate agency Hamptons said that when buyers of more expensive homes were last hit by big changes to property taxes, sales fell. Stamp duty moved from a 'slab' system where a single 5 per cent rate was charged to a 'slice' system where bands of the purchase price were taxed at 2 per cent, 5 per cent and 10 per cent. The change left anyone buying a home worth less than £935,000 paying less, but those who bought higher-value homes paying more. Under the old system someone buying a £1.5 million home would have paid 5 per cent across the entire property's value — £75,000. They now pay £93,750. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts In 2014 about 4 per cent of homes sold in London went for more than £1.5 million, according to Hamptons. Last year 2.9 per cent sold at that level, once you accounted for property price inflation, the lowest share on record. Beveridge said: 'What we saw with the stamp duty changes was that demand for those homes at the top end of the market slowed because they became much more expensive, so people did not move as often.' A property sales tax on expensive homes would have a knock-on effect on all those further down a sales chain if the sellers at the top simply decided not to move. Wilford said: 'Imagine finally deciding to move after decades only to be stung with a bigger bill for selling than you would ever have paid for buying. That leaves a very sour taste.' Experts argue that anything that deters older homeowners from downsizing is bad news for the market in general. Some 53 per cent of homes in England and 35 per cent of homes in Scotland have at least two spare bedrooms, according to Nationwide Building Society. Polling of 4,300 people by Barclays suggested that 37 per cent of those with one or more spare bedrooms were over 65. • How could Rachel Reeves reform stamp duty and other property taxes? Barclays said that those who downsize should be given grants or be allowed to offset any moving costs against their stamp duty bill. Brandling-Harris said: 'Downsizers should be helped because every move they make unlocks the housing ladder beneath them — freeing up family homes for those moving up the ladder, and so starter homes for first-time buyers. That's why the focus should be the exact opposite of a sellers' tax: rather than penalising people for moving, we should be encouraging it.' Wilford added: 'Downsizing is already a daunting process. People want to stay near friends, family and their GP yet often suitable homes locally are scarce. 'Add in the emotional attachment to the family home, the slog of clearing out a lifetime of belongings, plus legal fees, removals and surveys, and it is no wonder many decide it is easier to stay put — they just don't want the hassle. Add a seller's tax into the mix and you risk wiping out a whole segment of the market that keeps the housing ecosystem moving.'
South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Culture minister says ‘biggest anxiety' is public service broadcasters' budgets
The commissioning budgets of PSBs have been 'squeezed by the real-terms reduction of the BBC licence fee', as well as a reduction in advertising revenue, according to a report from the Culture, Media and Sport (CMS) Committee published earlier in the year. The MP also spoke about the Government's rejection of a streamer levy, after the report called for platforms, such as Netflix, Amazon, Apple TV+ and Disney+, to commit to paying 5% of their UK subscriber revenue into a cultural fund which would help PSBs through financing drama with a specific interest to British audiences. Speaking at the Edinburgh TV Festival, he said: 'We want to get a mixed economy. I love the fact that the streamers and big Hollywood houses make lots of shows in the UK … I want to mix it, to be making our own stuff.' Speaking about the importance of 'a mixed economy', he said: 'Film and TV, and high-end television in particular is fundamentally an international thing. 'I think that some politicians in the world don't seem to fully understand us, but one of the things I've been trying to achieve in the UK is, yes, it's great that the streamers do make fabulous stuff here, and lots of wonderful films made here. 'Tom Cruise is probably one of the biggest investors in the UK economy over the last decade. Brilliant. 'I really want to celebrate that, but I don't want everything that is made in the UK, all the IP (intellectual property), simply to go back to the West Coast of the United States of America. 'I'd like us to have some IP that remains here so that we can continue making investments and have strong UK production companies, which also make stuff which maybe sometimes is specifically made for a UK audience as well as for a wider audience. 'So I've been trying to make that mixed economy.' Cruise's blockbuster Mission Impossible films, particularly recent instalments, have frequently filmed in the UK, with locations including London, Derbyshire and the Lake District. Sir Chris added: 'My biggest anxiety is the state of public service broadcasting budgets, and if they haven't got any funding, they're not going to be making any progress.' After the report into British film and high-end television, chairwoman of the CMS committee, Dame Caroline Dinenage, said 'there will be countless distinctly British stories that never make it to our screens' unless the Government intervenes to 'rebalance the playing field' between streamers and public service broadcasters (PSBs).
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Speciality Steel UK plunges into administration putting 1,500 jobs at risk as Government takes control
Judge Edward Mellor deemed it 'hopelessly insolvent' with just £600,000 in the bank STEEL SETBACK Speciality Steel UK plunges into administration putting 1,500 jobs at risk as Government takes control Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE Government yesterday took control of Britain's third largest steelworks — putting 1,500 jobs at risk. Speciality Steel UK, pictured above, collapsed into administration as the High Court granted a compulsory winding-up order. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up It owes creditors hundreds of millions of pounds. The company is part of the Liberty Steel Group founded by controversial tycoon Sanjeev Gupta. Judge Edward Mellor deemed it 'hopelessly insolvent' with just £600,000 in the bank — and a monthly wage bill of £3.7million. The steelworks employs 1,450 people in Rotherham and Sheffield, South Yorks. It will be taken over by the Official Receiver and special managers from consultancy firm Teneo — appointed to run it on behalf of the liquidator. But Speciality Steel bosses slammed the move to wind up the business. Its chief transformation officer Jeffrey Kabel claimed a plan by Mr Gupta's parent business GFG — presented to the court — would have secured new investment. Mr Kabel said: 'The decision to push Speciality Steel UK into compulsory liquidation is irrational — especially when we have support from the world's largest asset manager to resume operations and facilitate creditor recovery. 'Instead, liquidation will impose prolonged uncertainty and significant costs on UK taxpayers for settlements and expenses.' 1 Speciality Steel UK collapsed into administration putting 1,500 jobs at risk Credit: AFP M&S JOBS LIFT MARKS & SPENCER is planning to build a huge automated distribution centre which will create 3,000 jobs — as it aims to double the size of its food business become a 'destination for the weekly shop'. M&S — recently crippled by a cyber attack — is investing £340million in the Northants warehouse, opening in 2029. MD Alex Freudmann said it would boost product availability and lower long-term costs. Scottish firm goes bust after plunging into administration SMITH'S SLIPS WH SMITH saw its share price plunge as it revealed an accounting error in the US means its yearly profits will be lower than expected. Shares in the London-listed retailer were down by about a third in early trading. The firm discovered its North America trading profit had been overstated by about £30million — meaning it now expects it to be about £25million for the year to August.
