Delhi govt set to table draft Bill to regulate school fee. Here's why parents groups oppose it
The Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, has been circulated to members of the Delhi Legislative Assembly, with copies in Hindi and English versions, according to the Legislative Assembly Secretariat's circular dated August 1. 'The Delhi government will table the Bill to regulate fee hike by private schools, in the Monsoon session of Assembly beginning from August 4,' Chief Minister Rekha Gupta told reporters on Saturday.
The 13-page Bill outlines a new system to govern how private schools in the National Capital Territory fix and revise fees. The stated aim is to prevent profiteering in line with the National Education Policy (NEP), 2020.
Violations by schools such as charging unapproved fees could attract penalties ranging from Rs 1 to 10 lakh, with provisions for refund of excess fees within 20 working days. The Bill also prohibits coercive practices like striking names off rolls or withholding exam results over non-payment. Every such violation carries a Rs 50,000 penalty per student.
Every private unaided school, the Bill mandates, must form a School Level Fee Regulation Committee each year by July 15. This committee is to include the school principal, a nominee of the school management, three teachers and five parents drawn by lottery from the Parent-Teacher Association, and a nominee from the Directorate of Education.
The school management will propose a fee structure for a block of three academic years, which the committee must review and approve by September 15.
If the committee fails to decide the fees within the timeline, the matter is referred to a District Fee Appellate Committee, which includes education officials, a chartered accountant, two school representatives, and two parent members. Further appeals may be taken to a Revision Committee constituted by the government
A key concern among parents is the provision that only a group comprising at least 15% of total parents in the affected class or school may file an appeal before the District Fee Appellate Committee. This Clause, defined under Section 2 of the Bill, raises the threshold for raising grievances and has been widely criticised.
Groups such as the Forum for Indian Parents have also said that the Bill allows schools to dominate the regulatory process by controlling the selection of committee members and framing fee components with minimal oversight. It also raised concerns about the absence of provisions for audits, the selection of parent and teacher members through internal processes, and the broad language of Section 8 that allows inclusion of all forms of surplus and capital expenditure, including litigation costs and penalties, as fee components.
'The BJP-led Delhi government has colluded with private schools, effectively handcuffing Delhi's parents through the 15% clause,' alleged Mahesh Mishra, a parent at DPS Dwarka and a member of a Delhi-based parents' group. 'There is no provision for Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audits, which is essential for financial accountability.'
The Bill outlines a broad set of heads under Section 8 that schools can factor into their fee proposals, including infrastructure, staff salaries, 'reasonable revenue surplus', and 'capital expenditure'. Critics have argued that this opens the door for schools to include luxury expenses and litigation costs as part of the fee burden on parents.
The Forum added that the Bill weakens existing provisions requiring prior approval from the DoE for fee changes in schools situated on government land. Under the proposed system, approval rests with school-level committees, which they argue can be influenced by the management.
'This Bill is not just anti-parent,' Mishra said, 'it's a direct attack on the middle class and will make quality education even more inaccessible.'
Lawyer and child rights activist Ashok Agarwal echoed similar concerns. 'The Bill is totally confusing and unworkable. So many layers of committees means no end to controversies and litigations,' he posted on X.
Ahead of the start of the Monsoon session, AAP Delhi state president Saurabh Bharadwaj has also slammed the Bill as a 'bonanza for private schools' and a 'direct assault on parents,' alleging that it empowers school managements while silencing dissent. 'When even one parent could earlier raise concerns, why create a threshold of 450 parents in a school of 3,000?' Bharadwaj asked, while flagging the removal of the audit provision, despite earlier government claims of auditing private schools.
The Monsoon Session will be the third session of the Delhi Assembly under the Rekha Gupta-led government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
50% tariffs: Here's how India can flip the script on Trump's trade offensive
Synopsis India is preparing to counter the impact of Trump's 50% tariff through alternative markets and dedicated fund support, as key sectors such as textiles, gems & jewellery, and shrimp brace for the impact. With the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement at a standstill despite several rounds of negotiations, industry leaders and experts are exploring ways to contain the tariff impact. As US President Donald Trump hit India on Wednesday with an additional 25% tariff for purchasing Russian oil, raising the total tariff to 50%, Indian businesses and exporters are bracing for the economic repercussions. In response, experts and industry leaders are actively discussing measures to mitigate the impact of these tariff US is a major trading partner of India. In FY25, India exported products valued at $86.51 billion to the US across various categories, including shrimp, textiles, and gems and jewellery. With the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement at a standstill despite several rounds of negotiations, industry leaders and experts are exploring ways to contain the tariff Indian government is reportedly preparing a Rs 20,000 crore export promotion mission aimed at protecting exporters from global trade uncertainties. This mission is being jointly implemented by the ministries of commerce and industry, micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME), and finance. It is expected to be finalised by August and come into effect by mission, according to sources, will have five components—trade finance, non-trade finance dealing with regulation, standards and market access, better brand recall for Brand India, e-commerce hubs and warehousing, and trade facilitation. Ajay Sahai, DG & CEO of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO), explained that when the mission was announced in the Union Budget this year, it aimed to increase access to export credit. From that perspective, there may be some softening of collateral on one hand; there may also be an element of the Interest Equalisation Scheme. 'We have also requested that the Interest Equalisation Scheme for MSME manufacturers be extended to all countries, with a specific emphasis on ensuring that all exporters receive this support for exports to the US, as it will enhance their competitiveness,' he said. He noted that there is a temporary problem, assuming that by September-October this year, India and the US are able to work out the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). However, he pointed out that any losses faced by Indian exporters will be for a limited duration. 'The good thing is that in that scenario, both buyers and sellers want to maintain the equation, and both sides want to look at absorbing the cost. They can look at increasing productivity.'However, 'they have been forced to be innovative' due to Trump tariffs, so there is always a silver lining in all these things as well,' he said. 'Even if the replacement of the US market happens, it will take time. If we are not through with the BTA, we must be prepared for some setbacks in exports. That is undeniable,' he Taneja, Professor, ICRIER, asserted that allocating a dedicated fund to support and shield exporters from the disruptions caused by US tariffs is a commendable and timely initiative. 'This is much in line with what countries like Australia, Spain, and South Korea are doing. The Australian government announced a $1-billion zero‑interest loan package to support businesses facing market disruptions. Spain has combined direct aid and soft loans in its proposed relief package. Similarly, the South Korean EXIM Bank manages the Supply Chain Resilience Fund (SCRF), allowing exporters to respond swiftly to trade wars and geopolitical conflicts,' she a similar view, Shravan Shetty, Managing Director, Primus Partners, said that the fund can prove beneficial, especially for vulnerable segments like textiles, gems & jewellery, and auto ancillaries, wherein production-linked schemes can help provide relief. 'The funds can also be deployed for strategic trade promotion activities and brand-building in alternate markets, such as Africa, the UK, the European Union, and Central Asia,' he Sen, Trade Policy Leader at EY India, emphasised the importance of understanding what percentage of this fund percolates down to the actual exporters who need it. This is important, given the undefined nature of the new Trump tariff regime, he said. 'The arbitrage possible between exports of the same product from different countries; the lack of finality in the rates; the definitional issues, such as what would be considered as 'transhipping', etc., make a structured support scheme difficult to formulate. In case we see a significant downturn in US demand, the amounts from the fund would be needed to explore newer markets,' he also noted the necessity of placing greater emphasis on countries with which we have recently signed FTAs, as they remain underutilised. 'We have one with the UK that will be operationalised; now is the time to start focusing on the UK market and the EU, where an early harvest is expected in the coming months.''So, I think the strategy should be focusing on diversification because with the kind of tariff that has been imposed by the US and the threat issued every day, we cannot rely on the US. Even if BTA happens and an additional tariff in the form of India's relations with Russia is imposed, we can be subjected to any kind of tariff. So, this is the time we should look at diversification in the medium to long term. And we should exploit opportunities with FTAs,' he mentioned that the fund relief and the development of alternative markets will only help in the short to medium term. India must build structural competitiveness and export reliance frameworks in the long term, he said. 'The answer lies in building an export ecosystem that can withstand geopolitical shocks, price wars, and shifting consumer preferences.'He proposed that the government should provide MSMEs and exporters with digital platforms and single windows to facilitate export credit, insurance, and risk cover, while noting that many smaller firms lack awareness or access to EXIM Bank schemes, ECGC support, or interest equalisation benefits. 'Digitising access and simplifying application processes can significantly boost participation,' he other measures, officials have indicated that lowering testing charges for smaller exporters, levied by the Export Inspection Council, can ease exporters' concerns. Additionally, measures like providing customs relief, accelerating GST for exports and increasing RoDTEP can also mitigate tariff impacts, as per industry RoDTEP and RoSCTL schemes, as per Sen of EY India, should be expanded to cover all exports between them. He said that increasing the RoDTEP/RoSCTL rates to directly refund a wider range of embedded taxes and duties not covered by other schemes would reduce overall production costs for exporters, enhance the price competitiveness of their products in the international market and partially alleviate the tariff Kumar Gulati, Chairman at the Compound Livestock Feed Manufacturers Association (CLFMA) of India, said that lowering the charges and simplifying the process for mandatory testing and certification (especially for food, agriculture, pharma, and chemicals) significantly reduces compliance costs. 'It's particularly vital for smaller exporters and for sectors with low margins, directly supporting their ability to remain price-competitive internationally,' he said. Sector-specific Looking at the sectors, textiles could be one of the worst hit with $4 billion of business, such as t-shirts and home textiles bearing the brunt, especially due to lower tariffs imposed on India's rivals—Bangladesh and Vietnam at 20%. At 50%, US tariffs on India are now the highest Thakur, Secretary General of the Apparel Export Promotion Council, commended the 'expected' export promotion mission and suggested an increase in the mission budget, which is currently set at Rs 20,000 crore. He also recommended including specific measures for the textile sector in the mission, considering that the sector is the second-largest employer after agriculture in the country.'We need incentives to offset India's cost disadvantage vis-à-vis competing countries,' he said, adding that 'reviving the Interest Equalisation Scheme for five years at an enhanced rate of 5% for all exporters, without any value cap, is crucial.' He emphasised the need for continuity of schemes such as RoSCTL, a moratorium on loan repayments, expedited India-EU trade negotiations, and the quick disbursal of outstanding dues and claims from shrimp exports, totalling nearly $7 billion, to the US could suffer significantly. Even before the new tariffs, Indian seafood exporters were facing stiff price competition and falling prices thanks to increased supply from Ecuador (which faces only a 10-14% tariff).'Shrimp prices dipped by 20-25% in the last year. The oversupply continues to depress global prices, which further erodes profits and export earnings for Indian producers. It's estimated that Indian exporters are already facing losses of Rs 600 crore due to order cancellations and containers stuck in transit as these tariffs take effect. Margins in the industry are a slim 4-5%, making it impossible to absorb such steep tariff hikes, and exporters fear a significant long-term loss of market share, with Ecuador likely to replace India as the top shrimp supplier to the US,' pointed out added that the government's Rs 20,000-crore scheme will focus on making export credit accessible, enhancing brand building, and addressing non-tariff barriers. The aim is to provide liquidity, promote market diversification, and support value addition. 'While this injection can help tide over some immediate financial distress, industry experts warn it cannot fully compensate for the cost disadvantage created by the high US tariffs and ongoing oversupply and price drops due to Ecuador's surge in production and exports,' he said.
Hans India
41 minutes ago
- Hans India
Indiramma Housing scheme sees remarkable progress in Nizamabad
Nizamabad: The Indiramma housing initiative in Nizamabad district has registered exceptional progress, with State Housing Corporation Secretary and Managing Director V.P. Gautam commending the district administration for its performance. During his visit on Wednesday, Gautam praised the rapid advancements made in the past two months, particularly in the second phase of house sanctioning and grounding. Accompanied by District Collector T. Vinay Krishna Reddy, Gautam inspected housing sites in Tirmanpalli (Indalvai mandal) and Ghanpur (Dichpalli mandal), interacting with beneficiaries and reviewing aspects such as free sand supply, bill payments, and mason charges. He encouraged the beneficiaries to speed up the construction process and assured them of ongoing support. At the Integrated District Office Complex, a comprehensive review meeting was held with municipal commissioners, MPDOs, and engineering officials. Collector Vinay Krishna Reddy presented a mandal-wise progress report, revealing that out of the targeted 19,306 houses, 17,291 have been sanctioned. Out of these, 9,360 have been grounded, while 5,541 are at various stages of construction: 4,647 are at the basement level, 665 at the wall level, and 229 at the slab level. Loans of up to Rs 1 lakh are being provided to financially constrained beneficiaries through self-help groups. So far, Rs 30.07 crore has been disbursed to 2,637 beneficiaries. The administration is actively enrolling new members into women's groups to expand loan access and encourage construction. For those unwilling to proceed despite support, written declarations are being obtained, and their allocations are being redirected to other eligible individuals. Gautam emphasized that no eligible person should be excluded and that Indiramma houses must not be sanctioned to ineligible applicants. He warned officials of accountability in case of irregularities. To ease construction logistics, Gautam directed coordination between housing officials and MPDOs for free sand token distribution and regulated transport charges. He also instructed the Mandal-level Price Control Committees to ensure fixed rates for materials and mason fees. Highlighting the importance of timely payments, Gautam assured that there is no fund shortage and that bills are cleared weekly. Aadhaar-linked bank accounts will soon be used for direct payments to avoid technical issues. He also called for the immediate uploading of beneficiary details on the Pradhan Mantri Awas portal and faster geo-tagging. Proposals to construct G+3 Indiramma houses on 4.32 acres in Abhayahastam Colony were discussed.
Hans India
41 minutes ago
- Hans India
MP urges MPLADS Fund hike & GST exemption
Anantapur: MP Ambica Lakshmi Narayana has called for urgent reforms to the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), highlighting the need to increase annual allocations and exempt development works from GST. Speaking in the Lok Sabha, he pointed out that the current allocation of Rs 5 crore per MP, unchanged since 2011, has become insufficient due to inflation, rising construction costs, and growing public needs. In large rural constituencies like Anantapur, where drinking water scarcity, poor road connectivity, and lack of basic infrastructure persist, the existing funds are barely enough to meet essential requirements. He strongly opposed the imposition of GST on development works carried out under MPLADS, stating that these should be treated on par with other welfare schemes implemented by the central government, which enjoy GST exemption. The MP urged the Union Finance Minister and the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation to consider the demands, including increasing of MPLADS funds from the current Rs 5 crore to at least Rs 10 crore per MP annually, provide complete GST exemption for all MPLADS-funded works. He stressed that these measures would significantly strengthen rural development in backward regions such as Rayalaseema, enabling MPs to address critical local needs more effectively.
