BREAKING NEWS Arsenal break silence after Thomas Partey is charged with five counts of rape and one count of sexual assault just five days after leaving the club
In a brief statement issued to the BBC, the club said: 'The player's contract ended on June 30. Due to ongoing legal proceedings the club is unable to comment on the case.'
The 32-year-old Ghana international, who spent five seasons in north London, is accused of attacking three women between 2021 and 2022 following a three-year investigation by Scotland Yard.
He is now due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on August 5.
Partey, who was signed by Arsenal for £45million from Atletico Madrid in 2020, denies all the charges against him. In a statement released through his lawyer Jenny Wiltshire of Hickman and Rose, Partey said he 'welcomes the opportunity to finally clear his name' and has 'fully cooperated with the police and CPS throughout their investigation'.
The Crown Prosecution Service confirmed that the charges were authorised after it 'carefully reviewed a comprehensive file of evidence'.
According to the Metropolitan Police, two counts of rape relate to one woman, three counts of rape relate to a second woman, and the sexual assault charge relates to a third woman. None of the alleged victims can be named for legal reasons.
The investigation began in February 2022, with Partey first arrested in July of that year, though he was not publicly named at the time and continued to play for Arsenal while on bail. It has since emerged that he made over 50 appearances for the club during the period in which the investigation was ongoing.
Detective Superintendent Andy Furphy, who is leading the investigation, said: 'Our priority remains providing support to the women who have come forward. We would ask anyone who has been impacted by this case, or anyone who has information, to speak with our team.'
Partey left Arsenal last month following the expiry of his contract, with reports suggesting negotiations over a new deal had stalled weeks earlier. The midfielder has been training in Ghana as he looks for a new club and recently won the Ghana Footballer of the Year award.
He made 167 appearances for Arsenal, scoring nine goals, and was part of the side that won the Community Shield in 2023. Despite injury setbacks, Partey returned to feature regularly last season as Mikel Arteta's side finished second in the Premier League and reached the Champions League semi-finals.
In a recent interview discussing his future, Partey said his family would play a decisive role in where he plays next, explaining: 'I think the first thing is where are you happy and where do you feel at home… there are a lot of things where you have to look now with a family, where you want them to be happy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Raducanu does not trust 'dodgy' electronic line calls
Emma Raducanu says she does not trust the electronic line calling at Wimbledon, pointing to "dodgy" calls in her defeat by world number one Aryna Briton was particularly unhappy when a shot from the Belarusian was judged to have clipped the line midway through the first set."That call was for sure out," Raducanu said after a closely fought 7-6 (8-6) 6-4 loss where she went toe-to-toe with the top seed for much of the match."It's kind of disappointing that the calls can be so wrong, but for the most part they've been OK. I've had a few in my other matches, too, that have been very wrong. Hopefully they can fix that."Wimbledon replaced line judges this year with the technology, which is being used at many other top-level tournaments, including the US Open and Australian if she trusted the electronic line calls, Raducanu replied: "No, I don't trust the line calls - I think the other players would say the same thing, there were some pretty dodgy ones but what can you do?"Raducanu is not the only player to question the accuracy of the system, with British men's number one Jack Draper saying after his second-round defeat by Marin Cilic on Thursday: "I don't think it's 100% accurate, in all honesty. "A couple of the ones today it showed a mark on the court. There's no way the chalk would have showed." It is not just the accuracy of the automated 'out' calls that have been questioned this week, with players saying they have also been too said she had not been able to hear all of the calls during her match against Sabalenka on Centre Court, where the roof was closed and the partisan fans were noisy during a gripping encounter."Some of them were a little bit quiet or dulled out by the crowd," she said. "But overall you kind of have an idea if the ball was in or out. And then hope that Hawk-Eye calls it the same."Sabalenka agreed, adding: "It was quite loud and I think people also weren't sure if it's in or out. So there was a little pause and then they figured [it out] by the scoreboard."When there were human line judges, players could challenge the calls by using electronic reviews, which were shown on a big screen. Now the screens show replays of close calls but they can not be said she thought the Hawk-Eye electronic line calling system "was way more accurate back in the day when there were lines judges and you could challenge". "It's difficult to deal with. And also [it is] a shame that the tradition's kind of been broken with the linesmen and women," she said, referring to the smartly dressed officials who were a familiar sight around the it announced it would be introducing the technology this year, Wimbledon said it considered "the technology to be sufficiently robust and the time is right to take this important step in seeking maximum accuracy in our officiating".Earlier this week Wimbledon's operations director Michelle Dite was asked about the player feedback about the sound level of the calls and she replied: "The team are obviously working to make sure that it's optimum. "We're also just making sure that it's not too loud and it disrupts the play on the next court. It's always something that's being managed, and the teams will take all the feedback and keep working on it as we go."Wimbledon has not commented on the most recent players' concerns about accuracy.
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Martin expects to be 'so pleased' with next Rangers signings
Russell Martin says Rangers are "at a disadvantage" in their team building because they play so early in Champions League qualifying, but the head coach expects to be "so pleased" with new signings anticipated "in the next week or two".The Scottish Premiership runners-up have bought centre-half Emmanuel Fernandez from Peterborough and midfielder Joe Rothwell from Bournemouth, from whom right-back Max Aarons has also been signed on Lyall Cameron's arrival from Dundee had been arranged before Martin's appointment this summer. The former Southampton manager told Rangers TV he is "so pleased" with the close-season additions and said: "The ones we think will be coming into the building in the next week or two, we'll be so pleased with them and we still need some help."We also can't be in a rush to get ones we're not too sure about. When we do get them in, it will be down to a lot of very hard work, a lot of due diligence and we'll make sure they are the right ones." Rangers, who play Club Brugge in a pre-season friendly on Sunday, start their competitive campaign at home to Panathinaikos in just over two weeks time."We're also at a disadvantage because we play so early in Europe. We are trying to work when everyone else is on holiday," Martin former Scotland and Rangers defender outlined his requirements for new arrivals. "People need to be desperate to play for this club and not just be an option and one of a few options," Martin explained."We have to be ready to win early, but we also need to be in a position to help the whole football club with players who can come here, develop whilst winning, and be good business. Every club has to look at that model."Football ability would not be enough to convince Martin a player is right for Rangers."Can you come here and add to us as a group in terms of your behaviour, the way you train, the way you work and who you are as a human being, your willingness to play in a way that we want to, which is not for everyone because it's not easy?" he added."Also playing for this football club will not be for everyone. Character first and then talent after and if we get both, we'll be really happy."
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ban on Palestine Action to take effect after legal challenge fails
Being a member of, or showing support for, Palestine Action will be a criminal offence from Saturday after a last-minute legal challenge to suspend the group's proscription under anti-terrorism laws failed. A ban on Palestine Action, which uses direct action to mainly target Israeli weapons factories in the UK and their supply chain, was voted through by parliament this week but lawyers acting for its co-founder Huda Ammori had sought to prevent it taking effect. After a hearing at the high court on Friday, however, Mr Justice Chamberlain declined to grant her application for interim relief. Ammori said: 'The home secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect.' Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Ammori sought permission to appeal against Chamberlain's decision in an 8pm hearing that lasted approximately one hour at the court of appeal on Friday night, in an attempt to prevent the ban coming into force. But at about 10.25pm – less than two hours before it was due to take effect – the three judges, led by the lady chief justice, Sue Carr, refused permission. It means Palestine Action will become the first direct action protest group to be banned under the Terrorism Act, placing it in the same category as Islamic State, al-Qaida and the far-right group National Action. Raza Husain KC, representing Ammori, described the proscription decision in the hearing before Chamberlain, as 'an ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power'. He said it was 'absurd' to label a civil disobedience direct action protest group that does not advocate violence as a terrorist organisation. 'The main target has been stopping Elbit Systems … which markets itself as the backbone of the IDF [Israel Defense Forces],' said Husain. 'As my client says: 'The aim of terrorism is to take lives and hurt people, that's the opposite of what we do.'' He said before making the decision the government had engaged with the Israeli government, Elbit Systems and pro-Israeli lobby groups, while Palestine Action and other pro-Palestine groups were not consulted. Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC, also representing Ammori, said what was going on in Gaza was 'an annihilation, it is a genocide' and Palestine Action was 'seeking to disrupt and prevent' UK complicity in it. Ben Watson KC, representing the home secretary, focused on the proscription procedure in his submissions. 'All of these issues, all of that evidence is supposed to go to the secretaries of state… it's only after that process, after the secretary of state has had a chance to consider … then the matter goes before Poac [the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission].' He said only then could the case go to the court of appeal and then, potentially, the supreme court. Watson said Palestine Action's activities met the statutory test for proscription and that if the ban took effect but the group subsequently won a judicial review against proscription it would not cause 'irreparable harm' to it. He told the court that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. The protest group Defend Our Juries wrote to the Met police commissioner, Mark Rowley, on Friday to tell him that it 'may be committing offences under the Terrorism Act' in Parliament Square from 1pm on Saturday. It said non-violent protesters would hold signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The letter said that they 'refuse to be bystanders to what's happening to the people of Palestine, who are bombed, starved and gunned down as they queue for food'. Several hundred protesters gathered, waving Palestinian flags and carrying signs saying 'Free Palestine' and 'We are all Palestine Action' outside the Royal Courts of Justice. UN experts, civil liberties groups, cultural figures and hundreds of lawyers have condemned the ban as draconian and said it sets a dangerous precedent by conflating protest with terrorism. Another hearing is scheduled for 21 July when Palestine Action will apply for permission for a judicial review to quash the order. In the meantime, and unless the judicial review is successful, membership of, or inviting support for, the group will carry a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
