logo
15 Things Your Inner Child Is Still Waiting To Hear

15 Things Your Inner Child Is Still Waiting To Hear

Yahoo20-06-2025
We carry our childhood whispers like secret companions, often too faint to decipher but too persistent to ignore. These echoes of our younger selves shape our desires, fears, and the way we navigate the world. The words we yearned for then might still hold the power to unlock doors in our minds today. Here, we explore those unspoken affirmations that can soothe your inner child and maybe, just maybe, offer you the grace to grow and glow.
In the age of perfectionism, the notion of being enough as you are feels almost radical. Your younger self needed to hear that your worth is innate, not dictated by achievements or accolades. Research by Dr. Brené Brown highlights that acknowledgment of inherent worth fosters resilience and authenticity in adulthood. Remember, your essence is not to be measured by external standards, but cherished in its unaltered form.
The relentless quest for approval can be traced back to moments when self-worth felt conditional. Imagine whispering to your inner child, reassuring them that their mere existence is a triumph. Perfection is an illusion; being enough is the reality you deserve to embrace. Letting go of the need for validation is a practice worth honing, a gift to the child within.
Sadness is often treated like a stain to scrub away, but what if it were simply part of the tapestry of life? Your inner child craved the freedom to cry without judgment, to recognize sorrow without shame. Allowing yourself to experience sadness can be liberating, a profound act of self-compassion that acknowledges your full emotional spectrum.
You learned to hide your tears, believing vulnerability was weakness. What if, instead, you let your inner child know that feeling sad is part of being human? Embracing your emotions, rather than stifling them, frees up space for healing and growth. It's only through facing your shadows that you can bask in the light.
The dreams you held as a child were pure, untainted by the cynicism of adulthood. Yet, somewhere along the way, you might have been taught they were frivolous or out of reach. Dr. Gail Matthews, a psychology professor, found that writing down goals increases the likelihood of achieving them by 42%. Your inner child needs to hear that those dreams still hold value and are worthy of pursuit.
Reignite those dreams, even if they seem silly or grandiose. Give your inner child permission to imagine without limits, to pursue passions that spark joy. Nurturing these dreams is not merely a nostalgic act but a commitment to living authentically. Remember, the dreams you once whispered to the stars are still waiting to be realized.
Love with conditions is a transaction, one your inner child might have become all too familiar with. It's time to dismantle this notion and rebuild it with unconditional regard. An affection not linked to performance or behavior, but simply because you are you, is the type of love that can heal old wounds.
Picture the child you were, seeking validation in a world that sometimes seemed indifferent. Your inner child needs to hear that love is not a reward but a given. Accepting love freely, without the weight of expectations, is a revolutionary act of self-care. It's a reminder that love, in its truest form, asks nothing of you but to exist.
The fear of making mistakes is often rooted in a childhood where errors were met with criticism or punishment. Yet, every misstep is a stepping stone on the path to understanding and growth. Studies by Carol Dweck, a renowned psychologist, emphasize the importance of a growth mindset in fostering resilience and a love of learning. Tell your inner child that mistakes are not failures but opportunities in disguise.
Consider the shame you might have felt when errors seemed like personal shortcomings. Reassure your inner child that in each mistake lies the potential for insight and innovation. Embrace the chaos of trial and error; it's the fertile ground where creativity blooms. Celebrate your imperfections as markers of a life fully lived and lessons well learned.
The ability to say no is often misconstrued as defiance, especially for a child. Yet, having agency and setting boundaries is essential for healthy relationships and self-respect. Your inner child yearns to hear that their voice matters, that refusing is not rudeness but a declaration of self-worth.
Reflect on times you felt obligated to say yes, even when every fiber of your being screamed no. Teaching your inner child that it's okay to prioritize their needs is a crucial step towards empowerment. Establishing boundaries is not an act of isolation, but one of self-preservation. It's a reminder that your time, energy, and happiness are valuable resources worth protecting.
In moments of isolation, your inner child might have felt like an island in an indifferent ocean. But solitude is often an illusion, a trick of the mind that obscures the connections we inherently share. A study published in the Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology found that strong social connections reduce stress and improve overall well-being. Let your inner child know that they are part of a vibrant, interconnected web of humanity.
Imagine telling your younger self that they are surrounded by unseen allies, even in solitude. Acknowledge the power of community, the comfort found in shared experiences and empathy. Reassure your inner child that reaching out is a sign of strength, not weakness. Together, we rise, bolstered by the invisible threads that bind us.
Voicelessness can be one of the profound silences a child carries into adulthood. Maybe you were told to sit down, be quiet, and not make waves. Yet your inner child deserves to know that their perspectives and ideas hold immense value. Speak up, even if your voice shakes, for it is through expression that liberation is found.
Think of all the times you swallowed your thoughts, fearing judgment or dismissal. Let your inner child hear that silence should not be a default, but a choice. Claim your right to articulate your truth, embracing the power words hold. In doing so, you validate your experiences and beliefs, empowering yourself and those who listen.
Somewhere between childhood and adulthood, play often becomes a forgotten art. Yet, play is where creativity thrives, where joy is unfiltered and abundant. Your inner child needs to hear that play is not frivolous but rather a vital component of a balanced, fulfilling life. Allow yourself moments of spontaneity and silliness; they are the soul's playtime.
Reflect on the pressure to be productive, to always justify your actions with tangible outcomes. Remind your inner child that play fosters imagination and innovation, key ingredients for a vibrant life. Embrace leisure without guilt, knowing that it's as essential as any work you undertake. Rediscover the magic of play, and let it infuse your existence with wonder and possibility.
Conformity was often the unwritten rule of childhood, where fitting in felt safer than standing out. Yet, your uniqueness is your superpower, the spark that sets you apart. Your inner child needs to hear that being different is not a liability but an asset. Celebrate your quirks, for they are the threads that weave your distinctive tapestry.
Consider the times you hid parts of yourself to blend into the crowd. Reassure your inner child that authenticity opens doors to genuine connections and opportunities. Revel in your peculiarities, knowing they are the hallmarks of a life unapologetically lived. Embrace the diversity within yourself, and watch as it enriches the world around you.
Strength is often misconceived as brute force or unyielding toughness. Yet, true strength is the quiet resilience, the ability to endure and adapt in the face of adversity. Your inner child needs to hear that their strength is not measured by their invincibility, but by their courage to persevere.
Reflect on the challenges that left you questioning your capacity to cope. Let your inner child know that resilience is forged in the crucible of experience, not in the absence of struggle. Embrace your fortitude, acknowledging the battles you've faced and the wisdom they've imparted. Stand firm in the knowledge that you are capable, courageous, and undeniably strong.
In a culture obsessed with linear success, the idea of starting over feels daunting. Yet, every end is a new beginning, a chance to redefine and rediscover. Your inner child needs to hear that it's okay to pivot, to choose a different path when the current one no longer serves. Reinvention is not failure, but a profound act of self-actualization.
Consider the fear of leaving behind familiarity, of leaping into the unknown. Reassure your inner child that change is not to be feared but embraced as a gateway to growth. Trust in your ability to rebuild, knowing that your foundation is unshakable. With every new chapter, you write the story of resilience and reinvention.
The compulsion to prove oneself can be traced back to early quests for acknowledgment and validation. Yet, your worth is not contingent upon external approval or accolades. Your inner child needs to hear that they are whole and complete without having to justify their existence. Let go of the pressure to perform, and embrace the freedom of being.
Think of the times you felt the need to overcompensate, to demonstrate your value tirelessly. Assure your inner child that they are not defined by their accomplishments, but by their essence. You have the liberty to exist authentically, free from the constraints of expectation. In the absence of proving, you find the peace of self-acceptance.
Body image issues often originate in childhood, when comparisons and critiques shape self-perception. Yet, your body deserves to be celebrated for its strength, its resilience, and its uniqueness. Your inner child needs to hear that their body is not flawed, but a miraculous vessel that carries them through life. Embrace your form, knowing it is a masterpiece in its own right.
Reflect on the societal ideals that dictated what beauty should be. Reassure your inner child that their beauty is not defined by conformity but by individuality. Nourish your body with compassion and gratitude, recognizing its incredible capabilities. In acceptance, you find liberation, a profound love for the skin you're in.
Doubt can be a shadow that looms large, obscuring your potential and ambitions. Yet, your inner child needs to hear that they are capable of achieving greatness, of realizing their dreams. Believe in the power of possibility, knowing that the only limits are the ones you impose. Your potential is boundless, waiting to be unleashed.
Consider the moments when you questioned your abilities when fear held you back from pursuing your passions. Reaffirm to your inner child that they possess the skills, the vision, and the tenacity to succeed. Trust in your journey, knowing that every step forward is a testament to your capability. In the pursuit of greatness, you honor the child who dared to dream.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Union calls continued delay of silica dust rule a ‘death sentence' for coal miners in Pa. and beyond
Union calls continued delay of silica dust rule a ‘death sentence' for coal miners in Pa. and beyond

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Union calls continued delay of silica dust rule a ‘death sentence' for coal miners in Pa. and beyond

Gary Hairston (from left to right), Judy Riffe, Dianna Perdue and Roosevelt Neal, stand outside of an office building for the U.S. House of Representatives last year. The advocates for people with black lung were in the U.S. Capitol encouraging lawmakers to support coal miners with the incurable disease. (Quenton King | Courtesy photo) Representatives with the United Coal Workers of America have condemned a federal court's decision to continue delaying the implementation of a federal rule to lower coal miners' exposure to dangerous silica dust, calling the pushback 'bureaucratic cowardice.' The silica dust rule — finalized under the U.S. Department of Labor and the Mine Safety and Health Administration last year — should have gone into effect on Monday after being delayed for the first time in April. But now the rule has yet again been pushed back to at least October due to a previous temporary injunction issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in response to a request from the National Sand, Stone and Gravel Association to block the rule's implementation completely. The rule would have gone into effect on Monday only for coal mines; the NSSGA — along with several other industry groups who joined the organization in its request — would not have been impacted by the new regulations until 2027, per the rule. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Meanwhile, as the rule is delayed, more and more coal miners are working in dusty conditions known to cause and exacerbate black lung disease. 'This is bureaucratic cowardice, plain and simple,' said UMWA International Secretary-Treasurer Brian Sanson. 'We've buried too many friends, too many fathers, and too many sons because of black lung. Bowing to corporate interests doesn't solve the problem; it puts more miners at risk. The science is clear, the rule is needed, and the delay is shameful.' Other industries have had similar protections in place for their workers for years due to settled science showing the dangers posed by constant exposure to silica dust. 'This delay is simply a death sentence for more miners,' said UMWA International President Cecil E. Roberts. 'The fact that an industry association with no stake in coal mining can hold up lifesaving protections for coal miners is outrageous. The Department of Labor and MSHA should be fighting to implement this rule immediately, not kicking enforcement down the road yet again. Every day they delay, more miners get sick, and more miners die. That's the truth.' Black lung has no cure. Experts say the most effective way to stop the disease from forming or from evolving into a more complicated case is to limit exposure to silica dust. The finalized silica dust rule, if implemented, would cut the exposure limits for coal miners in half for the first time ever. It would also impose new penalties for mines that operate out of compliance and require companies to offer free medical monitoring for their workers with the hope of detecting black lung and other respiratory diseases earlier. Coal miners and advocates for people with black lung have been directly fighting since at least 2009 for industry protections against the disease. Rebecca Shelton, director of policy for the Appalachian Citizens' Law Center, said the continued delay of the rule shows that 'the Trump Administration and the coal companies are seemingly working hand-in-hand to slow down the process and weaken future protections.' 'These delays and efforts to weaken the rule are a disgrace, and undermine the claims of anyone in the Trump Administration who claims to be on the side of coal miners,' Shelton said. While the rule is being continuously delayed, President Donald Trump has called for the country to increase coal production. But coal miners in Central Appalachia and beyond are already seeing higher rates of black lung than any time in the previous 25 years, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The disease is also hitting coal miners at younger ages than ever before due to a lack of easily accessible coal. Today, miners must cut through more layers of silica-rich sandstone to reach the coal that remains in existing seams, creating dustier conditions that increases their risk of developing black lung. 'Every American worker deserves to come home from work with their lungs intact, miners included,' Roberts said. 'It's as simple as that.' West Virginia Watch is a sister outlet of the Pennsylvania Capital-Star and part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity.

Why UnitedHealth (UNH) Stock Is Down Today
Why UnitedHealth (UNH) Stock Is Down Today

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why UnitedHealth (UNH) Stock Is Down Today

What Happened? Shares of health insurance company UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) fell 3% in the afternoon session after investors took some profits off the table as markets awaited signals on future monetary policy from the Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole symposium later in the week. The downturn in the market was largely attributed to a significant sell-off in megacap tech and chipmaker shares. Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), and Broadcom all saw notable drops, dragging down the VanEck Semiconductor ETF. Other major tech-related companies like Tesla, Meta Platforms, and Netflix were also under pressure. A key reason for this trend is that much of the recent market gains have been concentrated in the "AI trade," which includes these large technology and semiconductor companies. So this could also mean that some investors are locking in some gains ahead of more definitive feedback from the Fed. The shares closed the day at $304.16, down 1.4% from previous close. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy UnitedHealth? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. What Is The Market Telling Us UnitedHealth's shares are quite volatile and have had 19 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 4 days ago when the stock gained 11.6% on the news that the company disclosed that Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway had acquired a significant new stake, with news that regulators had also approved a major merger. According to regulatory filings, Berkshire Hathaway accumulated a position of approximately 5 million shares valued at around $1.6 billion. The investment is seen as a major vote of confidence in the health insurer, whose stock had fallen significantly year-to-date amid various challenges. Adding to the positive news, regulators also cleared UnitedHealth's proposed $3.3 billion merger with Amedisys Inc., further bolstering investor optimism. Filings also revealed that other top investors, such as Michael Burry, had initiated new stakes in the company. UnitedHealth is down 39.8% since the beginning of the year, and at $303.75 per share, it is trading 51.4% below its 52-week high of $625.25 from November 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of UnitedHealth's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $963.06. Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Is Red Meat Bad for You? The Proof Is in the Processing
Is Red Meat Bad for You? The Proof Is in the Processing

Medscape

time26 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Is Red Meat Bad for You? The Proof Is in the Processing

This transcript has been edited for clarity. Is red meat bad for you? On the one hand, meat makes you strong, and it's every American's God-given right to grill a steak on his barbecue during the summer. I believe this came up in a church synod at some point… But on the other hand, the WHO (World Health Organization) has declared red meat a carcinogen, with a hot dog being as bad as cigarette. Yes, that was headline when the report came out. So, how do we reconcile these opposing ideas? Part of the solution is realizing the WHO organization in question is based in France. Maybe they're still angry about the "freedom fries" thing, but actually examining the nuances of the French language will help us understand what's going on. If you don't speak French, don't worry I got you covered. Ce n'est pas si difficile de tout n'inquiétez vous pas. Vous allez voir . Sit back, grab a baguette, and let's find out how dangerous red meat really is. I'm Christopher Labos, and this is Medscape's On Second Thought . Bonjour, tout le monde! Now, meat doesn't seem like it should be a complex topic to study, but it is. Many people around the world eat animals, but we don't all eat the same animals. For example, this is a cow, often used to make hamburger and steak. And this is Tobi, God's perfect angel who gets a more elaborate birthday party than I do each year. He is my son, and I would throw myself in front of a moving car for him. By necessity, when we do medical research on meat, we are lumping together a whole lot of a different human behavior, with people eating different types of animals based on where they live. There's no real alternative, and frankly, you can't let the perfect become the enemy of the good. Most credible research will at least separate out red meat from white meat. But most people don't really know what the difference is. If you thought pork was white meat, you're wrong. You think that because of a marketing slogan. In 1987, the National Pork Board paid for the marketing campaign "Pork. The Other White Meat." They were basically trying to position pork as an alternative to chicken. People also usually think veal or deer is white meat. They think the difference between white and red meat has something to do the age of the animal, whether its free range, or the color of the meat. But it doesn't. Chefs and restaurants say all kinds of things, but the real definition is simple: Mammals are red meat, and birds are white meat. Now, there's another thing we need to explain. We have red meat, but we also have processed red meat. Processed red meat is when red meat is transformed in some way — and that doesn't mean cooking. If you just take a piece of steak and cook it on your barbecue or in the oven, that's not processed meat. Processing is doing things like salting the meat, smoking it, or curing it. Processed meat includes items like bacon, sausages, hot dogs, salami, corn beef, and smoked meat. So, when we talk about red meat and health risks, we are primarily talking about processed red meat. And the people talking about this are the International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC). IARC is a WHO organization, and their mandate is to promote international research on cancer — particularly its cause. One of their programs is a monograph program that evaluates the evidence of the carcinogenicity of specific exposures. Here's where a knowledge of French is going to come in handy. IARC likes to look at something called the hazard, rather than the risk. In fact, every time they have a press conference, they spend about 5 minutes explaining the difference to people, which begs the question: Why not just study risk and be done with it? In English, those words seem pretty much like synonyms. And with the way most people use them, they essentially are. But in French, they are slightly different. Le risque et le hasard don't quite mean the same thing in French. To be fair, their definitions are technically different in English, as well — as those of you who read the dictionary for fun already know. A risk is the probability that something harmful will happen. A hazard is a potential source of harm. For example, a grenade is a hazardous thing to have on your desk, but the risk of it exploding is quite low… unless you pull the pin. IARC is researching hazard. They are evaluating whether something is associated with cancer, not how risky that something is. IARC categorizes everything into groups: carcinogenic to humans, probably carcinogenic, possibly carcinogenic, or not classifiable. There is technically a "not carcinogenic" group, but there's nothing in there. Well, there was one substance in there for a bit, but they removed it. Comment below if you know what that substance is. Here's a hint: You find it in yoga pants. So, IARC has never found anything that doesn't cause cancer. When they go hunting for heffalumps and woozles, they find heffalumps and woozles. To be fair, which I am under no contractual obligation to be, they are a WHO agency, and they are tasked to review substances that are of interest to world governments. As such, they are not going to review stuff that is clearly unrelated to cancer… but still. They put a lot of stuff in Group 1, the (definitely) carcinogenic group. Tamoxifen is in Group 1, and as most of you know, tamoxifen treats breast cancer. It has saved countless lives. Calling it a carcinogen sounds a bit daft, but it is associated with abnormal uterine bleeding and an increased risk of uterine cancer. And the data is pretty uncontroversial, right? Thus, IARC says, 'We are certain this association is true, therefore it goes in Group 1.' But what's the risk of tamoxifen causing uterine cancer? It's 0.3% on the absolute risk scale. It's basically zero and a heck of a lot lower than the breast cancer risk. Clearly, you should take the drug if you have ER-positive breast cancer. So, this is the problem. IARC is saying how certain they are that something is dangerous, but not how dangerous something is. Conclusive data will land a substance into Group 1: carcinogenic. Strong but not conclusive data goes into Group 2a: probably carcinogenic. If there's only some evidence, contradictory evidence, or maybe just animal data, you get sorted into Group 2b: possibly carcinogenic. And Group 3 is used when there's not much data to work off of. Generally, their system works okay. They put tobacco, asbestos, and gamma radiation in Group 1, which makes sense. But then also put stuff like birth control pills, estrogen, and tamoxifen in Group 1. Sure, there is a small increased risk of breast cancer with birth control pills if you have a family history, but it's a pretty small risk and frankly negligible for the general population — plus, it's largely outweighed by the decrease in ovarian cancer risk that comes with using birth control pills. But IARC isn't doing that type of nuanced calculation. They say, 'Estrogen causes breast cancer. The pill has estrogen. The link is proven. The pill goes into Group 1.' So, it was IARC that reviewed all the data about processed red meat and declared it a Group 1 carcinogen. Fun fact: Unprocessed red meat was only put in Group 2A because the data was less solid. For anybody grilling a steak right now, this doesn't apply to you. But not everybody agreed with IARC. The Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium was a group of researchers who also reviewed the data on red meat and came to a completely different conclusion. Their analysis was motivated by two things: 1) the funding they received from the beef industry (this is why we can't have nice things), and 2) they dismissed much of the research because it comes from observational cohorts, not randomized controlled trials. In food science, randomized controlled trials are hard to conduct, because telling people what to eat is often met with "make me." Regardless, the NutriRECS Consortium conclusion was, 'Keep eating meat, as the data is uncertain because most of it is observational.' This conclusion is a bit reductionist to me, because we have a lot of observational data pointing toward health risks associated with processed red meat, and I have a hard time believing all the stuff added to processed red meat is doing us any favors. But let's take the IARC assessment at face value. They are convinced by the hazard or the hasard. But what's the risk? The cancer risk is most clear cut for colon cancer, which is pretty logical. Your lifetime risk of colon cancer is about 4%, assuming you're of general risk with no family history or genetic risk factors. It's actually 4.2% for males and 4.0% for females, according to the 2022 Cancer Statistics from the American Cancer Society. But let's say 4% for everyone — just for simplicity. The IARC report estimated that eating an extra 50 g of processed meat per day, every day, increased your risk of colorectal cancer by 18%. Take 4%, multiply it by 1.18, and you get 4.72%. So, let's say 5% if we're rounding. All this to say, if you eat hot dogs every day of your life, your risk of getting colon cancer goes up by 1 percentage point on the absolute scale. Now, on first instinct you might say, "Pfff, that's nothing. Pass the bratwurst." But 1% on the absolute scale is not trivial. That's thousands of cases per year. Millions of cases over the course of your lifetime in a country of 300 million people. It has some important public health implications. Is the risk high enough for us to stop killing and eating Bambi's mother? Hard to say. It's not negligible, but it's not astronomical either. And there are economic and environmental factors to keep in mind — issues that are often forgotten when we talk about medicine. I will stress one point, though. The IARC estimates of 1% absolute risk increase are about daily consumption of processed meat. You don't need to eat jerky every day of your life. For Medscape, I'm Dr Christopher Labos… with Tobi.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store