Almost impossible to open doors of sinking car due to water pressure
He said the priority should be to stay calm, unbuckle seat belts and lower the windows immediately, as they are the main escape route.
"Get windows down as quickly as possible and exit through them. It is almost impossible to open car doors due to water pressure.
"You generally have 30 to 60 seconds to act before water pressure makes escape significantly harder," he said.
Nor Hisham said electric vehicles (EVs) are similarly affected. Though waterproof and equipped with safety shutdowns, their electronic window controls may fail faster.
"The electronic window controls in EVs may fail faster, so escaping through the window using a tool is even more vital," he said," he added.
He advised that all vehicles be equipped with emergency tools such as a spring-loaded glass breaker and a seatbelt cutter.
"These tools should be mounted within easy reach, such as on the driver's door or sun visor. If stored in the glove box or boot, they may be unreachable in an emergency."
Only side windows, not windshields, should be targeted in such cases, as they are designed to shatter with proper tools.
His remarks follow the discovery of a family of six who were found dead in a Proton Iswara submerged in Sungai Korok, Jitra.
Kedah Fire and Rescue Department Zone 1 chief Ahmad Aminuddin Abd Rahim said the bodies—two adults, three children and a baby—were found huddled at the back and left side of the vehicle.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Tesla's easy money from regulatory credits set to dry up amid weakening sales
FILE PHOTO: A logo of Tesla Motors on an electric car model is seen outside a showroom in New York June 28, 2010. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -A key driver of Tesla's profit is disappearing fast as the U.S. government changes policies on an environmental asset known as regulatory credits. Investors are likelyto have a number of questions for Chief Executive Elon Musk when Tesla reports second-quarter results on Wednesday. Among them are how fast the EV maker can turn a trial robotaxi program into a money-making business, how to avoid a decline in sales for the second year in a row, and Musk's possible political plans. Less sexy, perhaps, is the issue of regulatory credits, which are bought by traditional automakers from electric-vehicle companies to make up for the tailpipe pollution from their gasoline-powered vehicles. But this income segment is crucial for Tesla's finances, having been the main driver of its profit in the first three months of the year. Without the income from those credits, sold to internal combustion engine automakers, Tesla would have reported a first-quarter loss, and Musk may be pressed to say how long he thinks Tesla will be able to sell credits. The U.S. government incentivized zero-emission vehicle production by giving credits to EV makers while imposing hefty penalties on combustion engine vehicle manufacturers that fail to meet emission standards. The traditional automakers can avoid the fines by purchasing credits from companies like Tesla. Recent legislation passed under the U.S. President Donald Trump, however, is set to eliminate fines for automakers that fail to meet National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards — which underpin much of the demand for these regulatory credits. "They are making conventional ICE vehicles more competitive while making EVs less competitive," said Batt Odgerel, a director at the Energy Policy Research Foundation, referring to Congress, Trump and the federal government. Tesla risks losing revenue from the credits as well as market share, he added. The future of two other sources of credits - from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and California's zero-emission vehicle program - is uncertain, with proposed rule changes and political and legal challenges. "That is certainly likely to be a big loss of revenue for automakers" that were selling credits, added Chris Harto, a senior policy analyst at Consumer Reports. Tesla has reported more such sales than anyone else in the automotive sector. FASTER DECLINE THAN EXPECTED One question for Tesla is how fast the credit sales are falling and whether the EPA and California transactions are holding up for now. Other credit producers include smaller EV playersRivian and Lucid. Analysts at William Blair calculate that about three-quarters of Tesla's credit revenue comes from CAFE standards. Within days of the new law, they slashed estimates for Tesla's 2025 credit revenue by nearly 40% to about $1.5 billion. They expect it to plummet to $595 million next year, before being wiped out in 2027. That is a faster decline than seen by many on Wall Street. Tesla's revenue from credit sales will fall 21% this year to $2.17 billion and fall consistently in the coming years, according to 14 analysts polled by Visible Alpha this month. "The elimination of the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) fines requires a reset in expectations," the William Blair analysts said in their note earlier this month. Revenue from credits wasalways expected to dwindle as traditional automakers ramped up production of zero- or low-emission cars, but not so fast. Tesla has acknowledged its financials would be "harmed" if demand and prices of credits dropped. It did not respond to a request for comment. The credits, which have virtually no cost to produce, were instrumental to keeping Tesla profitable several years ago. While surging Model Y demand once pushed Tesla's profit well above regulatory credit income, recent sales declines and aggressive price incentives have meant regulatory credits are once again a key support for profit. Tesla's loss is a win for internal combustion engine automakers such as General Motors, Ford and Honda, and it comes on top of a second win - the early end of a $7,500 U.S. tax credit for EVs, which now will happen at the end of September. (Reporting by Abhirup Roy in San Francisco and Akash Sriram in Bengaluru; Editing by Peter Henderson and Matthew Lewis)
The Star
5 days ago
- The Star
Market in motion: Policy crossroads and the electrification curve
AFTER a record-setting 2024, Malaysia's car market is downshifting, not collapsing, rather correcting as it reaches a pivotal juncture. Total industry volume hit 816,700 units last year, a historic peak, but 2025 forecasts suggest a soft landing, with projections ranging between 750,000 and 792,000 units. The sector might not draw much consumer attention, but industry observers are noticing a more stable gear after the post-pandemic demand surge and backlog clearances. What looks like easing demand is more than a number, underneath it lies a deeper reconfiguration – policy pivots, shifting consumer incentives, and a tightening race towards electrification. Two-speed market emerges The policy landscape is not background noise; it has always been the steering wheel. The first looming change is CKD (completely knocked down) vehicle excise duty treatment, set for January 2026, as planned, would add to car prices, likely creating a spike in advance purchases in late 2025. An intended long-term pricing structure causing short-term demand. The second potentially more transformative shift is the RON95 fuel subsidy rationalisation. Designed to ease the fiscal burden and redirect RM8bil annually toward more targeted support, this policy is set to reshape buyer purchase considerations. As fuel prices reflect global markets, the government is creating stronger incentives for consumers to choose more efficient, lower-emission vehicles. This aligns fiscal reform and green mobility to support a scalable transition in the near term. This is expected to cause a short-term slowdown in car sales. However, economists generally believe that the demand for personal cars will continue, as car ownership remains a necessity for many Malaysians, especially outside cities. Even in towns without access to good public transport, families still see cars as essential for work, school and daily errands, even if fuel prices rise. Lower-income B40 (bottom 40%) and much of the M40 (middle 40%) groups are expected to retain protection, but for upper M40 and T20% (top 20%) consumers, the calculations will change. Rising fuel costs will shift preferences toward hybrids (HEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs), not only as lifestyle choices, but as economic ones as well. Through the rationalisation of fuel subsidies, the transition towards more fuel-efficient and electrified vehicles, including HEVs and EVs, will likely accelerate. The tax breaks for EVs further enhance their appeal, creating a combined positive effect that helps the country's environmental goals. Together, these shifts highlight how reactive the market is to policy change and is producing a two-speed market: one where affordability remains protected for some, while others begin to hedge against rising long-term costs through tech-forward vehicle choices. For manufacturers, the signal is clear, diversification is key. EV momentum, policy uncertainty Electrification is gaining traction, but beyond the headlines, there are subtle nuances. EV registrations in Malaysia jumped 110% year-on-year in February 2025, with 2,160 units sold, surpassing HEVs for the first time. The unmistakable momentum in EVs could account for 5% of total car sales in 2025 – a small but fast-growing slice. Behind the surge is a mix of incentives, expanding model choices, and stronger narratives around environmental responsibility. Proton's 7, for instance, led February's EV chart with 580 units, becoming a homegrown success made possible by Geely partnership support and government backing. For the first time, the idea of a mass-market Malaysian EV doesn't feel aspirational but attainable and parked in driveways. Chinese manufacturers are also throwing out the old playbook. BYD has overtaken Nissan to break into Malaysia's top 10 automakers, while Chery continues its upward trajectory. Their aggressive pricing and bundled service offerings are disrupting the established order of legacy players, forcing them to adapt or risk losing out, and reinforcing Malaysian buyers' preference for value above all. In the wider Asean context, the EV market share grew from 9% in 2023 to 13% in 2024, with Thailand and Indonesia actively aiming to be the top EV hub, while Malaysia aims for xEVs to make up 20% of new car sales by 2030 and a bold goal of 80% by 2050. This shows a regional competition for EV dominance, which could lead to more regional trade and robust supply chains integration across member countries. But even as momentum builds, a crucial policy hurdle looms: Malaysia's current EV tax exemptions expire at the end of 2025. There is, as yet, no clarity on what comes next. Without a signal of continuity, investor confidence and consumer adoption risk stalling, echoing the early 2010s, when HEVs were first introduced, derailing momentum by removing policy support. The success of Malaysia's xEV landscape and long-term electrification goals depend not just on product, but on stable and inclusive policy frameworks that do not alienate but fortify existing automotive supply chains. Hybrids: From stopgap to strategic segment While much attention focuses on EVs, the HEV segment deserves a second look. As charging infrastructure expands unevenly and energy grid concerns persist, HEVs offer a flexible, lower-barrier entry point into electrification. Fuel-efficient, range-assured, and infrastructure-light, they present a practical choice for cautiously optimistic adopters. Recent global trends suggest that HEVs and plug-in EVs (PHEVs) are entering a second wind. As EV demand begins to stabilise after its initial surge and fanfare, HEVs are quietly reclaiming ground, offering continuity where full electrification still feels uneasy, especially among those unwilling to fully rely on chargers, or who value range consistency in semi-urban settings. The bigger insight? Electrification isn't binary. It's a spectrum. HEVs/PHEVs represent practical, scalable steps that can reduce emissions without overburdening infrastructure. They offer access without demanding sacrifice, while building public confidence for deeper electrification later. Policy must meet the moment Malaysia's green mobility agenda is ambitious. Targets of 20% xEV share by 2030 and 80% by 2050 position the nation as a regional contender. Good news: we are well on our way. But ambition needs scaffolding. There's an urgent need for a post-2025 policy roadmap – one that doesn't just extend tax breaks but sets out a coherent long-term vision. Such a framework should: > Ensure continuity for xEV incentives, especially for local production and R&D investments; > Include HEVs, PHEVs, and even fuel-cell EVs (FCEV) in the green transition toolkit; > Provide clear policy signals that don't alienate existing supply chain players; > Coordinate with Asean partners on interoperability, trade integration, and component localisation. With Malaysia chairing Asean in 2025, the opportunity is ripe. As Thailand and Indonesia race ahead in EV manufacturing, Malaysia's strength may lie in integration: establishing itself as the connective tissue between production, assembly, and battery innovation across the region. Conclusion: Calibrating the climb 2025 will not be the year Malaysia's automotive market slows – it is the year it recalibrates. Policy has always played a pivotal role, driving at the heart of purchasing decisions. Electrification is no longer fringe, rather an unfolding reality. The winners of this next chapter won't be the loudest marketers or the cheapest importers. They will be the ones who understand the nature of reform, who localise their offering without losing ambition, and who see the road ahead not as a straight path but a multifaceted climb towards a robust, thriving, economically and environmentally sustainable automotive industry for all. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
Barnama
6 days ago
- Barnama
Toshiba Unveils Automotive Photorelay For 1800V Battery Systems
BUSINESS Toshiba: a new photorelay "TLX9165T" with an output withstand voltage of 1800V (min) suited for high voltage automotive batteries. KUALA LUMPUR, July 17 (Bernama) -- Toshiba Electronic Devices & Storage Corporation (Toshiba) has introduced an automotive photorelay, TLX9165T, designed to support high-voltage battery systems with an output withstand voltage of 1800 volts (V). In a statement, Toshiba said volume shipments of the product, housed in a 10pin SO16L-T package, begin today. The TLX9165T is developed for use in battery management systems (BMS) in electric vehicles (EVs), which monitor battery charge levels and ensure electrical insulation between the high-voltage battery and vehicle body for safe operation. It is also applicable to energy storage systems (ESS) used in renewable energy infrastructure, which operate with voltage levels similar to EV battery systems. Toshiba noted that while 400V battery systems remain standard in EVs, the shift to 800V systems is accelerating to enable faster charging and longer vehicle range. Photorelays in such systems must withstand at least twice the system voltage, which is 1600V or more. The TLX9165T meets this requirement by integrating a newly developed high-voltage MOSFET. The SO16L-T package uses a resin with a Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) of 600 or more, compliant with IEC 60664-1 standards, and offers a creepage distance of 7.5 millimetres (mm) or more on the light receiver side, enabling a rated operating voltage of 1500V. The product retains the same pin pitch and configuration as existing SO16L-T models, allowing designers to reuse printed circuit board layouts. Toshiba will continue to expand its photorelay portfolio for automotive and industrial applications, contributing to the safety and efficiency of high-voltage systems.
