logo
President Ocasio-Cortez isn't as far of a reach as it once was

President Ocasio-Cortez isn't as far of a reach as it once was

The Hill3 days ago
In a move that surprised many on both sides of the political aisle, progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) recently voted — with an overwhelming majority of House Democrats and Republicans — to support funding for Israel's Iron Dome defense system.
To be sure, Ocasio-Cortez's vote made little difference to the final tally. The amendment, sponsored by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), which could have cut U.S. support, was shot down 422-6.
Nevertheless, voting to support continued funding was extremely revealing for what it says about Ocasio-Cortez's grander ambitions.
Indeed, not only did her vote mark a clear break with other members of the progressive 'Squad,' who made up five of the six objections.
More importantly, it positioned Ocasio-Cortez closer to the Democratic mainstream at a time when her name has been brought up as a candidate for the Senate, and potentially even President.
Further, this vote positions the congresswoman well vis-à-vis Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who trails Ocasio-Cortez by 19-points (55 percent to 36 percent) in a poll reported by Politico.
This is not the first time Ocasio-Cortez has broken from the progressive wing in order to strengthen her candidacy for higher office, although it is the most serious.
In 2021, in the wake of another war between Israel and Gaza, Ocasio-Cortez publicly lobbied against Iron Dome funding only to reverse course and vote 'present.' At the time, MSNBC called her actions a bid to 'preserve the possibility of challenging Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.'
Much like that vote, Ocasio-Cortez has maintained her image as a critic of Israel, but one who recognizes its right to exist and to self-defense, albeit her recent statements make it clear that she has an extremely narrow definition of 'self-defense.'
This position, much closer to the wider Democratic Party and national electorate, is also in stark contrast with other progressive rising stars, such as Zohran Mamdani.
Mamdani, the front-runner to be New York City's next Mayor has said Israel should not exist as a Jewish State, expressed support for the anti-Israel Boycott, Divest, Sanctions movement, and who has taken a decisively one-sided view to Hamas's Oct. 7 attacks as well as the ensuring war.
And yet, given the vastly different circumstances between the 2021 vote and present day, Ocasio-Cortez's July 18 vote carries considerably more weight.
For months, even as many have doubted Ocasio-Cortez's viability for statewide or national office, she has travelled the country, drawing thousands to her rallies. Even in red states and districts, voters are coming out to see her.
At one rally in Plattsburgh, N.Y., a district represented by Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik, Ocasio-Cortez reportedly drew a full 10 percent of the entire town.
In that same vein, she has shown herself to be unmatched at fundraising ability.
According to a Wall Street Journal analysis, Ocasio-Cortez has raised $15.4 million this year, nearly twice as much as House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and 23 times more than Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), the longest serving woman in the House.
Moreover, virtually all (99 percent) of Ocasio-Cortez's contributions have come from individuals — her average donation in the second quarter was just $17 — rather than big-spending political action committees.
Tellingly, almost three-quarters (72 percent) of her contributions have come from out of state, with a significant share also being spent on advertising in states other than New York.
In fact, at this point — three years out from the 2028 elections — Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly more popular, marketable and noteworthy than former President Barack Obama was three years before the 2008 election.
Obama, it will be remembered, was not even included in polls during the summer of 2005. His first appearance in a national poll came that December but was still considered such a longshot that his next appearance did not come until October of 2006.
Conversely, the Race to the White House polling aggregator shows Ocasio-Cortez (12 percent) in fourth place, and she's consistently a top five finisher in individual polls. Polymarket even shows her having the second-best odds, 17 percent, behind only Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) at 21 percent.
Additionally, in Democratic primaries, the left-wing of the party tends to dominate, giving her a considerable boost, particularly given the enthusiasm she tends to generate among this group.
Taken together, it increasingly appears that Ocasio-Cortez's growing national appeal supports her growing political ambitions.
However, as I've stated elsewhere, there are legitimate reasons to doubt whether her viability for higher office corresponds with her aspirations.
Aside from her age, she will turn 39 three weeks before the 2028 election, and inexperience, Ocasio-Cortez's political leanings could alienate a sufficient number of swing voters.
The 2024 election indicated that Americans, including a significant number of Democrats, do not want a far-left Democratic Party, and Ocasio-Cortez has historically been squarely on that side.
Likewise, even if she is taking steps to quietly move to the center on some issues, she may be underestimating the potential damage it may do among her own base of support.
Just days after the vote on the amendment, a far-left group defaced Ocasio-Cortez's Bronx office, painting 'Ocasio-Cortez funds genocide' in red paint. Her campaign advisor has also said that they've received death threats due to her vote.
Without downplaying the seriousness and inexcusability of political violence, it is doubtful that the far-left would stay away if Ocasio-Cortez began to be considered a legitimate frontrunner in the next three years.
Furthermore, were she to become the party's nominee for either the Senate or the presidency, there is likely a 'built in' vote among Democratic voters who would support the party, regardless of the candidate.
That's especially true given that she addresses critical needs for Democrats — their lack of fresh ideas, new faces and overall lack of energy.
Of course, this is certainly not to suggest that she will be the nominee. She may very well decide that making a run at the Senate first makes more sense. Her appeal may also begin to fade between now and 2028.
Ultimately, the prospect of Ocasio-Cortez becoming Democrats' 2028 presidential nominee is not out of the realm of reason, and even looks considerably more plausible than it did just one year ago.
Douglas E. Schoen is a political consultant who served as an adviser to President Clinton and to the 2020 presidential campaign of Michael Bloomberg. He is the author of 'The End of Democracy? Russia and China on the Rise and America in Retreat.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thune: Recess appointments on table as Senate faces backlog of nominees
Thune: Recess appointments on table as Senate faces backlog of nominees

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Thune: Recess appointments on table as Senate faces backlog of nominees

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) says that putting the Senate into an extended recess to allow President Trump to make recess appointments to clear the backlog of his pending nominees is an option that's 'on the table.' Thune pushed back on the idea of putting the Senate into an extended recess at the start of the year to allow Trump to fill his Cabinet without having to go through the time-consuming confirmation process. Now, Thune isn't ruling out the idea of opening the way for recess appointments as the Senate faces a huge backlog of 161 nominees, mostly lower-level positions that in past years would have been filled by voice votes or unanimous consent agreements on the floor. 'I think everything is on the table,' Thune told reporters, who said that other options such as rules reform 'make more sense.' 'Fixing the rules, not just for now, but for the long term would be a better solution for it. But at this point right now, I wouldn't say we're taking any options off the table,' he said. Some Republicans are making the argument within the GOP conference that putting the Senate into an extended recess, which would allow Trump to swiftly fill open positions with recess appointments, is the best path forward. Proponents of going the route of recess appointments argue that there are so many nominees currently pending that it would take too long to reach consensus on a rules change to speed up confirmations, and that the rules reform would likely be too modest to have much of an immediate impact on the backlog. 'Whatever it takes,' Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said of adjourning the Senate for several weeks to allow Trump to make recess appointments. 'This is so completely broken, so out of control,' he said of the backlog of nominees. There are several obstacles to putting the Senate into an extended recess. The first is that Thune would need to get at least 50 Republicans to vote for the recess, and already two GOP senators have raised concerns about doing that — Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). Thune could afford no more than three defections from his conference on recess appointments. The second obstacle is that the House would also have to agree to a longer-term adjournment resolution to opt out of pro forma sessions that block the president from making recess appointments. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) hasn't given any indication that he plans to call his members back to Washington to approve an adjournment resolution, but that could change if the Senate decides to set the stage for Trump to make recess appointments.

Many Americans favor Jeffries, Mamdani, Lander among New York politicians: Survey
Many Americans favor Jeffries, Mamdani, Lander among New York politicians: Survey

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Many Americans favor Jeffries, Mamdani, Lander among New York politicians: Survey

Many Americans outside New York favor House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and New York City Comptroller Brad Lander among the state's prominent politicians, according to a new poll from YouGov. The trio each had a one percentage point net favorable rating. Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D), who lost to Mamdani in the mayoral primary, was the least popular politician on the poll's list, at 35 percent underwater. In the poll, Jeffries was viewed as either 'very favorable' or 'somewhat favorable' by 31 percent of respondents, while 'somewhat unfavorable' and 'very unfavorable' views of the Democratic leader came in at 30 percent. Thirty-eight percent said they didn't 'know' Jeffries. Mamdani, who recently shocked political observers with a win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, was seen as either 'very favorable' or 'somewhat favorable' by 30 percent of respondents, compared to 29 percent 'somewhat unfavorable' or 'very unfavorable.' Forty-two percent didn't 'know' who Mamdani was. Lander, who also ran in the mayoral primary, garnered 13 percent favorable and a similar number of unfavorable responses. Seventy-three percent of people didn't know Lander. Some other high-profile Democrats, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D) and Gov. Kathy Hochul, had more respondents in the poll who disliked them, with Ocasio-Cortez three points underwater and Hochul 10 points. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had a 22-point gap between his favorables and unfavorables. While New York remains a safe blue state for most statewide races, it is a key battleground in the 2026 race for the House. Mamdani is the favorite heading into the general election for mayor, with both Cuomo and Mayor Eric Adams running and independents, and has become a rising star in the progressive wing of the Democratic party. Adams has a -21 percent net favorable rating, with only 1 percent holding a very favorable view of the incumbent mayor. The YouGov poll took place from July 14 to 16, with 1,107 respondents and plus or minus 4.1 percentage points as its margin of error.

Danny Davis won't seek reelection after 30 years in House
Danny Davis won't seek reelection after 30 years in House

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Danny Davis won't seek reelection after 30 years in House

Longtime Rep. Danny Davis (D-Ill.) announced Thursday that he will retire from Congress at the end of this term, ending a three-decade run representing parts of Chicago on Capitol Hill. The move was not a surprise: Davis had suggested for weeks that he was ready to step out of the seat. He made the decision public on Thursday morning with a press conference outside of one of his Windy City offices. 'The road has not always been the easiest, but I tell you I've had so much fun doing this job, I would do it for nothing,' Davis told a crowd of reporters and supporters. Davis, 83, is just the latest in a long and growing list of Illinois Democrats who are leaving their seats at the end of next year. In May, Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), 80, announced that she would not seek reelection after 14 terms in the House. And Reps. Raja Krishamoorthi (D-Ill.) and Robin Kelly (D-Ill.) are also giving up their seats to run for the U.S. Senate, where Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) is retiring at the end of 2026 after serving 30 years in the upper chamber. First elected in 1996, Davis is a senior member of the powerful Ways and Means Committee and has also played a leadership role within the Congressional Black Caucus, where he was previously co-chair of the group advocating for young men of color. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) quickly issued a statement praising Davis as 'a tremendous champion for racial, social and economic justice.' 'Danny forged a remarkable legacy and made clear his commitment to public service,' Jeffries said. Davis's decision opens up what is likely to be a large and lively primary contest to replace him, and the veteran lawmaker quickly threw his weight behind La Shawn Ford, a member of the Illinois legislature. But his retirement won't change the dynamics of the broader midterm race for control of the U.S. House, since Chicago is a safe Democratic stronghold. Indeed, Davis won reelection last year with 83 percent of the vote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store