logo
In a tiny European statelet, a Putin ally is running out of road

In a tiny European statelet, a Putin ally is running out of road

CNN4 days ago
FacebookTweetLink When Bosnia's electoral authorities stripped Milorad Dodik of his post as president of the tiny Serb-majority statelet Republika Srpska, he did his best to appear unfazed. Instead, the divisive, genocide-denying nationalist laid down his own challenge to the institutions trying to topple him.
'What if I refuse?' he asked.
Bosnia may be about to find out.
Dodik, a key Balkan ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, has been in and around power in Bosnia since 2006, picking at the seams of the country's patchwork multiethnic state. That state was birthed in 1995 by the Dayton Peace Accords, which halted the violence that spread across the former Yugoslavia as it crumbled in the 1990s, driven by then-Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic's frenzied push to create a 'Greater Serbia.'
Although Dayton halted the Bosnian War, it left the country split along ethnic lines. Bosnia comprises two entities: the Federation, where Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims) share power with Croats, and the Serb-dominated Republika Srpska. Above them sits a mostly toothless central government and a foreign 'High Representative,' who is bestowed with far-reaching powers to implement the deal and keep the peace.
Dodik – who for years has threatened to split from Bosnia and 'reunite' with Serbia – was convicted in February of defying the orders of Christian Schmidt, the current High Representative. Last week, an appeals court upheld his one-year prison sentence and six-year ban on holding office. Although Dodik has avoided prison by paying a fine, Bosnia's electoral commission on Wednesday chose to apply the law which automatically removes an official from office if sentenced to more than six months in jail.
After two decades of raging against Bosnia's state-level institutions, emboldened by his cast of illiberal allies and the lack of pushback from the European Union, many in Bosnia were stunned that authorities moved so quickly to implement the court's ruling.
'Since 2006, Dodik has done his damned best to weaken Bosnia's institutions and hollow out the state from the inside,' Arminka Helić, who fled the wars in the 1990s and now sits in Britain's House of Lords, told CNN. 'I don't think he would have expected, after all his threats and all the noise, that anyone would dare question his position.'
The question now is whether Dodik goes quietly or puts up a fight, she said.
For now, the latter looks more likely. Dodik has threatened to prevent new elections from taking place – if necessary, by force – and has looked to his allies in Belgrade, Moscow and Budapest for support.
'Surrender is not an option,' Dodik said.
Moscow, which has long looked to Dodik to foment trouble in the Balkans, has warned that the region could spiral 'out of control.' Its embassy in Bosnia warned the country was making a 'historic mistake.'
'Has its reputation as the 'European powder keg' been forgotten…?' it asked.
When Dodik first took power, Western diplomats were delighted. After the bloodbath of the 1990s, he seemed to herald an era of stability. For Madeleine Albright, then-US Secretary of State, Dodik was a 'breath of fresh air.'
But since then, Dodik has refashioned himself as an unrepentant nationalist, denying the genocide of 8,000 Bosniaks at Srebrenica in 1995, the war's most notorious massacre, and often meeting with Putin in Moscow.
For years, Dodik has raged against the structures of the Dayton agreement, making it harder for Bosnian institutions to operate in his entity and threatening, ultimately, to split Srpska from the rest of the country.
He has made a nemesis of Christian Schmidt, the current High Representative and a former government minister in Germany under then-Chancellor Angela Merkel. Dodik casts Schmidt as an albatross around Srpska's neck, claiming his powers trample on the will of Serb voters.
Since Dodik's conviction, his European allies have begun to take up his cause. Viktor Orbán, Hungary's prime minister, dismissed the case against Dodik as an attempt by the foreign-installed High Representative 'to remove him for opposing their globalist elite agenda.'
Marko Djurić, Serbia's foreign minister, also said Schmidt was subjecting Dodik to 'a political witch hunt,' using 'undemocratic methods' to thwart 'the will of the people.'
Focusing his complaints against Schmidt is a 'smart strategy,' Adnan Ćerimagić, a senior analyst at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told CNN.
Even defenders of Bosnia's institutions find it hard to justify the powers granted to Schmidt. High Representatives are appointed by a council comprising several Western nations and bestowed with the power to impose annul laws as well as appoint and remove officials. Paddy Ashdown, a former British MP who previously served as High Representative, said the role gave him 'powers that ought to make any liberal blush.'
'No other person in Europe today, at least in the democratic part, has that power: simply to wake up, access his website, and post new laws, decisions and dismiss people,' said Ćerimagić.
Seeking more heavyweight diplomatic support, Dodik has begun to ramp up his overtures to the Trump administration, claiming that he, like the US president, has been subjected to 'lawfare' by an unelected bureaucrat.
Echoing criticisms made by Vice President JD Vance in his infamous Munich speech earlier this year, Dodik has claimed that, in attempting to remove him from office, European authorities are ignoring the will of the people.
He has also attempted to paint himself as a victimized Christian leader in a Muslim-majority country, said Helić.
'He wants to paint himself as a kindred soul sitting out there in a little entity in the Balkans, who is not only going through the same trials and tribulations that President Trump went through, but is also standing there as the sole figure defending the rule of law and Christianity from chaos,' she said.
The electoral authorities' decision against Dodik will take effect once an appeals period expires. Early elections will then be called within 90 days.
But confusion remains over who will enforce the decision if Dodik refuses to stand down, or obstructs the new elections. Although the EU expanded its peacekeeping force in the country in March, those troops did not move to detain Dodik even when a warrant was active for his arrest earlier this year.
Jasmin Mujanović, a senior fellow at New Lines Institute, told CNN that Bosnian and European authorities will face a 'major test' if Dodik attempts to stay in post.
'If you can't deal with the likes of Milorad Dodik, at least from the EU's perspective, you really have no business talking about competing with the likes of (Chinese leader) Xi Jinping or Vladimir Putin or whoever else,' he said.
Although Dodik has threatened to defy the ruling, Mujanović said much of his support base in the entity has withered away. For months, there has been 'elite defection' in Republika Srpska, as the political opposition begins to imagine a 'post-Dodik future.'
Nebojša Vukanović, founder of an opposition party in the entity, said only Dodik's total removal from office could end the 'constant crisis' in Bosnian politics, and would finally 'free the institutions to prosecute those responsible for crime and corruption.' Dodik is under US sanctions for cultivating a 'corrupt patronage network.'
But although some in Srpska may be beginning to imagine political life without Dodik, Helić warned he could take reckless actions – such as attempting full secession from Bosnia – if he feels he has nothing to lose.
'A desperate man might decide to do something that would further destabilize the country,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ben Wallace: Invite Britain to peace talks or Zelensky will be bullied
Ben Wallace: Invite Britain to peace talks or Zelensky will be bullied

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ben Wallace: Invite Britain to peace talks or Zelensky will be bullied

Britain must be invited to peace talks to stop Volodymyr Zelensky from being bullied by Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, Sir Ben Wallace has said. The former defence secretary said the Ukrainian president is a 'brave man' but would need support to push back against Mr Trump and the Russian president who are 'known to be bullies'. Mr Trump will reportedly hold talks with Putin as soon as next week, followed by trilateral talks with Mr Zelensky. European nations are not going to be included in the discussions. Sir Ben said a 'European power' should be 'in the room' to ensure Ukraine is not forced to accept an unsatisfactory deal. Asked if he believed there was a possibility that Ukraine could be 'strong-armed' by Mr Trump into agreeing to something it does not actually want to do, Sir Ben told Times Radio: 'Yes, there is a concern and I think that is why, there are two other nuclear powers in Nato, France and Britain, and I think it is important that in the room should be a European power. 'Because both Trump and Putin are known to be bullies, they bully people all the time, and I don't think two bullies versus Zelensky, who is a brave man, but I don't think would necessarily produce the right outcomes. 'If this is going to be a peace process, those people who have skin in the game, and that is Europeans as well as Ukraine and indeed the United States, should be part of that peace making process.' The announcement of talks has raised hopes that an end to the conflict could be in sight after more than three years of intense fighting. After speaking to the US president on the phone, Mr Zelensky said he believed Russia was 'now more inclined to a ceasefire'. Meanwhile, Yuri Ushakov, Putin's foreign affairs adviser, said a summit could possibly take place next week at a venue that has been decided 'in principle'. He brushed aside the possibility of Mr Zelensky joining the summit, however. It came after Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump's special envoy, met with the Russian president in Moscow for three hours. At the same time, Mr Trump intensified his pressure on Putin with fresh sanctions, declaring Russia to be an 'extraordinary threat' to the United States. Mr Trump hit India with a further 25 per cent trade tariff over its purchase of Russian oil, a vital source of income for the Kremlin. It was not clear how the announcement of the meeting would affect Mr Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face its own economic sanctions. The meeting would be the first US-Russia summit since 2021, when Joe Biden, the former US president, met Putin in Geneva. It would be a significant milestone toward Mr Trump's effort to end the war, although there is no guarantee it would stop the fighting as Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. The war has killed tens of thousands of troops on both sides as well as more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. Western officials have repeatedly accused Putin of stalling for time in peace negotiations to allow Russian forces time to capture more Ukrainian land. Putin previously offered no concessions, claiming he would only accept a settlement on his terms, which Ukraine has said would be tantamount to surrender. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword

Russia Faces A Future Labor Shortage, Which War Makes More Complex
Russia Faces A Future Labor Shortage, Which War Makes More Complex

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Russia Faces A Future Labor Shortage, Which War Makes More Complex

Russia has a dirty little secret. It faces a dire – perhaps even a fatal – population problem. For decades, the country has struggled under deeply adverse demographics, with deaths outpacing births and successive waves of mass emigration. Russian officials have tried desperately to mitigate this downward trajectory, but to little avail. Despite Kremlin programs to boost 'maternal capital' and President Vladimir Putin's focus on population growth as a national priority, the number of Russians has continued to decline. All this, moreover, has been made significantly worse over the past three-plus years by the Ukraine war. The conflict, and the Kremlin's ongoing need for new troops to fuel its fight, has propelled Russians out of the country at record-breaking rates. After the Kremlin's controversial 'partial mobilization' in autumn 2023, the Washington Post described the resulting exodus as 'a tidal wave on scale with emigration following the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution and the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991.' The war is also contributing to a massive decline in working-age males; this summer, Russia passed the grisly milestone of one million killed or wounded as a result of the conflict. In fact, all the available data now paints a picture of a country in full-blown population crisis. Last Fall, Russia's official ROSSTAT agency published statistics showing that the country's birth rate is now at its lowest point in a quarter-century. Russia's Total Fertility Rate is roughly 1.4 births per woman – far below the 2.1 needed for a stable 'replacement' of the national population. The situation has gotten so dire that ROSSTAT recently stopped publishing official figures altogether in an effort to cover up the true state of affairs. But the problem persists, and the latest warning about its potential consequences comes from Russian Labor Minister Anton Kotyakov. At a mid-July cabinet meeting, Kotyakov reportedly told President Putin that the country is now facing an acute labor shortage. By 2030, he detailed, the Russian economy will need at least 2.4 million additional workers. (Other estimates put Russia looming labor deficit at even higher: three million workers or more.) The only real answer is for Moscow to rely more and more heavily on migrant workers. Russia currently has an abundance of those: 10 million or more, by some tallies, with most hailing from Central Asia. But the number has dropped in recent years, and Russia is now facing 'a massive shortfall in migrant labour,' Novaya Gazeta Europe reported last because Putin's increasingly nationalist, draconian governing style has made the country downright hostile for non-Russians. A recent survey by OpenMinds, a 'cognitive defense tech' firm, found a massive surge of online hate speech and negative media attention directed against migrants in the country. These souring sentiments have been matched by government action; in February, the Kremlin launched a 'controlledpeople' register that creates 'stricter measures for foreign nationals violating migration laws' – including shutting off access to jobs, expedited deportations and bank account freezes. All of which has cast an understandable pall over Russia as a labor Moscow might do about this is unclear. It's hard to imagine a kinder, gentler Kremlin policy toward migrants – one that rolls out the welcome mat for exactly the same foreign workers who are being mistreated currently. But even if it somehow does adopt such an open-door approach, Russia's growing international isolation, and mounting fears along its periphery that the conflict with Ukraine will be inevitably followed by more of the same elsewhere, are bound to keep Russian labor the heart of the matter is a stark reality: with his policies, Putin has virtually insured that fewer and fewer people outside of his small gang of loyalists have a real stake in the Russian national project. The consequences of that are bound to be ruinous.

What to know about past meetings between Putin and his American counterparts
What to know about past meetings between Putin and his American counterparts

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

What to know about past meetings between Putin and his American counterparts

What to know about past meetings between Putin and his American counterparts Bilateral meetings between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his U.S. counterparts were a regular occurrence early in his 25-year tenure. But as tensions mounted between Moscow and the West following the illegal annexation of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and allegations of meddling with the 2016 U.S. elections, those meetings became increasingly less frequent, and their tone appeared less friendly. Here's what to know about past meetings between Russian and U.S. presidents: Putin and Joe Biden Putin and Joe Biden met only once while holding the presidency –- in Geneva in June 2021. Russia was massing troops on the border with Ukraine, where large swaths of land in the east had long been occupied by Moscow-backed forces; Washington repeatedly accused Russia of cyberattacks. The Kremlin was intensifying its domestic crackdown on dissent, jailing opposition leader Alexei Navalny months earlier and harshly suppressing protests demanding his release. Putin and Biden talked for three hours, with no breakthroughs. They exchanged expressions of mutual respect, but firmly restated their starkly different views on various issues. They spoke again via videoconference in December 2021 as tensions heightened over Ukraine. Biden threatened sanctions if Russia invaded, and Putin demanded guarantees that Kyiv wouldn't join NATO –- something Washington and its allies said was a nonstarter. Another phone call between the two came in February 2022, less than two weeks before the full-scale invasion. Then the high-level contacts stopped cold, with no publicly disclosed conversations between them since the invasion. Putin and Donald Trump Putin met Trump met six times during the American's first term -– at and on the sidelines of G20 and APEC gatherings — but most famously in Helsinki in July 2018. That's where Trump stood next to Putin and appeared to accept his insistence that Moscow had not interfered with the 2016 U.S. presidential election and openly questioned the firm finding by his own intelligence agencies. His remarks were a stark illustration of Trump's willingness to upend decades of U.S. foreign policy and rattle Western allies in service of his political concerns. 'I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,' Trump said. 'He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be.' Since Trump returned to the White House this year, he and Putin have had about a half-dozen publicly disclosed telephone conversations. Putin and Barack Obama U.S. President Barack Obama met with Putin nine times, and there were 12 more meetings with Dmitry Medvedev, who served as president in 2008-12. Putin became prime minister in a move that allowed him to reset Russia's presidential term limits and run again in 2012. Obama traveled to Russia twice — once to meet Medvedev in 2009 and again for a G20 summit 2013. Medvedev and Putin also traveled to the U.S. Under Medvedev, Moscow and Washington talked of 'resetting' Russia-U.S. relations post-Cold War and worked on arms control treaties. U.S. State Secretary Hillary Clinton famously presented a big 'reset' button to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at a meeting in 2009. One problem: instead of 'reset' in Russian, they used another word meaning 'overload.' After Putin returned to office in 2012, tensions rose between the two countries. The Kremlin accused the West of interfering with Russian domestic affairs, saying it fomented anti-government protests that rocked Moscow just as Putin sought reelection. The authorities cracked down on dissent and civil society, drawing international condemnation. Obama canceled his visit to Moscow in 2013 after Russia granted asylum to Edward Snowden, a former National Security Agency contractor and whistleblower. In 2014, the Kremlin illegally annexed Crimea and threw its weight behind a separatist insurgency in eastern Ukraine. The U.S. and its allies responded with crippling sanctions. Relations plummeted to the lowest point since the Cold War. The Kremlin's 2015 military intervention in Syria to prop up Bashar Assad further complicated ties. Putin and Obama last met in China in September 2016, on the sidelines of a G20 summit, and held talks focused on Ukraine and Syria. Putin and George W. Bush Putin and George W. Bush met 28 times during Bush's two terms, according to the Russian state news agency Tass. They hosted each other for talks and informal meetings in Russia and the U.S., met regularly on the sidelines of international summits and forums, and boasted of improving ties between onetime rivals. After the first meeting with Putin in 2001, Bush said he 'looked the man in the eye' and 'found him very straightforward and trustworthy,' getting 'a sense of his soul.' In 2002, they signed the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty -– a nuclear arms pact that significantly reduced both countries' strategic nuclear warhead arsenal. Putin was the first world leader to call Bush after the 9/11 terrorist attack, offering his condolences and support, and welcomed the U.S. military deployment on the territory of Moscow's Central Asian allies for action in Afghanistan. He has called Bush 'a decent person and a good friend,' adding that good relations with him helped find a way out of 'the most acute and conflict situations.' Putin and Bill Clinton Bill Clinton traveled to Moscow in June 2000, less than a month after Putin was inaugurated as president for the first time in a tenure that has stretched to the present day. The two had a one-on-one meeting, an informal dinner, a tour of the Kremlin from Putin, and attended a jazz concert. Their agenda included discussions on arms control, turbulence in Russia's North Caucasus region, and the situation in the Balkans. At a news conference the next day, Clinton said Russia under Putin 'has the chance to build prosperity and strength, while safeguarding that freedom and the rule of law.' The two also met in July of that same year at the G8 summit in Japan, in September — at the Millennium Summit at the U.N. headquarters in New York, and in November at the APEC summit in Brunei. In an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson last year, Putin said he asked Clinton in 2000 if Russia could join NATO, and the U.S. president reportedly said it was 'interesting,' and, 'I think yes,' but later backtracked and said it 'wasn't possible at the moment.' Putin used the anecdote to illustrate his point about the West's hostility toward Russia, 'a big country with its own opinion.' 'We just realized that they are not waiting for us there, that's all. OK, fine,' he said. —— Associated Press writer Yuras Karmanau contributed. Dasha Litvinova, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store