Sara Duterte questions impeachment case crossing over to 20th Congress
'Kinu-question din namin 'yan, 'yung pag-crossover from the 19th to the 20th Congress,' Duterte said in an interview in The Hague, Netherlands on June 3, Tuesday.
Vice President Sara Duterte is questioning whether the articles of impeachment filed against her in the Senate in the 19th Congress may be taken up by the chamber sitting as an impeachment court in the 20th Congress.
'Kinu-question din namin 'yan, 'yung pag-crossover from the 19th to the 20th Congress,' Duterte said in an interview in The Hague, Netherlands on June 3, Tuesday.
(We're also questioning the crossover of the trial from the 19th to 20th Congress.)
She, however, refrained from expounding the matter, saying that she would leave it up to her legal team.
''Yung lawyers ko na lang magsalita kasi papagalitan na naman ako nila. Papagalitan na naman ako no'n, 'yung mga lawyers ko. So tanong natin 'yung lawyers,' she added.
(I'll let my lawyers talk about that. They will scold me again if I answer, so let's ask my lawyers.)
On Wednesday, Sen. Ronald "Bato" Dela Rosa said that he was behind a resolution on the dismissal of the impeachment case against Sara Duterte.
Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero last week announced that the reading of the impeachment raps would be postponed from June 2 to June 11.
The 19th Congress will adjourn sine die on June 14.
The Vice President went to The Hague to visit her father, former president Rodrigo Duterte, who is currently detained in the Scheveningen Prison for charges of crimes against humanity for the extrajudicial killings during his administration's war on drugs.
While in the Netherlands, Sara Duterte admitted that she was not able to monitor the developments regarding the impeachment proceedings in the Philippines due to the time difference.
'Pero ang pagkakaintindi ko ay maraming procedural lapses na nangyayari na labag sa Constitution,' she added.
(But as far as I understand, there are many procedural lapses happening that are against the Constitution.)
Duterte was impeached by the House of Representatives on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint against her.
She was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. –NB, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
4 hours ago
- GMA Network
Ombudsman asks CA to quash TRO on Gwen Garcia suspension
Ombudsman Samuel Martires has asked the Court of Appeals (CA) to quash the temporary restraining order (TRO) on the preventive suspension his office has meted against outgoing Cebu Governor Gwen Garcia. In a motion filed May 30 but furnished to GMA Integrated News on Saturday, Martires told the CA that the preventive suspension has already been implemented on April 29. The CA issued the TRO on May 15. 'But this Honorable Court closed its eyes to this very basic doctrine that 'when the acts sought to be prevented by the injunction or prohibition have already been performed or completed prior to the filing of the injunction suit, nothing more can be enjoined or restrained… the court by mere issuance of the writ, can no longer stop or undo the act,' Martires said in the motion. On April 29, the Ombudsman suspended Garcia for six months without pay over alleged grave abuse of authority for illegally granting a special permit to a construction company. But Garcia continued to defy the order and obtained a TRO from the CA. The Ombudsman refuted the basis for the TRO saying 'the implementation of this preventive suspension order will impede public service strains credulity. To be sure, petitioner Garcia's suspension will not disrupt the delivery of public services to the people of Cebu.' Martires also said that the prohibition on imposing suspension on government officials during the election period does not apply to the Ombudsman. 'It is a power directly conferred by the Constitution upon the .. Ombudsman, and the exercise of such power is unqualified and not subject to the vagaries of Congress or opinion of government officials… the Local Government Code and the Omnibus Election Code cannot supersede the constitutionally entrenched powers of the Ombudsman' he said. Martires further added that allowing the TRO to remain in effect sets a dangerous precedent. '… it (allows) petitioner Garcia to sidestep the preventive suspension sends a troubling message: that legitimate grievances and complaints of graft and corruption, properly brought before the Ombudsman, can be nullified by a provisional remedy issued in contravention of established rules and jurisprudence… it (erodes) the Ombudsman's prosecutorial and investigative powers,' he said. GMA News Online contacted Garcia for comment but has yet to receive a reply as of posting time. —with a report from Jamil Santos/KG, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Ateneo School of Gov't joins call for VP Sara impeachment trial
The Ateneo School of Government (ASoG) is the latest member of the academe that joined the call for the Senate to proceed with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. 'We stand for ethical leadership in public service,' ASoG said in a statement released on Saturday. 'We call on the Senate to fulfill its Constitutional duty and to proceed with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte,' it said. ASoG's statement came on the heels of San Beda University Graduate School of Law professors' —including retired Supreme Court Associate Justices Adolf Azcuna and Jose Vitug, and graduate school dean Fr. Ranhilio Aquino— call for the Senate to hear the articles of impeachment against the Vice President. Meanwhile, over 100 members of the UP College of Law faculty called on the Senate to start the impeachment trial and "let the truth unfold." In an open letter, the UP College of Law faculty members called on the Senate to comply with the constitutional duty to "forthwith proceed" with the trial. 'Dereliction of duty' ASoG, in its statement, said that 'dispensing the case without the benefit of a trial is a dereliction of duty and a clear attempt to whitewash the accusations raised against a public official.' 'The impeachment process is a sacred duty enshrined in our Constitution. It is the primary mechanism to ensure that our elected officials would remain faithful to their sworn duty to serve the public with dedication, commitment, and, most importantly, integrity,' the Ateneo institution said. ASoG reminded senators that 'they are public servants and their mandate is based on the people's trust.' 'We pray that they would remain true to what the Senate institution stands for: upholding the Constitution, promoting democratic values, and serving the national interest,' it added. In a similar call, the Philippine Political Science Association (PPSA) Board of Trustees urged the Senate 'to fulfill its constitutional mandate by immediately commencing the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Z. Duterte.' 'This long-overdue obligation has been delayed and such inaction raises serious concerns regarding transparency and institutional integrity,' PPSA said. 'While impeachment is inherently political, it is first and foremost a constitutional mechanism for ensuring accountability among the country's highest officials. In a functioning democracy, no public official, regardless of their popularity or political influence, is above scrutiny,' PPSA added. 19th Congress The House impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Articles of Impeachment were transmitted to the Senate the same day but the Upper Chamber adjourned without addressing the case. On February 25, Escudero said the processes related to Duterte's impeachment trial would start on June 2. However, Escudero on May 29 said the presentation of the articles of impeachment before the Senate was moved to June 11 to prioritize the passage of the items in the administration's legislative agenda before the end of the 19th Congress. Escudero said that based on the law, Duterte will be given 10 days, or up to June 21, to respond, which could be extended upon her request. The 19th Congress is set to end on June 30. Senator Francis Tolentino on Monday said the impeachment case against Duterte will be considered 'functionally dismissed' if the Senate impeachment court is unable to finish the trial before June 30. Asked if Duterte's impeachment trial is considered dead or will be pushed through in the 20th Congress, Escudero said the senators will vote on the matter. Duterte was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. The Vice President has denied the allegations. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
21 hours ago
- GMA Network
Retired SC justices sign San Beda statement urging VP Sara Duterte impeachment trial
'There is no sound constitutional and legal basis for any delay in the trial. In fact, an undue delay sends the signal to the nation that mandated processes are thwarted for ulterior ends,' the statement read. Professors at the San Beda University Graduate School of Law have asked the Senate to proceed with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. Among them are retired Supreme Court Associate Justices Adolf Azcuna and Jose Vitug, and graduate school dean Fr. Ranhilio Aquino. Their statement came a day after more than 100 members of the faculty of the University of the Philippines College of Law made a similar call for the Senate to hear the articles of impeachment against the Vice President. 'We, professors of the Graduate School of Law of San Beda University, in our individual capacities, respectfully urge the Senate of the Philippines to proceed with the trial of the Vice President in accordance with Article XI of the Constitution,' the San Beda law professors said in their statement. The members of the faculty said, 'Article XI is clear that when the verified complaint is endorsed by at least one-third of the members of the House of Representatives, trial by the Senate must thereupon proceed.' 'There is no sound constitutional and legal basis for any delay in the trial. In fact, an undue delay sends the signal to the nation that mandated processes are thwarted for ulterior ends,' the statement read. The statement said that accountability is crucial to the workings of a government that should be able to earn the respect and trust of citizens. The trial is a measure of accountability. 'The problem with government, and the resulting lack of public trust in it, has to do with deficits in measures of accountability,' it said. 'We therefore urge the Senate to convene as ordained by the Constitution and to proceed with the impeachment trial of the Vice-President,' it added. On Thursday, over 100 members of the UP College of Law faculty called on the Senate to start the impeachment trial and "let the truth unfold." In an open letter, the faculty members called on the Senate to comply with the constitutional duty to "forthwith proceed" with the trial. "Respectfully, a dismissal at this point would be deemed by the Filipino people as effectively engineered by the Senate's own delay and an abdication of its constitutional role in impeachment," it read. The faculty members also stressed that the 19th Congress should not preempt whether the trial should continue. It said this should be left to the 20th Congress. "For the Senate to decide for the 20th Congress would be undemocratic, contrary to the very rationale underlying the 'non-continuing body' argument," the letter read. The members stressed that a dismissal would mean an abandonment of the Senate's tradition as an august chamber and will alter the country's system of checks and balances. "It will also undermine the people's trust in the Senate as an independent and impartial institution before which the highest officials of the land may demonstrate and prove their fealty to the principles of accountability, public service, and democracy," it said. Section 3(4) of Article XI, which states: In case the verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed. –Jiselle Anne C. Casucian/NB, GMA Integrated News
