Trade deal struck: 15% tariff on EU goods entering US
Trump said that the EU had agreed to purchase $750 billion of American energy and to increase its investment in the US by more than $600 billion above current levels. He also said that the EU would buy military equipment and that no tariffs would be imposed on some goods. Trump implied that the 50% tariff he had imposed on steel and aluminum globally would remain as is, saying it's a "worldwide thing that stays the way it is.
" Other details of the pact were not immediately available.
The agreement will "rebalance, but enable trade on both sides," Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, the executive arm of the EU, said as she sat next to Trump as the leaders made the announcement.
"We made it," Trump said.
Though the agreement appears to be a preliminary one that leaves many questions to be resolved, it could bring a measure of calm to one of the world's most important economic relationships and allay fears of an escalating trade war.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Stylish New Mobility Scooters Available for Seniors (Prices May Surprise You)
Mobility Scooter | Search Ads
Search Now
Undo
The EU last year accounted for nearly $610 billion of the $3.3 trillion in goods imported by the US.
The tariff rate is higher than the 10% tax that Europeans had been angling for, and that Trump applied to British goods. But 15% mirrors the main tariff rate of the US-Japanese trade agreement that was announced last Tuesday, and is lower than the 19 and 20% rates imposed on several Southeast Asian countries.
The deal followed weeks of unpredictable talks.
Even after that announcement, von Der Leyen stressed the importance of continuing talks and trying to reach a negotiated deal. But the EU also continued working to put the finishing touches on a plan to retaliate against Trump's tariffs, one that could be enacted quickly if needed.
Bringing down the tariff on European auto exports was a sticking point for the Europeans, especially Germany, the largest EU economy. European automakers, which sent cars worth 38.5 billion euros ($45bn) to the US last year, have been suffering under the 27.5% tariffs imposed by Trump in April.
Pharmaceutical tariffs were another key issue. the US threatened last month that it could raise tariffs on pharma - Europe's largest export to the US - to 200%. Such a high tax would have been crushing for the industry. The govts did not clarify what would happen to tariffs on pharmaceuticals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
7 minutes ago
- The Hindu
A.P. BJP spokesperson Vinusha Reddy selected for IVLP
BJP State spokesperson Vinusha Reddy has been selected as the Indian delegate for the prestigious International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP), a professional exchange programme funded by the U.S. Department of State. The IVLP, established in 1940, is a foundational exchange programme designed by the U.S. to introduce emerging global leaders to their American counterparts and to U.S. society and culture. She was officially selected and invited by the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi to attend the programme. Ms. Vinusha Reddy made the announcement in the presence of former Rajya Sabha member and senior leader T.G. Venkatesh, Adoni MLA P.V. Pardhasaradhi in Kurnool on Monday. The 2025 IVLP will be held from August 9 to 30 on the theme 'Women in Politics and Civil Society'. Emerging leaders from 20 nations across different regions like Japan, Germany, Poland, Argentina, South Africa, Taiwan, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Singapore, Iraq, Palestine and Lebanon will also attend the programme, which includes civic engagement across multiple cities in the U.S.. Ms. Vinusha Reddy will visit Washington D.C., Boston, Massachusetts, Manchester and Concord, New Hampshire, Columbia, South Carolina, and Salt Lake City, Utah. The programme includes meetings with U.S. policymakers, women leaders, and civil society organisations to discuss initiatives promoting equal pay, fair treatment, and women leadership in political and civic spheres. The IVLP alumni in India include the present Prime Minister Narendra Modi and also former Prime Ministers Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Indira Gandhi. 'I am truly humbled to be selected for this global programme. It reflects India's growing leadership in promoting women's participation in governance under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Modi. I thank the BJP for giving me a platform, mentoring, and offering opportunities at every step since I joined the party. It reflects the way BJP nurtures new voices, especially women leaders, and promotes our global engagement rooted in Indian values,' Ms. Vinusha Reddy said.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran blames US for military aggression, demands compensation in talks
Tehran ruled out direct talks with Washington, accusing it of military aggression alongside Israel during a recent 12-day conflict that derailed nuclear discussions. read more Iran said Monday that any future negotiations would hold the United States responsible for attacks on its nuclear installations, but that direct talks with Washington were out of the question. On June 22, the United States briefly joined Israel's battle against Iran, which had stalled discussions on Tehran's nuclear program. 'In any potential negotiation… the issue of holding the United States accountable and demanding compensation for committing military aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities will be one of the topics on the agenda,' foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told a press briefing on Monday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Asked whether Iran would engage in direct talks with the United States, Baqaei said: 'No.' During the course of the 12-day battle, Israel began an unprecedented onslaught in mid-June that targeted Iranian military and nuclear installations while also striking civilian areas. US troops joined the attack by attacking nuclear facilities in Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. The fighting halted negotiations that had begun in April and were the highest-level communication between Tehran and Washington since the US abandoned a major nuclear agreement with Iran in 2018. Following the battle, Tehran stopped cooperation with the UN nuclear inspectors and wanted assurances against military action before restarting discussions. Washington has slammed Tehran's demand for compensation as 'ridiculous'. Baqaei said on Monday that Iran was committed to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, but criticised what he described as the 'politicised and unprofessional approach' of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The foreign ministry spokesman said that the IAEA's deputy chief is expected in Iran 'in less than 10 days'. Last month, Iran said future cooperation with the UN agency would take on a 'new form'. On July 25, Iranian diplomats met with counterparts from Germany, Britain and France, in the first meeting since the war with Israel ended. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The three European powers are parties to the 2015 nuclear deal, which unravelled after the US withdrew during Trump's first term. In recent weeks, the trio has threatened to trigger sanctions if Tehran failed to agree a deal on uranium enrichment and cooperation with UN inspectors. Iran has repeatedly called reimposing sanctions 'illegal' and insisted on its right to enrich uranium. Israel and Western nations accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has consistently denied.
Economic Times
7 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Pakistan's Asim Munir crafts a new gambit against India
Synopsis Tensions escalate in South Asia as Pakistan, under Field Marshal Asim Munir, considers a multi-front strategy against India. Renewed US support emboldens Pakistan, potentially involving Bangladesh and India's northeast. Pakistan's military spokesman signals intentions to strike deeper within India, starting from the east. Agencies Asim Munir In a region long accustomed to fraught borders and historical enmities, a potentially dangerous new front is emerging in South Asia. At the center of this shifting strategic chessboard is Field Marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan's army chief and the de facto ruler of the country. Bolstered by renewed American support and emboldened by shifting geopolitical currents, Munir appears to be recalibrating Pakistan's strategy toward India.A recent interview with The Economist of a spokesperson for Pakistan's military provided a telling glimpse into this strategy. Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry told The Economist that in a future conflict, 'we'll start from the East,' a remark that can be interpreted as a signal of intentions to open a new front against India through the eastern corridor, where the regime change in Dhaka has significantly altered the security landscape."Field Marshal Munir wants to bring it to the negotiating table," The Economist wrote. "Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, is determined to resist and has vowed to respond to any more terrorist attacks with further military action. Asked how Pakistan would react to that, its military spokesman says it would begin by striking deeper within India. 'We'll start from the East,' he says. 'They also need to understand that they can be hit everywhere.' The Field Marshal's grip on power may have increased since May. But so too have the risks of a bigger clash between South Asia's nuclear strongmen." A new axis in Dhaka Until early 2025, India enjoyed a relatively stable and cooperative relationship with Bangladesh under the leadership of Sheikh Hasina. Her administration had proven to be a bulwark against Islamist extremism and a reliable partner in cross-border security coordination. However, her ouster last year, followed by the rise of hardline Islamist factions, has undone years of diplomatic new political leadership in Dhaka has signaled a softening stance toward Pakistan, reviving old Islamist solidarity rhetoric and quietly reactivating links with Pakistan's intelligence services. Signs of renewed cooperation between radical groups in Bangladesh and Pakistan's deep state have emerged in the form of arms trafficking, madrassa activism and movement of operatives in the Chittagong Hill Tracts and border areas adjacent to India's northeast. While the statement from Pakistan's military spokesman could be dismissed as rhetorical bravado, the regional shifts suggest it may represent a broader strategic calculation that aims to surprise and overwhelm India by exploiting vulnerabilities in the east. Munir's strategic plan Field Marshal Munir's actions over the past year reveal a deliberate attempt to re-anchor Pakistan's position in global geopolitics. His overtures to the United States have begun yielding tangible results. His June 2025 luncheon with US President Donald Trump at the White House, followed by Pakistan awarding its highest civilian award upon General Michael Kurilla of CENTCOM, indicates a strategic reset in US-Pakistan relations. Kurilla had earlier called Pakistan as a "phenomenal partner in counterterrorism". Trump's mocking criticism of India -- including the imposition of new tariffs and the farcical suggestion that US companies would drill for oil in Pakistan which Pakistan can sell to India -- has emboldened Munir's camp. For a Pakistani military used to leveraging superpower patronage, this signals a return to relevance. Munir is now clearly positioning himself as a regional player who can assist Washington's objectives in Iran, the Islamic world, and possibly even in normalising relations between Muslim countries and patronage gives Munir both the diplomatic cover and strategic confidence to challenge India in unconventional ways, and perhaps even consider an expansion of conflict zones beyond Kashmir. India's eastern theatre The logic behind opening a front in the east is grounded in Pakistan's need to offset India's superior conventional power. By involving Bangladesh or using its territory to facilitate proxy operations, Pakistan could stretch Indian military resources and force the Indian leadership to divide its focus and assets between two fronts. The northeastern states of India, already dealing with porous borders, demographic sensitivities, and sporadic insurgencies, present exploitable cultural and linguistic proximity in the border regions of West Bengal, Assam, and Tripura allows operatives to move with a level of deniability not available in the west. Unlike the heavily militarised Line of Control, the eastern frontier is not bristling with weapons and surveillance to the same degree. For Pakistan, this opens an opportunity for deniable attacks, possibly through sleeper cells or cross-border militants supported by Bangladesh-based jihadi is not merely a tactical shift but a strategic evolution toward hybrid warfare, incorporating disinformation, cyber-operations and irregular warfare in areas where India's response infrastructure is still catching up. The shadow of Operation Sindoor India's most recent military operation, Operation Sindoor, was a significant departure from its earlier doctrine of strategic restraint. In response to coordinated terror attacks, Indian forces launched missile strikes deep into Pakistani territory, targeting nine terror camps and disabling nearly a dozen air bases. The action demonstrated both technological superiority and a willingness to escalate beyond the conventional limits of conflict the deterrence effect of Operation Sindoor appears to be limited. The Pakistani establishment, particularly Munir, seems to have interpreted it as a warning shot rather than a constraint. This may have catalysed Pakistan's shift toward asymmetric warfare, with the goal of circumventing India's conventional dominance. Indian intelligence agencies are reportedly taking the eastern threat seriously. Surveillance has increased, with military intelligence and border forces in Assam and Meghalaya placed on alert. Diplomatic engagement with key regional allies, especially ASEAN countries and Gulf states, has been strengthened to deny Pakistan broad-based Islamic world support in the event of another confrontation. Munir's pursuit of a multi-front strategy against India, involving not just Kashmir but potentially Bangladesh and India's vulnerable northeast, marks a dangerous evolution in South Asian geopolitics. His confidence is rooted in a reinvigorated relationship with the US, domestic consolidation of power and the perception that India may be overstretched or distracted. But this is a high-risk gamble. For India, the imperative is to preempt such moves with strategic foresight, integrated intelligence operations and a recalibrated eastern defense posture.
