
Selena Gomez Could Lose Title of 'Most Followed Woman' on Instagram Amid Deportation Video Backlash
Selena Gomez's reign as the most followed woman on Instagram could be in jeopardy, with the singer and actress reportedly losing over 700,000 followers in the last month.
With a staggering 422 million followers, Gomez took the crown from Kylie Jenner back in March 2023.
However, recent events including backlash over her emotional video about deportations and the critical reception of her movie Emilia Pérez , have led to a significant drop in her follower count.
Earlier this week, Gomez shared a tearful video on Instagram in response to President Donald Trump's mass deportations of undocumented immigrants.
The emotional clip quickly sparked a backlash, particularly from Republican and MAGA supporters, including U.S. Senate candidate Sam Parker, who went as far as calling for the Bad Liar singer—who is of Mexican descent—to be deported.
Although Gomez deleted the video shortly after posting it, the damage had been done. In the 24 hours following the video's release, she lost over 44,000 followers in a single day.
By the end of the week, Gomez had shed a total of 116,833 followers, with her overall loss reaching 808,500 over the past 30 days.
CritiqueJeu , an app analytics firm, tracked the decline in Gomez's social media following and cited her involvement in Emilia Pérez as another factor contributing to the dip.
The film, despite earning 13 Academy Award nominations, has been heavily criticized, especially by Mexican audiences, who have criticized Gomez's Spanish language skills and the film's portrayal of their culture.
The backlash, combined with the response to her deportation video, has made 2025 a rocky start for the actress, whose personal and professional controversies are affecting her public image.
As the criticism mounted, a source close to the star explained to MailOnline that Gomez's decision to delete the video was motivated by her concern that it showed "weakness." The source added, 'She realizes that she cannot go up against a Republican backed nation - many of whom are loyal customers of her Rare Beauty brand. She does not wish to alienate. She is going to stay out of politics and in her own lane after that drama.'
Despite her passion for advocating on behalf of immigrants, Gomez reportedly felt that the emotional nature of her video led to it being perceived as counterproductive. 'She realized that the message and video actually turned out to be counterproductive due to her emotional state in the video,' the source continued.
On social media, critics were quick to slam the video, accusing Gomez of being "shallow" and "narcissistic." British journalist Piers Morgan also chimed in, calling it "a new level of absurd celebrity narcissism."
Despite these challenges, Gomez has continued to speak out about her Mexican-American heritage and the importance of immigration reform.
In a 2019 Time magazine essay, she shared her family's immigration story, which began in the 1970s when her aunt crossed the border from Mexico to the U.S. in the back of a truck. She noted, 'As a Mexican American woman, I feel a responsibility to use my platform to be a voice for people who are too afraid to speak.'
As for her massive Instagram following, it remains to be seen whether the loss of followers will be permanent or if Gomez will find a way to recover.
Whatever happens, it's clear that Selena Gomez's journey as a public figure continues to be a whirlwind of highs and lows.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
23 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Elon Musk apologizes to Donald Trump: Tesla founder humbled as he's forced to say sorry, admitting he 'went too far' in Trump-Musk feud
Elon Musk has publicly expressed regret over some of the posts he made about President Donald Trump, acknowledging that they "went too far." The remarks, posted on Musk's social media platform, X, marks the latest shift in the tumultuous relationship between the billionaire tech entrepreneur and the US president. Musk's statement of remorse follows a bitter and public exchange between the two men. I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 Musk, who played a key role in Trump's 2024 election campaign, using his vast financial resources to help secure a Republican victory, had recently criticised Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' a massive tax and spending package making its way through Congress. Musk's sharp criticisms of the bill and his departure from his government role sparked a fiery response from Trump. Trump, speaking to reporters in early June, expressed his disappointment with Musk, saying, "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore." He also took to Truth Social, accusing Musk of "going CRAZY!" and suggesting the termination of Musk's government subsidies and contracts. In response, Musk accused the Trump administration of suppressing the release of the so-called Epstein Files, and he supported calls for Trump's impeachment. These posts have since been deleted. The social media feud came to a head when Trump declared their relationship over. Trump appeared to soften his stance on Monday, stating, 'I wish him well,' adding that he would not have a problem with Musk calling him. While Trump hinted that he may move his Tesla off-site, he made it clear that the Starlink service provided by Musk's SpaceX would remain in use at the White House. Musk's statement of regret, without specifying which posts he was referring to, indicates a potential de-escalation in tensions. Shares of Tesla rose by 2.7% following Musk's post, according to local media reports. While the two powerful men's public feud has sparked intense debate, Musk's apology suggests that he may be open to repairing his relationship with the President, despite their differences over policy and the handling of the recent protests.


Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Mayor Karen Bass imposes LA curfew amid clashes over Trump's immigration raids
Listen to article Several US cities braced for protests on Wednesday against President Donald Trump's sweeping immigration raids, as parts of the country's second largest city Los Angeles spent the night under curfew in an effort to quell five days of unrest. The Governor of Texas, Republican Greg Abbott, said he will deploy the National Guard this week, ahead of planned protests. Protesters and police in Austin clashed on Monday. Trump's extraordinary measures of sending National Guard and Marines to quell protests in Los Angeles has sparked a national debate on the use of military on US soil and pitted the Republican president against California's Democrat governor. "This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers and even our National Guard at risk. That's when the downward spiral began," California Governor Gavin Newsom said in a video address on Tuesday. "He again chose escalation. He chose more force. He chose theatrics over public safety. ... Democracy is under assault." Newsom, widely seen as preparing for a presidential run in 2028, and the state of California sued Trump and the Defense Department on Monday, seeking to block the deployment of federal troops. Trump in turn has suggested Newsom should be arrested. Hundreds of US Marines arrived in the Los Angeles area on Tuesday under orders from Trump, after he also ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard to the city. Marines and National Guard are to be used in the protection of government personnel and buildings and not in police action. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the deployments were not necessary as police could manage the protest, the majority of which have been peaceful, and limited to about five streets. I issued a curfew starting tonight at 8pm for Downtown Los Angeles to stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the President's chaotic escalation. If you do not live or work in Downtown L.A., avoid the area. Law enforcement will arrest individuals who break the curfew, and… — Mayor Karen Bass (@MayorOfLA) June 11, 2025 The curfew will run through 6 am local time on Wednesday and will last "for several days," Bass said at a separate press conference. It will only be in effect within a roughly one square mile area in downtown that includes the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and City Hall. Earlier Tuesday, Trump pledged to "liberate" the US's second largest city during remarks delivered to Army troops at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, claiming the protests sparked by his mass deportation campaign are "a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and on national sovereignty, carried out by rioters bearing foreign flags with the aim of continuing a foreign invasion of our country." He also said California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Bass are "incompetent, and they paid troublemakers, agitators and insurrectionists. They're engaged in this willful attempt to nullify federal law and aid the occupation of the city by criminal invaders." The president attempted to walk back those comments as well as the broader claim that the protesters are being paid when asked by reporters about his remarks. "I didn't say the governor or the mayor. I said somebody's paying them, I think. And if they're not, they're just troublemakers. What can I tell you? But I believe somebody's paying them," he said. Trump has deployed roughly 4,000 US National Guardsmen and 700 Marines to the streets of Los Angeles in defiance of warnings from Newsom and Bass that the action would only serve to further inflame already-heightened tensions. A federal judge denied Newsom's request for a restraining order to block what Newsom described as Trump's "unlawful militarization of Los Angeles." Senior District Judge Charles Breyer with the Northern District of California instead set a Thursday hearing on Newsom's request. Protests erupted Friday after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents raided local businesses and detained hundreds of people suspected of living in the US illegally. The Trump administration has continued to carry out the raids in defiance of the community's opposition. Critics of the raids say ICE is going after law-abiding undocumented immigrants, a vital part of the community and the local economy, rather than the criminals that Trump pledged to deport while campaigning last year to return to the White House. Read: Trump defends LA Marines deployment amid more protests Previously, hundreds of US Marines were expected in Los Angeles on Tuesday after President Donald Trump ordered their deployment in response to protests against immigration arrests and despite objections by state officials. The 700 elite troops will join around 4,000 National Guard soldiers, amping up the militarization of the tense situation in the sprawling city, which is home to millions of foreign-born and Latino residents. The small-scale and largely peaceful demonstrations — marred by sporadic but violent clashes between police and protesters — were entering their fifth day. In downtown LA's Little Tokyo neighbourhood at night Monday, scores of protesters faced off with security officials in riot gear, some shooting fireworks at officers who fired back volleys of tear gas. Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X that US Marines "shouldn't be deployed on American soil facing their own countrymen to fulfill the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President. This is un-American." But Trump has branded the LA protesters "professional agitators and insurrectionists." "They're meant to be protecting us, but instead, they're like, being sent to attack us," Kelly Diemer, 47, told AFP. "This is not a democracy anymore." LA police have detained dozens of protesters in recent days, while authorities in San Francisco and other US cities have also made arrests.


Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Proposed Finance bill moved in Senate
ISLAMABAD: Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, Tuesday, moved a copy of the proposed federal budget in the Senate amidst strong protest by the opposition that dismissed the legislative draft as 'anti-poor.' In the brief Senate sitting, the finance minister laid a copy of the proposed Finance Bill 2025, shortly after presenting it in the National Assembly, in the Senate, in accordance with the relevant constitutional provisions, following which, Chairman Senate Yousaf Raza Gilani directed the senators to share their recommendations, if any, on the bill, latest by Thursday, 12 June, 5 pm. The chairman then referred the bill to the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue with the direction to finalise its recommendations on the bill by Friday, 13 June. Amidst continued sloganeering against the proposed federal budget, the chairman Senate adjourned the House till Friday. The Upper House of the Parliament can hold extensive debate on the finance bill and devise recommendations accordingly, but it has no significant role in budgetary legislation, since it is completely up to the National Assembly to either completely or partially accept those recommendations or reject them, partially or completely. Article 73 of the Constitution of Pakistan, which deals with parliamentary business with respect to money bills, reads a money bill shall 'originate in the National Assembly: Provided that simultaneously when a money bill, including the finance bill containing the annual budget statement, is presented in the National Assembly, a copy thereof shall be transmitted to the Senate which may, within 14 days, make recommendations thereon to the National Assembly.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025