To prioritize defense, Germany to cut development aid – DW – 06/30/2025
Germany's draft federal budget for 2025 includes sweeping cuts. The Economic Cooperation and Development Ministry (BMZ) is set to receive €10.3 billion ($12.1 billion) — nearly a €1 billion less than in 2024. It's the second consecutive year that the budget has been reduced.
A glance back at 2022 underscores the scale of the decline: At that time, Germany was still spending €13.8 billion on development aid.
Michael Herbst, chair of the umbrella organization VENRO, which represents about 140 development NGOs in Germany, illustrated the human cost of these dramatic cuts amid growing global conflict. "More than 100 million people are displaced," Herbst said. "At the same time, more and more donor countries are pulling back." That's why, he said, Germany needs to ensure stable funding for development cooperation and humanitarian aid. But the opposite is occurring.
Germany's cuts come at a time when US President Donald Trump, early in his second term, has also initiated deep reductions in development aid, reportedly slashing about 80% of funding.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization agreed at its recent summit on June 25, 2025, that each NATO member state should spend 5% of its gross domestic product on defense annually.
Against this backdrop, the global decline in development aid stands out all the more. The consequences are already becoming clear, especially in the field of humanitarian assistance.
The United States has completely withdrawn its support for the UN-administered relief fund. Faced with sweeping international cutbacks, emergency aid coordinator Tom Fletcher says he is being forced to shut down numerous programs for the world's poorest.
Weeks ago, Fletcher warned that the impact on people in need and suffering from hunger would be devastating. Instead of the originally projected $44 billion, Fletcher now expects just $29 billion to be available for distributing food, water, medicine, shelter, and other essential aid.
Fletcher said the reduced funding would enable 114 million people to be reached — down from the 180 million originally planned.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Because of the sharp reduction in the BMZ budget, Germany's official development assistance ratio fell below its self-imposed goal of 0.7% of gross national income in 2024. It had consistently remained above that threshold since 2020.
Humanitarian emergency aid is being slashed by 53%, to about €1 billion. VENRO chair, Herbst, says the move is short-sighted: "As the world's third-largest economy, Germany can and must take responsibility here. It cannot continue cutting budgets in these areas." However, his push for a reversal was unsuccessful.
As an export-driven nation, Germany depends on strong international ties and global stability. "The German economy benefits from a solid reputation and reliable relationships in countries of the Global South. That helps secure jobs here at home, as well," Herbst points out.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The NGOs Welthungerhilfe and Terre des Hommes give the federal government a poor overall assessment. However, the coalition agreement between the governing center-right Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and center-left Social Democratic Party describes the cuts to development and humanitarian aid as "appropriate."
In response, the aid organizations counter: "That contradicts the government's own stated goal of ensuring sustainable humanitarian funding — especially at a time when other donor countries are pulling out."
All the same, Development Minister Reem Alabali Radovan, a Social Democrat, said Germany remained committed to its global responsibilities — "despite painful budgetary constraints on development spending imposed by the coalition agreement."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Germany updates: Berlin seeks deportation deal with Taliban – DW – 07/03/2025
Germany's interior minister is calling for direct talks to deport Afghan migrants who were convicted of crimes. The German coalition failed to agree on reducing an electricity tax. Follow for more headlines from Germany. German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has said that needing third parties to negotiate with Afghanistan's rulers, the Taliban, is "not a permenant solution." His remarks represent a shift in Germany's policy of not directly talking to the Taliban. Also dominating the headlines in German media today is the coalition government's failure to reach a deal on reducing the electricity tax. Meanwhile, a new survey shows the majority of Germans want a ban of a rule that allows young teens to drink.A Forsa survey commissioned by commercial health insurance company KKH showed that 65% of Germans were in favor of abolishing a rule that allows young teenagers to drink alcohol. Under the supervised drinking rule, teens as young as 14-year-olds could buy and consume beer and wine if they are with a legal guardian. According to the poll, 52% also support raising the legal age for drinking beer and wine from 16 to 18. The survey included more than 1,000 participants aged 18 to 70 from across Germany. Health Minister Nina Warken has voiced support for an initiative by ministers from German states calling for a ban supervised drinking. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Guten Morgen! We're watching the news in Germany today from Bonn, where the weather has cooled down again after an intense heat wave. Today, Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz is scheduled to speak at a banking conference in Berlin, and the foreign minister is meeting with his Chinese counterpart. We'll also highlight in this blog some explainers and analyses from our colleagues across DW.
DW
15 hours ago
- DW
Federal court blocks Trump's effort to deny asylum at border – DW – 07/02/2025
A federal court found the US president cannot categorically deny asylum to migrants who cross the US-Mexico border. The US government can appeal the ruling. A federal judge on Wednesday blocked US President Donald Trump's asylum ban at the US-Mexico border. US District Judge Randolph Moss ruled that Trump overstepped his authority by declaring illegal immigration an emergency and bypassing existing legal processes. However, he stayed the ruling for two weeks to give the government time to appeal. As part of his immigration crackdown, Trump declared that the situation at the southern border constituted an invasion of the United States. He signed a proclamation on the day of his inauguration, saying he was "suspending the physical entry" of migrants and their ability to seek asylum until he decides the situation is over. But Moss found that Trump had exceeded his authority in suspending the right to apply for asylum. "Nothing in the [Immigration and Nationality Act] or the Constitution grants the president or his delegates the sweeping authority asserted in the proclamation and implementing guidance," Moss wrote in his ruling. In his 128-page opinion, he added that the president was not granted "an extra-statutory, extra-regulatory regime for repatriating or removing individuals from the United States, without an opportunity to apply for asylum" or other humanitarian protections. On Wednesday, the White House announced that Border Patrol made 6,070 arrests in June. This number is down 30% from May and set a pace for the lowest annual total since 1966. The ruling is a setback for Trump, who regained the White House by promising a sweeping immigration crackdown. Trump and his allies argue that the asylum system has been abused. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The American Civil Liberties Union brought the challenge to Trump's asylum ban in February on behalf of three advocacy groups and migrants denied access to asylum, arguing that the broad ban violated US laws and international treaties. "The decision means there will be protection for those fleeing horrific danger and that the president cannot ignore laws passed by Congress simply by claiming that asylum-seekers are engaged in an invasion," said Lee Gelernt, who argued the case for the ACLU. There was no immediate reaction from the White House, the Justice Department, or the Department of Homeland Security.
DW
18 hours ago
- DW
Amid severe heat wave, EU pitches flexible 2040 climate goal – DW – 07/02/2025
The EU has unveiled its new climate target, a 90% reduction in emissions by 2040. But not all member states are on board, while a provision to outsource part of the climate efforts abroad has generated controversy. With large parts of Europe gripped in a record-breaking heat wave, the European Commission has proposed that the bloc reduce its net greenhouse gas emissions 90% by 2040. That's in comparison to levels back in 1990, and on track to meet the target of net-zero emissions by 2050. The binding emissions reduction target was first proposed last year, and came after months of tough negotiations among member states. The existing target requires the EU to reduce net emissions by at least 55% by 2030; in May, the Commission said the bloc had already cut climate-warming emissions by 37%. The new target will give certainty to investors, "strengthen industrial leadership of our businesses, and increase Europe's energy security," the commission said in a statement on Wednesday. But not all member states are on board with the plan, and a controversial flexibility clause on buying carbon credits on international markets has activists crying foul. Under the proposal, EU member states could purchase international carbon credits on green projects in third countries from 2036 onward, using them to offset up to 3% of the benchmark 1990 emissions. "This can provide a safety-net to ensure a 90% target is achievable as we are closing on climate neutrality," the commission said. But activists have said the flexibility clause was included due to pressure from member states like France and Germany, along with major industry lobbyists, at the cost of reduced investments at home. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Mathieu Mal, a climate and agriculture expert at the European Environment Bureau, said the 3% flexibility clause was a "bad idea" for a variety of reasons. "What this means is that the EU would be investing in other countries outside the bloc to reduce their emissions, and that's problematic because we need these investments within the EU. We also have our sectors to decarbonize and we need funds for energy transformation here," he said. "Every country across the world needs to commit to climate action. If the EU counts these carbon credits towards its own goals then what about the countries who also need to reduce their emissions and achieve their own targets?" In May, the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change advised against outsourcing part of the bloc's climate efforts, saying it "risk[s] diverting resources from domestic investments and could undermine environmental integrity." It called on all reduction toward net zero to be "achieved through domestic action." Critics of the clause have called it a ruse for heavy polluters who find it cost intensive to decarbonize in Europe and easier to invest in projects abroad that lack sufficient oversight. "The use of carbon credits is simply magical thinking for a bloc unwilling to live up to its responsibility for causing the climate catastrophe we're already living through," said Friends of the Earth Europe. "Carbon credits have a long record of failure and ultimately do not stop Europe emitting more than its fair share of carbon emissions." Speaking with DW, Mal highlighted previous concerns about green investments in third nations. "There have been lots of issues in the past. Projects carried out in some countries often don't have high standards, they often remain just on paper. There are questions if they were ever materialized," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Commission's new target has the backing of at least some of the EU member states. As Denmark takes over the EU's rotating presidency this week, it has listed the 2040 target as one of its top priorities. "Anyone who says that the green transformation cannot be achieved with high ambition and social justice at the same time should come to Denmark," said Villy Sövndal, a lawmaker with the European Greens group and Denmark's former foreign minister. "Competitiveness in the 21st century is not linked to fossil fuels but to the advancement of the energy transition," Pedro Sanchez, Spain's socialist prime minister, said last week at the EU summit in Brussels. But other countries consider the 2040 target to be too ambitious. Italy has said an 80-85% target for 2040 would be more realistic, and the Czech Republic said Wednesday it disagreed with the commission's proposal. Speaking at the EU summit, French President Emmanuel Macron also indicated it was still too early to agree to setting the target for 2040. "The reality is that I want to get my 2030 target right first," he said, "and take the democratic and political time to convince others to get to 2040." While Germany and France both back the 3% flexibility clause, France expects an even higher percentage of the overall goal to be met by purchasing international carbon credits, with some reports suggesting up to 10%. According to Teresa Ribera, the EU's green transition chief, some political groups in the EU continue to deny climate change whereas others lack courage in confronting their constituents about steps required to combat the problem. "Political courage is needed to understand that there is a difficulty," she said in an interview with on Wednesday. "You need to face it with honesty." The EU's climate plans have raised concerns around the costs of green transition and disruption to industrial growth and livelihood, if decarbonization is carried out without adequate support. However, Ribera believes there is no time to waste. "Sorry, but it'll be much more expensive if we don't act," she said. According to a Eurobarometer survey released this week, 85% of Europeans believe climate change is a serious problem and tackling it should be a priority, while 77% agreed that the cost of damage due to climate change is much higher than the investment needed for a net-zero transition. "As European citizens increasingly feel the impact of climate change, they expect Europe to act," the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Wednesday. The proposal still needs the stamp of approval from the European Parliament and member states, and Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said he hoped an agreement could be reached before the UN climate change conference in Brazil in November. But time is short, and there are still doubts as to whether the proposal in its current form will be adopted as law.
