Tanzania shuts down access to X again, marking second blockade in under a year
The Tanzanian government reportedly restricted access to the X platform (formerly Twitter), raising concerns about digital freedoms.
NetBlocks confirmed the disruption on May 20, 2024, indicating service providers nationwide blocked the platform.
Critics highlight increasing digital censorship in Tanzania, evidenced by its tightening regulations since 2017.
This marks the second time in less than a year that Tanzania has blocked access to the platform, raising ongoing concerns about digital freedoms in the country.
The internet observatory group NetBlocks confirmed the disruption on Tuesday, May 20, reporting that X had become inaccessible across major internet service providers in the country.
" Confirmed: Live metrics show X (formerly Twitter) has become unreachable on major internet providers in Tanzania," the group said in a statement posted online.
According to reports by Kenyans.co.ke, the shutdown may have been triggered by a cybersecurity breach involving the official X account of the Tanzania Police Force (TANPOL). Suspected hackers allegedly infiltrated t he account and used it to spread false information about President Samia Suluhu Hassan.
While the government has not publicly explained the decision, the move has once again raised serious concerns about digital censorship and the future of online freedoms in Tanzania.
Human rights advocates and press freedom groups have increasingly criticized the country's tightening grip on digital platforms, warning that such actions undermine free expression and democratic accountability.
Tanzania's long run with social media ban
Tanzania has, over the years, steadily expanded its control over digital spaces by imposing various restrictions on social media usage and online expression.
A key moment in Tanzania's tightening control over digital space came in 2017 with the passage of the Electronic and Postal Communications (Online Content) Regulations, later amended in 2020 to criminalise content deemed obscene, hateful, or disruptive.
Ahead of the 2020 general election, the government blocked social media and messaging apps and restricted SMS use, further curbing online communication.
During this period, platforms considered essential and accessible—such as Twitter (now X), WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram—were either blocked or restricted.
In 2024, Tanzanian Internet Service Providers—including Airtel, Vodacom, Halotel, Tigo, and TTCL—blocked access to X (formerly Twitter), rendering the platform inaccessible nationwide and sparking renewed concerns over digital freedom.
The move followed police claims that opposition party CHADEMA was using Zoom to coordinate protests involving small groups targeting offices and police stations.
Earlier this month, the government intensified its enforcement of the 2017 online content law by shutting down over 80,000 websites, social media accounts, blogs, and other platforms. While authorities cited the protection of children's mental health, critics saw it as the country's largest and most troubling digital purge yet.
This pattern reflects a broader continental trend. Internet shutdowns have become increasingly frequent across Africa.
In 2023 alone, sub-Saharan Africa lost an estimated $1.74 billion due to government-induced internet disruptions. The region recorded 114 shutdowns across 23 countries in 2022, 50 in 21 countries in 2021, 93 in 21 countries in 2020, and 134 in 22 countries in 2019.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Trump 2.0 Has Signed 16 Congressional Review Act Resolutions Of Disapproval
In recent roundups of the Trump-era administrative state and its 'Unrules,' we've noted that the Trump administration is on track (so far) to issue the lowest annual tally of rules and regulations since record-keeping began in the 1970s. While a number of Trump rules take the form of recissions, rollbacks, delays and relaxation of enforcement, it is the congressional 'Resolutions of Disapproval' of late-term Biden rules that are getting much of the attention. Rooted in the Congressional Review Act of 1996, these allow Congress and a new president to overturn certain rules issued late in a predecessor's term. To some extent the attention that CRA's get makes makes sense, as these disapprovals tend to zero in on some of the most prominent recent regulatory activity. In the current setting, it is Biden's aggressive and even punitive green agenda getting upended, not just by Congress and its CRAs, but prominently by the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency (as a flurry of tweets from EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin attests in the latter case). Before Trump 1.0, there had been only one resolution of disapproval signed into law -targeting Department of Labor rulemaking on repetitive-motion injuries. But then in a rapid 2017-18 change of pace, the Trump administration overturned 16 Obama rules. Turnabout was not unexpected, so the Biden era brought three reversals of Trump rules (notably on relaxation of emission standards and bank lending), as part of what proved to be Biden's wholesale rejection of regulatory streamlining as such in favor of what his administration dubbed 'whole-of-government' progressive interventions. Here we are in 2025. So far in Trump 2.0 there have been 16 resolutions of disapproval of Biden-era rules (the most recent signed into law on June 20, as compiled below). Of dozens of candidates for potential overturn by CRA resolution of disapproval (I did an inventory in this column late last year) Congress did wind up getting rid of some of the most noteworthy. That comes with a big caveat, however. While the CRA does get used to eliminate some of the most significant, headline-grabbing and prominent regulations, the CRA cannot fundamentally roll back the administrative state. Remember; the CRA has been with us since 1996. A pace of a couple dozen rule eliminations per generation - however large or costly and worthy of revocation they may be individually - is a slog that just won't do to preserve limited government over the long term. Consider: betwwen 1976 (when federal agency rules first started getting counted in the Federal Register) and year-end 2024, 220,813 final rules were finalized. So far this year, another 1,560 rules have been issued (granted, a sizable number of them the recissions and relaxations noted) for a total of 222,373. A few dozen CRAs makes just a dent. Not only that, as CEI's work on agency guidance documents, policy statements memoranda and other forms of regulatory dark matter attests, conventional notice-and-comment regulation increasingly comes nowhere close to capturing government intervention in the economy. That intervention includes the likes of antitrust regulation (which I like to refer to as the Original Sin of the administrative state, although even it has forebears); tariffs; and perhaps most distressingly, regulatory laundering via the procurement/contracting behemoth and subsidies, grants and public-private partnerships. Topping the list and responsible for all the rest is congressional disregard of enumerated powers, its unwillingness to leave any corner of economic or social life alone and the collapse of federalism. But still, during White House transitions, the CRA resolutions are the splashiest and most headline grabbing, and they do matter a lot for planning and strategy. There's also an interesting twist to all this in 2025. So far, there have been are "only" 31 public laws enacted in the 119th Congress. But half of them (16, as noted) have been CRA resolutions of disapproval. It's kind of funny to think that half of 2025's laws are Biden rule-killers. We've long needed legislators willing to come to DC, not to 'get things done' and be otherwise meddlesome, but to get things undone. The year 2025 has served as an example of how to go about that. Among prominent CRAs in 2025 are the Department of Energy's conservation standards ("We now have the technology available to eliminate efficiency!" our CEI founder Fred Smith would joke about wrongheaded federal policies). EPA is dominant of course, along with some finance rules. What follows is the to-date compilation of rules and the public law overturning them. As the year progresses, these may be tracked at the Government Accountability Office's landing page for Congressional Review Act goings-on:
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom Gets Into War of Words With Ted Cruz Over Texas Democrats
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom has locked horns with Texas GOP Senator Ted Cruz over Texas Democrats leaving their state to avoid a redistricting vote. Posting on X, formerly Twitter, the two politicians traded barbs with each other, referencing old political controversies, as the state's redistricting conflict intensifies. Why It Matters Republicans want to redraw the districting map to bolster their chances in next year's midterm election. It was thought the new map would give the party the opportunity to gain five seats in the midterms. Their efforts were thwarted when more than 51 Texas Democrats traveled to Chicago last Sunday to stop the vote, causing anger from critics and praise from political allies who accused Republicans of gerrymandering and voter suppression. Votes can only take place in the Texas legislature when two-thirds of the 150 members are present. In the days that followed, some Democrats also traveled to California and other Democratic states. Newsom and Cruz's interventions epitomize how far-reaching the Texas saga is and its broader significance in national politics. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in support of the Texas Democratic lawmakers for their walkout to block a vote on a congressional redistricting plan sought by Republicans, during a news conference in Sacramento, California on... California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in support of the Texas Democratic lawmakers for their walkout to block a vote on a congressional redistricting plan sought by Republicans, during a news conference in Sacramento, California on August 8, 2025. More AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli What To Know Posting on X, Newsom, who has spoken out in support of the fleeing Democrats, responded to Speaker of the Texas House Dustin Burrows and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filing a legal complaint in California to enforce arrest warrants for Texas Democrats who had gone to the Golden State to avoid voting. "You should definitely use ALL resources looking for them here, Ken," Newsom wrote in what appeared to be a sarcastic tone. "You will TOTALLY find them here." This prompted Cruz to reply: "I assume they're having inner with you at the French Laundry," referencing an incident in 2020 when Newsom attended a dinner party at the French Laundry restaurant during the coronavirus pandemic. This was not against the rules at the time, but sparked a backlash given that the governor had encouraged people to stay distanced to contain the fast-spreading virus. Newsom replied to Cruz: "To be fair, he knows a lot about fleeing" and posted an image of the senator pulling a suitcase through an airport. This referenced a viral image of Cruz leaving his home state for Cancun, Mexico, in 2021 in the middle of a record-breaking cold snap in Texas. What People Are Saying Texas Governor Greg Abbott said of the redistricting furor in an X post on Friday: "We have an agenda to pass priorities critical to Texans, and we will get it done. I'll call special session after special session—no matter how long it takes—until the job is finished." Texas State Representative Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, in a statement: "This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity. We're not walking out on our responsibilities; we're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent." What Happens Next The Texas House is scheduled to meet again on Monday. The FBI has been called in to find the lawmakers. Meanwhile, redistricting issues are also taking place in other states. The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing a dispute over redistricting in Louisiana, and earlier this year overturned a lower court decision that ruled South Carolina's congressional map was unconstitutional.
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Trump Envoy Slammed for 'Damaging Incompetence' Over Putin Talks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff has been slammed for "damaging incompetence" over his talks with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Posting on X, formerly Twitter, Michael McFaul, who served in the Barack Obama administration, including as U.S. ambassador to the Russian Federation, reacted to reports that Witkoff presented conflicting narratives about Putin's intentions in several calls with European leaders last week, creating confusion. Newsweek was unable to verify these reports and contacted Witkoff and the White House outside of normal business hours for comment. Why It Matters One of Trump's pledges during the 2024 presidential campaign was to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office, but he has thus far failed to do so. In a renewed attempt to broker a peace deal between the warring countries, Witkoff met Putin on Wednesday for three hours of talks in what was his fifth trip to Moscow in his capacity as Trump's envoy. Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff, right, shake hands during their meeting in Moscow on August 6, 2025. Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff, right, shake hands during their meeting in Moscow on August 6, 2025. Gavriil Grigorov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP What To Know According to The Wall Street Journal, Witkoff presented Putin's ceasefire plan to European officials after he met with the Russian leader. Citing anonymous sources, the publication said Moscow was prepared to withdraw from the southern regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson in exchange for full control of Donetsk Oblast. The publication said that the next day, he presented a different claim—that Putin would withdraw and freeze the front line, and that during a third call, he said the Russian leader wanted Ukraine to withdraw from Donetsk in an exchange for a ceasefire. McFaul, now a Stanford University academic said: "This is deeply damaging incompetence. Witkoff should finally start taking a note taker from the U.S. embassy for future meetings. That's how professional diplomacy works." Meanwhile, other figures also criticized Witkoff. Journalist Michael Weiss wrote: "The U.S. envoy is grossly incompetent and his confusion is causing diplomatic crises." Garry Kasparov, a Russian chess grandmaster and political activist wrote: "Like so most of Trump's appointees, Witkoff's only qualification is that Trump is sure he will put Trump's personal interests and desires over American national interests without a second thought. Of course he's incompetent." What People Are Saying Writing on Truth Social about the meeting, President Donald Trump said: "My special envoy, Steve Witkoff, just had a highly productive meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Great progress was made! Afterwards, I updated some of our European allies. Everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come." What Happens Next Trump is scheduled to meet Putin in Alaska on August 15 as part of his efforts to secure a ceasefire in Ukraine.
