Arkansas revenue offices issue record number of REAL IDs Tuesday, Sherwood office forced to redirect customers after running out
A spokesperson for the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration said Arkansas revenue offices issued a record number of REAL IDs on Tuesday, noting that they issued 10,000 on Monday and expect the number to be as high as 15,000 on Tuesday.
REAL ID enforcement starts this week: 5 things to know
According to the DFA, the Sherwood Revenue Office was forced to redirect customers to nearby offices after running out.
The DFA spokesperson added that a belief that May 7 was the final day to get a REAL ID is leading to a widespread sense of urgency to get a REAL ID.
'That is not the case. DFA will issue the REAL ID for years to come,' the spokesperson said. 'Unless there is an urgent need (a flight in the next day or two), Arkansans can wait and obtain it next week or next year.'
DFA officials said they expect revenue offices to be replenished on Wednesday and encourage Arkansans to check back with their nearby revenue offices if they visited one that ran out Tuesday.
'Again, we want to be sure Arkansans understand tomorrow is not the deadline to obtain a REAL ID,' the DFA spokesperson said. 'Their regular license or state ID will certainly remain valid after May 7. For those with an upcoming flight, a U.S. Passport or Department of Defense ID will work in place of a REAL ID to board a flight.'
Can you still receive a REAL ID after the May 7 deadline in Arkansas?
For more information on what you'll need and how to get a REAL ID, visit DFA.Arkansas.gov.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to KARK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
20 hours ago
- UPI
Appeals court: Arkansas can ban gender-affirming care for minors
Participants walk up Market Street in the 55th annual San Francisco Pride Parade in San Francisco on Sunday, June 29, 2025. An appeals court on Tuesday permitted Arkansas to enforce its gender-affirming care ban for minors. File Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- A federal appeals court has ruled that Arkansas may enforce its ban on minors receiving gender-affirming care, overturning a lower court's decision that found the law unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued its ruling Tuesday, stating the lower court erred in June 2023 when it struck down Arkansas' Save Adolescents From Experimentation Act for violating the First Amendment and both the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause. It said the lower court's ruling was incongruent with a recent Supreme Court decision that upheld Tennessee's gender-affirming care ban for minors. "Because the district court rested its permanent injunction on incorrect conclusions of law, it abused its discretion," the appeals court ruled. Arkansas' Republican attorney general, Tim Griffin, celebrated the ruling. "I applaud the court's decision recognizing that Arkansas has a compelling interest in protecting the physical and psychological health of children and am pleased that children in Arkansas will be protected from risky, experimental procedures with lifelong consequences," he said in a statement. Gender-affirming care includes a range of therapies, from psychological, behavioral and medical interventions with surgeries for minors being exceedingly rare. The medical practice has been endorsed by every medical association. Despite the evidence and the support of the medical community, Republicans and conservatives, often with the use of misinformation, have been targeting gender-affirming care amid a larger push threatening the rights of the LGBTQ community. Arkansas passed the SAVE Act in 2021, but then-Gov. Asa Hutchinson vetoed it that same year, calling the ban a "product of the cultural war in America" that would interfere with the doctor-patient relationship. The GOP-majority legislature then overrode his veto, making Arkansas the first state to pass a bill banning gender-affirming care for minors in the United States. Four transgender minors and their parents then challenged the law, saying it violated their rights, resulting in the 2023 ruling overturning the ban, which marked a victory in the fight for LGBTQ healthcare until Tuesday. "This is a tragically unjust result for transgender Arkansans, their doctors and their families," Holly Dickson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, said in a statement. "As we and our clients consider our next steps, we want transgender Arkansans to know they are far from alone and we remain as determined as ever to secure their right to safety, dignity and equal access to the healthcare they need." The ruling comes as Republicans seeking to restrict transgender healthcare have gained a support in the White House with President Donald Trump who has implemented several federal policies that align with their efforts. On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order making it federal policy that there are only two genders, male and female, both of which were determined at "conception." He has also banned transgender Americans from the military and has sought to bar transgender athletes from competing on teams and in competitions that align with their gender identity. Twenty-six states and the territory of Puerto Rico have banned gender-affirming care for minors, according to the Movement Advancement Project.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Appeals court allows Arkansas to enforce gender-affirming care ban
A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that Arkansas can enforce its 2021 ban on gender-affirming care for minors, reversing a lower court decision that struck down the first-in-the-nation law as unconstitutional and following a June Supreme Court decision. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Tuesday that a federal district court had erred in striking down Arkansas's Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act in 2023. U.S. District Judge Jay Moody ruled at the time that the law, adopted by the state Legislature in 2021 after former Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) vetoed it, discriminates against transgender people and poses 'immediate and irreparable harm' to trans youth. In its decision, the 8th Circuit said Moody's ruling conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. Skrmetti, which found that a similar law banning gender-affirming care for minors in Tennessee does not discriminate based on sex. 'Because the district court rested its permanent injunction on incorrect conclusions of law, it abused its discretion,' Judge Duane Benton, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, wrote in Tuesday's order. 'The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.' Four families of transgender children and two doctors challenged Arkansas's law in 2021, arguing that it violates their constitutional rights. Holly Dickson, executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas, one of the groups representing the plaintiffs in court, called Tuesday's decision 'a tragically unjust result for transgender Arkansans, their doctors, and their families.' 'The state had every opportunity and failed at every turn to prove that this law helps children; in fact, this is a dangerous law that harms children,' Dickson said in a statement on Tuesday. The organization is considering its next steps, she said. Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin (R) applauded Tuesday's ruling, writing on the social platform X that he is 'pleased that children in Arkansas will be protected from experimental procedures.' Griffin announced immediately after the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Skrmetti on June 18 that the decision had 'positive implications' for Arkansas's appeal to the 8th Circuit, 'because our law is similar to Tennessee's law.' Twenty-seven states have banned the use of certain prescription medications and rare surgeries to treat gender dysphoria in minors since Arkansas passed its first-in-the-nation prohibition in 2021. In July, Puerto Rico became the first U.S. territory to ban gender-affirming care for youth, restricting treatment for anyone under 21, the island's age of majority. With Arkansas now able to enforce its ban, only Montana's law restricting transition-related care for minors remains blocked by court orders, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a nonprofit tracking LGBTQ laws. A district court judge struck down the state's 2023 law in May, finding the measure violates Montana's constitution. Tuesday's decision comes as the federal government also looks to broaden its approach to limiting access to gender-affirming care for minors, one of President Trump's campaign promises. An executive order Trump signed in January during his first days back in office states the U.S. 'will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another, and it will rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures.' In May, Trump's Department of Health and Human Services broke with major medical groups, which have said gender-affirming care for trans youths and adults is medically necessary, in an unsigned report declaring there is a 'lack of robust evidence' to support providing such care to minors. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has called for providers and medical boards to update treatment protocols to align with the department's report, which recommends greater reliance on psychotherapy over medical interventions. The Department of Justice, the FBI and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are also investigating providers of gender-affirming care, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is expected to announce a proposal to bar funding for hospitals or clinics that offer transition care to minors.
San Francisco Chronicle
04-08-2025
- San Francisco Chronicle
North Carolina DMV audit recommends reforms to reverse customer wait times, worker morale
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Customers at North Carolina's Division of Motor Vehicles are waiting longer in lines that are often far away from home, while agency staffing fails to keep pace with the state's surging population, according to agency reviews that also recommend major reforms. Elected Republican Auditor Dave Boliek on Monday released two audits totaling nearly 600 pages that scrutinize the DMV — the bane of motorists in many states. But long lines and frustrations are acute in the ninth-largest state. 'Our DMV affects the economy. It affects people having to take off of work unnecessarily. It takes our students out of the classroom,' Boliek told reporters. 'This has to be fixed and it has to be a top priority.' Constituent complaints, REAL ID brings problems to fore Boliek promised during last year's campaign to conduct a top-to-bottom review of the DMV if elected. Elected leaders' constituents have complained about the inability to book appointments online close to home and the struggles for their teenagers to complete driving tests. It's not unusual for customers to camp outside driver's license offices in the wee hours hoping to get seen later that day. Problems continued as federal REAL ID license security standards took effect in May. Erin Van Dorn of Holly Springs said at Boliek's news conference it took her and her teenage son four trips to the DMV — the last time 130 miles (209 kilometers) away in Mount Airy — to obtain his license. Information technology and staffing shortages were to blame. 'My son has missed a total of four days of school,' Van Horn said. 'It's just been a very big ordeal for us.' New Democratic Gov. Josh Stein's administration brought in former state legislator Paul Tine as the new Division of Motor Vehicles commissioner and has pledged a turnaround. Longer waits, continued examiner shortages A DMV performance audit Monday said average wait times for customers at the state's driver's license locations increased by over 15% since 2019 to 1 hour and 15 minutes. And close to 14% of the wait times lasted over 2 hours and 30 minutes — a 79% increase from 2019. And nearly half of all transactions by customers aren't happening at the license office closest to where they live. 'The employee experience has diminished as well,' Boliek said. The audit said there were 160 vacant license examiner positions as of April. And while the state's population has grown by 29% over the last 20 years, the number of examiner positions has grown by just 10%. Boliek's staff heard DMV employee complaints about burnout, security and low pay — average examiner position salaries were well below $50,000 last year. The audit attributes many problems to DMV's relationship to the Cabinet-level state Department of Transportation that oversees the agency. The auditor said DMV has undersized influence within DOT when it comes to decision-making and getting budget requests approved by the legislature. Agency independence among recommendations Boliek's most significant recommendation is for policymakers to consider turning DMV into an autonomous agency separate from DOT. Boliek said the recommendation is no slight upon Tine and current Teansportation Secretary Joey Hopkins, whom he said are taking steps toward reform. But he said a permanent change is needed to address situations where the commissioner and secretary don't cooperate as well. Other recommendations include creating a public online dashboard measuring keys performance goals and initiating nonconventional initiatives to reduce wait times and backlogs. Boliek said outside driving school instructors could administer road tests required of new drivers. The DMV could open 'pop-up' license offices at a vacant mall anchor store or create 'fast-pass' options for customers who pay extra to reach the front of the line. 'We can't keep doing things the same old way," he said. DMV, DOT chiefs back most recommendations In a written response to the audits, Tine and Hopkins agreed with nearly all of the recommendations and said many already getting carried out. But they opposed the recommendation to separate DMV, saying the agency's core functions align with the Transportation Department's mission to improve highway safety. 'We know that with the right leadership and follow-through, we will get results -– getting people out of lines and empowering our hard-working DMV employees," Stein spokesperson Morgan Hopkins said. The GOP-controlled General Assembly could still attempt to implement the change. A stopgap budget measure on Stein's desk provides funds to hire over 60 license examiners. And a new state law has established a temporary moratorium on renewing standard licenses, allowing them to remain valid within North Carolina for up to two years beyond the expiration date.
