Ex-President Moon criticizes indictment against him as ‘unjust'
The remarks came during his meeting with National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik ahead of attending a celebratory event marking seven years of the April 27 Panmunjom Declaration, which was an outcome of the April 2018 inter-Korean summit between then-president Moon and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.
'The indictment itself was unjust, but I felt that (the prosecutors) were pushing this into a direction (they had) already set,' Moon told Woo in a meeting held at the main building of the Assembly.
'This means that the prosecution has become that much political and is an example of abuse of prosecutorial power,' he added.
Moon also revealed that the indictment came as a surprise for him, as there was an initial agreement with the prosecutors to allow the former president to review the facts tied to the bribery charges before they would make any further decisions.
'(In the timeframe leading up to the indictment,) I was reviewing (related) records at the presidential archives to do some in-depth fact checking after having written my affidavit (to submit to the prosecution later),' he explained. 'The process had been agreed upon by the prosecution … But they have decided to abruptly indict me.'
Moon asked Woo to focus on letting the public know about the 'abuse of prosecutorial power and politics.'
Ahead of Moon's remarks, Woo said that the prosecutors' move to indict the former president was 'unconvincing' for him, as he believes that they ignored the appropriate procedures before charging Moon with bribery.
'It's unconvincing for me in terms of the (charges) and the timing of the indictment with the country suffering under various turmoil. I believe the Assembly should look into whether there are any flaws in the procedures (of the indictment),' Woo said.
The Jeonju District Prosecutors' Office said Thursday they indicted Moon without detention on charges of bribery concerning his former son-in-law's employment at a local airline.
The former son-in-law, surnamed Seo, allegedly received some 217 million won ($151,000) between August 2018 and April 2020 in the form of salary and housing support from Thai low-cost carrier Thai Eastar Jet after being appointed as executive director. Seo had no experience in the airline industry and former lawmaker Lee Sang-jik, who is the airline's founder, was appointed as head of the Korea SMEs and Startups Agency at the time. Moon was in office as president from 2017 to 2022.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Pentagon stresses 'primary' alliance focus on N. Korea, 'shared priorities' over 'broader regional' threats
The "primary" focus of the South Korea-US alliance remains on deterring North Korea, but the allies continue to cooperate to align their "shared defense priorities" to respond to the "broader" regional security environment, a Pentagon press secretary said Friday. Press secretary Kingsley Wilson made the remarks in response to Yonhap News Agency's question over the meaning of joint efforts by Seoul and Washington to "modernize" the alliance at a time when US President Donald Trump's administration prioritizes deterring an increasingly assertive China. "While the primary focus remains on deterring North Korean aggression, we continue to work closely with the Republic of Korea to align our shared defense priorities in response to the broader regional security environment," she said in a statement. She added that the US Defense Department remains committed to a "modern, strategically sustainable" South Korea-US alliance that "can address today's and tomorrow's security challenges." "Alliance modernization includes adapting our combined posture, deepening interoperability and expanding cooperation across domains to ensure credible deterrence on the Korean Peninsula and beyond," she said. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Are Washington, Pyongyang testing waters for summit?
Speculation is mounting over the chances of a fourth meeting between US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, as the rhetoric of the two sides has recently suggested an openness to reengagement. Experts noted that the two sides might have already begun testing the waters for a possible meeting of Trump and Kim, for the first time after meetings in 2018 and 2019 under Trump's first administration. In the latest remark, an official of the US Department of State acknowledged Thursday that Washington "note(d) with interest" a statement on July 29 by Kim Yo-jong, a powerful sister of the North Korean leader. In the statement, Kim Yo-jong rebuffed talk of North Korea's denuclearization but said the personal relationship between the two leaders was "not bad" ― an apparent hint at an openness to dialogue. Seth Bailey, acting deputy assistant secretary in the bureau of East Asian and Pacific affairs of the US State Department, said Washington "(has) seen high-level statements from the DPRK leadership, including recent statements from Kim Yo-jong, which we note with interest," during an annual government briefing hosted by the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency in Arlington, Virginia. DPRK stands for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, or the North's official name. Bailey also hinted that the groundbreaking joint statement between Trump and Kim in 2018 would serve as a cornerstone for any advancement in the two countries' relationship. Bailey said that efforts to recover the remains of US service members who were killed or went missing during the Korean War "features so prominently as an important pillar of President Trump's joint statement with the DPRK at the Singapore summit in June of 2018." Bailey's invocation of the 2018 Singapore summit, which enshrined the two leaders' commitment to a complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, came ahead of Trump's message to mark the National Korean War Veterans Armistice Day in late July. There, Trump wrote that he "maintained a maximum pressure campaign and enforced sanctions on North Korea to negotiate denuclearization" during his term from 2017 to 2021. These statements point to a sharp difference in position with Kim Yo-jong's statement on July 29, which rejected denuclearization talks. Experts said that the two sides appeared already engaged in a tug-of-war before entering the next stage of negotiations, while indirectly expressing willingness to engage in talks. 'The two sides have already begun exploring what their counterparts are looking for,' said Park Won-gon, professor of North Korean Studies at Ewha Womans University. 'They have already begun tussling over who would take the upper hand, or who would control the negotiation agenda.' While the Trump administration has been consistent in its message to North Korea in terms of pushing for denuclearization, Park claimed that the US' recent adjustment to the joint Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise on the other hand might be a gesture for talks "from a bigger picture." "From North Korea's perspective, joint training and deployment of strategic assets could also be conditions for dialogue between North Korea and the United States," Park said. Another expert said that Kim Yo-jong's statement could be construed as North Korea's indirect show of interest in talks with the United States without losing control of the negotiations. 'It's like throwing jabs in a boxing match,' said Kim Yong-hyun, professor of North Korean Studies at Dongguk University. 'There's now a bit of mutual interest in dialogue, and it seems like (the two sides) are now working to find some momentum (for dialogue).' Experts also noted that support for the upcoming talks between Trump and Kim could be announced at Lee's forthcoming trip to the White House, which Trump announced would take place before mid-August but is still speculated to be occurring in the final week of August, albeit not suggesting a concrete blueprint for the Trump-Kim summit. Dongguk University professor Kim said Lee might express an anticipation that Trump would swiftly re-engage with Kim, in line with Lee's steps to ease tensions on the Korean Peninsula through the South's removal of propaganda loudspeakers on the border. Park of Ewha Woman's University said the issues on the Korean Peninsula could be addressed during the upcoming summit, possibly by revisiting what is enshrined in the 2018 Singapore joint statement for the peninsula's complete denuclearization.
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Proposed Cho Kuk pardon a two-edged sword for Lee
President Lee Jae Myung faces a political dilemma over whether to grant a Liberation Day pardon to Cho Kuk, the former justice minister and leader of the minor Rebuilding Korea Party, as he returns from a weeklong summer break. On Thursday afternoon, the Justice Ministry's Pardon Review Committee convened to discuss recommendations for pardons. Former Rebuilding Korea Party leader Cho Kuk and his wife, former Dongyang University professor Chung Kyung-shim, are widely believed to be included on the list. Cho was convicted of fabricating official documents to help his children's academic careers, as well as illegally interfering in a government audit. Chung was convicted of several charges related to fraudulently helping her children and financial crimes. The final call now lies with Lee, but reports that the committee had decided to include Cho has already sparked a significant backlash. Lee is scheduled to review and approve the special pardon list at a Cabinet meeting on Aug. 12. And Lee will announce the beneficiaries of presidential pardon on Aug. 15, National Liberation Day. South Korean presidents have issued pardons to commemorate important national holidays, such as the Liberation Day celebrating Korea's 1945 independence from Japanese colonial rule, to reward the good behavior of offenders and foster national harmony. Cho, who served as a senior aide to former President Moon Jae-in and as justice minister in 2019, began his two-year prison term in December after the Supreme Court upheld his conviction on charges of academic fraud involving his children and unlawful interference in a government inspection. The mooted pardon for the minor progressive party leader is seen as a double-edged sword. Should Lee decide to pardon Cho, it could boost support from left-leaning voters. But clemency toward a man who illegally helped his children get university places could also undermine Lee's commitments to fairness in society, potentially sapping the momentum of his administration in its early stages. Multiple progressive lawmakers and religious leaders, including the Ven. Jinwoo — president of the Jogye Order of Korean Buddhism — publicly called for the pardon of Cho, as they view him as a victim of prosecutorial manipulation. Rep. Jeon Yong-gi of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea also backed Cho's pardon, explaining that Cho and his family suffered greatly from a political 'witch hunt' led by former President Yoon, who was prosecutor general at the time of the investigation. With former President Moon also publicly calling for Cho's pardon after a meeting with Woo Sang-ho, senior presidential secretary for political affairs, on Tuesday, a ruling party official reportedly said that unity among the Democratic Party of Korea and Rebuilding Korea Party could be achieved with the pardon. And Lee could face significant repercussions if Cho is not pardoned. The anonymous official was quoted by the Korean-language daily Chosun Ilbo as saying that refusing to grant the presidential pardon was likely provoke strong criticism from the ruling party's support base and that this risk could not be ignored. Split on Cho Pardon The main opposition People Power Party's interim leader Song Eon-seog expressed his anger at the suggestion of pardoning Cho. 'We are outraged that Cho, who has been widely condemned by the public, was included in the Liberation Day special pardon (list),' Song told the reporters in a press briefing on Thursday. Rep. Joo Jin-woo of the People Power Party also put pressure on Lee after posting an online message, claiming Lee's administration will be labeled as unjust government if Cho's pardon is approved. As Cho's convictions include using his influence to receive academic favors for his children, his rumored inclusion on the ministry list sparked outrage among some parents and students, especially Suneung test-takers. Suneung is South Korea's nationwide college entrance exam. An online post titled 'They're not going to pardon someone involved in academic fraud, right?' uploaded in a local student-based online community Pnmath Mathematic Lab, received multiple comments opposing Cho's pardon. A poll on the issue suggests the public sentiment does not lean clearly for or against pardoning Cho. In a three-day poll conducted by local polling company Jowon C&I and media outlet Straight News from Aug. 2 involving 2,018 participants, 48 percent of the people reportedly supported the special pardon for Cho, while 47.6 percent opposed it. The presidential office, meanwhile, remained tight-lipped about whether Cho would be granted a pardon. 'It is difficult to know until the president makes his final decision. The special pardon list will likely be available when the list is finalized after the Cabinet meeting,' presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said during a press briefing Thursday.
