How should you position yourself in IT and pharma now? Neeraj Dewan answers
ADVERTISEMENT After the TCS as well as HCL Technologies Q1 results, it seems like IT will need to be avoided this quarter too?
Neeraj Dewan: Yes, definitely the beginning of the result season has not been good for IT. It was on expected lines because we are not expecting good results from IT this quarter and even the immediate outlook is not that clear. So, one should wait to get more clarity; one, what is going to happen on the earnings front and second, what clues we have from the US regarding business going ahead.
So, one should really wait and see how it goes. As far as largecap IT is concerned, if TCS, Infosys consolidate in this region and stop correcting, maybe it is not a good idea to sell them at this point. One should hold on to them to get more clarity or start accumulating.
A lot of things are happening in the pharma space. There is some stock specific action from Zydus Life, positive news flow coming in for Zydus as well as Biocon for their diabetes drug Kirsty. Other than that, there is some commentary coming in from Trump where he is saying that pharma tariffs could be announced by the end of this month. What is your take on the sector? How should investors position themselves in this sector?
Neeraj Dewan: As far as the tariffs are concerned, there are two things. One, Trump has been speaking about pharma tariffs for quite some time. Off and on, he comes out with statements but the market has not reacted too much and stocks have been doing well. Second, there are these country specific deals. There is still no clarity if India will have a country-specific deal. If there will be separate tariffs for all industries, then what is the idea of having a country specific deal?There is a lot of confusion over tariffs as of now. So, I do not think stocks will react too much. For an investor, it would be best to just invest in the stocks we like and stay invested in them as far as pharma is concerned. Pharma has been a stock specific bet and one cannot really invest across because now the stocks are not that cheap. They are quite fairly valued. We will get pockets there. We will get stocks which are doing very well and stock specific moves will come. So, you should stay invested in the ones you are betting on and then see how it goes as far as the tariffs are concerned.
Is there merit in looking at the two-wheeler space right now? Yesterday, the entire pack was fairly charged up. We have seen an early onset of monsoon as well. The distribution so far as well pretty much seems to be on course. Is that going to reflect in the two-wheeler numbers?
Neeraj Dewan: Yes, I think so because bigger companies like Hero Motors and Bajaj Auto have come out with some statements. They are going to be aggressive and they are looking at growth going ahead. We have seen that if we have a good monsoon, there is definitely a pickup in demand in the two-wheeler space. Going ahead, since inflation is low, there is excess liquidity in the system, and we are having a good monsoon as well, it will all augur well for the sector.
ADVERTISEMENT Hero Motor is trading at discount to its long-term averages. At this price, getting into Hero Motor should make sense for a long-term investor. Similarly, in Bajaj Auto, we are yet to see some improvement happening. Let us see the results for this quarter and then we will take a call on Bajaj Auto. Hero Motor definitely as they are quoting 20 times historical and Bajaj Auto is at close to 30 times historical; 12 months trailing are showing attractive valuations. One should consider them for long-term investing.
In terms of the stock market, insurance has been a nonstarter barring a few odd moves here and there. How should insurance be looked at? It may be a structural story but the stocks have not performed at all.
Neeraj Dewan: You are right, it is a structural story where five-six years back, everyone believed it would be a good value generator. But everyone got invested also. You see long-term portfolios, they are holding on to some good insurance stock. The funds have been holding on to them. But that follow-up big buying is not coming because there is no exceptional gain which comes specifically from life insurance companies.
ADVERTISEMENT Life insurance companies have been a drag and going ahead, we are looking at 10-12% return. We can still get that kind of return in this sector. But general insurance is one where there is still good scope. There can be growth there and we have seen those companies doing better also. So, if I have to pick one of the two, I will pick general insurance.
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fuel folly
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day. Washington's new tariff plan for those who buy Russian oil is hypocritical & will hurt US too After insulting Zelenskyy in Feb, pausing intelligence sharing with Kyiv in March, and weapons supplies in March and May, Trump finally has a plan to stop Putin. He's going to hit Russia and its trade partners with 'very serious tariffs'. Not immediately – Putin gets 50 days to finish the business he started in 2022. But as a big buyer of Russian oil, India should take note. Trump's threatened to impose 100% tariff on countries that buy Russian goods after the expiry of his deadline, and if he doesn't waver, or forget – neither unlikely – the concessions won through a trade deal could be lost. Will tariffs work? Not directly, because Russia and US have never been more decoupled economically since the collapse of the Soviet Union. US bought goods worth just $3bn from Russia last year, and sold $500mn worth, down from $29bn and $6bn, respectively, before the start of the war in 2022. That's why Putin must be checkmated through secondary tariffs on his major oil buyers like China, India and Brazil. Fossil fuels are a very big part of Russia's GDP (16%), and make up over half of its exports (55%). By the third anniversary of the war, Russia had earned about $1tn from fossil fuel exports. India, which used to buy just 1% of its oil from Russia before the war, now sources 40%, so the threat of 100% tariff on exports could make it pivot again. And China, which buys 20% of its oil from Russia, might also find 100% tariff discouraging. Russia could be hurt, but at what cost? Plugging the Russian pipeline is bound to drive up oil prices, which could increase inflation in most places, including US. Add to that the US-specific price rise resulting from 100% tariff on China, India and other US trade partners, and the political risk might be too much for Trump's Republicans. Above all, Trump's threat – backed by Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte – smacks of hypocrisy. After ordering the world not to buy Russian oil, US continued buying enriched uranium from Russia for its nuclear plants. Even when it announced a ban on Russian uranium imports from 2027, it gave a waiver to its largest operator of reactors. Likewise, Rutte's Europe is still buying gas from Russia, and won't stop till the end of 2027. So, Trump and Rutte's threat is less about conviction than convenience. India must play by the same rule. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's oil tariff plan: Big talk, big problems
US President Donald Trump has come up with a plan to punish Russia for its war with Ukraine — by making things super expensive for countries that buy oil or goods from Russia. This includes countries like India, China, and Brazil. Trump says he'll put a 100% tariff (which means doubling the price) on things those countries sell to the US if they keep buying from Russia. But he's giving them 50 days before the rule starts — which gives Russia time to keep doing what it's doing. Why does this matter? Because countries like India now buy a lot of oil from Russia — about 40% of their oil. Before the war, it was just 1%! China gets 20% of its oil from Russia. If Trump really adds this tax, both countries might have to change their oil suppliers. The idea behind Trump's plan is to hurt Russia's economy by hitting its biggest moneymaker — oil and gas. Russia earns more than half of its export money from selling fuel. In fact, since the war started, Russia has made almost $1 trillion from selling fossil fuels. But here's the problem: if countries stop buying Russian oil, oil prices might shoot up. That could make life more expensive for everyone — including people in the US. Also, if the US charges more on products from India or China, things like clothes, electronics, and toys might cost more in American stores. And here's where the plan feels unfair: the US is still buying nuclear fuel (called uranium) from Russia! Even when it said it would stop, it gave itself extra time and allowed some companies to keep buying it. And Europe is still buying Russian gas until 2027. So while Trump and other leaders are telling countries like India to stop buying from Russia, they're not stopping completely themselves. That's why this whole thing looks more like politics than true action. India should watch carefully and do what's best for itself — just like everyone else is doing. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg can issue their own currency - Stablecoin bill critics send chilling warning to Donald Trump
Agencies Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. The US House has passed three bills intended to boost the legitimacy of the cryptocurrency industry with new regulations as President Donald Trump has pushed to make the U.S. the "crypto capital of the world". One of the three bills, legislation to regulate a type of cryptocurrency called stablecoins, had already passed the Senate with broad bipartisan support and will now head to Trump's desk. The other two bills — a broader measure to create a new market structure for cryptocurrency and a bill to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing a new digital currency — will go to the Senate. The stablecoin bill, passed on a 308-122 vote, sets initial guardrails and consumer protections for the cryptocurrency, which is tied to a stable asset, often the U.S. dollar, to reduce price volatility. It passed the Senate with bipartisan support in June. However, the stablecoin bill has drawn sharp criticisms from critics who claimed that the bill paves way for Big Tech companies and other conglomerates to issue their own private currencies. Crypto Week After Trump declared it 'crypto week,' the bills were stalled for more than a day amid disagreements among House Republicans about how to combine the legislation. In the end, GOP leaders put the three bills for a separate votes, leaving the fate of the other two bills unclear in the Senate. The internal dissent could foreshadow challenges ahead for the more sweeping crypto legislation that Trump has demanded and the industry has poured millions into advancing. Also Read - Massive victory for Cryptocurrency as Stablecoins bill passed by US House of Representatives. What does this mean for Crypto buyers, US Dollar? The stablecoin measure is seen by lawmakers and the industry as a step toward adding legitimacy and consumer trust to a rapidly growing sector. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in June that the legislation could help that currency 'grow into a $3.7 trillion market by the end of the decade.' The bill outlines requirements for stablecoin issuers, including compliance with U.S. anti-money laundering and sanctions laws, and mandates that issuers hold reserves backing the cryptocurrency. Without such a framework, Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee in a statement warned, 'consumers face risks like unstable reserves or unclear operations from stablecoin issuers."New Market Structure for CryptocurrencyAfter the votes, House Republicans strongly urged the Senate to take up the second bill, which would create a new market structure for Bryan Steil, R-Wis., said the 294-134 vote on that legislation shows broad bipartisan support and a 'massive energy' on the issue. But it is so far unclear whether the Senate would consider the House bill or try to write its legislation aims to provide clarity for how digital assets are regulated. The bill defines what forms of cryptocurrency should be treated as commodities regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and which are securities policed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In general, tokens associated with 'mature' blockchains, like bitcoin, will be considered third bill, passed on a narrower 219-210 margin, prohibits the U.S. from offering what's known as a 'central bank digital currency,' which is like a government-issued form of digital cash. Warning from Democrats While the bill has significant bipartisan support, it has also faced pushback from Democrats who say the legislation should address Trump's personal financial interests in the crypto space. Some Democrats also criticized the bill for creating what they see as an overly weak regulatory framework that could pose long-term financial risks. They've also raised concerns that the legislation opens the door for major corporations to issue their own private cryptocurrencies. 'If this bill passes, it will allow Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg to issue their own money. The bill still permits Big Tech companies and other conglomerates to issue their own private currencies,' said Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee. A provision in the stablecoin bill bans members of Congress and their families from profiting off stablecoins. But that prohibition does not extend to the president and his family, even as Trump builds a crypto empire from the White House, they May, the Republican president hosted a private dinner at his golf club in Virginia with top investors in a Trump-branded meme coin. His family holds a significant stake in World Liberty Financial, a crypto project that launched its own stablecoin, reported earning $57.35 million from token sales at World Liberty Financial in 2024, according to a public financial disclosure released in June. A meme coin linked to him has generated an estimated $320 million in fees, though the earnings are split among multiple investors. Q1. What is Stablecoin bill?A1. The Stablecoin bill, passed on a 308-122 vote, sets initial guardrails and consumer protections for the cryptocurrency, which is tied to a stable asset, often the U.S. dollar, to reduce price volatility. Q2. Who is President of USA? A2. President of USA is Donald Trump.
