Maharashtra: Opposition slams absence of national emblem on entry passes to legislative building
Nationalist Congress Party (SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad tried to raise the issue in the House before the Speaker presented a condolence motion but was asked to raise it later.
'I wanted to raise it today itself. However, today's business was limited to passing condolence motion. I wanted to highlight how the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government is undermining the Constitution and national emblem. How can they remove the emblem from the entry pass?' asked Awhad.
The opposition said that it will raise the issue aggressively on Tuesday.
However, according to sources within the state legislative building, it was an attempt to 'safeguard' the national emblem.
'The entry pass, after its use, either gets thrown into the garbage or torn into pieces. It leads to the insult of the national emblem. Therefore, it was not printed on the entry pass,' said the official.
In a similar incident, during the two-day National Conference of Chairpersons of Estimates Committees of Parliament and State / UT Legislatures held in Mumbai. the national emblem was missing, and the Sengol was used instead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
CPI(M) and Congress accuse BJP of claiming credit for the nuns' release to score political brownie points
Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] and Congress have accused Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of attempting to score brownie points with the sizeable Christian community in Kerala and the influential Church leadership in allegedly trying to rack up political credit for the release of two Kerala nuns on bail from a prison in BJP-ruled Chattissgarh on Saturday. The sisters, Preeti Mary and Vandana Francis, were remand prisoners in the Durg Central jail since their arrest on July 25 on charges of attempting to spirit out three women to Agra for conversion to Christianity. BJP State president Rajiv Chandrasekhar's comment that Congress and CPI(M) 'political theatre' in front of the Durg Central Prison had impeded the BJP-ruled Central and Chattissgarh State governments efforts to secure early bail for the sisters seemed to snuff out the geniality that politicians from Kerala briefly displayed while rubbing shoulders and distributing sweets to welcome the nuns at a convent in Chhattisgarh after their release on bail on Saturday. CPI(M) State Committee member John Brittas, MP, on Sunday stated that secular parties had championed the cause of justice for the sisters because they viewed the unjust arrest through the prism of the Constitution and not political expediency. Leader of the Opposition V.D. Satheesan had earlier accused the BJP of shedding crocodile tears for the nuns while allowing the serious charges of human trafficking and forced conversion slapped on them to stay. Divergent views Meanwhile, schisms seemed to develop in the Church leadership over the question of whether the BJP national leadership had genuinely come to the aid of the nuns, as the party has claimed. For one, the Irinjalakuda diocese read out a pastoral letter in Churches on Sunday, claiming the Central and Chhattisgarh governments had done little for the nuns' release despite a national outcry. Irinjalakuda Diocese Bishop Mar Pauly Kannookadan dismissed the suggestion that some prelates, notably Archbishop Joseph Pamplany, praised Prime Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for intervening on the nuns' behalf. 'The Church has a clear political view. However, it is not politically partisan,' he added.
News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
Court sets aside hands up in air punishment for accused
Agency: PTI Last Updated: New Delhi, Aug 3 (PTI) A Delhi court has set aside an order of a magistrate directing some accused people to stand in the court with their hands raised for the entire day after finding them guilty of contempt of court. Principal District and Sessions Judge Anju Bajaj Chandna was hearing the appeal of Kuldeep and Rakesh, against whom the magisterial court had passed the order on July 15, while hearing a complaint case. In an order dated August 1, the court said the order did not qualify the test of legality and propriety, and that it was an 'illegal order", passed without adopting legal procedure. It said, 'Non-furnishing of bail bonds by the accused persons cannot be termed as a contemptuous act by any stretch of imagination." 'The act of accused persons of not furnishing bail bonds does not fall within the scope and ambit of Section 228 (intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding) of the IPC, and can in no manner be taken as intentional insult or interruption to public servant in judicial proceedings," the court said. It said the magistrate did not afford any opportunity to the accused persons to show cause as to why they should not be proceeded against, and that, without hearing them, the accused people were asked to stand in the court till the rising of the court with their hands straight in the air. 'This kind of sentence is not contemplated in law," the court said, adding, Article 21 of the Constitution conferred fundamental rights of personal liberty, which could be curtailed only by a procedure established by law. 'The object of law is to ensure that basic human rights are not violated. The judges are duty-bound to safeguard basic and natural rights meant for a dignified existence of individuals," the court said. 'Every person appearing before the court (even if involved in a crime) has the inalienable right to live with dignity and is entitled to equal respect. It is the duty of the court to ensure that no person can be detained without proper legal justification or without following due process of law," the court added. It said the magistrate completely failed in his duty and responsibility to conduct judicial proceedings legally and properly. 'The order convicting the accused persons under Section 228 IPC and sentencing them to stand with their hands in the air till the rising of the court is not sustainable. The magistrate is advised to properly read and understand the legal provisions before using his discretionary power," the court said, setting aside the order. Earlier, on July 15, Judicial Magistrate Saurabh Goyal, who was hearing a 2018 complaint case, which was at the stage of pre-charge evidence, had passed the order. He said, 'Despite waiting and calling the matter twice from 10 am till 11.40 am, the bail bonds were not furnished by the accused persons. For wasting the time of the court, which is in contempt of the order duly promulgated on the last date of hearing, the accused persons are hereby held guilty for contempt of court proceedings and are convicted for the offence under Section 228 of the IPC." 'They are directed to stand in the court till the rising of this court with their hands straight in the air," the magistrate added. PTI MNR RHL view comments First Published: August 03, 2025, 21:00 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Court sets aside 'hands up in air' punishment for accused
New Delhi, A Delhi court has set aside an order of a magistrate directing some accused people to stand in the court with their hands raised for the entire day after finding them guilty of contempt of court. Court sets aside 'hands up in air' punishment for accused Principal District and Sessions Judge Anju Bajaj Chandna was hearing the appeal of Kuldeep and Rakesh, against whom the magisterial court had passed the order on July 15, while hearing a complaint case. In an order dated August 1, the court said the order did not qualify the test of legality and propriety, and that it was an "illegal order", passed without adopting legal procedure. It said, "Non-furnishing of bail bonds by the accused persons cannot be termed as a contemptuous act by any stretch of imagination." "The act of accused persons of not furnishing bail bonds does not fall within the scope and ambit of Section 228 of the IPC, and can in no manner be taken as intentional insult or interruption to public servant in judicial proceedings," the court said. It said the magistrate did not afford any opportunity to the accused persons to show cause as to why they should not be proceeded against, and that, without hearing them, the accused people were asked to stand in the court till the rising of the court with their hands straight in the air. "This kind of sentence is not contemplated in law," the court said, adding, Article 21 of the Constitution conferred fundamental rights of personal liberty, which could be curtailed only by a procedure established by law. "The object of law is to ensure that basic human rights are not violated. The judges are duty-bound to safeguard basic and natural rights meant for a dignified existence of individuals," the court said. "Every person appearing before the court has the inalienable right to live with dignity and is entitled to equal respect. It is the duty of the court to ensure that no person can be detained without proper legal justification or without following due process of law," the court added. It said the magistrate completely failed in his duty and responsibility to conduct judicial proceedings legally and properly. "The order convicting the accused persons under Section 228 IPC and sentencing them to stand with their hands in the air till the rising of the court is not sustainable. The magistrate is advised to properly read and understand the legal provisions before using his discretionary power," the court said, setting aside the order. Earlier, on July 15, Judicial Magistrate Saurabh Goyal, who was hearing a 2018 complaint case, which was at the stage of pre-charge evidence, had passed the order. He said, "Despite waiting and calling the matter twice from 10 am till 11.40 am, the bail bonds were not furnished by the accused persons. For wasting the time of the court, which is in contempt of the order duly promulgated on the last date of hearing, the accused persons are hereby held guilty for contempt of court proceedings and are convicted for the offence under Section 228 of the IPC." "They are directed to stand in the court till the rising of this court with their hands straight in the air," the magistrate added. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
