Kanwar Yatra: A balancing act between vibrant pilgrimage and uninterrupted civic life
Traditionally, the Kanwar Yatra is an emulation of Hindu mythological act of King Bhagirath in bringing the holy. What was earlier an act of penance and prayer, in recent decades has expanded in both scale and form, from being Spartan to opulent. What was once a quiet, barefoot pilgrimage is now, in many cases, a vibrant and sometimes chaotic procession involving motorbikes, trucks, decorated floats, and blaring DJ systems.
Delhi, as a cosmopolitan and administrative hub, faces particular challenges during this period. The city's roads, already under pressure from dense traffic and infrastructure issues, are further strained by road closures, rerouting for Yatris, and checkpoints set up to manage their movement.
Despite these disruptions, the 2025 Yatra was handled with commendable administrative care by the Rekha Gupta-led Delhi government. Crossing the tightrope between respecting religious sentiments and maintaining the functional integrity of civic life is no small feat.
While the Delhi government sought to maintain law and order and civic harmony, it also had to ensure that no action was seen as obstructing the religious fervour of the devotees, lest it be accused of being 'anti-Hindu' in a polarized political climate. This balancing act was largely successful in logistical terms: no major incidents of violence or breakdowns in law enforcement were reported.
However, there were some aspects of the Yatra which could not be managed to the satisfaction of residents. The most glaring failure in the otherwise orderly handling of the Kanwar Yatra was the uncontrolled use of high-decibel DJ music systems mounted on trucks and floats accompanying the processions.
These sound systems blared remixed musicat such high volumes that shook window panes, disrupted sleep cycles, and sparked anxiety among residents. The noise pollution was not just a matter of inconvenience; it was a violation of legal norms.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's 25% tariff threat puts $87 billion in Indian exports at risk
New Delhi: India's $87 billion export pipeline to the US is facing fresh turbulence after President Donald Trump proposed a 25% reciprocal tariff on Indian goods, escalating trade tensions just days before a pause on such duties is set to expire. The move threatens to disrupt sectors ranging from textiles and electronics to pharmaceuticals and auto parts. While details of the proposed tariffs are yet to emerge, Trump's statement, issued Wednesday, has unsettled markets and cast a shadow over India's near-term export outlook. A US delegation is scheduled to visit India on 25 August for bilateral trade talks, but the final contours of the measures remain unclear. 'While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country," Trump said on his social media platform Truth Social. The Indian government is analysing the potential impact of the 25% tariff on exporter losses in terms of value and outbound shipments, the ministry of commerce said in a statement issued Wednesday. Madhavi Arora, chief economist at Emkay Global Financial Services, said the proposed tariffs would significantly raise the effective US duty on Indian goods from an average of 10.7% to about 22%, after factoring in higher duties on exempted sectors such as copper, steel and aluminium. This rate, she added, is already higher than what most Asian economies face, barring China. 'We do not believe the talks are over," Arora said, noting that while negotiations appear stalled, geopolitical factors may drive a fresh round of engagement. 'Even countries like the UK, EU, Japan, and Indonesia, Vietnam that signed trade pacts with the US continue to face elevated tariffs despite major concessions. These deals are, in many ways, no better than a trade war," she said. India exported goods worth $87 billion to the US in FY25, accounting for 2.3% of GDP, Arora said. Of this, five sectors—engineering goods ($19.16 billion), electronics ($14.64 billion), drugs and pharmaceuticals ($10.52 billion), gems and jewellery ($9.94 billion), and textiles ($10.91 billion)—together made up $65.17 billion. According to government estimates, about 75.3% of India's merchandise exports to the US could be impacted by the proposed tariffs. 'We've already seen front-loading of shipments in the last three months, so exports may remain tepid in the coming months unless clarity emerges," she added. Her current account model factors in a 3.5% contraction in exports, though the overall current account deficit-to-GDP ratio remains below 1%. Exporters flag rising costs 'The 25% tariff on Indian manufactured goods by the US introduces new variables for exporters, particularly in sectors such as electronics where supply chains are globally integrated," said Abhishek Malik, executive director of Calcom Vision Ltd, which exports LED lighting systems and BLDC fans. 'These measures could lead to higher cost structures and may influence future investment decisions and planning." Vipul Shah, former chairman of the Gems and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) and an exporter himself, said the move could materially damage shipments: 'It's a big setback for the gems and jewellery sector. The US is one of our largest markets, and if the revised tariff remains in place, exports could decline by about 30%." Rajiv Nath, forum coordinator at the Association of Indian Medical Device Industry (AiMeD), said the relative competitiveness of Indian firms may depend on how Chinese duties evolve. 'Clarity will come after 12 August, when the duties on Chinese products are expected to be finalised. They were earlier raised to over 50%, but were temporarily reduced to 30%," he said. 'If, after August, the duties on Chinese medical devices revert to over 50% while Indian goods face a 25% tariff, our export prospects versus China will improve. However, both the government and manufacturers will need to work on enhancing our competitiveness to offset the 6% disadvantage we face compared to Indonesian and Vietnamese competitors." Textile firms brace for hit amid uncertainty In the textile sector, the proposed 25% tariff, and the added risk of an unknown penalty, has weighed on sentiment, especially since industry expectations had been for a softer rate following the 90-day pause. 'This is slightly worse than expected," said Harsh Mittal, research analyst at Emkay Global Financial Services, adding that companies such as Gokaldas Exports, which derives nearly 48% of its revenue from the US, are likely to feel the most heat. SP Apparels and Pearl Global, with 25-30% exposure, may also take a hit, while KPR Mills, with under 9% dependence, could see limited impact. While textile stocks may react negatively in the near term, the sector is banking on relief from other trade agreements. The India-UK FTA, expected to be operational in a few months, and ongoing talks with the EU may help offset some market share loss in the US, Mittal said. Pharma counts on exemption, but awaits clarity Pharmaceutical players are cautiously optimistic that Indian generics may be exempted from the proposed tariffs, similar to the zero-tariff carve-out offered in the US-EU deal. Shashank Krishnakumar, pharma expert at Emkay, said Indian companies supply nearly 47% of the US generics market by volume, and any tariff shock would hurt both sides. While US-based Teva Pharmaceuticals has flagged uncertainty, most Indian players, including Aurobindo, Dr. Reddy's and Biocon, expect to continue exports regardless of tariff movements. 'Onshoring is not a viable option given the regulatory timelines and cost inefficiencies," he said. Sun Pharma's specialty drugs, largely made in Korea, may see some relief due to that country's preferential terms with the US. Auto parts makers already under pressure Auto component firms, already subject to a 25% US import duty since April, do not expect a major incremental hit unless a separate penalty tariff is imposed. Analysts flagged concerns about volume and margin pressures arising from slowing US demand and price absorption along the value chain. 'Bharat Forge has 25% exposure to the US market, and while it has local operations there, demand will still be affected," said Chirag Jain, an auto and electronics sector expert. Tata Motors' US exposure via Jaguar Land Rover is expected to remain insulated due to UK-US trade arrangements. As per Jefferies, the impact of the proposed US reciprocal tariffs will vary across sectors. In auto components, Bharat Forge (40-45% US revenue) may be more affected due to new duties on truck parts, while Sona Comstar (30-35%) sees limited impact as PV parts already face 25%. OEMs like Eicher Motors (3-4%) and Tata Motors' JLR (30-35%) face minimal risk due to low exposure or UK-EU trade cover. In capital goods, Cummins, Thermax, and KEI have 5-15% US exposure, with China as an alternate source. Chemical exporters like Navin Fluorine (24%), PI Industries (20%), and SRF (6%) could be hit due to refrigerant gas tariffs. Pharma companies, especially Biocon, Sun Pharma, and Dr Reddy's, risk a 2-8% EPS hit in FY26 unless generics are exempted, Jefferies said. Dixon, which gets around 10% revenue from the US, may see some pressure, but Syrma, Kaynes, and Polycab have low exposure. Refiners like Reliance Industries Ltd, Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd, and Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd may be indirectly affected due to sourcing shifts. Waaree Energies, with a 59% US order book, could be impacted. In textiles, firms like Welspun, Gokaldas, and Indo Count (40-70% US revenue) face competitiveness challenges versus China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh, it said. Macroeconomic impact could be modest but real According to Goldman Sachs, the proposed 25% reciprocal tariff by the US could cause an incremental drag of about 0.3 percentage points on India's real GDP growth in 2025, on top of a previously estimated 0.2 percentage point hit if tariffs above 10% are enforced. The impact stems from India's goods exports exposure of around 4% of GDP to US final demand. Goldman also flagged indirect risks from elevated trade policy uncertainty, which could delay investment decisions by Indian firms. On earnings, the brokerage estimates a potential 2% hit to MSCI India EPS if the new tariffs are enforced, considering both direct and second-order effects. Despite this, it has not revised its 12% and 14% EPS growth forecasts for 2025 and 2026 but warns of downside risks.
Hans India
15 minutes ago
- Hans India
Jayaraju demands action: Why Is Kurnool High Court Bench still pending despite state resolution?
Kurnool: Senior Advocate Y. Jayaraju has strongly questioned the prolonged delay in establishing a permanent High Court bench in Kurnool, despite a formal resolution passed by the Andhra Pradesh State Cabinet and Legislative Assembly over eight months ago. Highlighting the historical and constitutional importance of the issue, Jayaraju emphasized that the Rayalaseema region has long been deprived of judicial and administrative institutions, despite the promises made under the Sribagh Pact of 1937. The resolution, passed in November 2024 under the NDA-led government, was intended to fulfil a key commitment to decentralised governance and regional equity. Following the resolution, the state government submitted the proposal to the Chief Justice of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, as required by constitutional procedure. Legal provisions clarify that the Chief Justice's consent is the only remaining step before the Central Government can issue a notification. The Union Law Minister has also reiterated in Parliament that the Centre is ready to notify the bench immediately upon receiving approval from the Chief Justice. The State Law Department has already complied with all procedural requirements, including submission of infrastructure details requested by the High Court Registrar in January 2025. Despite these developments, there has been no official communication from the Chief Justice or the Full Court of the Andhra Pradesh High Court regarding their decision. In June 2025, Minister Nara Lokesh once again raised the matter with the Union Law Minister, reinforcing the state's commitment. However, the absence of a response from the judiciary has left the proposal in limbo. Legal and civil society leaders in Rayalaseema argue that the delay undermines the principles of justice, accessibility, and balanced regional development. Y. Jayaraju, a noted legal figure and former Public Prosecutor, stated that the issue transcends politics and is a matter of constitutional propriety. He called on the judiciary to uphold transparency and accountability, urging the Chief Justice to clarify whether the proposal has been placed before the Full Court and, if so, what the outcome was. 'Justice delayed is justice denied,' he warned, calling upon the legal community, political representatives, and citizens to push for immediate consent and notification of the Kurnool High Court bench.
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Bangladesh struggles with human rights after Sheikh Hasina fled, says rights body
The interim Bangladesh government of Mohammed Yunus is falling short in implementing its challenging human rights agenda, a year since tens of thousands of people took to the streets to successfully depose their authoritarian government, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said on Thursday. On July 16, violence involving security forces and supporters of Hasina's now-banned Awami League killed five people in the town of Gopalganj.(Reuters) Some of the fear and repression that marked Sheikh Hasina's Awami League Party's 15-year rule, and abuses such as widespread enforced disappearances, appear to have ended. However, the interim government has used arbitrary detention to target perceived political opponents and has yet to deliver systemic reforms to protect human rights, HRW said in a statement. "The hope of the thousands who braved lethal violence a year ago when they opposed Sheikh Hasina's abusive rule to build a rights-respecting democracy remains unfulfilled," said Meenakshi Ganguly, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "The interim government appears stuck, juggling an unreformed security sector, sometimes violent religious hardliners, and political groups that seem more focused on extracting vengeance on Hasina's supporters than protecting Bangladeshis' rights." Eleven reform commissions established in 2024, as well as the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and both Bangladeshi and international human rights activists, have submitted detailed recommendations to the interim government that are still pending. Meanwhile, the government is facing enormous challenges, including an alarming surge in mob violence, political violence, and harassment of journalists by political parties and other non-state groups, such as religious hardliners hostile to women's rights and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. On July 26 and 27, a mob damaged at least 14 homes belonging to members of the Hindu minority in Rangpur district, and there are continuing violations against minority communities in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. Hasina fled Bangladesh on August 5, 2024, following five weeks of protests which killed 1,400 people, according to the UN. The interim government led by Yunus, a Nobel laureate, was established on August 8. But continuing torture and deaths in custody highlight the urgent need for security sector reform. On July 16, violence involving security forces and supporters of Hasina's now-banned Awami League killed five people in the town of Gopalganj after the National Citizens Party, formed by students who had participated in last year's popular movement, held a rally there. In what appears to mirror the partisan actions of the past, police later arbitrarily detained hundreds of alleged Awami League supporters and filed ten murder cases against over 8,400 mostly unnamed people. The government denied carrying out "mass arrests." Between August 6 and September 25, 2024, police lodged cases against 92,486 people, most of them related to murder. Nearly 400 former ministers, members of parliament, and other Awami League officials have been named in over 1,170 cases, which also include hundreds of unnamed individuals. Materials provided to Human Rights Watch show that Mohammad Atiqul Islam, the former mayor of North Dhaka, has been detained since October 2024 in connection with at least 68 separate cases of murder or attempted murder during the 2024 protests. But 36 of these incidents occurred while he was outside the country. As in most other cases, the authorities have not filed charges. Detainees in other high-profile political cases have also cited baseless grounds for arrest, and accused the authorities of denying them medical care and bail. The first trial, with three defendants including Sheikh Hasina, who will be tried in absentia, is due to begin on August 3, but there is no apparent prospect of trials in many cases, and no evidence has been produced against many of those detained. Hundreds may have been arrested under the draconian Special Powers Act, which allows preventive detention and was used by the previous government to suppress dissent. In addition, over 8,600 people were reportedly arrested in a crackdown in February called "Operation Devil Hunt," many of them allegedly Awami League supporters. While it is vitally important to hold people accused of serious crimes accountable, many detentions of people allegedly connected to the Awami League appear to be arbitrary and politically motivated, Human Rights Watch said. Meanwhile, the government is prosecuting very few members of the security forces responsible for egregious violations under the Hasina government. In July, a spokesperson for the Bangladesh Police told the BBC that only 60 police officers had been arrested for their role in the deadly violence in July and August last year, an operation that involved dozens of police and military units, including the notoriously abusive Rapid Action Battalion. On August 27, 2024, the interim government formed a commission to investigate enforced disappearances during Hasina's rule, and on August 29, Bangladesh ratified the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance. The commission, which has received over 1,800 complaints, has completed two interim reports, with another due in December. The commissioners told Human Rights Watch that they have collected significant evidence. But they said that security forces members have destroyed evidence, limited their cooperation, and are resisting efforts to hold accountable the alleged abusers, many of whom are still security agency members. Several senior figures implicated in these crimes were able to flee the country after the interim government came to power. The Yunus government also established 11 commissions to recommend legal and constitutional reforms in areas including the police, the judiciary, and women's rights. However, the interim government has not adopted them, and efforts to reach political consensus on a significantly reduced reform agenda have been slow. A crucial outstanding issue is ensuring women's full, equal, meaningful, and safe participation in all decision-making processes, in line with UN Security Council resolution 1325, including through the reformed electoral system. "To help protect human rights beyond its tenure, the interim government should end arbitrary detentions, including by ensuring that pretrial detention is an exception, not the rule. It should end impunity by supporting the prosecution of security force members accused of serious crimes; ensure the independence of the judiciary from the executive; begin security sector reform, including by disbanding the Rapid Action Battalion; and prioritise women's rights and women's full representation," HRW said. Foreign governments and the UN should support the interim government, Human Rights Watch said. This should include imposing targeted sanctions on alleged abusers. Other governments should prosecute individuals allegedly implicated in serious abuses who have left Bangladesh, including under the principle of universal jurisdiction. And they should make clear that Bangladeshi participation in UN peacekeeping operations is contingent on ensuring accountability for grave violations of international human rights law. "No one is in any doubt that Yunus's interim government faces enormous challenges, but more needs to be done now to ensure a real and lasting change in Bangladesh's human rights situation," Ganguly said. 'Political parties, whose members have been victims of rights violations in the past, should support reforms to ensure that such crimes can never recur and support rights protections for all.'
