The risks and rewards of tokenization as crypto heavyweights push for it
As cryptocurrencies become more intertwined with the traditional financial system, industry heavyweights are racing for a long-sought goal of turning real-world assets into digital tokens.
'Tokenization is going to open the door to a massive trading revolution,' said Vlad Tenev, the CEO of the trading platform Robinhood at a recent James Bond-themed tokenization launch event in the south of France.
Advocates say tokenization is the next leap forward in crypto and can help break down walls that have advantaged the wealthy and make trading cheaper, more transparent and more accessible for everyday investors.
But critics say tokenization threatens to undermine a century's worth of securities law and investor protections that have made the U.S. financial system the envy of the world. And Robinhood's push into tokenizing shares of private companies quickly faced pushback from one of the world's most popular startups.
The basic idea behind tokenization: Use blockchain technology that powers cryptocurrencies to create digital tokens as stand-ins for things like bonds, real estate or even fractional ownership of a piece of art and that can be traded like crypto by virtually anyone, anywhere at any time.
The massive growth of stablecoins, which are a type of cryptocurrency typically bought and sold for $1, has helped fuel the appetite to tokenize other financial assets, crypto venture capitalist Katie Haun said on a recent podcast.
She said tokenization will upend investing in ways similar to how streamers radically changed how people watch television.
'You used to have to sit there on a Thursday night and watch Seinfeld,' Haun said. 'You tune in at a specific time, you don't get to choose your program, you couldn't be watching a program like Squid Games from Korea.
Netflix was market-expanding. In the same way, I think the tokenization of real-world assets will be market expanding.'Robinhood began offering tokenized stock trading of major U.S. public companies for its European customers earlier this month and gave away tokens to some customers meant to represent shares in OpenAI and SpaceX, two highly valued private companies.
Several other firms are diving in. Crypto exchange Kraken also allows customers outside the U.S. to trade tokenized stocks while Coinbase has petitioned regulators to open the market to its U.S. customers. Wall Street giants BlackRock and Franklin Templeton currently offer tokenized money market funds.
McKinsey projects that tokenized assets could reach $2 trillion by 2030.The push for tokenization comes at a heady time in crypto, an industry that's seen enormous growth from the creation and early development of bitcoin more than 15 years ago by libertarian-leaning computer enthusiasts to a growing acceptance in mainstream finance.
The world's most popular cryptocurrency is now regularly setting all-time highs — more than $123,000 on Monday — while other forms of crypto like stablecoins are exploding in use and the Trump administration has pledged to usher in what's been called the 'golden age' for digital assets.
Lee Reiners, a lecturing fellow at Duke University, said the biggest winners in the push for tokenization could be a small handful of exchanges like Robinhood that see their trading volumes and influence spike.
'Which is kind of ironic given the origins of crypto, which was to bypass intermediaries,' Reiners said.
Interest in tokenization has also gotten a boost thanks to the election of President Donald Trump, who has made enacting more crypto-friendly regulations a top priority of his administration and signed a new law regulating stablecoins on Friday.
'Tokenization is an innovation and we at the SEC should be focused on how do we advance innovation at the marketplace,' said Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul Atkins.Securities law can be complex and even defining what is a security can be a hotly debated question, particularly in crypto.
The crypto exchange Binance pulled back offerings of tokenized securities in 2021 after German regulators raised questions about potential violations of that country's securities law.
Under Trump, the SEC has taken a much less expansive view than the previous administration and dropped or paused litigation against crypto companies that the agency had previously accused of violating securities law.
Hilary Allen, a professor at the American University Washington College of Law, said crypto companies have been emboldened by Trump's victory to be more aggressive in pushing what they can offer.
'The most pressing risk is (tokenization) being used as a regulatory arbitrage play as a way of getting around the rules,' she said.
However, the SEC has struck a cautionary tone when it comes to tokens. Shortly after Robinhood's announcement, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, who has been an outspoken crypto supporter, issued a statement saying companies issuing tokenized stock should consider 'their disclosure obligations' under federal law.
'As powerful as blockchain technology is, it does not have magical abilities to transform the nature of the underlying asset,' Peirce said.One of the most closely watched areas of tokenization involves private companies, which aren't subject to strict financial reporting requirements like publicly traded ones.
Many hot startups are not going public as often as they used to and instead are increasingly relying on wealthy and institutional investors to raise large sums of money and stay private.
That's unfair to the little guy, say advocates of tokenization.
'These are massive wealth generators for a very small group of rich, well-connected insiders who get access to these deals early,' said Robinhood executive Johann Kerbrat. 'Crypto has the power to solve this inequality.' But Robinhood's giveaway of tokens meant to represent an investment in OpenAI immediately drew pushback from the company itself, which said it was not involved in Robinhood's plan and did not endorse it.
'Any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval—we did not approve any transfer,' OpenAI said on social media.
'Please be careful.' Public companies have strict public reporting requirements about their financial health that private companies don't have to produce. Such reporting requirements have helped protect investors and give a legitimacy to the U.S. financial system, said Allen, who said the push for tokenized sales of shares in private companies is 'eerily familiar' to how things played out before the creation of the SEC nearly a century ago.
'Where we're headed is where we were in the 1920s,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
2 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Eurozone growth falters as Germany shrinks, tariff headwinds mount
Agencies Europe's economy barely grew in the second quarter of the year, official data showed on Wednesday, as the rush to ship goods before new U.S. tariffs eased and output in Germany, the region's largest economy, unexpectedly declined. Gross domestic product (GDP) grew an anemic 0.1% compared to the previous quarter in the 20 countries that use the euro currency, the EU statistics agency Eurostat reported. And prospects are mediocre for the coming months, given the 15% tariff, or import tax, imposed on European goods in the U.S. under the EU-U.S. trade deal announced Sunday. The higher tariff will burden European exports with higher costs to either be passed on to U.S. consumers or swallowed in the form of lower profits. The eurozone growth still held up better than feared amid expectations for an unchanged reading in the second quarter, suggesting that businesses are adapting to trade uncertainty, potentially reducing the need for more European Central Bank (ECB) interest rate cuts to stimulate the bloc. Compared to the second quarter a year earlier, the bloc's economy expanded by 1.4%, ahead of expectations for 1.2%. The economy sagged after a stronger-than-expected 0.6% growth in the first quarter, a figure inflated by companies trying to move product ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump's additional tariff onslaught that was announced April 2, two days after the first quarter ended. When examined together, however, the first two quarters suggest resilience, supported by the most recent PMI reading, which showed that business activity accelerated faster than forecast, supported by a solid improvement in services and the continued recovery in manufacturing. Europe's economic powerhouse, Germany, unexpectedly shrank by 0.1% from the previous quarter. Italy's economy also contracted by 0.1% in the same period. Growth of 0.3% in France was boosted by a rise in auto and aircraft inventories, while domestic demand was otherwise stagnant. That left Spain as the only strong performer among the four largest eurozone economies at 0.7%. France's Economy Minister Eric Lombard said the figures for France demonstrated the country's companies were, however, proving resilient to U.S. tariff hikes. 'With the 15% U.S. universal tariff likely to subtract around 0.2% from the region's GDP, growth is likely to remain weak in the rest of this year,' said Franziska Palmas, senior Europe economist at Capital Economics. The 27-country EU economy expanded by 0.2% over the April-June period from the previous quarter, after registering 0.5% growth in the first three months of 2025. Germany's economy remains roughly the same size as it was before the pandemic six years ago, as its export-dominated business sector struggles with multiple issues, including stronger competition from China, a lack of skilled workers, higher energy prices, lagging infrastructure investment, and burdensome regulation and bureaucracy. Palmas said that Germany 'is likely to be hit harder than other major economies by tariffs and continue to struggle this year' before increased government spending from the new government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz, aimed at boosting defense and making up the infrastructure gap, starts to boost the economy in 2026. Economists also argue that a sharp increase in budget spending from next year could be a boost to growth that will offset much of the tariffs' impact. This economic resilience is a key factor why financial investors think the ECB is close to done easing borrowing costs after halving its key rate to 2% in the past 13 months. Markets see just a 50% chance of another cut by December and a small chance that rates will actually start rising toward the end of 2026 as the economy gathers speed and price pressure starts rising is far from over, however. The EU has yet to sign its trade deal with the U.S., and plenty of details remain to be worked out, indicating that it could take months for businesses to gain the confidence to make investment decisions. China has also yet to strike a deal with the U.S., raising fears that Beijing will be forced to dump surplus goods on the rest of the world, depressing prices elsewhere. Such dumping could then lower eurozone inflation and force the ECB into cutting interest rates on fears that below-target inflation, its main worry in the pre-pandemic decade, is returning.
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Tariffs and turmoil: Rough road ahead for Europe's carmakers
Agencies European carmakers viewed the trade deal struck with the U.S. as a de-escalation, but were still bracing for damages, which some industry insiders said could reach 'billions.' German auto companies in particular were in for a great deal of export pain, as their share prices indicated. Shares in Porsche, Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes-Benz all lost more than 3% in trading on Monday, a day after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, on behalf of the European Union, shook hands with U.S. President Donald Trump, reaching a preliminary trade deal. The agreement eases 'the intense uncertainty surrounding transatlantic trade relations in recent months,' Europe's main auto group, the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (ACEA), said in a statement welcoming the deal 'in principle.' But it noted that the 15% U.S. tariffs imposed on EU goods, including cars, 'will continue to have a negative impact not just for industry in the EU but also in the U.S.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his country's economy – the biggest in Europe – would face 'substantial damage' from the U.S. tariffs agreed in the deal. But, he said, 'we couldn't expect to achieve any more.' The U.S. is a key market for European automakers, which last year sent nearly 750,000 of their cars to the U.S., representing nearly a quarter of the sector's overall exports. While the 15% rate is less than the 27.5% tariff Trump imposed in April, it is far higher than the 2.5% levy European car manufacturers faced before Trump's return to the White House. A German analyst, Stefan Bratzel, said it could be expected that U.S. consumers would pay two-thirds of the price hike caused by the tariff, while car exporters would probably swallow the other third. For those companies, 'we might have to see whether it is possible for cost-cutting somewhere else,' he said. The 15% rate was similar to one reached in the deal the U.S. struck with Japan, another major car-exporting country. For German carmakers, the U.S. represents around 13% of their total exports. In the short term, a 15% tariff will cost them 'billions each year,' said Hildegard Mueller, head of the national automobile manufacturers' association VDA. The situation has compelled all automakers to lower their 2025 profit forecasts and seek ways to alleviate the pressure. BMW boss Oliver Zipse suggested in June that Europe could get rid of its own tariffs on imported vehicles made in the U.S. That could benefit his company, which last year exported 153,000 vehicles from the Americas, and imported into Europe 92,000 cars that were assembled in the U.S. Similarly, Mercedes is seeking assistance from the national or EU level. 'The deal reached between the EU and the U.S. is a first, important step that needs to be followed by other measures,' a company spokesperson told Agence France-Presse (AFP). 'Politicians need to keep working to get rid of obstacles getting in the way of free trade. We are counting on the EU and U.S. to continue their constructive dialogue in the future,' she said. Volkswagen is also facing tariff hardship for vehicles it manufactures in Mexico for the U.S. market, announcing that its first quarter results were shaved by around 1.3 billion euros ($1.5 billion) compared to the same period a year earlier. Its Porsche and Audi cars are also exposed as they have no production factories in the U.S. On Monday, Audi reduced its revenue and profit targets for this year, although it expects them to rise next year. Volkswagen CEO Oliver Blume has suggested reaching a side deal with the U.S. that would take into account investments his company could make in that country. Volvo Cars, the Swedish carmaker owned by China's Geely Holding, has announced steep second quarter losses because of tariffs. The European auto sector is now lobbying the European Commission to delay the timetable for transitioning the European car market to all-electric and to provide some form of industry stimulus. With no help, European car factories, already facing uphill challenges, 'will have to reduce production,' said Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer, director of the Center for Automotive Research. That, he said, could affect up to 70,000 jobs in Germany alone.
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
‘Just unrealistic': EU's $250B US energy pledge faces major doubts
Agencies The European Union's commitment to purchase $250 billion worth of U.S. energy annually is seen as unrealistic, according to analysts, as it would require diverting most U.S. energy exports to Europe while the EU has limited control over the import decisions of its companies. The U.S. and the EU struck a framework trade deal on Sunday, which will impose 15% U.S. tariffs on most EU goods. The deal included a pledge for the EU to spend $250 billion annually on U.S. energy – imports of oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear technologyfor the next three years. Total U.S. energy exports to all buyers worldwide in 2024 amounted to $318 billion, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) data showed. Of that, the EU imported a combined $76 billion of U.S. petroleum, LNG and solid fuels such as coal in 2024, according to Reuters' calculations based on Eurostat data. More than tripling those imports was unrealistic, analysts said. Arturo Regalado, senior LNG analyst at Kpler, said the scope of the energy trade envisioned in the deal 'exceeds market realities.' 'U.S. oil flows would need to fully redirect toward the EU to reach the target, or the value of LNG imports from the US would need to increase sixfold,' Regalado said. There is strong competition for U.S. energy exports as other countries need the supplies and have themselves pledged to buy more in trade agreed to a 'major expansion of U.S. energy exports' in its U.S. trade deal last week, the White House said in a statement. South Korea has also indicated interest in investing and purchasing fuel from an Alaskan LNG project as it seeks a trade deal. Competition for U.S. energy could drive up benchmark oil and gas prices and encourage American producers to favour exports over domestic supply. That could make fuel and power costs more expensive, which would be a political and economic headache for U.S. and EU leaders. Neither side has detailed what was included in the energy deal – or whether it covered items such as energy services or parts for power grids and EU estimates its member countries' plans to expand nuclear energy would require hundreds of billions of euros in investments by 2050. Its nuclear reactor-related imports, however, totalled just 53.3 billion euros ($61.70 billion) in 2024, trade data shows. The energy pledge reflected the EU's analysis of how much U.S. energy supply it could accommodate, a senior EU official said, but that would depend on investments in U.S. oil and LNG infrastructure, European import infrastructure and shipping capacity. 'These figures, again, are not taken out of thin air. So yes, they require investments,' said the senior official, who declined to be named. 'Yes, it will vary according to the energy sources. But these are figures which are reachable.' There was no public commitment to the delivery, the official added, because the EU would not buy the energy – its companies would. Private companies import most of Europe's oil, while a mix of private and state-run companies import gas. The European Commission can aggregate demand for LNG to negotiate better terms, but cannot force companies to buy fuel. That is a commercial decision.'It's just unrealistic,' ICIS analysts Andreas Schröder and Ajay Parmar said in written comments to Reuters. 'Either Europe pays a super high non-market reflective price for U.S. LNG or it takes way too much LNG volumes, more than it can cope with.' The United States is already the EU's top supplier of LNG and oil, shipping 44% of EU LNG needs and 15.4% of its oil in 2024, according to EU data. Raising imports to the target would require a U.S. LNG expansion way beyond what is planned through 2030, said Jacob Mandel, research lead at Aurora Energy Research. 'You can add on capacity,' Mandel said. 'But if you're talking about the scale that would be necessary to meet these targets, the $250 billion, then it's not really feasible.' Europe could buy $50 billion more of U.S. LNG annually as supply increases, he said. The EU has already said it could import more U.S. energy as its plan advances to end Russian oil and gas imports by EU imported around 94 million barrels of Russian oil last year – 3% of the bloc's crude purchases – and 52 billion cubic metres (bcm) of Russian LNG and gas, according to EU data. For comparison, the EU imported 45 bcm of U.S. LNG last year. Higher EU fuel purchases would, however, run counter to forecasts for EU demand to decline as it shifts to clean energy, analysts said. 'There is no major need for the EU to import more oil from the U.S., in fact, its oil demand peaked a number of years ago,' Schröder and Parmar said.
