Joe Biden last underwent common prostate cancer screening in 2014, spokesman for his office reveals
Former President Joe Biden last underwent a Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) blood test, one of the most common ways to screen for prostate cancer, in 2014 while he was serving as Barack Obama's vice president, a spokesperson for his office announced Tuesday.
'Prior to Friday, President Biden had never been diagnosed with prostate cancer,' the rep went on in response to speculation that the 82-year-old had been secretly diagnosed while in office.
Sunday's announcement that Biden had an 'aggressive' form of prostate cancer that had spread to his bones shocked longtime members of the Democrat's inner circle, some of whom expressed befuddlement to The Post that the disease could have advanced to such a stage without being detected.
White House physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor, a longtime friend of the Bidens, made no mention of performing a PSA in his report on Biden's most recent physical exam while president, conducted in February 2024.
'I think the likely scenario, knowing Kevin O'Connor pretty well, is that they had a discussion on what a PSA test is, and they decided not to do one because it would likely be elevated and cause a story, since a lot of older men have high PSAs that are false positives,' a long-serving aide to Biden mused Monday.
'A blood test has a paper trail. They probably just didn't do the test. I think it would leak if he had a PSA test they tried to bury.'
'What's ironic,' this person added, 'is that if they didn't give the president a PSA test because of the potential for optics of a possible false positive, that decision is ultimately going to lead to his death because they could have caught it earlier.'
A former Biden White House aide also cast doubt on the idea of a secret prostate cancer diagnosis, saying: 'Frankly, residence staff talk. It would have gotten out … Also, Doc [O'Connor] isn't discreet. Yes, he's a doctor, but he's always chatting.'
Both the American Academy of Family Physicians and the US Preventative Services Task Force recommend against prostate cancer screenings for men 70 and older. Biden turned 70 on Nov. 20, 2012.
'Men aged 70 years and older have a higher rate of prostate cancer, but because they are more likely to die from a cause other than their prostate cancer, the potential benefit screening is diminished,' the AAFP's guidance reads on its website. 'Older men experience more harms from screening, including increased rates of false positives, overdiagnosis, and increased risk of harms from biopsy and treatment.'
Dr. Zeke Emanuel, a well-respected oncologist and architect of the Affordable Care Act, told MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' in a Monday appearance that Biden has 'had this for many years, maybe even a decade, growing there and spreading.'
'He did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days,' Emanuel added. 'He had it while he was president. He probably had it at the start of his presidency in 2021.'
Additional reporting by Steven Nelson
Originally published as Joe Biden last underwent common prostate cancer screening in 2014, spokesman for his office reveals
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Uncertainty over AUKUS
Isabella Higgins: Uncertainty over Australia's multi-billion dollar nuclear submarines deal as the United States reviews the AUKUS security pact. The agreement was struck under former President Joe Biden. Now, officials say it's being reviewed to ensure it fits Donald Trump's agenda. North America correspondent Carrington Clarke is in Washington. He joined me a short time ago. Carrington Clarke: Well, what we know is that the review is taking place. A senior defence official has framed this as ensuring that the security pact, which remember this was signed back in 2021 when Joe Biden was president of the United States, that the pact aligns with Donald Trump's so-called 'America First' agenda. What I thought was interesting is that they specified that some of the things they're looking at is to ensure that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs. Now, there have been concerns raised that the agreement in place potentially puts at risk America's ability to have enough nuclear powered submarines of its own, that by Australia receiving some of those submarines, the earlier submarines are supposed to be effectively second-hand, but that that could leave America vulnerable for its own needs. And then there is this question about how much America expects its allies, including Australia, to be spending on defence. There's already been calls from the secretary of defence here, Mr Hegseth, that Australia should be upping its defence budget. So you do question whether perhaps part of this review will put more pressure on Australia to raise how much money we're spending, not necessarily just about the AUKUS agreement. Isabella Higgins: And Carrington, I think the question for many people is where does this leave Australia? Carrington Clarke: Well, I think this really raises doubts yet again about how vulnerable this AUKUS agreement makes Australia to the whims of the American administration. Effectively, this is by far and away our biggest expenditure on defence, but it's very reliant on accessing American technology. There have been sceptics, critics of this deal who've said that it effectively takes away some of Australia's autonomy when it comes to defence. We are so reliant on America agreeing and continuing to agree to supply this technology and to supply hardware. So this will obviously raise doubts. In saying that, experts also tell me that we shouldn't be too concerned about the idea of a review. Reviews are very normal. They are particularly normal for a new administration when looking at agreements that were signed by previous administrations. So this does not mean that Donald Trump is keen to ditch the AUKUS agreement. It may be that they look to change some of the details. But again, part of the reason there is concern is we haven't seen a full-throated endorsement of the AUKUS agreement since Donald Trump took back power. And although the defence secretary says that he is in favour of it, the fact that we haven't heard it from the President himself raises some concern. Isabella Higgins: Carrington Clarke in Washington.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Uncertainty of AUKUS
Isabella Higgins: Uncertainty over Australia's multi-billion dollar nuclear submarines deal as the United States reviews the AUKUS security pact. The agreement was struck under former President Joe Biden. Now, officials say it's being reviewed to ensure it fits Donald Trump's agenda. North America correspondent Carrington Clarke is in Washington. He joined me a short time ago. Carrington Clarke: Well, what we know is that the review is taking place. A senior defence official has framed this as ensuring that the security pact, which remember this was signed back in 2021 when Joe Biden was president of the United States, that the pact aligns with Donald Trump's so-called 'America First' agenda. What I thought was interesting is that they specified that some of the things they're looking at is to ensure that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs. Now, there have been concerns raised that the agreement in place potentially puts at risk America's ability to have enough nuclear powered submarines of its own, that by Australia receiving some of those submarines, the earlier submarines are supposed to be effectively second-hand, but that that could leave America vulnerable for its own needs. And then there is this question about how much America expects its allies, including Australia, to be spending on defence. There's already been calls from the secretary of defence here, Mr Hegseth, that Australia should be upping its defence budget. So you do question whether perhaps part of this review will put more pressure on Australia to raise how much money we're spending, not necessarily just about the AUKUS agreement. Isabella Higgins: And Carrington, I think the question for many people is where does this leave Australia? Carrington Clarke: Well, I think this really raises doubts yet again about how vulnerable this AUKUS agreement makes Australia to the whims of the American administration. Effectively, this is by far and away our biggest expenditure on defence, but it's very reliant on accessing American technology. There have been sceptics, critics of this deal who've said that it effectively takes away some of Australia's autonomy when it comes to defence. We are so reliant on America agreeing and continuing to agree to supply this technology and to supply hardware. So this will obviously raise doubts. In saying that, experts also tell me that we shouldn't be too concerned about the idea of a review. Reviews are very normal. They are particularly normal for a new administration when looking at agreements that were signed by previous administrations. So this does not mean that Donald Trump is keen to ditch the AUKUS agreement. It may be that they look to change some of the details. But again, part of the reason there is concern is we haven't seen a full-throated endorsement of the AUKUS agreement since Donald Trump took back power. And although the defence secretary says that he is in favour of it, the fact that we haven't heard it from the President himself raises some concern. Isabella Higgins: Carrington Clarke in Washington. Jennifer Parker is a national security expert from the Australian National University. She says the announcement of a review isn't entirely surprising Jennifer Parker: As we're nearly four years into the deal, it's probably prudent that they're launching a review. I don't think we can read into it any comments at the moment in terms of whether they think it's going to change et cetera. And when you ask the question of is it fundamentally beneficial to the US, the answer is yes. And so I'm confident that any review would determine that it is in the US' interests to continue with AUKUS. Isabella Higgins: ANU national security expert, Jennifer Parker.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
WA news LIVE: Man with blow torch threatens to light Bunnings gas cylinders on fire
Latest posts Latest posts 9.30am Man with blow torch threatens to light Bunnings gas cylinders on fire First up this morning, officers from the Tactical Response Group, WA Police and DFES swarmed a Bunnings in Perth's southern suburbs last night after a man, allegedly armed with a blow torch and threatening to set gas cylinders on fire, was arrested. An exclusion zone was set up outside the warehouse in Cannington, after police received reports of a man acting suspiciously inside the warehouse around 7.20pm. Further reports received stated the man had then armed himself with the weapon and was making threats to ignite the gas cylinders outside the store. Police said officers attempted negotiations with the man when they arrived, and he was then taken into custody soon after. Footage of the dramatic arrest, posted to Facebook by a bystander, shows multiple officers from the TRG and WA Police swarming in to make the arrest. The 42-year-old Kelmscott man has been charged with burglary and commit, stealing, being armed in a way that may cause fear and endangering the life, health or safety of a person. The man's bail was refused and he is due to appear before the Armadale Magistrates Court today. Across the nation and around the world Here's what's making headlines today: The United States has launched a review into whether the AUKUS submarine deal should be changed or scrapped, with the Pentagon saying the Joe Biden-era arrangement must be examined to ensure it meets President Donald Trump's 'America First' priorities. Australians have some of the most critical attitudes towards US President Donald Trump and his administration among the world's voters, with an international survey revealing most people find him arrogant, dangerous and a threat to the global economy. A Manhattan jury found Harvey Weinstein guilty on a sex crimes charge on Wednesday, though the jury has not yet reached a verdict on all counts the former movie mogul faces in deliberations that have been marred by infighting and threats. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley is preparing to order a radical investigation into the future of the Liberal Party, going beyond a standard post-election review, as she seeks to rebuild it after its historic electoral loss. Critical worker shortages and inflationary pressure on high-volume materials are among the causes driving the unprecedented cost of building a house in Australia, as experts warn that snowballing expenses could doom ambitious housing reform to failure.
