
Milly Alcock debuts first look at ‘Supergirl' following ‘Superman' success
The poster features the tagline 'Look Out. 2026,' a twist on Superman's classic phrase 'Look up,' that suggests an edgier tone. Alcock's face is not visible, but her costume, which a blend of classic comic book elements and the Woman of Tomorrow storyline, is on full display. The outfit includes the red skirt and boots fans will recognise, along with the House of El crest and a brown trench coat.
Alcock, known for her breakout performance as young Rhaenyra Targaryen in House of the Dragon, made a surprise appearance in the final moments of Superman, which released on July 11.
Describing the character, Gunn said: 'She's a mess. A total mess. While Superman was raised in a loving and supportive environment, Supergirl's path has been far more traumatic.'
The film, inspired by the acclaimed Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow comic miniseries by Tom King and Bilquis Evely, follows Kara Zor-El and her dog Krypto on a cosmic journey to help a young alien named Ruthye avenge her father's death.
Craig Gillespie, best known for I, Tonya and Cruella, will direct. The cast includes Matthias Schoenaerts as villain Krem of the Yellow Hill, Eve Ridley as Ruthye Marye Knoll, and Jason Momoa as the antihero Lobo.
Supergirl is slated for release on June 26, 2026.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
14 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why are movie tickets so expensive? A cinephile's plea for affordability
It was the year 2006. Krrish had hit the theatres, and it was the first time my parents were taking me to watch a movie on the silver screen. Paras Cinemas, Nehru Place, now known as INOX Paras, was then a single-screen theatre. We bought the tickets in 'black' and three of them cost just Rs 210. I still remember Hrithik Roshan leaping onto a horse and then into the sky — it was the exact moment the seven-year-old me fell in love with cinema. And in that love, theatres played a starring role. From Saif Ali Khan racing for redemption in Ta Ra Rum Pum to Brad Pitt 'flying' in his F1 car; from Shah Rukh Khan being reborn in Om Shanti Om to Shah Rukh Khan being reborn again as Pathaan; from Harry Potter defeating Voldemort to Iron Man snapping his fingers to end Thanos, theatres have given me countless moments to hold on to. Sitting in a dark room with strangers, watching stories unravel on a giant screen, was more than just the trivial act of moviegoing. For me, it was a ritual — a highly rewarding one. But then I grew up. And with adulthood came the moment that every cinephile dreads: paying for the tickets myself. Theatres once gave me my first taste of stories that felt larger than life. They gave me magic and belongingness. Now, they give me anxiety and a bill. This summer alone has been a blockbuster for the box office with Superman, F1, Mission: Impossible, Metro In Dino, and Saiyaara. But for anyone like me who enjoys movies the traditional way, on the big screen, it's also been the costliest one yet. For the first time, I wasn't just excited about new releases; I was also calculating whether I could afford to watch them. Superman tickets alone were priced anywhere between Rs 400 and Rs 1,600. I never thought much about ticket prices until recently. Now, I plan around them. I wait for discount days. I resurrected an old bank account just because it gave me a 50 per cent cashback. I have become that person who refreshes the coupon section on apps before deciding whether I can afford to watch a movie on release day. Often, I find myself texting friends, not just to share the film but to ask, 'Want to come? There's a buy-one-get-one offer.' I never used to care about going alone. Now, I feel like I need company, just to split the cost. And that hurts. I have always been someone who lives for the 'first day, first show'. But now, major chains have started offering Rs 99 – Rs 149 ticket prices on Tuesdays to boost footfalls, and I often find myself waiting till the fifth day and catching the last show just so I don't burn a hole in my wallet. The excitement of walking into a packed house on Friday has now been replaced by the disappointment of waiting for Tuesday. Let's not forget that the ticket price is just the beginning. Add Rs 100 for parking, Rs 700 for popcorn — more if you dared to ask for cheese or caramel or a drink — and of course, taxes. Suddenly, your simple plan to watch a movie turns into an over Rs 1,000 experience. And this is if you are going alone. If you are going with someone, it may as well be a small budget holiday. The annual 'Box Office Report' by the Mumbai-based research firm, Ormax Media, reveals a telling figure. In 2022, the average price of a movie ticket was Rs 119. In 2023, it rose to Rs 130. And in 2024, it touched Rs 134. That's a 12.6 per cent rise in just two years, and a whopping 45.6 per cent increase from 2015. Now, it must be noted that box office earnings have also grown in that period. In 2024, films earned Rs 11,833 crore (though this was marginally less than 2023's Rs 12,226 crore). This marked a 42 per cent rise over 2015 earnings. However, footfall is yet to recover to its pre-pandemic levels. Just before the Covid-19 pandemic hit, box office footfall was at a high of 103 crore in 2019, which has fallen to 88.3 crore in 2024, even lower than the 94.3 crore in 2023. The report notes, 'This underscores the increasing dependence of the box office on rising Average Ticket Prices (ATP) in recent years.' It's not just casual moviegoers feeling the heat. Even those immersed in the film ecosystem are being priced out. Anshul Gupta, a journalist based in Delhi-NCR, summed it up best: 'I have watched 24 films in theatres already this year — 34, if you count all the media screenings and film festival movies. In short, I watch a lot. Doing this in Delhi-NCR in 2025 is an expensive hobby. Being in the media business, I am still able to watch a few through the screenings but I think looking for coupons, card discounts and other 'jugaads' every time when a tentpole film releases is getting on my nerves.' To understand how the situation plays out in other cities, I reached out to Abhinav Chakraborty, a senior journalist based in Chennai and a fellow film enthusiast. Chakraborty self-admittedly watches one movie in the theatre almost every week. When asked whether pricing impacts his viewing habits, he responded, 'Yes, it does. I grew up in Mumbai where tickets are much pricier, especially on the first weekend. Compared with that, Chennai's ticket prices don't exceed Rs 250 at any point (not applicable for IMAX, of course). So while I only looked at morning shows back in Mumbai, here I can go watch movies according to my convenience.' Chakraborty added, 'I believe the range of movie ticket prices in Delhi is similar to that in Mumbai, which would make moviegoing every weekend unviable.' Affordable ticketing doesn't just allow you to watch a movie; it encourages a habit of watching. It aids a culture of moviegoing and helps build a community. If Chennai can cap prices and still run successful shows, why can't the other northern and western regions follow suit? Just recently, Karnataka announced a price cap of Rs 200 on movie tickets. That's a move in the right direction. But when I tried to get a sense of how theatre chains view this issue, the responses were guarded. I reached out to a few cinema managers, but none were willing to comment. A duty officer at PVR Cinemas, Mall of India, said people may not be frequenting theatres because 'there is an abundance of content'. 'Because of OTT and YouTube, the audience has content on their phones,' he added. But that doesn't offer the complete picture. As Chakraborty pointed out, lower ticket prices encourage him to watch films he might not even be interested in initially. A 2023 research by Ormax Media shows that while the 'appeal' of a movie stays stable when the ticket prices increase in multiples of Rs 25, there is a 15 per cent fall in appeal when the price point moves from double-digit to triple-digit figures (i.e. Rs 50 to Rs 100). The trend continues across multiples of Rs 100, with the appeal dropping by 18 per cent between Rs 100 and Rs 400. This is true for a regular film. For event films such as Pathaan or Tiger 3, with large-scale releases, the appeal is often higher despite expensive tickets. However, the appeal does drop between Rs 50 and Rs 400. Though ticket prices may not result in a dramatic decline in the appeal of a movie, they certainly have an impact. It shows that the shrinking footfalls at theatres may not be just about a lack of interest, but also a lack of access. When tickets cost as much as a decent dinner, experimentation dies. Curiosity becomes a calculated risk. There's also a burgeoning idea of 'premium moviegoing experience' with recliner seats, curated menus, and call-a-waiter buttons. Some halls resemble luxury hotels more than cinemas. However, the experience isn't for everyone and may even be exclusionary. So here's a simple request to the powers that be: let movies be movies again. Let them be accessible, affordable, and democratic. Don't make us choose between passion and practicality. Because when cinema becomes a luxury, it stops being culture and starts being a commodity. Let me buy that ticket without flinching. Let me sit in the dark with strangers and feel wonder, not worry. Let me be that seven-year-old again, watching Hrithik Roshan fly, not calculating if I can afford to watch him land.


Hindustan Times
14 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Jacob Elordi cast as Frankenstein's monster in Guillermo del Toro's reimagining: ‘Have a supernaturally good connection'
Guillermo del Toro's long-awaited Frankenstein is finally taking shape, but not without a dramatic twist behind the scenes. The Oscar-winning director, known for turning monsters into mythic poetry, has recast the film's iconic creature — and the result may be even better than what he first imagined. Jacob Elordi cast as Frankenstein's monster in Guillermo del Toro's reimagining In an interview with Vanity Fair, del Toro revealed that he had just nine weeks to completely reimagine the look and essence of Frankenstein's monster after original star Andrew Garfield exited the film due to scheduling conflicts following the 2023 Hollywood strikes. Garfield's departure was no small setback since the director and his trusted makeup artist Mike Hill had already spent nine months carefully crafting Garfield's version of the creature. 'I mean, it was like Jacob is the most perfect actor for the creature,' del Toro said of Jacob Elordi, who stepped into the role last-minute. 'And we have a supernaturally good connection. It's like, very few words. Very few things I have to say, and he does it.' Towering at 6'5', Elordi brings an entirely new physicality to the role, a stark contrast to Garfield's 5'10' frame. His height, gangly elegance, and sombre intensity helped reframe the creature not just as a monster, but as something tragically human. 'What attracted me to him was his gangliness and his wrists. It was this looseness,' said Hill. 'Then he has these real sombre moments where he watches you really deftly, and his eyelids are low, with the long lashes like Karloff. I was like, 'I don't know who else you could get with a physicality like this.'' Del Toro echoed that sentiment, likening the moment to director Richard Donner's legendary casting of Christopher Reeve in Superman. 'He said, 'I eventually had to pray to God to bring me Superman with Christopher Reeve,'' Hill recalled. 'When Guillermo suggested Jacob, his own prayers were answered.' Although the last-minute change forced the team to rebuild their monster in just nine weeks, the pressure seems to have led to unexpected magic. 'We recast, and we had nine weeks,' del Toro said. 'You can't be under more pressure than that.' Elordi's monster is expected to be both tender and terrifying. 'His demeanour is innocent,' Hill noted, 'but it's encompassed in a six-foot-five frame. He could really do a lot of damage if this man really wanted to be a bad guy.' Also starring Oscar Isaac, Mia Goth, Christoph Waltz, and Charles Dance, Frankenstein promises to be a haunting and deeply human take on Mary Shelley's 1818 novel. As del Toro continues shaping his most ambitious gothic vision yet, it's clear he's found not just a creature — but a muse — in Elordi.


Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Superman vs The Fantastic Four: Which film had the bigger opening weekend at the box office?
David Corenswet's Superman and Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby-led The Fantastic Four: The First Steps are the two big movies this summer. Both films arrived with good previews and opened big, both in the US and worldwide. But which film had an edge over the other and emerged as the winner? The box office results are in, and we might have a close winner. The two films were released just two weeks apart in theatres. (Also read: Superman director James Gunn says 'anti-American sentiment' is harming Hollywood films overseas) Superman and The Fantastic Four The First Steps got the cash counters ringing at the box office this summer. Superman box office figures Let's begin with James Gunn's Superman, which saw David Corenswet step into the beloved role of the Man of Steel. As per Box Office Mojo, the DC release collected $125 million at the North American box office during its opening weekend. At the worldwide box office opening weekend, the film crossed $95 million, taking its global debut at $220 million. After two weeks, the film has now crossed the $500 million mark in North America, reaching $289.5 million locally and $213.2 million internationally. Superman stars David Corenswet in the titular role, along with Rachel Brosnahan as Louis Lane and Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor. The Fantastic Four opening figures Meanwhile, The Fantastic Four, starring Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, and Joseph Quinn, arrived two weeks later on July 25. The Marvel release collected $118 million domestically. Globally, the film was released in 52 markets, earning $100 million overseas. The gross overall collection now stands at $218 million. It's also the 37th MCU film to top the box office, contributing to Disney becoming the first studio to hit $3 billion in global ticket sales in 2025. By comparing these two figures, it is clear that Superman edged past Fantastic Four by a small margin. It will be interesting to see how Fantastic Four holds up in the upcoming weeks, as the performance of this film will also affect the future of its franchise.