
Kerala slams Centre's move to permit offshore atomic minerals mining
Kerala's coastline, along with parts of Odisha and Tamil Nadu, is known for its rich deposits of beach sand minerals that contain thorium—crucial for India's nuclear energy ambitions. Rajeeve said the rules would disproportionately impact Kerala, home to public sector undertakings involved in beach sand mineral processing. 'This will jeopardise not just the operations of these PSUs but also the thousands employed by them,' he said.
Equally alarming, according to the state, is the environmental damage that deep-sea mining can cause. 'Offshore atomic minerals mining will severely disrupt fragile marine habitats, destroy fish stocks, and collapse food chains,' the minister warned. 'It will directly affect the livelihoods of lakhs of traditional fishers who depend on these waters.'
He accused the Centre of ignoring Kerala's repeated objections while moving forward with plans to permit exploration and mining in areas adjacent to the state's maritime boundaries. 'The sudden notification of these rules, without dialogue or transparency, is unacceptable,' he said.
Calling the move an 'injustice to coastal states,' Rajeeve demanded the complete withdrawal of the Offshore Areas Atomic Minerals Rules, 2025. 'The Centre must understand that this is not merely a matter of resource exploitation — it is a question of environmental protection, constitutional rights, and human survival,' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
SC agrees to examine plea to repeal Bodh Gaya temple law
Gaya: The long-pending issue of total control over management and administration of the Unesco world heritage Mahabodhi Mahavihara being raised from time to time by a section of Buddhists got a ray of hope, as a bench of the Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine a plea for repealing the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The demand of Buddhists' included replacing the Act with a central law. The bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh issued notice to the Centre and others seeking their responses on the petition and tagged it for further hearing. Earlier on June 30, the apex court had turned down the petition and asked the petitioner to move high court concerned. Mahavihara campus in comprises the sacred Bodhi (peepal) tree, around 50-metres tall shrine structure, the lotus pond known as Muchlind pond, several ancient stupas and other religious signs of Buddha's enlightenment journey. Practising meditation under the shadow of the tree, Prince Siddhartha attained enlightenment to be called Buddha, around 2,600 years ago. According to the temple Act 1949, an eight-member committee comprising four Buddhists and four Hindu members takes care of management and administration of the sacred shrine. District magistrate of Gaya happens to be ex-officio chairman of the committee, while the member secretary is nominated by home department of the state govt. Apart from seeking all members from Buddhist community in the committee, the petition has also sought removal of encroachment in the vicinity of the Mahavihara campus.


New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Kerala slams Centre's move to permit offshore atomic minerals mining
Offshore mining rules are threat to coastal livelihoods Kerala's coastline, along with parts of Odisha and Tamil Nadu, is known for its rich deposits of beach sand minerals that contain thorium—crucial for India's nuclear energy ambitions. Rajeeve said the rules would disproportionately impact Kerala, home to public sector undertakings involved in beach sand mineral processing. 'This will jeopardise not just the operations of these PSUs but also the thousands employed by them,' he said. Equally alarming, according to the state, is the environmental damage that deep-sea mining can cause. 'Offshore atomic minerals mining will severely disrupt fragile marine habitats, destroy fish stocks, and collapse food chains,' the minister warned. 'It will directly affect the livelihoods of lakhs of traditional fishers who depend on these waters.' He accused the Centre of ignoring Kerala's repeated objections while moving forward with plans to permit exploration and mining in areas adjacent to the state's maritime boundaries. 'The sudden notification of these rules, without dialogue or transparency, is unacceptable,' he said. Calling the move an 'injustice to coastal states,' Rajeeve demanded the complete withdrawal of the Offshore Areas Atomic Minerals Rules, 2025. 'The Centre must understand that this is not merely a matter of resource exploitation — it is a question of environmental protection, constitutional rights, and human survival,' he said.


India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Legal arrest, linguistic misstep: Delhi Police FIR stirs 'Bangladeshi language' row
A legitimate arrest of an illegal immigrant in Delhi has spiralled into a politically charged controversy, after an internal communication by the Delhi Police allegedly referred to Bengali as a "Bangladeshi language". The error, though seemingly minor, stirred a political storm, especially in poll-bound West Bengal, where language and identity are deeply intertwined. The alleged error pitted the Centre and the Trinamool Congress against each LANGUAGE THAT DOES NOT EXISTThe controversy erupted with an internal police note during the investigation of an FIR registered on March 11, 2025. The document referenced evidence in the "Bangladeshi language" — a term that has no linguistic basis. The official language of Bangladesh is Bengali, which is also widely spoken in Indian states like West Bengal, Tripura, and parts of semantic slip was swiftly politicised. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee took to X (formerly Twitter), writing, "See now how Delhi police, under the direct control of the Ministry of Home, Government of India, is describing Bengali as 'Bangladeshi' language!"THE FIR THAT SPARKED ROW The case involves 27-year-old Mohammad Jewel Islam, a Bangladeshi national arrested from the Bhogal–Jangpura area in South Delhi. According to the FIR filed at Lodhi Colony Police Station, Islam had entered India illegally in 2021 via the Cooch Behar border in West Bengal, without valid interrogation, Islam submitted a Bangladeshi National ID (No. 3325183683) and the identity cards of his mother and brother, confirming his Bangladeshi citizenship. He had procured an Aadhaar and PAN card in Delhi using allegedly forged documents, with the help of an agent from Hazrat has since been booked under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Foreigners Act, and the Aadhaar Act. Seven more individuals were arrested in connection with similar document-related GAP THAT'S OVERSHADOWING THE CASEWhile the arrest and evidence appear legally sound, the fallout from the language misstep has dominated headlines. The mention of "Bangladeshi language" was not part of the FIR, but a note accompanying a translation request. However, it has become the focal point of political argue that such errors reflect a lack of cultural and linguistic awareness within enforcement bodies. Film personalities and community leaders across the Bengali diaspora have condemned the terminology as reductive and harmful, particularly in a country as linguistically diverse as VS PROFILING: WHERE'S THE LINE?The case has raised uneasy questions about how identity is perceived in law enforcement. While the FIR process demonstrated procedural diligence, the reference to language has sparked concerns over ethnic is no language called "Bangladeshi." Bengali, the official language of Bangladesh, is also a constitutionally recognised Indian language. Dialects such as Sylheti, Rarhi, Rajbanshi, and Chittagonian are spoken across both India and Bangladesh, often with indistinguishable warn that using language as a proxy for nationality is dangerous. In a multilingual country like India, dialects don't follow borders. A resident of Cooch Behar or Malda may speak in a dialect nearly identical to someone from across the border in Rajshahi or Khulna. Mistaking that for evidence of foreignness risks criminalising speech and misidentifying OF SPEECH: WHY DIALECT CAN'T DECIDE CITIZENSHIPThe Bangladeshi national's arrest was based on tangible documents, not speech. Yet, the fallout underscores a deeper flaw: the assumption that language can denote citizenship. This case highlights the urgent need for training law enforcement in linguistic and cultural competence.A speaker's dialect cannot serve as biometric data. As experts and politicians have pointed out, legitimate Indian citizens across Tripura, Assam's Barak Valley, and Meghalaya speak dialects like Sylheti, which are also common in POLICE'S SILENCE, BJP'S REBUTTALThe Delhi Police has not issued a formal statement on the language error, allowing political parties to dominate the narrative. The BJP defended the terminology, with National Information in-charge Amit Malviya writing on X, "Nowhere in the Delhi Police letter is Bangla or Bengali described as a 'Bangladeshi' language."advertisementMalviya added, "Delhi Police is absolutely right in referring to the language as Bangladeshi in the context of identifying infiltrators.' However, his comment that 'dialects like Sylheti are nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis" triggered Susmita Dev responded sharply: 'Now BJP calls Sylheti a Bangladeshi language... We have lived in this region since 1874 as part of Assam, and before that, Bengal. Zero knowledge of history.' Congress's Gaurav Gogoi also joined in, saying, 'Today the BJP IT cell insults the Bengali language spoken by lakhs of people in Tripura, Meghalaya and the Barak Valley of Assam.'WHAT THIS COMES AROUND ASThis case underscores how fragile public trust becomes when administrative errors collide with questions of identity. In the context of West Bengal's politics, where language is central to cultural and political identity, such a mistake is seen as more than a bureaucratic enforcement agencies acknowledge the complexity of India's linguistic landscape, and communicate with greater precision, even a misused word risks overshadowing legitimate law enforcement work — turning proof into politics and mistakes into movements.- EndsMust Watch