logo
New research links hundreds more deaths to major bushfires in Los Angeles and Hawaii

New research links hundreds more deaths to major bushfires in Los Angeles and Hawaii

Poor air quality, health care delays and a surge in suicides have been blamed for hundreds of deaths following large-scale bushfires in Los Angeles and Hawaii.
That's according to three separate reports released this week by the scientific journal JAMA.
The number of suicide and overdose deaths in Hawaii jumped by 46 per cent in August 2023, when fires spread across the island of Maui, according to one report.
Those fires burned more than 2,200 structures and killed more than 100 people directly.
Lung problems and mental health issues also increased following the disaster, according to separate research.
A third paper looking into the Los Angeles wildfires in January found 440 deaths — compared to the official death toll of 30 — could be attributed to the destruction.
Researchers from Boston University's Department of Global Health compared the expected weekly death rate for LA to the actual tally.
They found the additional deaths likely reflected a combination of factors, including "increased exposure to poor air quality" and health care delays.
The Palisades fire in California sparked up during heavy winds on January 7, ripping through the affluent LA neighbourhood.
It killed at least 12 people and damaged nearly 8,000 homes, businesses and other structures.
The same day, a second fire started in the eastern suburb of Altadena, killing another 17 and destroying or damaging more than 10,000 buildings.
Other fires ignited across the area in the following days and weeks.
The new study out of Boston University looked at the excess deaths in Los Angeles County from January 5 to February 1.
For each week, they compared the expected deaths and the actual number of deaths in the area.
The weekly deaths "consistently exceeded" the expected amount — with a total 6,371 deaths in that time compared to the expected 5,931.
This meant, they concluded, an excess of 440 people died during the wildfires.
"The findings … highlight the need for improved mortality surveillance during and after wildfire emergencies."
Co-author Dr Andrew Stokes said researchers had suspected the official death toll after the fires was likely a "severe under-count".
"We used an excess mortality modelling framework to obtain estimates of the wildfires on all-cause mortality," he said.
"[This included] deaths associated with exposure to toxic chemicals in wildfire smoke and deaths associated with health care interruptions and delays.
"These gaps are commonly found in research comparing mortality estimates to official death tolls associated with natural disasters.
He added future research should investigate additional cause of death data, hospital records and administrative claims to narrow down the specific reasons for extra deaths.
In August 2023, a series of wildfires broke out across the island of Maui in Hawaii.
Like the Los Angeles fires, these were sparked by dry conditions and extreme winds.
Four separate fires burned for weeks across the area, killing at least 102 people and destroying thousands of homes.
In the wake of the fire there was also an increase in calls to Hawaii's suicide and crisis helpline, according to research out of New York University.
There were 13 deaths from overdose and suicide in Maui in August 2023, and 59 in non-Maui counties of Hawaii, the highest in a 120-month time period and a 46 per cent increase on all other months.
The jump in numbers was not sustained throughout the following four months.
"Results show that the 2023 Maui wildfires had immediate effects on suicide and overdose deaths in Maui and across the Hawaiian islands broadly," the report said.
"[The statewide rate] suggests that direct exposure to the wildfires may have increased risk of suicide and overdose death among Maui residents who migrated to neighbouring islands during or after the fires.
"Indirect exposure to the wildfires [like] concerns for loved ones may have also increased the risk of death from these causes on neighbouring islands."
Their report noted however that only four months of post-wildfire death data was available, adding their findings were limited by lack of information on exact dates of death and migration data.
The research was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities.
The second Maui report found there was an increase in economic hardship, food insecurity, and lack of healthcare in the wake of the fires.
Almost a quarter of the 1,043 people surveyed by researchers at the University of Hawaii were experiencing very low food security.
This was more than double the pre-disaster rate.
"Mental health burdens were also substantial, with depressive symptoms exceeding historical pre-wildfire estimates.
"Pre-wildfire mental health prevalence in Maui County indicated baseline depression rates of 30 per cent, low self-esteem prevalence of 13 per cent, and suicidal ideation in less than 1 per cent of the population."
The survey found 4.6 per cent of participants experienced suicidal ideation, 26.1 per cent reported low self-esteem and 49.4 per cent showed "clinically meaningful depressive symptoms".
Their report was backed by the Hawaii Community Foundation, Kaiser Permanente, the State of Hawaii and a grant from the National Institute of Health.
All three reports published by JAMA were peer-reviewed.
Andrew Gissing, chief executive of Natural Hazards Research Australia, said the reports were important, but not surprising.
"What you're seeing in terms of those excess death statistics, we've seen that here in Australia as well," he told the ABC.
"Post-Black Summer, there's been some similar research done [which found] there were excess fatalities due to wildfire smoke in the hundreds.
"The implication for wildfire management across the world is that as much as we concentrate on the actual fighting of these fires, we need to make sure that we're very much focused on the public health impacts there as well.
"That messaging to stay indoors, to minimise exposure to bushfire smoke [is] obviously really key during these events."
The research about ongoing mental health impacts, he said, could be attributed to the "long tail of disasters".
"We often measure disasters by their direct impact, insurance losses or how many people immediately were injured or killed," he said.
"What we see are these longer tail impacts due to the trauma and the physical impacts of those events."
Dr Sonia Angell, from the Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health said the research highlighted the failure of current responses to extreme weather events.
"Each of these studies provides a unique example of how [emergency] health measurements … such as direct fatalities do not sufficiently capture the full health impact of wildfires," she said.
"Climate health impacts can occur long after an event or be unassociated with extreme events."
The Australasian Fire and Emergency Services Authorities Council (AFAC) said in its latest bushfire outlook there was an "unseasonable bushfire risk" this winter.
The council noted a heightened risk of fire in large parts of Victoria and in southern areas of South Australia.
"[There's] this concept of worsening natural hazard risk that we're facing in Australia," Mr Gissing said.
"That's been driven by climate change increasing the frequency of extremes, but it's also due to our own decisions about where we choose to live and build our homes into the future as well.
"That means we're seeing some people being more frequently exposed [to disasters] than others, particularly in those high-risk areas.
"And with each extreme, we know the compounding trauma of that only makes things worse.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Army sergeant shoots 5 fellow soldiers at Fort Stewart army base in Georgia
US Army sergeant shoots 5 fellow soldiers at Fort Stewart army base in Georgia

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

US Army sergeant shoots 5 fellow soldiers at Fort Stewart army base in Georgia

An Army sergeant has opened fire at a military base in Georgia, shooting and wounding five soldiers and prompting a brief lockdown at one of America's largest Army bases, officials have said. The US Army identified the suspected gunman behind the shooting at Fort Stewart as 28-year-old soldier Sergeant Quornelius Radford. Brigadier General John Lubas, the commander of the 3rd Infantry Division, told reporters that Sergeant Radford appeared to use a personal handgun at his workplace, and described the wounded soldiers as Sergeant Radford's co-workers. The gunman was now in custody, he added. Soldiers in the area who witnessed the shooting "immediately and without hesitation" tackled the shooter, Brigadier General Lubas said. The Army said it was still unsure why Sergeant Radford opened fire at his five fellow soldiers, who were in stable condition, adding it was still investigating the shooting. The injured were treated and then moved to Winn Army Community Hospital, base officials said in a Facebook post, adding there was no threat to the community. Some of the wounded were also taken to Memorial Health University Medical Center in Savannah, said spokesperson Bryna Gordon. The hospital is the top-level trauma centre for coastal Georgia. The Army would not release names of those wounded pending notification of family members and would not speculate on motive, Lieutenant Colonel Angel Tomko said at a news conference. Governor Brian Kemp wrote on X that he and his family were "saddened by today's tragedy" at the base. "We are keeping the victims, their families, and all those who answer the call to serve in our hearts and prayers, and we ask that Georgians everywhere do the same," he added. President Donald Trump had been briefed on the shooting and was monitoring the situation, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X.

New research links hundreds more deaths to major bushfires in Los Angeles and Hawaii
New research links hundreds more deaths to major bushfires in Los Angeles and Hawaii

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

New research links hundreds more deaths to major bushfires in Los Angeles and Hawaii

Poor air quality, health care delays and a surge in suicides have been blamed for hundreds of deaths following large-scale bushfires in Los Angeles and Hawaii. That's according to three separate reports released this week by the scientific journal JAMA. The number of suicide and overdose deaths in Hawaii jumped by 46 per cent in August 2023, when fires spread across the island of Maui, according to one report. Those fires burned more than 2,200 structures and killed more than 100 people directly. Lung problems and mental health issues also increased following the disaster, according to separate research. A third paper looking into the Los Angeles wildfires in January found 440 deaths — compared to the official death toll of 30 — could be attributed to the destruction. Researchers from Boston University's Department of Global Health compared the expected weekly death rate for LA to the actual tally. They found the additional deaths likely reflected a combination of factors, including "increased exposure to poor air quality" and health care delays. The Palisades fire in California sparked up during heavy winds on January 7, ripping through the affluent LA neighbourhood. It killed at least 12 people and damaged nearly 8,000 homes, businesses and other structures. The same day, a second fire started in the eastern suburb of Altadena, killing another 17 and destroying or damaging more than 10,000 buildings. Other fires ignited across the area in the following days and weeks. The new study out of Boston University looked at the excess deaths in Los Angeles County from January 5 to February 1. For each week, they compared the expected deaths and the actual number of deaths in the area. The weekly deaths "consistently exceeded" the expected amount — with a total 6,371 deaths in that time compared to the expected 5,931. This meant, they concluded, an excess of 440 people died during the wildfires. "The findings … highlight the need for improved mortality surveillance during and after wildfire emergencies." Co-author Dr Andrew Stokes said researchers had suspected the official death toll after the fires was likely a "severe under-count". "We used an excess mortality modelling framework to obtain estimates of the wildfires on all-cause mortality," he said. "[This included] deaths associated with exposure to toxic chemicals in wildfire smoke and deaths associated with health care interruptions and delays. "These gaps are commonly found in research comparing mortality estimates to official death tolls associated with natural disasters. He added future research should investigate additional cause of death data, hospital records and administrative claims to narrow down the specific reasons for extra deaths. In August 2023, a series of wildfires broke out across the island of Maui in Hawaii. Like the Los Angeles fires, these were sparked by dry conditions and extreme winds. Four separate fires burned for weeks across the area, killing at least 102 people and destroying thousands of homes. In the wake of the fire there was also an increase in calls to Hawaii's suicide and crisis helpline, according to research out of New York University. There were 13 deaths from overdose and suicide in Maui in August 2023, and 59 in non-Maui counties of Hawaii, the highest in a 120-month time period and a 46 per cent increase on all other months. The jump in numbers was not sustained throughout the following four months. "Results show that the 2023 Maui wildfires had immediate effects on suicide and overdose deaths in Maui and across the Hawaiian islands broadly," the report said. "[The statewide rate] suggests that direct exposure to the wildfires may have increased risk of suicide and overdose death among Maui residents who migrated to neighbouring islands during or after the fires. "Indirect exposure to the wildfires [like] concerns for loved ones may have also increased the risk of death from these causes on neighbouring islands." Their report noted however that only four months of post-wildfire death data was available, adding their findings were limited by lack of information on exact dates of death and migration data. The research was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. The second Maui report found there was an increase in economic hardship, food insecurity, and lack of healthcare in the wake of the fires. Almost a quarter of the 1,043 people surveyed by researchers at the University of Hawaii were experiencing very low food security. This was more than double the pre-disaster rate. "Mental health burdens were also substantial, with depressive symptoms exceeding historical pre-wildfire estimates. "Pre-wildfire mental health prevalence in Maui County indicated baseline depression rates of 30 per cent, low self-esteem prevalence of 13 per cent, and suicidal ideation in less than 1 per cent of the population." The survey found 4.6 per cent of participants experienced suicidal ideation, 26.1 per cent reported low self-esteem and 49.4 per cent showed "clinically meaningful depressive symptoms". Their report was backed by the Hawaii Community Foundation, Kaiser Permanente, the State of Hawaii and a grant from the National Institute of Health. All three reports published by JAMA were peer-reviewed. Andrew Gissing, chief executive of Natural Hazards Research Australia, said the reports were important, but not surprising. "What you're seeing in terms of those excess death statistics, we've seen that here in Australia as well," he told the ABC. "Post-Black Summer, there's been some similar research done [which found] there were excess fatalities due to wildfire smoke in the hundreds. "The implication for wildfire management across the world is that as much as we concentrate on the actual fighting of these fires, we need to make sure that we're very much focused on the public health impacts there as well. "That messaging to stay indoors, to minimise exposure to bushfire smoke [is] obviously really key during these events." The research about ongoing mental health impacts, he said, could be attributed to the "long tail of disasters". "We often measure disasters by their direct impact, insurance losses or how many people immediately were injured or killed," he said. "What we see are these longer tail impacts due to the trauma and the physical impacts of those events." Dr Sonia Angell, from the Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health said the research highlighted the failure of current responses to extreme weather events. "Each of these studies provides a unique example of how [emergency] health measurements … such as direct fatalities do not sufficiently capture the full health impact of wildfires," she said. "Climate health impacts can occur long after an event or be unassociated with extreme events." The Australasian Fire and Emergency Services Authorities Council (AFAC) said in its latest bushfire outlook there was an "unseasonable bushfire risk" this winter. The council noted a heightened risk of fire in large parts of Victoria and in southern areas of South Australia. "[There's] this concept of worsening natural hazard risk that we're facing in Australia," Mr Gissing said. "That's been driven by climate change increasing the frequency of extremes, but it's also due to our own decisions about where we choose to live and build our homes into the future as well. "That means we're seeing some people being more frequently exposed [to disasters] than others, particularly in those high-risk areas. "And with each extreme, we know the compounding trauma of that only makes things worse.'

What to know before saying yes to your doctor using AI
What to know before saying yes to your doctor using AI

ABC News

timea day ago

  • ABC News

What to know before saying yes to your doctor using AI

When Melissa Street's GP and psychologist both asked if they could start using artificial intelligence to record notes and a clinical summary of her appointments, she agreed to try it. "I said yes as it allows my doctor to actually listen to me rather than being distracted trying to type everything I say," says the university student from Kabi Kabi/Sunshine Coast. Nearly one in four GPs nationally are believed to be using AI digital scribes for note-taking, according to the Australian Medical Association (AMA). Other practitioners, like psychologists and podiatrists, are also using the technology. Here's what experts say we need to be aware of when deciding whether to consent to its use. Digital scribes are software applications that turn an audio recording into text by recording the conversation between a clinician and a patient (via a phone, tablet or computer microphone, or a dedicated sensitive microphone). The AI software then uses the transcript from the conversation to generate a written summary that goes into the patient's medical record or a letter that can be forwarded to other clinicians. "We've had digital scribes for a while now," says Yves Saint James Aquino, a research fellow at the Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values at the University of Wollongong. "But the new stuff that we have are the scribes that are using large language models (LLM) to summarise the text. "So, it's not just transcribing exactly … they are now summarising a conversation or a clinical interaction based on [an] audio recording." He says it is up to the clinicians to check the clinical summary, letters or notes for accuracy. Jennifer Morris, a patient safety advocate from Melbourne/Naarm, has recently written a guide to the technology for consumer and community representatives. She believes one of the things that can be helpful for people deciding whether they want to use the technology is to see what it's producing. "[Patients] have the right to access their medical records and decide for themselves whether they think it's accurate enough," she says. "I've been looking at letters that it's been writing for me [in consultations] and decided it's not meeting my standard of accuracy. "So, I'm choosing not to have it in my own consultations." Experts say clinicians should be able to clearly demonstrate to patients what the digital scribe software is, how it works and where the data is being stored. "If the data is stored or processed outside of Australia, the developers and users, including clinicians, should make sure that the location outside Australia has the same level of privacy protection and privacy laws," Dr Saint James Aquino says. Dr Saint James Aquino says patients "have to be informed every time it [digital scribe technology] is being used", even if they have previously consented to it. He says most of the software apps being used aren't regulated because they "don't meet the legal definition of a medical device" by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). "So, what consumers and patients should know is that a lot of AI scribes are not really tested in the same way that we expect a medical product, a pharmaceutical product or a medical device should be tested. He says while clinicians report the technology's positive benefits, such as saving time and effort and allowing more interaction with patients, further studies are needed because current evidence of its effectiveness "is very anecdotal". Last month, the TGA released a new report on how it was dealing with the "rapid innovation" of artificial intelligence in clinical settings. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency has also developed a code of practice for clinicians using AI. Ms Morris says AI only works well if it is trained with high-quality data. She says some large language models may not "represent diverse people" and they may also be a problem if the data they are built on is not from or about "Australia or Australians". "So, if you have AI that's trained on a population, for example, of mostly white, wealthy, middle-aged people, it may not be as effective. "Australia is, of course, a very multicultural country and that is actually important from a scientific, research and medical point of view. "Because different people from different backgrounds, ethnic backgrounds, cultural backgrounds have different needs [and] respond to health care differently. The TGA says clinicians have reported that "digital scribes frequently propose diagnosis or treatment options for patients beyond the stated diagnosis or treatment a clinician has identified during consultations". "This functionality indicates digital scribes meet the definition of a medical device and require pre-market approval and inclusion in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG)." It says a review of digital scribes is needed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store