India and Pakistan: a history of armed conflict
Photo:
AFP/BASIT ZARGAR
Long-running tensions between nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan
soared on Wednesday
after New Delhi launched deadly strikes at Pakistani territory.
The missiles killed at least eight people, according to Pakistan, which said it had begun retaliating in a major escalation between the South Asian neighbours.
India accuses Pakistan of backing the deadliest attack in years on civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir on 22 April, in which 26 men were killed.
Islamabad has rejected the charge. Both countries have since exchanged gunfire in Kashmir, expelled citizens and ordered the border shut.
Since the April attack soldiers on each side have fired across the Line of Control, the de facto border in contested Kashmir, a heavily fortified zone of Himalayan outposts.
The two sides have fought multiple conflicts - ranging from skirmishes to all-out war - since their bloody partition in 1947.
Two centuries of British rule ends on August 15, 1947, with the sub-continent divided into mainly Hindu India and Muslim-majority Pakistan.
The poorly prepared partition unleashes bloodshed that kills possibly more than a million people and displaces 15 million others.
Kashmir's monarch dithers on whether to submit to Indian or Pakistani rule.
After the suppression of an uprising against his rule, Pakistan-backed militants attack. He seeks India's help, precipitating an all-out war between the countries.
A UN-backed, 770-kilometre (480-mile) ceasefire line in January 1949 divides Kashmir.
Pakistan launches a second war in August 1965 when it invades India-administered Kashmir.
Thousands are killed before a September ceasefire brokered by the Soviet Union and the United States.
Pakistan deploys troops in 1971 to suppress an independence movement in what is now Bangladesh, which it had governed since 1947 as East Pakistan.
An estimated three million people are killed in the nine-month conflict and millions flee into India.
India invades, leading to the creation of the independent nation of Bangladesh.
An uprising breaks out in Kashmir in 1989 as grievances at Indian rule boil over. Tens of thousands of soldiers, rebels and civilians are killed in the following decades.
India accuses Pakistan of funding the rebels and aiding their weapons training.
Pakistan-backed militants seize Indian military posts in the icy heights of the Kargil mountains.
Pakistan yields after severe pressure from Washington, alarmed by intelligence reports showing Islamabad had deployed part of its nuclear arsenal nearer to the conflict. At least 1,000 people are killed over 10 weeks.
A suicide attack on a convoy of Indian security forces kills 40 in Pulwama.
India, which is busy with campaigning for general elections, sends fighter jets which carry out air strikes on Pakistani territory to target an alleged militant training camp.
One Indian jet is shot down over Pakistani-controlled territory, with the captured pilot safely released within days back to India.
- AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 days ago
- RNZ News
Trump's relentless tariff strategy finally crashes into delicate geopolitical reality
By Phil Mattingley , CNN US President Donald Trump delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025. Photo: AFP / Brendan Smialowski Analysis : President Donald Trump's relentless use of tariffs to coerce foreign counterparts into favourable deals is about to run headlong into the limits of geopolitical reality. Trump's willingness to dramatically escalate the long-running US economic warfare in response to Russia's war on Ukraine is real, advisors say. His threat to accelerate sweeping tariffs on India is certain to come to fruition, they insist. But he also faces the backdrop of a looming deadline to extend a trade truce with the world's second-largest economy that requires a degree of caution as White House deliberations come to a head. "He's pissed," one person close to Trump said of his rapidly deteriorating view of Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. "But he's also aware of the competing priorities here." Trump faces a unique challenge balancing all of his simultaneous demands: He is threatening punishing sanctions on the Russian energy production that serves as the financial linchpin of Putin's war machine at the same moment he is seeking leverage in trade talks with India while maintaining a fragile trade détente with China. The convergence of conflicting priorities has driven intensive discussions inside the West Wing about the range and scope of the options Trump could trigger as soon as today - and put a significant amount of weight on the meeting between Putin and Steve Witkoff, his trusted foreign envoy , underway in Moscow. Trump has threatened sweeping secondary sanctions on Russian energy that would primarily hit China and India, the two largest purchasers of Russian energy . But he's also considering more tailored options, including sanctions that target specific tankers - known inside the government as the "shadow fleet" - that are utilised to skirt the existing Western sanctions regime in the transport of Russian oil, two US officials with the knowledge of the matter said. Russia's President Vladimir Putin Photo: AFP The Biden administration's evolving sanctions actions found success in blacklisting the vessels critical to Putin's sanctions evasion efforts. Secondary sanctions tailored specifically to India in some form have also been discussed, the officials said. Trump feels empowered to trigger those secondary sanctions that were long weighed by his predecessor, but never deployed due to soaring inflation and concerns about a significant increase in domestic gas prices. That is a problem Trump simply doesn't have right now, as waning global demand and a steady increase in output by the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies have mitigated the concern about the energy price spikes that bedevilled the Biden administration. For the Trump administration, that has created leverage as frustration with Putin's refusal to come to the table has dashed Trump's envisioned quick end to the three-plus year conflict. Those dynamics also played directly into the recent breakdown in long running and intense trade negotiations between the US and India, advisors say. While there is obvious overlap between Trump's escalating threats targeting Russia and his explicit warnings about India's energy purchases , the dispute with the world's fifth-largest economy is specific to the trade talks, the officials say. "We consider a wide range of options, but this is a situation more of convenient coincidence than overarching strategic long-game," one of the officials said. Donald Trump and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi has soured compared with this warm embrace in February 2020. Photo: Mandel Ngan / AFP Trump has acknowledged as much. "The sticking point with India is that tariffs are too high," Trump said in an interview on Tuesday with CNBC. Peter Navarro, Trump's senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, has called India as "the Maharaja of tariffs," underscoring a long-running view that India's expansive protection of its domestic markets has been a significant frustration for Trump and his trade team. As the clock ticked toward Trump's 1 August "reciprocal" tariff deadline and foreign partners offered significant concessions on US market access, India was a notable exception, officials said. "The president wanted deals that substantially opened markets - everything or near everything," a senior administration official said. "They were interested in opening some of their markets, but not nearly ambitious enough to meet the president's view of what would constitute a good deal." So while India's purchases of Russian energy and Russian military equipment was well known on the periphery, Trump elevated those friction points to the forefront as he sought to pressure Indian negotiators, the official said. Any large-scale effort to trigger secondary sanctions, however, would crash directly into the delicate maintenance of US-China trade talks which have seen both countries utilise economic statecraft, sanctions and export controls to exert or ease pressure on the bilateral relationship over the course of months. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned his Chinese counterparts directly, during the third round of face-to-face talks last week, that Trump was serious about secondary sanctions and it was something Chinese officials needed to prepare for in the weeks ahead. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at the White House. Photo: MANDEL NGAN/AFP But as US and Chinese officials have quietly continued discussions over the technical details of an agreement to extend their existing trade truce, the concern about the impact secondary sanctions would have on those dynamics has been a factor inside the administration, officials say. Trump has yet to officially sign off on an extension, even as his top advisors made clear it was only a matter of time before Trump blesses it. For Trump, who has operated throughout his second term in a perpetual state of running deadlines, that clock is ticking concurrently with his deadline for Putin. The decision on the latter now weighs heavily on the status of the former. -CNN
RNZ News
6 days ago
- RNZ News
Trump order imposes additional 25% tariff on goods from India
United States President Donald Trump issued an executive order overnight imposing an additional 25 percent tariff on goods from India. Photo: CHIP SOMODEVILLA / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP United States President Donald Trump issued an executive order overnight imposing an additional 25 percent tariff on goods from India, saying the country directly or indirectly imported Russian oil , adding to 25 percent tariffs already announced. The move threatens to further complicate US-Indian relations and comes shortly after a Indian government source said Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi would visit China for the first time in over seven years later this month. US-India ties are facing their most serious crisis in years after talks with India failed to produce a trade agreement. The White House move, first signaled by Trump on Monday, follows meetings by Trump's top diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow aimed at pushing Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine. Trump has threatened higher tariffs on Russia and secondary sanctions on its allies, if Russian President Vladimir Putin does not move to end the war in Ukraine. - Reuters
RNZ News
03-08-2025
- RNZ News
How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear
By Saeed Shah and Shivam Patel , Reuters An Indian Air Force (IAF) Rafale fighter jet takes off, November 2022. Photo: Emmanuel Dunard / AFP Just after midnight on 7 May, the screen in the Pakistan Air Force's operations room lit up in red with the positions of dozens of active enemy planes across the border in India. Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Sidhu had been sleeping on a mattress just off that room for days in anticipation of an Indian assault. New Delhi had blamed Islamabad for backing militants who carried out an attack the previous month in Indian Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians. Despite Islamabad denying any involvement, India had vowed a response, which came in the early hours of 7 May, with air strikes on Pakistan. Sidhu ordered Pakistan's prized Chinese-made J-10C jets to scramble. A senior Pakistani Air Force (PAF) official, who was present in the operations room, said Sidhu instructed his staff to target Rafales, a French-made fighter that is the jewel of India's fleet and had never been downed in battle. "He wanted Rafales," said the official. The hour-long fight, which took place in darkness, involved some 110 aircraft, experts estimate, making it the world's largest air battle in decades. The J-10s shot down at least one Rafale , Reuters reported in May, citing US officials. It's downing surprised many in the military community and raised questions about the effectiveness of Western military hardware against untested Chinese alternatives. Pakistan Air Force J-10C fighter jets perform at a rehearsal ahead of Pakistan's national day parade in Islamabad in March, 2024. Photo: Aamir Qureshi / AFP Shares of Dassault, which makes the Rafale, dipped after reports that the fighter had been shot down. Indonesia, which has outstanding Rafale orders, has said it is now considering purchasing J-10s - a major boost to China's efforts to sell the aircraft overseas. Reuters interviews with two Indian officials and three of their Pakistani counterparts found that the performance of the Rafale wasn't the key problem. Central to its downing was an Indian intelligence failure concerning the range of the China-made PL-15 missile fired by the J-10 fighter. China and Pakistan are the only countries to operate both J-10s - known as Vigorous Dragons - and PL-15s. The faulty intelligence gave the Rafale pilots a false sense of confidence that they were out of Pakistani firing distance, which they believed was only about 150km, the Indian officials said, referring to the widely cited range of PL-15's export variant. "We ambushed them," the PAF official said, adding that Islamabad conducted an electronic warfare assault on Delhi's systems in an attempt to confuse Indian pilots. Indian officials dispute the effectiveness of those efforts. "The Indians were not expecting to be shot at," said Justin Bronk, air warfare expert at London's Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think-tank. "The PL-15 is clearly very capable at long range." The PL-15 that hit the Rafale was fired from about 200km away, according to Pakistani officials, and even farther, according to Indian officials. That would make it among the longest-range air-to-air strikes recorded. India's defence and foreign ministries did not return requests for comment about the intelligence mistakes. Delhi hasn't acknowledged a Rafale being shot down, but France's air chief told reporters in June that he had seen evidence of the loss of that fighter and two other aircraft flown by India, including a Russian-made Sukhoi. A top Dassault executive also told French lawmakers that month that India had lost a Rafale in operations, although he didn't have specific details. Pakistan's military referred to past comments by a spokesperson, who said that its professional preparedness and resolve was more important than the weaponry it had deployed. China's defence ministry did not respond to Reuters' questions. Dassault and UAC, the manufacturer of the Sukhoi, also did not return requests for comment. Reuters spoke to eight Pakistani and two Indian officials to piece together an account of the aerial battle, which marked the start of four days of fighting between the two nuclear-armed neighbours that caused alarm in Washington. The officials all spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss national security matters. Not only did Islamabad have the element of surprise with its missiles' range, the Pakistani and Indian officials said, but it managed to more efficiently connect its military hardware to surveillance on the ground and in the air, providing it with a clearer picture of the battlefield. Such networks, known as "kill chains," have become a crucial element of modern warfare. Four Pakistani officials said they created a "kill chain" or a multi-domain operation, by linking air, land and space sensors. The network included a Pakistani-developed system, Data Link 17, which connected Chinese military hardware with other equipment, including a Swedish-made surveillance plane, two Pakistani officials said. The system allowed the J-10s flying closer to India to obtain radar feeds from the surveillance plane cruising further away, meaning the Chinese-made fighters could turn their radars off and fly undetected, according to experts. Pakistan's military did not respond to requests for comment on this point. Delhi is trying to set up a similar network, the Indian officials said, adding that their process was more complicated because the country sourced aircraft from a wide range of exporters. Retired UK Air Marshal Greg Bagwell, now a fellow at RUSI, said the episode didn't conclusively prove the superiority of either Chinese or Western air assets, but it showed the importance of having the right information and using it. "The winner in this was the side that had the best situational awareness," said Bagwell. After India, in the early hours of 7 May, struck targets in Pakistan that it called terrorist infrastructure, Sidhu ordered his squadrons to switch from defence to attack. Five PAF officials said India had deployed some 70 planes, which was more than they had expected and provided Islamabad's PL-15s with a target-rich environment. India has not said how many planes were used. The 7 May battle marked the first big air contest of the modern era in which weaponry is used to strike targets beyond visual range, said Bagwell, noting both India and Pakistan's planes remained well within their airspaces across the duration of the fight. Five Pakistani officials said an electronic assault on Indian sensors and communications systems reduced the situational awareness of the Rafale's pilots. The two Indian officials said the Rafales were not blinded during the skirmishes and that Indian satellites were not jammed. But they acknowledged that Pakistan appeared to have disrupted the Sukhoi, whose systems Delhi is now upgrading. Other Indian security officials have deflected questions away from the Rafale, a centrepiece of India's military modernisation, to the orders given to the air force. India's defence attaché in Jakarta told a university seminar that Delhi had lost some aircraft "only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack (Pakistan's) military establishments and their air defences." India's chief of defence staff, General Anil Chauhan, previously told Reuters that Delhi quickly "rectified tactics" after the initial losses. After the 7 May air battle, India began targeting Pakistani military infrastructure and asserting its strength in the skies. It's Indian-made BrahMos supersonic cruise missile repeatedly sliced through Pakistan's air defences, according to officials on both sides. On 10 May, India said it struck at least nine air bases and radar sites in Pakistan. It also hit a surveillance plane parked in a hangar in southern Pakistan, according to Indian and Pakistani officials. A ceasefire was agreed later that day, after US officials held talks with both sides. In the aftermath of the episode, India's deputy army chief Lieutenant General Rahul Singh accused Pakistan of receiving "live inputs" from China during the battles, implying radar and satellite feeds. Military personnel stand in front of a Chengdu Aircraft Corporation J-10C, September, 2021. Photo: Noel Celis / AFP He did not provide evidence and Islamabad denied the allegation. When asked at a July briefing about Beijing's military partnership with Pakistan, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told reporters the work was "part of the normal co-operation between the two countries and does not target any third party". Beijing's air chief, Lieutenant General Wang Gang, visited Pakistan in July to discuss how Islamabad had used Chinese equipment to put together the "kill chain" for the Rafale, two PAF officials said. China did not respond, when asked about that interaction. The Pakistani military said in July that Wang had expressed "keen interest in learning from PAF's battle-proven experience in Multi Domain Operations". -Reuters
