
China's $167 billion Tibetan mega-dam is set to boost these hydro-equipment and materials' stocks
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies
President Donald Trump's firing of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on Friday afternoon just after she delivered a negative jobs report echoes the impulse of many leaders to shoot the messenger. Trump declared, 'I've had issues with the numbers for a long time. We're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony like they were before the election and there were other times. So I fired her, and I did the right thing.' While Trump may or may not be friends with Vladimir Putin, he is clearly following the Russian President's HR staffing guidelines to eliminate lieutenants who bring bad news. As we've documented before, the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) has a long history of manipulating official economic statistics to please Putin, 'bending over backward to correct bad numbers and burying unflattering statistics' under the pressure the Kremlin has exerted to corrupt statistical integrity, especially since Putin's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The reliability of official statistics from China has also been brought into question, leading analysts to rely on a wide range of unofficial or proxy indicators to gauge the true state of the Chinese economy. Even China's former Premier, the late Li Keqiang, reportedly confided that he didn't trust official GDP numbers. Read More: What to Know About the Jobs Report That Led Trump to Fire the Labor Statistics Chief Like other strongmen, Trump has repeatedly shown a pattern of manipulating data to suit his preferred narrative. Trump's surprise firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer has quickly caught the attention of technical market analysts and economists on both sides of the political spectrum. One side cheers the push to disrupt a slow, bureaucratic federal agency. The other side shouts in dismay over concerns about yet another example of Trump politicizing an apolitical institution. Both responses are warranted. The accuracy of BLS data has long been questioned as major revisions only come in months later. To their credit, the BLS, in addition to other statistical agencies, has publicly recognized a need to modernize its methodology. Unfortunately, though, the severity of job revisions has worsened since the COVID-19 era, with no successful program to address the issue. The downward revision on Friday of more than 250,000 jobs marked the most significant adjustment since the depths of the pandemic. However, Trump's accusations against the BLS of rigging the job numbers to make him and the Republican base look bad, and his subsequent firing of McEntarfer based on a belief that BLS revisions were politically motivated, are yet another step closer to authoritarianism. Introducing his latest conspiracy theory, the President went even further by suggesting McEntarfer, whose career spans two decades across Republican and Democratic Administrations, rigged the numbers 'around the 2024 presidential election' in then-Vice President Kamala Harris' favor. Trump conveniently fails to mention that his definition of 'around' was back in August 2024. Recall, the 2024 presidential election was a full three months later in November. Revisions are not unusual behavior by the BLS. They are a critical part of the natural process for developing an accurate picture of the largest, most dynamic economy in the world. The average size of job revisions since 2003 is not insignificant at 51,000 jobs. And, despite what Trump may want Americans to believe, his tariff policies have created an unprecedented level of uncertainty in the U.S. economy, comparable only to that of 2020, with many economists expecting a recession to follow as a result. Bloomberg reporting has pointed to a possible connection between the severity of negative job revisions and recessionary economic environments. The BLS has also been subjected to DOGE-led hiring constraints and other resource rescissions. In addition, the Trump Administration's disbanding of the Federal Statistics Advisory Committee in March both eliminated one of the main engines for enhancing agency performance and, perhaps, in what should have been a concerning harbinger, abolished the canary in the data integrity coal mine. Complaints about BLS methods are legitimate, like the reliance on enumerators over scanner data, and deserve attention, but this is not how to fix it. Read More: What Trump's Win Means for the Economy This is far from the first time Trump has subordinated statistical integrity to political theater. From crowd sizes to weather forecasts, vote counts to tariff formulas, Trump has discarded facts for fictions that play to his political favor. Trump doesn't just bend the truth—he twists the numbers until they resemble propaganda and then silences those who disagree. As CBS News titan Edward R. Murrow warned 65 years ago: 'To be persuasive, we must be believable. To be believable, we must be credible. To be credible, we must be truthful.'

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Here's What's Behind "Model T Moment" Ford Will Reveal Aug. 11
You'll normally find Ford CEO Jim Farley driving around in one of his company's pickups or SUVs, but he's spent a lot of time in recent months behind the wheel of a Xiaomi SU7 battery-electric vehicle. Like most senior industry officials, Farley is well aware of the threat being posed by a flood of new Chinese domestic automakers, including Xiaomi, Geely, Great Wall and BYD – the latter now outselling Tesla in key markets around the world. That's why he's also spent time in China recently, alongside a core team assigned to a new "skunkworks" program charged with developing a new generation of ultra-affordable Ford EVs. "This is a Model T moment for us," Farley said during the automaker's second-quarter earnings call this past week, confirming that Ford will have some big news about its future EV program to share on August 11 during a presentation at its assembly plant in Louisville, Kentucky. Don't expect to see an electric equivalent of the old Ford "Tin Lizzie," the name used by many owners to refer to the original Model T. Ford will leave that sort of project to Detroit-based EV company Slate with the bare-bones, plastic-bodied pickup it will launch in 2026. But Farley and his team hope to deliver something nearly as revolutionary as Ford's founder did more than a century ago. That means finding ways to not only slash battery costs but to dramatically simplify the manufacturing process to save tens of thousands of dollars per vehicle. The typical EV cost $56,910 in June 2025, according to Kelley Blue Book, about $8,000 more than the average transaction price for all vehicles sold in the U.S. last month. That's considered one of the key reasons why EV sales have been losing momentum. Related: 2025 Ford F-150 Lightning: What to Know if You're Thinking About Buying At the moment, Ford has three all-electric models in production: the Mustang Mach-E, the F-150 Lightning and the E-Transit, a battery-powered version of the automaker's big Transit van. It was also working up a high-end, three-row SUV that was expected to come in well above $60,000. The skunkworks team that's spent the last 18 months operating out of an anonymous facility Long Beach, California has been looking to cut that price tag in half. "We think that's a much better move than a $60,000 to $70,000 all-electric crossover," said Farley. Ford has been vague about what that team will bring to market, but insiders hint the company is preparing to launch an entirely new EV "family." And that's expected to include a number of different body styles, starting with a small, all-electric pickup somewhere in size between the compact Ford Maverick and midsize Ranger, said Sam Abuelsamid, lead analyst with Telemetry Research. At least one small SUV will follow. All of the products will be offered with new lithium-ion-phosphate battery packs produced at a new Ford plant being set up in Marshall, Michigan. While LFP sacrifices a bit of range it is substantially cheaper than the more familiar lithium-ion technology – and is also less likely to catch fire in a crash or when short-circuited. There will be multiple powertrain options for at least some of these new EVs. It's unclear if longer-range lithium-ion packs will be available, however. Related: 5 Game-Changing Batteries That Will Change Your Life Ford certainly isn't the only manufacturer aiming to deliver EVs starting at or below $30,000. General Motors will launch production later this year of a next-generation Chevrolet Bolt expected to come in below the brand's current low-end Equinox EV which starts at $34,995. But neither GM, nor Hyundai, nor Toyota, nor Volkswagen, are the brands Ford is looking at. "We believe the only way to compete effectively with the Chinese over the globe on EVs is to go and really push ourselves to radically re-engineer and transform our engineering supply chain and manufacturing process." Chinese domestic EV manufacturers have scored explosive growth over the past three years, much of that due to delivering extremely low prices for well-equipped vehicles. The BYD Dolphin, for example, goes for just the equivalent of $25,720 in Mexico. To get there, companies like BYD have not only focused on cheaper battery chemistry but have rethought the entire automotive design, engineering and manufacturing process, said Abuelsamid – just about everything down to the wheel. Farley and his team have been closely watching and various sources provided a glimmer of some of the things Ford has learned and plans to adopt: The battery packs on those new EVs will be more compact and will serve as part of the actual structure of the vehicles they're used in;That's just one way Ford plans to sharply reduce the number of parts it will use in those EVs;It also plans to adopt mega-casting – something already used by Tesla. In some applications, dozens of stamped steel parts will be replaced by a single cast piece of aluminum. That's one of the ways Xiaomi can sell the SU7 at a starting price of 215,900 yuan, or $29,900. Yet this is no stripped-down econobox, admitted Farley, with features including an air suspension and a large digital display. During an appearance on the Everything Electric Show podcast, he said, "I don't like talking about the competition so much, but I drive a Xiaomi (and) I've been driving it for six months now, and I don't want to give it up." Whether Ford can pull off its ambitious goal remains to be seen. The company has had enough trouble improving the quality of its existing line-up and staged more recalls during the first half of this year than any automaker has ever had before during a full year. Then there are the Trump tariffs that will raise costs for all sorts of imported raw materials and parts. Trump recently signaled he'll call for a 50% tariff on foreign copper, an essential EV ingredient. But industry-watchers like Abuelsamid say Ford has no choice if it expects to remain a serious contender in the global EV market, never mind just the U.S. Its future could depend on this "Model T Moment" as much as Henry Ford did a century ago. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) Sells $64M in Bad Loans to Cut Credit Risk, Stabilize Outlook
We recently compiled a list of the 10 Best Low Cost Stocks To Buy Under $50. Lufax Holding Ltd stands fourth on our list. Lufax Holding Ltd (NYSE:LU), a leading Chinese fintech firm serving small and micro businesses, is undergoing strategic shifts to navigate a challenging market in 2025. A key recent development was the sale of non-performing loans (NPLs) through its subsidiary, Ping An Consumer Finance. The transaction involved offloading 469 million yuan in NPLs for 36.44 million yuan to Sh China Merch Ping An Asset Management. This move reduced credit risk and supported a drop in the company's loan portfolio by 18%, helping stabilize investor sentiment amid asset quality concerns. In addition to asset optimization, Lufax Holding Ltd (NYSE:LU) is focusing on digital transformation through new partnerships and AI-driven innovation. These efforts aim to boost operational efficiency and profitability while enhancing its competitive edge in a crowded fintech market. The business is also pursuing cost-cutting measures as part of a broader strategy to improve earnings. Despite these positive steps, cheap stocks to buy like Lufax Holding Ltd (NYSE:LU) saw sharp declines in late July, dropping over 11% and 12% on back-to-back days. The sell-off reflected investor concerns over limited near-term catalysts and persistent pressure from traditional banks. An individual using a laptop to access the fintech platform to manage their finances. Looking ahead, the corporation plans to continue managing credit risk proactively, expand its digital offerings, and pursue strategic partnerships. These efforts are expected to support earnings growth and may enable the resumption of dividends by the end of the 2025 fiscal year. While we acknowledge the potential of LU as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None.