logo
NDP 2025: SCDF to field guard of honour contingent for the first time

NDP 2025: SCDF to field guard of honour contingent for the first time

CNAa day ago

There will be an additional guard of honour contingent at this year's National Day Parade. For the first time, the Singapore Civil Defence Force will be marching alongside the armed forces and police. In celebrating Singapore's 60th year of independence, the parade will feature the most number of marching contingents at the Padang since 1990. This year's parade and ceremony segment will feature more than 2,000 participants. Charlotte Lim reports.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Singaporean reminds everyone to be grateful to bus drivers, especially when they wait
Singaporean reminds everyone to be grateful to bus drivers, especially when they wait

Independent Singapore

time3 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

Singaporean reminds everyone to be grateful to bus drivers, especially when they wait

SINGAPORE: A local Reddit user issued a 'gentle reminder' for everyone to be thankful to the bus drivers in the city-state and not take them for granted. In a post on r/Singapore on Thursday (June 12), u/Bearbaggs wrote about an incident that they witnessed earlier that day at Simei, when the bus they were on stopped to let people board and alight. As the bus was about to leave, the driver waited, since there was a boy some 30 metres away who had broken into a run in the hopes of catching the bus. When the boy got on, however, he simply tapped his EZ-Link card and went on inside, neither looking at nor acknowledging that the driver had waited for him. At that point, since the light was red, the driver stayed at the bus stop, in case anyone still needed a ride. When the traffic light turned green, he saw two more people running to catch the bus, and therefore kept waiting. The post author added that, like the boy, the two people just tapped their cards and proceeded to find a seat without so much as a nod or acknowledgement to the driver, who could've just ignored them and driven off. 'It was a disappointing start to the morning. So please, next time you're on the bus, give your bus driver a smile. Simple gestures can make someone's day, a nd lastly, shoutout to you, SBS 8413R! You are appreciated.' Many Reddit users echoed the post author's sentiments in their comments, evidently agreeing that they are some of Singapore's unsung heroes. When one suggested that u/Bearbaggs write to the bus company, adding, 'That will make the Bus Captain's day!' as it turns out, the post author has already done so. 'Respect to the bus drivers who wait for last-minute arrivals! I have encountered a few myself, and would always say thanks to the driver,' another wrote, although they added that not all drivers are like this, as some take off even when they see people running to catch the bus. Others chimed in, however, to say that the buses are on a strict time schedule and can't always wait. One wrote that since a bus driver ' has no obligation to wait, saying a simple thank you goes a long way.' 'I'm always thankful for the drivers who wait for me as I sprint over to the closing doors. The surprised looks, followed by a nod and a smile when I thank them, always make my day too,' another added. 'Was on the bus around Marine Parade yesterday, and this lady was running towards the bus stop. There was no one else boarding/alighting, so he actually stopped a short distance away from the bus stop so that the lady wouldn't have to keep running. Didn't see whether she thanked the driver since the bus was full, but it's really rare to see people mutter a word of thanks for drivers who wait/go the extra mile for passengers. I think service staff in general are underappreciated, so do write in to their companies to compliment them,' a commenter observed. /TISG Read also: Woman honours bus driver who has considered her 'family' since she was 17, invites him to her wedding

Are migrant workers merely transient labour or a part of Singapore society?
Are migrant workers merely transient labour or a part of Singapore society?

CNA

time4 hours ago

  • CNA

Are migrant workers merely transient labour or a part of Singapore society?

Like many in Singapore, 37-year-old Ella Lyn would spend her days off indulging in a hobby, namely rollerblading with friends. What's unique about Ms Lyn's experience is that her fellow rollerbladers are made up mostly of migrant workers – though not entirely by choice. The domestic helper from the Philippines said that during her 12 years here, she has encountered Singaporeans who openly express their displeasure at the mere sight of migrant workers meeting up with their friends in public spaces. 'In my experience, and my group of friends' experience, they (locals) like making bad comments and have bad opinions about us,' she told CNA TODAY. Even when her friends in the Skate Club Singapore cruise around without bothering members of the public, they become the target of negative comments. Ms Lyn set up the club with her friends in 2022 and it now comprises mainly migrant workers from the Philippines, Indonesia, Bangladesh and India. 'We have experienced them (members of the public) shouting at us, telling us that we just formed the group to find boyfriends and girlfriends … they also tell us our group is for 'lust',' she recounted. Ms Lyn wishes that Singaporeans would see migrant workers like her as 'the same (like them), fellow humans who want to relieve stress after work'. She added that she is open to making friends with locals – though she is hesitant about making the first move. Meanwhile for Mr Mosharof, a lorry crane operator from Bangladesh, told CNA TODAY that he "don't have many" Singaporean friends, despite having worked here for 17 years. He said that the Singaporeans he has met are generally nice and helpful, but given the very little and precious rest time that he has, he would rather spend it catching up with his friends and family members who are also working here. "No need, thank you. My work hours are already so long," he replied when asked if he would like the opportunity to make friends with more Singaporeans. The experiences of Ms Lyn and Mr Mosharof highlight the challenges that work permit holders face when it comes to integrating into and forming friendships with the wider community here. This group of foreign workers often work in roles which are traditionally shunned by Singaporeans such as in construction, marine shipyards and domestic work. As many observers have pointed out over the years, they are viewed in a different light to foreign professionals who hold higher-tier work passes, who are regarded by many Singaporeans as a form of job competition. Still, the migrant workers interviewed by CNA TODAY said they are aware that they are not fully welcome by some segments of Singaporeans. Despite such negative perceptions about them, most said they would welcome that chance to befriend Singaporeans should they be given the chance. After all, even though these foreigners are often seen as transient due to the relatively short-term nature of their work permits, many have ended up working here for years, even decades. This is why Ms Dipa Swaminathan, founder of non-governmental organisation It's Raining Raincoats, said it is a 'misconception' to regard such workers as merely transient. 'You put yourself in their shoes…. If you have studied abroad in a particular country, or work there…people who go and live somewhere else, want to belong in that place,' she said. 'You may have your own family back in your country that you left, but while you're in a place, it's the human instinct to want to belong.' This underscores the importance of integrating such workers and building bonds with them so that they can feel that they are part of the Singapore that they have helped build, Ms Swaminathan said. In a speech at an appreciation dinner held in his honour by organisations from Singapore's Indian community earlier this year, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong called on Singaporeans to help immigrants and foreign workers adapt to the country's social norms to build a cohesive and inclusive society. "Immigrants and foreign workers raise political sensitivities in many societies," Mr Lee noted. But as Singapore relies on them "to top up our population base and talent pool", the inflow and integration must be be managed with "utmost sensitivity", while Singaporeans at the same time "must also stand firmly against nativism and xenophobia, and welcome the new arrivals to become part of our extended family." Currently, work permit holders are only allowed to work here for a maximum duration of between 14 and 26 years based on skill level, sector and country of origin. From July, this cap will be removed, which some observers believe will provide a stronger impetus to reassess the integration of such workers and their relationship with the local community, given their even longer duration of stay here. Sociology experts, advocacy groups and volunteers who work with migrant workers noted that as a society, Singapore will benefit from a more integrated pool of migrant workers since they make up over one-quarter of the total population here. To achieve this goal, however, would require a gradual approach of dismantling long-held stereotypes and concerns among Singaporeans that have led to the current separation between migrant workers and local citizens. There is, however, the matter of priority too — and integration is not necessarily high up the list of issues that the migrant worker workforce face. Non-government organisations (NGOs) and advocacy groups, as well as workers CNA TODAY spoke to, generally agreed that there are more pressing issues that directly impact the daily lives of work permit holders, which still require significant attention. Such issues include wage theft, welfare protection and physical safety, be it in workplaces or when being transported to their work sites. Vice-president of Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2) Alex Au noted that low-wage work permit holders do not have the right to bring in their family members, stay beyond their employment and have to return home at some point. "If, by 'integration', we mean turning them into Singaporeans, and getting Singaporeans to accept them as one of 'us', then it is all quite pointless," said Mr Au, adding that it applies more to those holding higher-tier work passes and their dependents. "It has no reason to be a priority when we're talking about work permit holders — at least if that is the definition we use." The "far more important discussion", he said, is how such low-wage workers get mistreated through "active disempowerment and exploitation or through neglect". Dr Mathew Mathews, principal research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), acknowledged that integration and forging relationships with locals is a 'second, third order' issue relative to the immediate ones listed earlier. 'But I think the bigger picture, in the longer term, fostering a relationship (with Singaporeans) will increase the motivation that Singaporeans have of ensuring that migrant workers are better protected.' HOUSED SEPARATELY FROM WIDER SOCIETY Work permit holders here have long formed a big part of Singapore's population, yet many have remained removed from the wider society. The number of work pass holders here have grown from 990,000 in 2019 to close to 1.7 million as of December 2014. Singapore's total population is about 6.04 million as of June 2024, according to the latest available official figures. About 301,600 work pass holders are domestic helpers, and 456,800 are from the construction, marine shipyard and process sectors. As the number of such foreign workers increases, so too have efforts to house them largely away from the wider society. Since 2006, public flat owners have been disallowed from renting out their homes to non-Malaysian work permit holders from the construction sector. The restriction has since been extended to the manufacturing as well as marine shipyard and process sectors. The authorities said then that they had taken into account the sentiments of HDB dwellers towards their migrant neighbours in introducing the restriction. At the same time, dormitories – mostly situated away from residential areas – were built to house male migrant workers. In 2008, about 1,400 residents in the affluent neighbourhood of Serangoon Gardens petitioned against the proposed construction of a migrant worker dormitory next to their homes. While their concerns were framed around practical concerns such as overcrowding and traffic, the arguments increasingly took on a classist and xenophobic tone, observers noted at the time. In 2015, during the debate on the Foreign Employee Dormitories Bill to license and regulate dormitory standards, several Members of Parliament also raised concerns from local residents over the prospects of having migrant workers in their neighbourhoods. The law, which regulates and licenses purpose-built dormitories, came two years after the Little India riot, which primarily involved migrant workers and had accentuated public order and safety concerns. All these developments influenced how the majority of male permit holders are housed today in relation to the wider community, said experts. Dr Leong Chan-Hoong, senior fellow at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), said: 'What we're doing now, is to mitigate potential tension that could arise due to factors such as very different cultures, different economic backgrounds.' Dr Leong heads the social cohesion research programme at RSIS. As of end 2024, there were 1,441 dormitories which can accommodate about 439,200 work permit holders – most of them operating at 'near full' capacity, according to an industry report by the Dormitory Association of Singapore Limited and property consultancy Knight Frank Singapore. In April this year, the government announced six new dormitories with a combined capacity of about 45,000 will be built 'over the next few years'. Aside from dormitories, there are also eight recreation centres (RCs) for migrant workers, designed to be one-stop places providing basic amenities, shops and services as well as event venues for them. Six of them are run by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), and the NTUC-affiliated Migrant Workers' Centre (MWC). The remaining two are managed by private operators. More and more migrant workers are turning to such centres for their recreational needs. MWC's executive director Michael Lim told CNA TODAY that there was a 41 per cent increase in visitorship in 2024 from the year before, averaging 150,000 visitors each month at the RC it operates at Soon Lee. 'This positive momentum has continued into 2025,' said Mr Lim. Meanwhile, an MOM spokesperson said overall, each of these centres drew an average of over 80,000 monthly visitors in 2024. Also, the nearly 90 outreach events organised at the RCs in 2024 attracted over 75,000 migrant workers, the spokesperson added. Experts cautioned that the physical distance between workers' dormitories and the heartlands pose a challenge to integration efforts. Associate Professor Laavanya Kathiravelu from the department of sociology and human geography at the University of Oslo said: 'Migrant worker dormitories and recreation centres at the edges of the island or in less accessible places means that these men don't interact at all with Singaporeans on a regular basis. 'They are not seen by locals as members of the neighborhood and nation,' added the Singaporean academic who concurrently holds a position in Nanyang Technological University (NTU). Indeed, a report by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) published in December 2020 on public attitudes towards migrant workers in Singapore said that physical distance in accommodation 'hinders migrant workers from integrating into the local community and encourages segregation and discrimination'. 'City planning can promote social inclusion by avoiding separation of migrant workers' accommodation,' it added. The report also found that between 2010 and 2019, there was a seven-point decline on a 100-point index measuring public support towards migrant workers. It noted that respondents with no interaction at all with migrant workers recorded a decline of 22 points, more drastic than the four-point decline among locals who had interacted with such workers. Ms Ratna Mathai-Luke, a programme technical officer from ILO, told CNA TODAY: "People who have regular interactions with migrant workers generally tend to have a more positive perception of migrant workers. So we do know that is one condition that will support positive attitude towards migrant workers." Commenting on the locations of RCs, MOM said: "They provide attractive options for workers who do not wish to travel far to unwind, connect with their peers and participate in events and activities." The ministry spokesperson added that workers can still choose to visit any part of Singapore on their rest days. Agreeing, Mr Lim of MWC added that his organisation "does not see them (RCs) as tools of segregation." 'In fact, many of our programmes at the RCs are designed to bridge communities and build understanding. The RCs are one of several platforms through which we engage migrant workers meaningfully.' Mr Lim added: 'Importantly, there are no restrictions on where migrant workers can go during their rest days – they are free to visit the public spaces, malls, parks, and places of worship as any other member of the community. 'They are also free to catch up with their friends and social circles both within the RCs and beyond.' Both MOM and MWC highlighted various programmes organised at the RCs that provide opportunities for locals to interact with migrant workers. For instance, MWC work with corporate partners to hold "meaningful corporate social responsibility activities" that allow employees connect with the migrant worker community. "These include hosting appreciation events, skill-sharing workshops, and inter-cultural team-building activities that highlight the contributions and personal stories of migrant workers," said Mr Lim. Meanwhile, MOM also works with schools and youth groups to encourage ground-up initiatives that support and care for the well-being of migrant workers and promote appreciation for the latter, said a ministry spokesperson. 'Last year, over 4,000 youths from schools and youth groups took part in activities supporting the well-being of our migrant workers. These initiatives include health screenings, financial and computer literacy classes, recreational sports and cultural exchanges as well as youth-hosted visits to local cultural and heritage centres,' said the spokesperson. GROUND-UP EFFORTS TO BUILD BRIDGES Apart from these official initiatives, there are notable efforts by civil society, Singaporeans and migrant workers seeking to integrate work-permit holders and to forge a closer relationship between them and residents. Those involved in such initiatives cited the COVID-19 pandemic, which began in early 2020, as a turning point that shed light on the plight of migrant workers confined to their dormitories during the health crisis. 'The whole nationwide attention on the migrant worker situation has, of course, gone down since then, but I think many of the groups that have actually started during COVID-19 have sustained themselves,' said Ms Jaya Anil Kumar, senior manager for research and advocacy at Humanitarian Organization for Migration Economics (HOME). SayurStory is one such initiative started by Singaporean Leong Man Wei during the pandemic. Her interest in gardening during the pandemic prompted conversations about plants with her own helper, which made Ms Leong realise how much the woman could share with others about the subject due to the latter's own experience back home in Indonesia. Ms Leong, now 25, felt that SayurStory could be a way to momentarily 'reverse the power dynamics and direction of teaching and learning', so that employers see their helpers as empowered individuals with knowledge to share, and not just view them as employees. The community has since organised various activities and events, such as workshops and visits to the park. One instance that left a deep impression on Ms Leong was an event last October at the National Library where migrant helpers from the SayurStory community acted as facilitators, sharing information on jamu, the Indonesian traditional medicine, with members of the public. 'They (attendees) engaged with the facilitators, with a lot of respect and curiosity in the topic that they were teaching, with a lot of questions around their Indonesian heritage, which in the setting of a typical home between a helper and employer, you don't actually get so much of,' said Ms Leong. Sports is another area of interest that could transcend ethnic boundaries, if the experience of Mr Shaji Philip is any indicator. The 55-year-old naturalised Singaporean who came from India, started organising cricket games in 2007 for himself and his friends – but word soon spread and the league now has over 100 teams with more than 3,000 players, of which about 20 per cent are local residents. 'They actively mingle and help the fellow migrant workers to get accustomed and take care of game expenses, if any. When it comes to sports there is no differentiation or segregation between the nationalities and other ethnic factors,' said the deputy director at a public transport operator here, referring to the interactions he saw on the pitch. 'I do observe there are a lot of team parties outside the pitch as well. For some parties, they invite me to be part of their gatherings and I try my best to be available for their invitations.' Migrant workers, too, are also taking steps to forge closer bonds with the local community. Ms Janelyn Dupingay, 34, a migrant domestic helper from the Philippines, is a member of the core team behind the Migrant Writers of Singapore, which organises many literary-related events all year round that are attended by both migrant workers and locals. 'For our art and writing workshops, usually there are four Singaporeans out of 10 participants and the rest are migrants. And for (the group's event) Carnival of Poetry, there would be at least two Singaporean writers out of five,' she said, referring to the group's monthly poetry reading sessions. These events not only provide an outlet for participants to express themselves through the arts, but also to interact with people of different backgrounds and bond over common interests. 'Two years ago, we paired a local and migrant writer to collaborate on a poem that they will perform at Esplanade and just recently, they asked me for a foreword for their upcoming anthology book,' said Ms Dupingay. 'As an organiser, I feel amazed how they stayed connected even after their performance. So I'm looking forward to their book coming out.' WHY IT'S WORTH FORGING A CLOSER RELATIONSHIP NGOs and experts noted that in reality, due to how certain policies are structured, low-wage work permit holders cannot be expected to be as fully integrated into the wider Singaporean community as the foreign workers who hold higher-tier passes. 'Integration is typically measured by factors like levels of inter-marriage with locals, inclusion into different sectors of the labour market, access to healthcare and spatial inclusion,' said Assoc Prof Kathiravelu. 'Because low-wage migrants are structurally kept out of institutions like marriage, allowed to work only in certain sectors, have to rely on private healthcare, and stay outside the public housing system in privately run dormitories, the notion of integration is really quite inappropriate,' she added. Ms Jaya of HOME and Ms Dipa of IRR noted that many migrant workers they have worked with would love a long-term residency in Singapore, a place where they typically spend over a decade working. 'They want to bring their children, they want to bring their spouses, but because they've remained a work permit holder, it's tough for them to do so, and at the end of their tenure, they have to go back,' said Ms Jaya. Though the migrant workers' stay here is temporary by design, the negative attitudes held by some Singaporeans towards them must still be addressed. Experts noted how these low-wage migrant workers tend to do '3D' jobs – dirty, demeaning and dangerous – that Singaporeans generally do not want to do themselves, yet acknowledge that they are necessary. Ms Dipa said that this led to the 'conflicting' way in which Singaporeans treat permit holders. 'They are everywhere, we want them to do the work around us. We don't mind that. Yet, we don't want them living around us,' said Ms Dipa. 'It's something for us to really reflect on ourselves.' As in other parts of the world where citizens are grappling with the presence of immigrants, two main concerns often underlie locals' fears: economic competition and perceived cultural erosion. It is the fear of cultural erosion that sometimes takes primacy in the minds of some Singaporeans, said Dr Leong. 'You can reassure Singaporeans as much as you want about the importance of the migrant worker community. You can reassure them as much as you want in terms of what economic benefits, and whether they are law abiding or not. 'But at the end of the day, a lot of what's driving how sharp you want to define the the intergroup boundary has a lot to do with whether you feel that you are being marginalised, whether you feel that your sense of community is being eroded because you have an influx of people who are alien to you,' Dr Leong added. Given these negative sentiments held by some locals, the importance of integrating work permit holders to the rest of society still needs to be reinforced. At the most economically pragmatic level, experts and NGOs noted that Singapore, with its fast-greying population and declining birth rate, will constantly be in need of migrant workers. However, as their home countries develop and other countries, too, seek the services of such migrant workers, the latter may not automatically view Singapore as a top destination to work. For the migrant workers, integration could benefit them in tangible ways too. Mr Ripon Chowdury, a worker from Bangladesh who runs a self-help community initiative called Migrant Workers of Singapore, said that the social distance between the two sides means that migrant workers' issues 'are not fully understood' by locals. 'When local communities see migrant workers not just as laborers but as individuals contributing to society, fairer treatment becomes a shared cause rather than an isolated issue,' he said. 'In that sense, integration may serve as the foundation that strengthens calls for safer work environments, fair wages, and better living conditions.' As a society, keeping migrant workers apart from the rest of Singapore will only perpetuate negative sentiments towards the workers. Dr Mathews from IPS said: 'I don't know how tenable it is to keep the groups so separate. I think it does breed all the stereotypes, all the (negative) concerns. A continual gap between the two groups may not be the most healthy in the longer term.' Providing shared spaces for both sides to meet and interact meaningfully, on the other hand, would engender trust and greater shared sense of responsibility towards Singapore. SINGAPOREANS SHOULD TAKE THE FIRST STEP Mr K Balakrishnan, 38, a construction worker who has been here for 10 years, typically spends his limited free time with his friends and colleagues at the void deck of a quiet block in Jurong, some 15-minute walk from their dormitory. His most frequent interaction with a Singaporean outside of work is an elderly cleaning staff member who works nearby and always makes small talk with them when the man bumps into them. Mr Balakrishnan, who hails from India, told CNA TODAY that besides the lack of opportunity, another reason he does not interact a lot with Singaporeans is that he would rather not intrude their personal space if they do not make the first move. 'The uncle was friendly, he approached us, that's why we can talk to him. Other younger Singaporeans, they don't talk to us, we just keep quiet. But if they talk to us, we can talk,' he said. Mr Balakrishnan's sentiment encapsulated what migrant workers and advocacy groups feel: that the ball is in Singaporeans' court to improve integration and relationships with these low-wage migrant workers. Ms Jaya of HOME said that workers are aware that they are migrants here and are still largely viewed as foreigners by many Singaporeans. 'I think it's definitely on us to make them feel welcome and integrated and respected,' she said. Dr Leong argued that while integration is important, it is ultimately a long-term endeavour, and expecting boundaries between the two communities 'to be porous so quickly, is unrealistic' and is bound to elicit a pushback from locals. In the meantime, it is just as important to continue directly advocating for policy changes over issues that continue to impact migrant workers more immediately and in their daily lives, such as those related to their welfare, safety and protection. Efforts to reassure Singaporeans that their culture and way of life will always be protected are just as critical to the work done to build shared spaces for locals and migrant workers, said Dr Leong. 'In order to want to engage, to have voluntary contact with the migrant community, you (as a Singaporean) have to first and foremost be confident that you're not threatened in terms of who you are, as a Singaporean, your place in the society and so on,' he said. Meanwhile, there are signs that things are looking up. ILO's latest report on public attitudes towards migrant workers in Singapore in 2024 found that 46 per cent of respondents said the pandemic has made them 'more supportive' of migrant workers. The proportion of locals who feel migrant workers 'have an overall positive effect on the economy' also went up to 69 per cent, from 58 per cent in the 2019 report. As for now, though migrant workers here may have different comfort levels when it comes to befriending Singaporeans, they all share a common aspiration: to be seen as more than just another replaceable cog in the Singapore economy. 'It is important for us to understand and to be more empathetic towards each other,' said Ms Dupingay. 'It is important because we meet each other every day, at zebra crossings, along the road, at work and even in elevators and escalators. To integrate means to see each other as both humans with the same needs.'

At least 265 dead in India plane crash, one passenger survives
At least 265 dead in India plane crash, one passenger survives

Straits Times

time17 hours ago

  • Straits Times

At least 265 dead in India plane crash, one passenger survives

At least 265 dead in India plane crash, one passenger survives Ahmedabad, India - A London-bound passenger jet crashed in a residential area in the Indian city of Ahmedabad on June 12, killing at least 265 people on board and on the ground – but one passenger has miraculously survived. An AFP journalist saw bodies being recovered from the crash site, and the back of the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner – which had 242 passengers and crew on board – hanging over the edge of a building it hit around lunchtime. The government opened a formal investigation into the cause of the crash, and rescue teams worked into June 13 morning scouring the charred wreckage with sniffer dogs. 'The tragedy in Ahmedabad has stunned and saddened us,' Prime Minister Narendra Modi said after Air India's flight 171 crashed following takeoff. 'It is heartbreaking beyond words'. Deputy Commissioner of Police Kanan Desai told reporters said that '265 bodies have reached the hospital'. That suggests that at least 24 people died when the jet ploughed into a medical staff hostel in a blazing fireball – and that the toll may rise further as more bodies are located. 'Devastating' The AFP journalist saw a building ablaze after the crash, with thick black smoke billowing into the air, and a section of the plane on the ground. 'One half of the plane crashed into the residential building where doctors lived with their families,' said Krishna, a doctor who did not give his full name. 'The nose and front wheel landed on the canteen building where students were having lunch,' he said. Dr Krishna said he saw 'about 15 to 20 burnt bodies', while he and his colleagues rescued around 15 students. India's civil aviation authority said two pilots and 10 cabin crew were among the 242 people on board. Air India said there were 169 Indian passengers, 53 British, seven Portuguese, and a Canadian on board the flight bound for London's Gatwick airport. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the scenes from the crash were 'devastating', while the country's King Charles III said he was 'desperately shocked'. 'Sole survivor' But while everyone aboard the flight was initially feared killed, state health official Dhananjay Dwivedi told AFP 'one survivor is confirmed' and had been hospitalised. Air India said in a statement that the 'sole survivor is being treated in a hospital', adding that the 'survivor is a British national of Indian origin'. The survivor is believed to be 40-year-old Vishwashkumar Ramesh. India's Home Minister Amit Shah told reporters he was speaking to them 'after meeting him'. The BBC and Britain's Press Association news agency spoke to Ramesh's family members. 'He said, 'I have no idea how I exited the plane'', his brother Nayan Kumar Ramesh, 27, told PA in the British city of Leicester. 'Devastating' The plane issued a mayday call and 'crashed immediately after takeoff', the Directorate General of Civil Aviation said. Ahmedabad, the main city of India's Gujarat state, is home to around eight million people and the busy airport is surrounded by densely packed residential areas. 'When we reached the spot, there were several bodies lying around and firefighters were dousing the flames,' resident Poonam Patni told AFP. 'Many of the bodies were burned,' she said. The AFP journalist saw medics using a cart to load bodies into an ambulance, while a charred metal bed frame stood surrounded by burnt wreckage. US planemaker Boeing said it was in touch with Air India and stood 'ready to support them' over the incident, which a source close to the case said was the first crash for a 787 Dreamliner. The UK and US air accident investigation agencies announced they were dispatching teams to support their Indian counterparts. Tata Group, owners of Air India, offered financial aid of 10 million rupees (S$149,000) to 'the families of each person who has lost their life in this tragedy', as well as funds to cover medical expenses of those injured. India has suffered a series of fatal air crashes, including a 1996 disaster when two jets collided mid-air over New Delhi, killing nearly 350 people. In 2010, an Air India Express jet crashed and burst into flames at Mangalore airport in southwest India, killing 158 of the 166 passengers and crew on board. Experts said it was too early to speculate on what may have caused June 12's crash. 'It is very unlikely that the plane was overweight or carrying too much fuel,' said Prof Jason Knight, senior lecturer in fluid mechanics at the University of Portsmouth. 'The aircraft is designed to be able to fly on one engine, so the most likely cause of the crash is a double engine failure. The most likely cause of a double engine failure is a bird strike.' India's airline industry has boomed in recent years with Mr Willie Walsh, director general of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), last month calling it 'nothing short of phenomenal'. The growth of its economy has made India and its 1.4 billion people the world's fourth-largest air market – domestic and international – with IATA projecting it will become the third biggest within the decade. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store