Man, woman charged after 4-week-old baby found with fractured bones
Police say the baby was taken to hospital on May 3 with a swollen leg.
A further medical examination found a number of serious injuries, including bone fractures.
Detectives investigated the child's injuries, and on Tusday arrested a 33-year-old man and a 34-year-old woman from Reynella East.
Police say all those involved were known to each other.
Both were charged with criminal neglect and recklessly causing serious harm.
The pair were granted bail to appear at the Christies Beach Magistrates Court on September 30.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
32 minutes ago
- The Australian
Clive Palmer accuses solicitor Sam Iskander of Mineralogy ‘theft'
Billionaire Clive Palmer says he has reported his long-time solicitor to police, alleging the lawyer stole $30m in legal fees from his mining company. In an explosive written statement released on Thursday night, former federal MP Mr Palmer alleged that Sam Iskander had stolen about $30m from the businessman's company Mineralogy between 2016 and last month. Mr Palmer said Mineralogy would launch legal action in the Supreme Court on Friday seeking an order to freeze Mr Iskander's assets and said he had reported the matter to police. 'This is the biggest individual fraud in Queensland history and it casts serious doubts over our judicial system,'' Mr Palmer said. A mobile number for Mr Iskander was disconnected and the website for his law firm Alexander Law was not functional on Thursday night. Mr Iskander did not respond to requests for comment via email and voicemail left on the firm's answering service. The Queensland Law Society said on Thursday night that the body was 'aware of the situation and can confirm that Mr Iskander has surrendered his practising certificate and is no longer in practice'. 'Our priority in this situation is to protect the public and execute our duties as co-regulator of the legal profession in Queensland,' a law society spokesman said. 'We are taking all necessary steps to do this in accordance with responsibilities under the Legal Profession Act.' The society's online register of solicitors said Mr Iskander was registered as a solicitor in 2004 and he had an 'unrestricted' practising certificate. Mr Palmer has, at times, made outlandish statements. In 2022, he and then West Australian premier Mark McGowan were both awarded minor damages for defaming each other. The Australian does not suggest Mr Palmer's allegations against Mr Iskander are true, only that they have been made. The Australian understands Mr Palmer claims the alleged offending was discovered when he was compiling a tax return and sought more details about a barrister's fees. He allegedly found that Mr Iskander had told him the barrister's fees were five times more than they actually were, and then pocketed the rest. A forensic audit going back to 2016 allegedly found Mr Iskander had taken $30m, by inflating alleged bills relating to legal cases that he ran for Mr Palmer. Mr Iskander has represented the former federal MP for years, including during Mr Palmer's chequered ownership of the Queensland Nickel refinery in north Queensland and the dismissal of hundreds of workers. In 2019, the refinery said Mr Iskander's law firm was managing the trust account for unpaid workers' entitlements. As recently as January this year, Mr Iskander was filing documents to the High Court on behalf of Mr Palmer in his legal action against the Commonwealth of Australia. That case related to the registration of Mr Palmer's United Australia Party and a dispute with the Australian Electoral Commission. Alexander Law was listed as Mr Palmer's solicitors when the judgment was handed down in May. The former member for the Queensland Sunshine Coast seat of Fairfax lost and was ordered to pay legal costs. In an interview on Thursday night, Mr Palmer said the internal audit of legal fees had led to a complaint being made to police against Mr Iskander and civil legal action, which would be filed on Friday. 'Tomorrow (Friday) in the Supreme Court of Queensland, we're moving against him to get a freezing order against his assets, right?'' Mr Palmer said. 'And it's clear that he's applied a lot of our funds to purchase property throughout Australia, and we have launched caveats on those properties. I can confirm on the record that we've made a complaint to police, yeah, and that they're investigating right now.' Questions were put to Queensland Police but a response was not received before deadline. Read related topics: Clive Palmer Politics Anthony Albanese faces mounting pressure to boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP ahead of his first face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump. Defence Pentagon officials warn Australia must lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP to meet AUKUS commitments and defend itself adequately.
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Mum furious as son's 13-year-old killer walks free under legal loophole
A heartbroken mum is campaigning for a law change after her son's 13-year-old killer walked free because of his age. Kristie Morris' son Brody, also aged 13, was stabbed to death during a pre-arranged fight with a former friend in Kariong, north of Sydney, in January 2022. He died on the street, surrounded by other teens who had come to watch and film the fight, after receiving three stab wounds from a kitchen knife. A five-month trial was held in the NSW Supreme Court in 2023, and although the accused pleaded not guilty the jury was told there was no dispute he had fatally stabbed Brody. In the end, the killer was found not guilty under an old legal principle, Doli Incapax, which holds that children under the age of 14 cannot be held criminally responsible unless it is proven beyond all reasonable doubt they realised what they were doing was seriously wrong. Ms Morris, 40, was devastated by the decision and has launched a petition aimed at removing what she describes as a 'legal loophole'. 'My heart is shattered. My 13-year-old son was stabbed to death by another 13-year-old - someone he used to call a friend,' Ms Morris wrote in the online petition, which had reached almost 2,000 signatures on Friday. 'I sat through the court case, listened to the details of how my son died, and watched as the boy who killed him was found not guilty, despite clear evidence. 'Not because he was innocent - but because of his age, because of a legal loophole called Doli Incapax. 'The law said he was too young to understand what he did. But my son is gone. Forever. And the boy who took his life walks free, with no punishment, no consequences, nothing. Where is the justice in that?' Ms Morris said Doli Incapax had 'robbed us of accountability'. 'If a child is old enough to take a life, they are old enough to answer for it and be held accountable. 'This is not a call for harsh punishment of all young offenders. This is a call for real accountability, with age-appropriate consequences and rehabilitative justice.' She argued Doli Incapax may have served justice in its time, but these days children with access to smartphones grow up faster. 'They are exposed to violence online, engage in complex digital planning, and often understand exactly what they're doing - and yet, the law presumes they cannot.' The petition by Ms Morris comes as another alleged teen stabbing case shocked Australians this week. A girl was allegedly stabbed to death by a fellow student on a foreign exchange trip from China to Australia. The two girls, aged 14 and 13, were both staying with the same host family in Edgeworth Newcastle, New South Wales, when the incident took place. The older girl was allegedly stabbed in the torso late on Monday night and, despite being rushed to John Hunter Hospital, succumbed to her injuries. The 13-year-old was arrested at the scene and charged with murder the following day. She did not apply for bail, which was subsequently refused, and is due to appear in court again in October with a Mandarin interpreter.
The Australian
3 hours ago
- The Australian
Husband feared Australia's mushroom killer had poisoned him before
Australia's recently convicted mushroom murderer also tried to poison her husband with bolognese pasta and chicken korma curry, according to testimony aired Friday after a suppression order lapsed. Home cook Erin Patterson was found guilty in July of murdering her husband's parents and elderly aunt in 2023, lacing their beef Wellington lunch with lethal death cap mushrooms. A series of potentially damning allegations about Patterson's behaviour in the lead-up to the meal were withheld from the jury to give the mother-of-two a fair trial. Supreme Court Justice Christopher Beale on Friday rejected an application to keep these allegations secret. Patterson tried to kill her estranged husband Simon on three occasions between 2021 and 2022, police alleged in one of the major claims not heard during the trial. She was accused of serving him poisoned dishes of pasta bolognese, chicken curry and a vegetable wrap, according to freshly released evidence. Simon told a pre-trial hearing in October last year how Patterson had asked him to taste test a batch of curries she had made. "I remember Erin saying that the purpose of the taste test was so she could, I guess, customise future curry production for our respective tastes," he said in testimony suppressed until now. He later fell ill after eating a mild chicken korma served by Patterson on a camping trip in 2022. "At first I felt hot, especially in my head, and that led to feeling nauseous and then that led to me quite suddenly needing to vomit," he said. Simon eventually fell into a coma before receiving life-saving surgery to remove a section of his bowel. He later told doctor Christopher Ford that he had come to suspect Patterson might be deliberately poisoning him. He became worried when Patterson offered him a batch of homemade cookies, Ford said. "Simon was apprehensive about eating the cookies, as he felt they may be poisoned," the doctor told a pre-trial hearing last year. "He reported to me that while they were away, Erin called several times and enquired about whether he had eaten any of the cookies." When his parents fell gravely ill after eating at Patterson's house, Simon would regretfully confide those fears to his family. "He wanted to tell us that he had suspected his own illnesses had been a deliberate act," cousin Ruth Dubois told a pre-trial hearing. "He had stopped eating food that Erin had prepared, because he suspected that she might have been messing with it. "And that he was really sorry that he hadn't told our family." Prosecutors dropped those charges before the start of Patterson's trial, with tight restrictions preventing media from revealing any details. - Lethal fungus - Patterson hosted an intimate meal in July 2023 that started with good-natured banter and earnest prayer -- but ended with three guests dead. A 12-person jury found the 50-year-old guilty of murdering Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, as well as his aunt Heather Wilkinson. She was also found guilty of attempting to murder Heather's husband Ian, a well-known pastor at the local Baptist church. Simon had been invited to that lunch as well, but pulled out because he felt "uncomfortable". At the time, Patterson's relationship with Simon was starting to turn sour. The pair -- long estranged but still legally married -- had been fighting over Simon's child support contributions. Patterson's trial drew podcasters, film crews and true crime fans to the rural town of Morwell, a sedate hamlet in the state of Victoria better known for prize-winning roses. Newspapers from New York to New Delhi followed every twist of what many now simply call the "mushroom murders". Throughout a trial lasting more than two months, Patterson maintained the beef-and-pastry dish was accidentally poisoned with death cap mushrooms, the world's most-lethal fungus. Death cap mushrooms are easily mistaken for other edible varieties, and reportedly possess a sweet taste that belies their potent toxicity. Patterson will return to court on August 25 for hearings that will determine how long she spends behind bars. Her legal team has 28 days after sentencing to appeal both her criminal convictions and her sentence. sft/cwl
