Google Photos vs. Amazon Photos: Which should you pick?
Google Photos and Amazon Photos are two of the best photo storage and sharing services, and it's easy to see why. They both offer plenty of storage, user-friendly organizational tools, and seamless photo sharing across your devices.
However, there are some important differences between these platforms that you should know about. Below, we compare Google Photos vs. Amazon Photos to help you decide which is right for you.
Let's explore the differences between Google Photos and Amazon Photos that you need to know about.
One of the biggest differences between Google Photos and Amazon Photos is how much storage you get and how much it costs.
Google offers 15GB for free with a Google account. However, that doesn't comprise only Google Photos data — content you own in Gmail and Google Drive also counts against your storage limit. If you need more than 15GB, Google One storage plans cost $1.99/month for 100GB, $9.99/month for 2TB, and $19.99/month for 2TB with AI Premium features.
Amazon Photos offers just 5GB of storage for free. However, if you have an Amazon Prime membership, which costs $14.99/month or $139/year, you get unlimited full-resolution photo storage and up to 5GB of video storage at no extra cost. If you need more storage (with or without Prime), you can get 100GB for $1.99/month, 1 TB for $6.99/month, or 2TB for $11.99/month.
For anyone with more than 15GB of photos — or a growing library that could exceed that threshold in the future — Amazon Photos is the far better deal. You can get unlimited full-resolution storage for photos and all the other benefits of Prime, such as two-day shipping and streaming videos, for less than the cost of 2TB of storage with Google Photos.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Both Google Photos and Amazon Photos offer desktop apps for Windows and Mac and mobile apps for iOS and Android. They're both accessible on any web browser, too.
Amazon Photos also offers an app for Fire TV and Fire tablet devices. The Fire TV app is handy because it enables you to quickly view your photos on the big screen or use them as screensavers.
The backup and sync experience is almost identical between Google Photos and Amazon Photos.
Both apps automatically back up new photos on your mobile device. You can choose whether to allow backups on Wi-Fi only or change the resolution of uploaded photos and videos. On the web, you can easily add images to your account by dragging and dropping. Both platforms also make it easy to download content to your device for offline viewing.
Google Photos and Amazon Photos also compete closely on features. Both platforms offer similar features for organizing, editing, and sharing your photos.
They both automatically group your photos based on people and places, and you can easily organize them into custom albums. Google Photos goes one step further, though: It organizes photos into albums based on content dates and locations. The algorithm is very effective at grouping images—for example, from a vacation where you visited multiple cities.
Google Photos and Amazon Photos also use AI to make your library more searchable. You can search for a term like 'sunset' and see all photos that include a colorful sunset, even if it isn't the photo's primary subject. The AI in both platforms is surprisingly good, but Google Photos may have the advantage. It offers excellent text search and facial, object, and scene recognition.
With either platform, you can easily share photos by inviting friends and family to an album or sending an album link. If you have contacts saved to your Google account, this process feels slightly more seamless with Google Photos. The platform will automatically suggest people you communicate with frequently.
One minor difference is that with Amazon Photos, if the owner of a shared album has a Prime account, anyone can upload unlimited photos to that album. With Google Photos, photos added to a shared album count against the contributor's storage space.
Google Photos and Amazon Photos both offer seamless photo storage and sharing. Which is better for you mostly depends on how much content you plan to store and whether you already have an Amazon Prime subscription.
If you have Prime, Amazon Photos is a no-brainer thanks to its unlimited photo storage. For non-Prime members who don't plan to store more than 100GB of photos and videos, Google Photos could be the better value.
Want even more options? Check out our guide to the best cloud storage for photos, or compare Google Photos vs. iCloud Photos.
It depends on your needs. If you have an Amazon Prime membership, Amazon Photos offers unlimited full-resolution photo storage, making it a better deal. However, Google Photos is an excellent option for those who prefer free storage and Google's AI-powered photo organization.
Google Photos offers 15GB of free storage, but this includes Gmail and Google Drive content. To get more storage, you need a Google One subscription.
Yes, but without Prime, you get only 5GB of free storage. You can purchase additional storage plans if needed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Big Tech's AI Endgame Is Coming Into Focus
If Google has its way, there will be no search bars, no search terms, no searching (at least not by humans). The very tool that has defined the company—and perhaps the entire internet—for nearly three decades could soon be overtaken by a chatbot. Last month, at its annual software conference, Google launched 'AI Mode,' the most drastic overhaul to its search engine in the company's history. The feature is different from the AI summaries that already show up in Google's search results, which appear above the usual list of links to outside websites. Instead, AI Mode functionally replaces Google Search with something akin to ChatGPT. You ask a question and the AI spits out an answer. Instead of sifting through a list of blue links, you can just ask a follow-up. Google has begun rolling out AI Mode to users in the United States as a tab below the search bar (before 'Images,' 'Shopping,' and the like). The company said it will soon introduce a number of more advanced, experimental capabilities to AI Mode, at which point the feature could be able to write a research report in minutes, 'see' through your smartphone's camera to assist with physical tasks such as a DIY crafts project, help book restaurant reservations, make payments. Whether AI Mode can become as advanced and as seamless as Google promises remains far from certain, but the firm appears to be aiming for something like an everything app: a single tool that will be able to do just about everything a person could possibly want to do online. Seemingly every major tech company is after the same goal. OpenAI markets ChatGPT, for instance, as able to write code and summarize documents, help shop, produce graphics, and naturally, search the web. Elon Musk is notoriously obsessed with the idea of turning X into an everything app. Meta says you can use its AI 'for everything you need'; Amazon calls its new, generative AI–powered Alexa+ 'an assistant available to help any time you want'; Microsoft bills its AI Copilot as a companion 'for all you do'; and Apple has marketed Apple Intelligence and a revamped Siri as tools that will revolutionize how people use their iPhones (which encompass, for many users, everything). Even Airbnb, once focused simply on vacation rentals, is redesigning itself as a place where 'you can sell and do almost anything,' as its CEO, Brian Chesky, recently said. In a sense, everything apps are the logical conclusion of Silicon Valley's race to build artificial 'general' intelligence, or AGI. A bot smart enough to do anything obviously would be used to power a product that can, in effect, do anything. But such apps would also represent the culmination of the tech industry's aim to entrench its products in people's daily lives. Already, Google has features for shopping, navigation, data storage, work software, payment, travel—plus an array of smartphones, tablets, smart-home gadgets, and more. Apple has a similarly all-encompassing suite of offerings, and Meta's three major apps (Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp) each have billions of users. Perhaps the only thing more powerful than these sprawling tech ecosystems is boiling them all down to a single product. That these tech companies can even realistically have such colossal ambitions to build everything apps is a result of their existing dominance. The industry has spent years collecting information about our relationships, work, hobbies, and interests—all of which is becoming grist for powerful AI tools. A key feature of these everything apps is that they promise to be individually tailored, drawing on extensive personal data to provide, in theory, a more seamless experience. Your past search history, and eventually your emails, can inform AI Mode's responses: When I typed line up into AI Mode, I got the 'line up' for the day's New York Mets game (the Mets are my favorite baseball team). When I typed the same phrase into traditional Google Search, I got a definition. In other words, the rise of AI-powered everything apps is a version of the bargain that tech companies have proposed in the past with social media and other tools: our services for your data. Meta's AI assistant can draw on information from users' Facebook and Instagram accounts. Apple describes its AI as a 'personal intelligence' able to glean from texts, emails, and notes on your device. And ChatGPT has a new 'memory' feature that allows the chatbot to reference all previous conversations. If the technology goes as planned, it leads to a future in which Google, or any other Big Tech company, knows you are moving from Texas to Chicago and, of its own accord, offers to order the winter jacket you don't own to be delivered to your new apartment, already selected from your favorite brand, in your favorite color. Or it could, after reading emails musing about an Italian vacation, suggest an in-budget itinerary for Venice that best fits your preferences. There are, of course, plenty of reasons to think that AI models will not be capable and reliable enough to power a true everything app. The Mets lineup that Google automatically generated for me wasn't entirely accurate. Chatbots still invent information and mess up basic math; concerns over AI's environmental harms and alleged infringement of intellectual-property rights could substantially slow the technology's development. Only a year ago, Google released AI Overviews, a search feature that told users to eat rocks and use glue to stick cheese to pizza. On the same day that Google released AI Mode, it also introduced an experimental AI shopping tool that can be easily used to make erotic images of teenagers, as I reported with my colleague Lila Shroff. (When we shared our reporting with the company, Google emphasized the protections it has in place and told us it would 'continue to improve the experience.') Maybe AI Mode will order something two sizes too large and ship to the wrong address, or maybe it'll serve you recommendations for Venice Beach. [Read: Google's new AI puts breasts on minors—and J.D. Vance] Despite these embarrassments, Google and its major AI competitors show no signs of slowing down. The promised convenience of everything apps is, after all, alluring: The more products of any one company you use, and the better integrated those products are, the more personalized and universal its everything app can be. Google even has a second contender in the race—its Gemini model, which, at the same conference, the company said will become a 'universal AI assistant.' Whether through Search or Gemini the company seems eager to integrate as many of its products and as much of its user data as possible. On the surface, AI and the everything app seem set to dramatically change how people interact with technology—consolidating and streamlining search, social media, officeware, and more into a chatbot. But a bunch of everything apps vying for customers feels less like a race for innovation and more like empires warring over territory. Tech companies are running the same data-hungry playbook with their everything apps as they did in the markets that made them so dominant in the first place. Even OpenAI, which has evolved from a little-known nonprofit to a Silicon Valley behemoth, appears so eager to accumulate user data that it reportedly plans to launch a social-media network. The technology of the future looks awfully reliant on that of the past. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The MRC Re-Affirms YouTube's Brand Safety Accreditation
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. YouTube has been awarded the Media Rating Council (MRC)'s brand safety accreditation for in-stream ads for the fifth year in a row, providing additional assurance for advertisers around their video ad placements. MRC accreditation means that YouTube's ad system has been approved by the MRC for its controls and metrics, based on a third-party audit of the platform's ad systems and processes. As per the MRC: 'Accreditation indicates that the Service complies with: (1) the Minimum Standards for Media Rating Research and the Enhanced Content Level Context and Brand Safety Guidelines published by the MRC; the Ad Verification Guidelines published by the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) and MRC; (2) the procedures described in Google's answers to the MRC questionnaire; and (3) the procedures described in procedure manuals and textual materials included in reports of the Service.' So it's really just confirming that Google/YouTube is maintaining its systems on this front, and ensuring compliance with relevant industry standard guidelines, but it does give advertisers some level of recourse, if they find that these systems are failing to meet the relevant benchmarks. The MRC's accreditation also certifies that YouTube's inventory filters deliver brand-safe ad placements, with content suitability based on advertiser selection. As per YouTube: 'Over the years, we've expanded advertisers' ability to choose where their ads run, and we've made sustained investments in policy and enforcement to ensure ads don't run alongside brand-unsafe content. As part of the accreditation process, the MRC assessed our AI-powered enforcement systems, our teams of human reviewers, and the policies that determine which videos are eligible to run ads.' It's a good endorsement of Google's ad systems, which, as noted, will give YouTube advertisers additional peace of mind. But I would note that, as specified by the MRC, this is only an audit of Google/YouTube's documented systems, not a test of them in action, as such. And with more and more AI elements being integrated into its ad placement process, such processes, in practice, could still veer from those parameters. Recommended Reading YouTube Launches New Experiment to Restrict Content from Those Using Ad Blocking Tools Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Seize the AI Revolution: How NEAR AI's Blockchain Powers Wealth and Freedom for Investors
Seize the AI Revolution: How NEAR AI's Blockchain Powers Wealth and Freedom for Investors originally appeared on TheStreet. Imagine a future where your AI agent buys, sells, and negotiates for you—securely, instantly, and without Big Tech's prying eyes. A world where you own your data, your assets, and your profits, free from corporate or government control. That's the vision of NEAR AI, a cutting-edge project within the NEAR Protocol ecosystem, built to merge blockchain's decentralization with AI's limitless potential. Eric Winer, CTO of NEAR AI, reveals how their lightning-fast, AI-focused blockchain is creating a new era of wealth-building opportunities for high net-worth individuals and family offices. Eric Winer's 11-year crypto journey began as the first engineer at Gemini, the U.S.'s first fully regulated crypto exchange. 'I helped grow that team,' Winer shared, before joining the NEAR Protocol ecosystem two years ago and becoming CTO of NEAR AI seven months back. NEAR's origin story is rooted in AI innovation: founded in 2017 by AI researchers aiming to build an AI coding agent, they needed a blockchain to pay global data labelers efficiently. 'Blockchains at the time were slow and expensive,' Winer explained. 'They built NEAR for day-to-day interactions, helping people own their data and assets.' Today, NEAR AI tackles a pressing problem: Big Tech's grip on AI. 'Open AI, Google, and others build compelling tools, but the more you use them, the more you're pushing your interactions through proprietary systems,' Winer warned. Google's AI could soon prioritize sponsored content over your interests, just as search ads do now. NEAR AI offers an open, decentralized alternative, ensuring you control your data and transactions in an AI-driven world. How does NEAR AI stack up against giants like Open AI or Google? 'Big labs lead in base models like GPT-4.1,' Winer admitted, 'but the tooling around them is wide open.' While ChatGPT offers raw AI interaction, NEAR AI envisions a world where AI agents act as your proxies—conducting interviews, selling products, or navigating government services. 'That world is coming, and it's open for innovation,' Winer said. Unlike Big Tech's walled gardens, NEAR AI fosters an internet-like ecosystem where anyone can build and experiment. NEAR's blockchain is uniquely suited for this. 'It's fast, scalable, and can direct activity on other blockchains,' Winer noted. For example, you can execute Ethereum trades using a NEAR wallet. This interoperability, combined with NEAR's AI roots, makes it a powerhouse for decentralized AI applications, from secure data markets to autonomous trading agents. For high net-worth individuals and family offices dipping into crypto, NEAR AI is a golden opportunity. 'As businesses and governments use AI more, agents will talk to each other, handling asset transfers, escrow, and disputes,' Winer predicted. These AI-to-AI transactions will favor digital-native solutions like crypto over clunky wire transfers. 'When my AI buys from another AI, it'll use crypto,' he said, opening a massive market for decentralized finance. NEAR's speed and scalability make it ideal for this AI-driven future. 'NEAR is faster than LLMs and one of the most scalable blockchains,' Winer emphasized. Its ability to interact with Ethereum, Solana, and beyond positions it as a 'home base' for cross-chain activity. With over 250 million transactions and 1.2 million daily active users in Q3 2024, NEAR's ecosystem is booming. Franklin Templeton's 2025 outlook named NEAR a top DePIN player, signaling its investment potential. NEAR isn't just riding the AI wave—it was designed for it. 'NEAR was built with AI in mind before anyone else,' Winer said. Its low-cost, high-speed transactions (0.01 cents, sub-second finality) outpace competitors like Ethereum, while its developer-friendly tools attract innovators. Projects on NEAR are experimenting with AI-driven apps, from data marketplaces to autonomous agents, much like early mobile apps reshaped the internet. 'Whatever works, it'll be built on our technology,' Winer predicted. Seize the AI Revolution: How NEAR AI's Blockchain Powers Wealth and Freedom for Investors first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 3, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 3, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
