Fix timeline for notifying fresh list of elephant corridors in Tamil Nadu, Madras High Court directs State government
A special Division Bench of Justices N. Sathish Kumar and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy passed the orders on a batch of forest related cases before it. Amici curiae T. Mohan, Chevanan Mohan, Rahul Balaji and M. Santhanaraman have been assisting the court in all these cases.
In September 2023, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests-cum-Chief Wildlife Warden had revealed a field study by an elephant corridor identification committee had brought to light preliminary information regarding existence of 36 corridors in Tamil Nadu.
As nearly two years had lapsed since then, the judges wanted a definite timeline to be fixed for devising strategies for consolidation, obtaining funds for corridor rebuilding and framing guidelines for ensuring public cooperation to avoid human-elephant negative interactions.
Filing a compliance report with respect to a series of other directions issued by the Bench on January 10, 2025; Coimbatore Collector G. Pavankumar said, necessary steps had been taken to implement the direction to install surveillance cameras to prevent illegal mining around forest areas in the district.
A private agency had submitted a detailed project report for installing Artificial Intelligence enabled surveillance cameras at a cost of ₹1.83 crore and the proposal was forwarded to the Commissioner of Geology and Mining on March 12, 2025 for sanctioning the funds, the Collector said.
The court was also informed that 270 cases of illegal mining had been identified and a penalty of ₹26.76 crore was imposed in 100 cases. The rest of the cases were being inquired by the jurisdictional Revenue Divisional Officer and action would be taken as and when the inquiry concludes.
The Division Bench was also informed of the action taken so far against the government and police officials for dereliction of duty and the engagement of a private agency to create mobile applications and an Internet portal for lodging complaints related to illegal mining.
After taking the Collector's report on file, the judges decided to pass further orders on the issue on July 25.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Bail plea of actors Srikanth, Krishna in drug case: Madras High Court to pass orders on July 8
The Madras High Court, on Monday (July 7, 2025), reserved its orders on individual bail petitions filed by Tamil film actors T. Srikanth (45) and Krishna alias K. Krishnakumar (47) in a case booked against them by the Greater Chennai City Police under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act of 1985. Justice M. Nirmal Kumar heard the arguments advanced by senior counsel R. John Sathyan and advocate L. Infant Dinesh on behalf of the two actors and decided to pronounce orders on Tuesday (July 8). The counsel contended their clients were innocent and had nothing to do with the narcotics case. According to the prosecution, Sub Inspector Arulmani attached to the Anti Narcotics Intelligence Unit (AINU) under the Triplicane Assistant Commissioner of Police, had received a source information on June 17 regarding a person in possession of cocaine near the Regional Meteorological Centre bus stop at Nungambakkam in Chennai. Since the location fell within the Nungambakkam police station limits, the Sub Inspector shared the information with the jurisdictional Inspector (Law and Order) and obtained permission to conduct a raid by the AINU team at the bus stop where they caught hold of the first suspect Prado alias G. Pradeep Kumar. The AINU team reportedly informed the suspect of his right to be searched either before a judicial magistrate or top government officials. However, on his insistence that he could be searched by the Sub Inspector himself, the team attempted to persuade a few passers by to be a witness to the search but in vain. Hence, the Sub Inspector conducted the search with two of the constables in his team as the witnesses and reportedly recovered one gram of cocaine. Immediately, the suspect was arrested. He also reportedly confessed to be have obtained the contraband from Nigeria through a Ghana national named M. John. On June 18, the AINU team arrested John at Hosur (Krishnagiri district) bus stand and reportedly recovered 10 grams of cocaine from him. Thereafter, the Sub Inspector lodged a complaint with the Nungambakkam police leading to the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against both of them. Further investigation in the case led to the arrest of the two actors before the court on charges of allegedly procuring the contraband for personal consumption. The prosecution claimed a urine test conducted with respect to Mr. Srikanth on June 23 had shown traces of the contraband. However, the actor in his bail petition, said, the urine test was conducted four hours after his arrest and in the meantime, the police had given him food, water, coffee and snacks. After consuming them, the actor said he started vomiting non-stop and fainted leading to his treatment at a government hospital. Actors' contention 'The police took the petitioner to the Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital in Chennai and treated him briefly by administering some medicines. Hence, there is a real apprehension that any substance could have been administered to him to falsely implicate him in the case,' his petition read. He also alleged the police had roped him in the case only to sensationalise the entire issue though no contraband was seized from him. On his part, actor Krishna too contended no contraband was seized from him and he had been implicated in the case only on the basis of the alleged confession by the two suspects arrested initially.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Cheque bounce case acquittals can be challenged before district courts from July 7: Madras High Court
Victims in cheque bounce cases can henceforth file appeals, against judicial magistrates' acquittal orders, directly before the jurisdictional district courts without having to approach the Madras High Court seeking its leave to file the appeals against the acquittal of the accused. The Madras High Court's Registrar (Judicial) has issued a notification intimating lawyers and litigants that the High Court would not entertain petitions to grant leave, to file appeals, from Monday (July 7, 2025) in accordance with a judicial order passed Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan. While hearing two such leave petitions on June 30, 2025, the judge pointed out the Supreme Court in Celestium Financial versus A. Gnanasekaran (2025) had ruled victims in cheque bounce cases were entitled to file appeals as a matter of right without having to seek the leave of the High Court. The top court had pointed out the procedure of filing appeals, against acquittal orders passed by judicial magistrates, in the High Court, that too after obtaining its leave, had to be followed only in cases where the private complainants were not the victims in a criminal case. 'A person convicted of a crime has the right to prefer an appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as a matter of right and not being subjected to any conditions. Similarly, a victim of a crime, whatever be the nature of the crime, unconditionally must have a right to prefer an appeal,' the Supreme Court had said. However, since the top court had not mentioned whether its decision should be given effect retrospectively or prospectively, Justice Ilanthiraiyan decided to give effect to it from July 7, 2025. 'The district courts are directed to entertain the appeals... from July 7, 2025 onwards,' he ordered. The judge also directed the High Court Registry to circulate his order to all district courts in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Fix timeline for notifying fresh list of elephant corridors in Tamil Nadu, Madras High Court directs State government
The Madras High Court has impressed upon the need for Tamil Nadu government to fix a timeline for notifying a fresh list of elephant corridors in the State. It has also called for a status report by July 25, 2025 indicating the progress made in this regard. A special Division Bench of Justices N. Sathish Kumar and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy passed the orders on a batch of forest related cases before it. Amici curiae T. Mohan, Chevanan Mohan, Rahul Balaji and M. Santhanaraman have been assisting the court in all these cases. In September 2023, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests-cum-Chief Wildlife Warden had revealed a field study by an elephant corridor identification committee had brought to light preliminary information regarding existence of 36 corridors in Tamil Nadu. As nearly two years had lapsed since then, the judges wanted a definite timeline to be fixed for devising strategies for consolidation, obtaining funds for corridor rebuilding and framing guidelines for ensuring public cooperation to avoid human-elephant negative interactions. Filing a compliance report with respect to a series of other directions issued by the Bench on January 10, 2025; Coimbatore Collector G. Pavankumar said, necessary steps had been taken to implement the direction to install surveillance cameras to prevent illegal mining around forest areas in the district. A private agency had submitted a detailed project report for installing Artificial Intelligence enabled surveillance cameras at a cost of ₹1.83 crore and the proposal was forwarded to the Commissioner of Geology and Mining on March 12, 2025 for sanctioning the funds, the Collector said. The court was also informed that 270 cases of illegal mining had been identified and a penalty of ₹26.76 crore was imposed in 100 cases. The rest of the cases were being inquired by the jurisdictional Revenue Divisional Officer and action would be taken as and when the inquiry concludes. The Division Bench was also informed of the action taken so far against the government and police officials for dereliction of duty and the engagement of a private agency to create mobile applications and an Internet portal for lodging complaints related to illegal mining. After taking the Collector's report on file, the judges decided to pass further orders on the issue on July 25.
