logo
Digha's Jagannath Temple inauguration is TMC's Ram Temple moment

Digha's Jagannath Temple inauguration is TMC's Ram Temple moment

The Hindu29-04-2025
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee-led administration is leaving no stone unturned to ensure that the inauguration of Jagannath Temple, built at a cost of ₹250 crore, in West Bengal's coastal town of Digha on Wednesday (April 30, 2025) is a grand success.
The Trinamool chairperson arrived in the tourist town in Purba Medinipur district a day earlier and has been personally supervising the last-minute arrangements for Wednesday's 'Prana Pratistha (consecration ceremony)' for which invitations have been extended to top State officials, industry captains, religious heads of almost every Hindu order in West Bengal, apart from senior Trinamool leaders.
The town has been decked up with lights and yellow 'Jai Jagannath' flags, and a devotional song praising Lord Jagannath, composed by the Chief Minister, is being played at every intersection.
The party leadership has been directed to ensure that the consecration ceremony is livestreamed on giant screens in every locality of the State. AI-generated profile pictures of most of the TMC leaders have flooded social media.
In the highly polarised political landscape of West Bengal, the Jagannath Temple is the ruling party's answer to the allegations of being 'fake-Hindu' levelled at it by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). 'Jai Jagannath' is going to be the Trinamool's answer to the BJP's war cry of'Jai Shri Ram'.
The much-awaited inauguration of the temple, a replica of the shrine in Puri, is, in other words, the Trinamool's Ram Temple moment.
'Soft Hindutva'
While Ms. Banerjee has renovated temples in the past and installed skywalks at Kolkata's famous Kalighat and Dakshineswar temples, the inauguration of Jagannath Temple makes a further push at burnishing the Trinamool's 'soft Hindutva' credentials. The party, which awards a monthly honorarium to imams and muezzins and awards incentives worth hundreds of crores every year to Durga Puja committees in the State, has never shied away from mixing religion with politics. With the temple in Digha, the TMC wants to take on the BJP at its own game by building its support base among Hindus while offsetting religious polarisation.
The construction of the temple also provides direct evidence of 'competitive communalism' of the ruling party and the BJP, which the Communist Party of India (Marxist) has been accusing both parties of for the past several years.
Even as the Chief Minister inaugurates the mega temple, built over 20 acres, Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari will launch a parallel drive to renovate temples damaged during the riots in Murshidabad.
Temple wars
The temple wars between the Trinamool and the BJP could not have come at a worse time. Nearly three weeks ago, West Bengal witnessed one of its worst episodes of communal riots, which claimed three lives and left hundreds homeless. The Dhulian and Samserganz areas of Murshidabad are still tense, even as over 300 have been arrested for their alleged role in the violence.
The clashes left a deep scar not only on those who suffered them first-hand, but also on the psyche of West Bengal's public at large, which firmly holds that the State's foundations were laid on the ideals of fraternity and brotherhood.
2026 election
Senior leaders of the BJP, which lost the 2021 Assembly election to the Trinamool despite a high-pitch campaign, have been saying that all they need to come to power in the 2026 poll is an additional 5% of the Hindu community's votes.
The Trinamool Congress hopes to win over the community ahead of next year's election by bringing Lord Jagannath from Puri to West Bengal.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tension between TMC, Congress over floor strategy to oppose Bill
Tension between TMC, Congress over floor strategy to oppose Bill

Hindustan Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Tension between TMC, Congress over floor strategy to oppose Bill

Tension crept in between two key INDIA bloc allies — Trinamool Congress and the Congress party — on the last day of monsoon session over the floor strategy to oppose the 130th Constitution amendment bill piloted by Union home minister Amit Shah. TMC had reached out to the Congress to launch a joint protest at the Well of the House and raise posters against the Constitution Amendment Bill.(PTI FILE) The TMC took an aggressive stand and rushed to the Well of the House on Thursday in the Rajya Sabha — the same strategy it adopted in the Lower House on Wednesday. According to the party's Rajya Sabha floor leader Derek O'Brien, 'We fought single-handedly while other parties sat on their seats,' referring to the Congress' plan to not join the protest in the Well of the Rajya Sabha. While TMC MPs brought posters to target Shah, three TMC MPs — Mitali Bag, Mahua Moitra and Shatabdi Roy — wrote to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla alleging manhandling and the threat to democratic values. 'It is very clear who was leading this opposition,' O'Brien said, even as TMC has 41 MPs in Parliament. The Congress has 126 lawmakers. According to Opposition functionaries, TMC had reached out to the Congress to launch a joint protest at the Well of the House and raise posters against the Constitution Amendment Bill. 'But Congress decided to stick to the strategy to tear up the copies of the bill. 'If some of our colleagues prefer to sit in the seats, it is their problem. TMC has taken the lead and become the driving force. This is not a competition,' O'Brien said. Congress pointed out that at least 4 MPs also joined the TMC to protest. A Congress leader, requesting anonymity, said there is no problem between the TMC and the Congress. 'We are part of the INDIA group. Our methods can differ but our goal remains the same.'

GoM nod for simpler GST, but some states flag compensation
GoM nod for simpler GST, but some states flag compensation

Hindustan Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

GoM nod for simpler GST, but some states flag compensation

A group of ministers (GoM) approved, in principle, the Union government's proposal to reduce the number of Goods and Services Tax (GST) brackets from four to two main slabs in order to substantially reduce tax burden on the consumer, although some of the ministers expressed concerns over the revenue implication of the move and sought ways in which the states could be compensated. The government has proposed to eliminate two tax slabs of 12% and 28% and retain the 5% and 18% tax rates with a special slab of 40% for so-called luxury and sin goods(FILE) The Centre proposed significant GST reforms encompassing structural changes, rate rationalisation, and ease of living measures. It proposed to eliminate two tax slabs of 12% and 28% and retain the 5% and 18% tax rates with a special slab of 40% for so-called luxury and sin goods. The panel's head and Bihar deputy chief minister Samrat Choudhary confirmed that GoM members are in favour of the rate rationalisation, but added some of them have made certain observations that will be discussed in the GST Council. ' GoM has decided to accept the two proposals of the Centre,' Choudhary said. Final decisions on all matters pertaining to GST are taken by the GST Council as GoMs are only recommendatory bodies. The six-member GoM has three members from BJP-ruled states of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan, and three members from the Opposition-ruled states — Karnataka, Kerala, and West Bengal. According to people familiar with the matter, most states are willing to sign off on the rate rationalisation if the move benefits the common man — but they do not want to take any hit on their revenues. According to an SBI research report, estimated revenue loss due to the changes could be ₹85,000 crore per annum and around ₹45,000 crore in the current financial year. 'In the current GST structure, the majority of revenue share comes from goods having GST rate of 18% followed by goods having GST rate of 28%,' the report said. To be sure, the government's thinking is that a surge in demand could offset much of the losses. Uttar Pradesh finance minister Suresh Kumar Khanna, who is part of the GST Council, said the Centre's proposal is in the interest of the common person. He said a considered view would be taken by the GST Council, which will also calculate revenue implications of the tax reform. West Bengal finance minister Chandrima Bhattacharya, also part of the council, supported the proposal, calling it 'pro-people' while emphasising on the need to know the revenue losses suffered by states because of the move. 'Because, ultimately, if a state suffers any loss, then it boils down to the sufferance of the common man. The GST Council will discuss the rate proposal item by item.' Pratik Jain, partner at Price Waterhouse & Co LLP said GoM's recommendations will simplify the tax structure, reduce disputes on classification of products and also boost consumption. 'Since more than 70% GST collections come from 18% slab (which is not proposed to be changed in general) the revenue impact of GST cuts may be limited, particularly because reduced prices will also spur demand,' he said. He also advised industry to be prepared for the changes, which he termed GST 2.0. 'Given the speed with which things are moving, industry needs to quickly gear up and assess the impact as timeline for transition plan is really steep.' .

Opp supports resolution recommending Bharat Ratna for former CM Parmar, says Cong undermining his legacy
Opp supports resolution recommending Bharat Ratna for former CM Parmar, says Cong undermining his legacy

Indian Express

time19 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Opp supports resolution recommending Bharat Ratna for former CM Parmar, says Cong undermining his legacy

The Himachal Pradesh Assembly on Thursday unanimously passed a resolution recommending the conferment of the Bharat Ratna on Dr Y S Parmar, the state's first chief minister, to the central government. The resolution was introduced under Rule 101 of the Private Member's Bill by Congress MLA Ajay Solanki. While the Opposition supported the resolution unconditionally, it accused the state government of undermining the legacy of Parmar. Leader of Opposition Jai Ram Thakur criticised the state government for organising a 'low-profile' event on the late chief minister's birth anniversary on August 4. BJP MLA from Pachhad Reena Kashyap, the constituency from where the late CM belonged, said, 'It is a matter of pride for me that I represent the assembly (seat) which was once represented by Parmar'. 'We definitely support this resolution but the current state government should take care of the condition of education and health in the native village of Parmar, Chanalag, in district Sirmaur. Chanalag falls under my constituency. I have raised the issue of health facilities and education facilities' conditions with the Health Minister Col (Dr) Dhani Ram Shandil and Education Minister Rohit Thakur many times respectively. If the state government actually wants to honour Parmar, it should also look into these issues. We supported this resolution beyond the political differences,' the MLA said. Meanwhile, Deputy CM Mukesh Agnihotri, presenting the government's stand, said, 'Parmar lived and died for the identity of the 'pahari' people. He is an inspiration for all hill states'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store