Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 pre-order deals — best telco and retail offers in Australia
When folded, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is only 8.9mm thick — only 0.7mm thicker than the S25 Ultra — and when unfolded, it's just 4.2mm thick. When you consider that the ultra-slim Galaxy S25 Edge has a thickness of 5.8mm, that's seriously impressive. Add to this a weight of just 215g (3g lighter than the S25 Ultra), and it's clear that the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a true feat of engineering.
But what really pushes the Galaxy Z Fold 7 into true flagship territory is its upgraded camera, which now boasts the same 200MP main sensor as the S25 Ultra. Throw in that phone's Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, and the Galaxy Z Fold 7 could arguably be considered Samsung's most premium smartphone ever.
As we've come to expect, Australia's leading retailers and carriers are providing enticing bonuses for customers who pre-order the Galaxy Z Fold 7 before its August 1 release. To make things easier for you, we've compiled a list of the top Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 pre-order offers in Australia.
In terms of Galaxy Z Fold 7 pre-order incentives, most Aussie retailers and carriers are offering the 512GB model for the price of the 256GB version, effectively saving you AU$200 on the larger model's RRP.
As always, those looking to pre-order the Samsung's latest premium foldable from Telstra, Optus or Vodafone will have the option of buying it outright or paying it off over 12, 24 or 36 months.
Samsung: pre-order Galaxy Z Fold 7 to receive a free storage upgrade worth AU$200
Samsung is offering an excellent for those looking to buy direct from the source: score the 512GB model for AU$2,899, which is the same price as the 256GB version —that's a neat AU$200 saving. If you need even more storage, the 1TB model is also AU$200 off, bringing its price down to AU$3,349 (originally AU$3,549).
Amazon: Get a bonus storage upgrade for the Galaxy Z Fold 7 plus AU$300 Amazon store credit
Not only will you save AU$200 on the 512GB Z Fold 7 at Amazon, effectively getting it for the price of the 256GB model, you'll also get AU$300 credit to spend on the retailer's site.
Vodafone: Save up to AU$300 when preordering the Galaxy Z Fold 7 on a plan
If you're planning on getting the Galaxy Z Fold 7 on plan, you may want to consider this offer: pre-order the Z Fold 7 with a qualifying 24 or 36-month Vodafone plan, and you'll save AU$300 on the 512GB and 1TB models, or AU$250 on the 256GB model, over your repayment period. Additionally, you can get up to AU$700 in bonus trade-in value for your old handset.
Monthly cost (512GB model, 24 months): AU$169.62Total cost on a 24-month plan: AU$4,070.88Minimum cost: AU$2,952
Optus: Get AU$800 in Samsung eStore credit when preordering the Galaxy Z Fold 7
Pre-order the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 at Optus on an eligible plan and receive an AU$800 credit to spend on Samsung's online store. A great option for those thinking of picking up the new Galaxy Watch 8 or a new set of Galaxy Buds.
Monthly cost: AU$175.78Total cost on a 24-month plan: AU$4,194.72Minimum cost: AU$2,953.72
JB Hi-Fi: Get the 512GB model for the price of the 256GB option
Much like we're seeing at other retailers, customers can purchase the 512GB model Galaxy Z Fold 7 for the price of the 256GB version. Additionally, the 1TB option is now available for AU$3,149 — a saving of AU$400 from its original price of AU$3,549.
Chip
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Cover Display
6.3 inches OLED (2376 x 968, 120Hz)
Main display
7.6 inches OLED (2160 x 1856, 120Hz)
RAM
12GB
Storage
256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Rear cameras
50MP wide (f/1.8), 12MP ultra wide (f/2.2, 123°), 10MP 3x telephoto (f/2.4)
Front camera
10MP (f/2.2, FOV: 85°)
Under display camera
4MP (f/1.8, 85°)
Battery
4,400 mAh
Charging
25W wired, 10-15W wireless
Colors
Silver Shadow, Pink, Navy, Crafted Black, White
Size
Folded: 153.5 x 68.1 x 12.1mm; Unfolded: 153.5 x 132.6 x 5.6mm
Weight
239g
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
3 hours ago
- CNET
The iPhone 17 Pro 'Feature' I Want Most? More Colors Beyond Monochrome and Metal
While we can all agree that what's inside an iPhone is far more important than the outside, I still care a ton about how my smartphone looks. So with all the rumors swirling about the upcoming iPhone 17, one that caught my eye had nothing to do with specs or features. It simply said the iPhone 17 Pro could adopt color inspired by iOS 26's Liquid Glass redesign -- which, based on descriptions, may resemble some older Samsung phone hues. And I started dreaming about a world where Apple's best phones look as fun as their lower-tier siblings. For years, Apple has split its phones into two tiers: the "regular" iPhones and the Pro models. The former offer lower specs and prices with bolder colors, while the latter are pricier premium models with more subdued tones. The iPhone Pro and Pro Max typically come in black, white and a silver-gray -- along with one trendier color that changes each year. For being the best that Apple offers, their colorways leave a lot to be desired, in my opinion. But the iPhone 16 Pro comes in desert titanium, which is gold in all but name. The year before, the iPhone 15 Pro was available in a gray-blue (which I remember well, if not fondly, for not matching my vintage Bondi blue case). In 2022, the iPhone 14 Pro left white behind for gold and added a pastel purple alongside its black and silver hues -- and so on. Some people dropping $1,000-plus on a souped-up iPhone Pro want their device to look svelte, not superlative -- elite over effervescent, cultured instead of colorful. I'm not that person. When I saw the iPhone 5C, I didn't mind the cheaper-looking plastic case -- the vibrant colors popped. I don't think buying a premium phone should sentence you to a purgatory of dimmer hues. And yes, there are those of you out there who don't care what your phone looks like, since its colors will only briefly see the light of day before the handset is stuffed in its case to survive life's inevitable bounces and falls. That's completely valid, too. So hearing that there's a potential Liquid Glass color coming to the iPhone 17 Pro that we expect to launch (as we do every year) in September, I got tentatively excited. But there's a big caveat: The rumor, sourced to Weibo-based leaker Instant Digital, didn't include a photo or any imagery of this potential debut. Instead, the leaker suggested that (as translated by Google Translate) the iPhone 17 Pro color is expected to be white, but with a finish that shifts or changes subtly under different lighting conditions. The baseline iPhone 16's rainbow of colors. Apple/CNET Where are my prismatic phone colors? Apple introduced its Liquid Glass update during WWDC 2025 in June, unveiling a new design strategy for the iPhone 17 Pro line that emphasizes translucence and rounded icons to give iOS 26 a fresh UI facelift. App makers responded to the initial developer betas with disdain, criticizing the design's distracting and disorienting lack of visual separation -- icons in the Control Center overlay were hard to see. Thankfully, subsequent tweaks improved the redesign ahead of the recently launched iOS 26 public beta. But how Liquid Glass's design looks as an iPhone color is a bit harder to fathom. Instant Digital's claim that it'll be white but will shift with the light offers clues -- and it could end up looking like some beloved colors from smartphones of yore. For instance, the 2018 Samsung Galaxy S10 came in a rather fetching prism white color that shimmered when you rotated it in the light, giving off a pearlescence of subtle pinks, purples and blues. Watch how it compares to the standard cream-colored ceramic white hue in this video from Sakitech. Contrast that with the more wildly prismatic "aura glow" color in the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 from the same year, which reflected every color of the rainbow. This bombastic choice sure was eye-catching, but I'd guess it's too flamboyant for Apple. (And the beautiful glass back sure couldn't stand up to a fall.) True, Apple has dabbled in subtly shimmering colors -- the iPhone 13 and 13 Mini came in midnight, a black so deep it was almost blue, reflecting hints of hidden hues underneath. That same year's iPhones had another color, starlight, that was essentially the same effect in white. But looking more closely at iPhone Pro designs from past years, I doubt we'll see anything as vivacious as those Samsung hues -- not only because Apple has avoided vibrant colors, but also because in recent years it's used a frosted rear glass that blurs and mutes the color beneath. Just what we end up getting from a Liquid Glass color, if anything at all, is very uncertain given Apple's design priorities. But I'm hoping, just this once, the Pro phones get to show off a bit more of their stuff. And who knows -- maybe that'll be what finally sells us on the upcoming Liquid Glass redesign that's set to change the look and feel of iOS, like it or not.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
I measured the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Honor Magic V5 to see which is the world's thinnest foldable
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. When the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 launched, there were plenty of changes to admire in the company's vastly upgraded device and one of the best foldable phones. But it's arrival also changed something else — people's perception of a rival foldable that had been claiming to be the thinnest of the two. Earlier in July, the Honor Magic V5 launched, proclaiming that it was the world's thinnest foldable phone. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 then launched later in the month, officially measuring slightly thicker and thus allowing Honor to keep the title. But then, users like tech leaker Ice Universe got their hands on both phones and started measuring. And they found different numbers to the published ones, numbers that seemed to prove the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is actually the thinner phone. With Honor trying to reassert its claim, and Samsung happily accepting that it's accidentally made the world's thinnest foldable phone, it's hard to know what to believe. So in the interest of trying to settle the matter, I've spoken to both Honor and Samsung, and taken my own measurements with my own samples of the two phones in question. A measured response As a baseline, let's look at the official claims for the thickness of these two phones when folded. The unfolded measurements are not under dispute here, and are arguably less important anyway since you won't be carrying a foldable around while unfolded the vast majority of the time. Also note that these measurements revolve around specifically the Ivory White Magic V5. The other colors of the Magic V5 are thicker due to slightly different back panel designs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Honor Magic V5 (White) Official thickness when folded 8.9mm 8.8mm Ice Universe's measurements 8.79mm 8.95mm Compare those to Ice Universe's measurements in the same table: the Magic V5 is 0.15mm thicker according to his calipers, while the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is 0.11mm thinner than claimed. Obviously, something is amiss here, and Honor was quick to respond with possible explanations. As part of its statement to me and other tech outlets, Honor noted that even mass-produced products like smartphones can have small manufacturing variances. But this isn't a unique problem to Honor, and could even work in its favor as well as against it. So let's instead focus on the two other reasons why the official numbers and Ice Universe's may not match. The first is that Honor's official measurements come from a Magic V5 device with no screen protector. The Magic V5, like all of Honor's phones, ships with a pre-applied plastic film on its outer screen. This courtesy puts Honor at a thickness disadvantage compared to the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which has no pre-applied protector. It's hard to see in IU's images if the Magic V5 has a screen protector on or not, but I made sure to take the film off of my device before measuring. The second issue is the precise way in which Honor took its measurement. In documentation I've seen, the recommended measurement method involves placing the calipers over the phone from the hinged side to cover the Honor logo, and with 'appropriate thumb pressure' on the bottom jaw. I don't know if there's some secret advantage gained by measuring at this point, but having a nice flat canvas for the calipers to grip is certainly helpful. What's more confusing is how the images Honor has published of its lab testing do not show this method being used. So with those facts in mind, I got measuring. I'll state up front that my calipers, while from the reputable brand iFixit, are perhaps not as accurate as more expensive models, such as the ones phone companies like Honor use for their official specs measurements. Nonetheless, from other measurements I've made with these calipers, I am confident that they are at least 99% accurate, and are at the very least capable of showing a size difference between our two foldables. In the thick of it I measured the two phones with the method given by Honor — it's only fair, after all. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 doesn't have a logo on the back to help judge its midpoint, but I made the best approximation I could, given its similar height and width to the Magic V5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Honor Magic V5 TG's measurement of thickness when folded 8.88mm 9.3mm My numbers are 0.08mm off the official figures for Samsung, and 0.5mm off for the Honor, making the Galaxy Z Fold 7 the thinner phone. I don't know what "appropriate thumb pressure" means precisely in Honor's statement, but it's an important detail. Putting pressure on the calipers allows you to get a smaller measurement as the object you're measuring flexes slightly, which applies all the more with foldable phones as there are two halves of the phone, plus the hinge, that can be squeezed tighter. Honor's official images of its size test don't appear to show the calipers under strain, with them only being held by one hand from the bottom of the ruler section. But given that calipers can be locked into place with the small screw on top of the display, we can't know for certain if there was any squeezing or not pre-photo. Annoyingly, I don't have any method of measuring or double-checking how much force I placed on the calipers to get the following measurements. The best I can do is describe the amount of force I applied, which I would call a press firm enough to leave a clean fingerprint in a thin piece of putty, or push open a door with just one thumb. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Honor Magic V5 TG's measurement of thickness when folded (with pressure) 8.6mm 8.78mm Here, we finally hit Honor's promised 8.8mm figure, with a final last-minute measurement in fact going past the promised figure (though sadly off-camera). But any celebrations that Honor may now be planning will be cut short, as doing the same on the Samsung makes it sleeker yet again, a whole 0.3mm thinner than the official specs and 0.18mm thinner than the Magic V5. As we discussed before, these results could be due purely to the construction of the Magic V5 unit I had, but I suspect if it's happened to both my and Ice Universe's devices, it'll happen to many others. Before putting the phones away, I contacted Samsung, both to ask for its stance on the situation and for its official measuring standards for its devices, so we might compare the two foldables' size on its terms too. The company declined to comment. Splitting hairs Despite the apparently conclusive evidence that the Magic V5 is not actually the thinnest book-style folding phone around, Honor seems to be sticking to its guns, and its official measurements. But now that I've seen the proof for myself that this claim is either inaccurate or comes with big caveats, I don't know why Honor's trying to power through like this. A device's thinness is an impressive and easy-to-grasp number, so I get why companies of all kinds like to talk about it in their marketing. But we are talking about the difference of about 40 micrometers - literally a couple hairs' thickness. There is so much more that Honor could sell the Magic V5 to people with beyond thinness. For instance, the V5's higher-res 50MP main and ultrawide cameras, its 64MP 3x telephoto camera, its huge 5,580 mAh battery or the faster 66W wired and 50W wireless charging standards. And if we're talking about deal breakers, the fact Honor doesn't sell in countries like the U.S. is going to be much more of a problem than its possibly imprecise measurements. As the global launch of the Magic V5 approaches, and we get closer to being able to fully review the phone, my anticipation isn't diminished by seeing it's slightly larger than the equivalent Samsung. As long as Honor doesn't make any other uncertain claims about the Magic V5's capabilities, it still stands a chance of making one of the best foldable phones around, and in ways that a rival phone maker can't just replicate or better immediately after. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide I tested Call Screening on iOS 26 vs Android 16 — and there's a clear winner Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — what we know so far I recently got hacked — here's 5 hidden Apple security features I wish I'd known about
Tom's Guide
7 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I'm a TV expert who's picky about performance — these are the 5 TVs I'd buy for under $500 right now
As a TV expert, I field my fair share of questions about the best TVs money can buy, but I get asked about cheap TVs from friends, family and readers more than anything else. It makes sense: Not everyone is looking for high-end performance or fancy features they might not ever use. With the summer winding down and the season of sales rapidly approaching, I thought I'd put together an up-to-the-minute, top-five list of my favorite TVs under $500. They're not peak performers, but they're much better than flimsy, bottom-of-the-barrel sets. My name is Michael, and for over ten years I've been the person everyone in my immediate circle asks for advice when the time comes to upgrade their TV. I don't mind, though, because affordable TVs are often the hardest to shop for. There's a thin line between an low-cost, reliable TV and a cheap, undependable one — and I'm quite familiar with it. The Samsung Q7F is on deck for testing, so we can't speak to its performance metrics, but I've seen this TV in person and I'm confident that it's a reliable pick for folks shopping at or below $500. The Q7F doesn't feature local dimming (or Mini-LEDs, for that matter), so if you can justify the extra $50, I still recommend the Panasonic W95A and the TCL QM6K over it due to their superior display technology. Nevertheless, the Q7F is a quantum dot-enhanced Samsung TV, which should fit the needs of someone who's especially appreciative of the Samsung aesthetic. Remember: No Samsung TV supports Dolby Vision, so adjust your expectations accordingly. The Samsung Q7F isn't as flashy as some of the other TVs on this list, but if you're a fan of Samsung software and design, it'll meet your needs for under $500. Just keep in mind that this TV doesn't support Dolby Vision, the most popular enhanced HDR format. This is by far my favorite TV on this list. The Panasonic W95A impressed me when it debuted last year at $1,299. Now that it's below $500, I think it's one of the best-kept secrets on the market. The W95A not only delivers exceptional brightness (which is critical if you get a lot of watching done during the day), it also features terrific backlight control. These two performance features put it well ahead of every other TV on this list. I should mention that the W95A is a Fire TV, meaning it leverages Amazon's Fire TV operating system for all of the built-in streaming features. Fire TV is not my favorite platform, as its UI is relatively cluttered and navigation can be sluggish at times. Still, at this price point, the W95A's sensational performance makes it easy to look past these shortcomings. Panasonic's fantastic Mini-LED TV has never been more affordable, so it's worth pouncing on this right away. You're not just getting a great sale price with the W95A, you're also getting a superb, 55-inch Mini-LED TV loaded with extra features. We dug this TV when it was over a thousand bucks, and we really dig it now that it's below $500. If you're shopping at the 55-inch size point and the Panasonic W95A doesn't suit your taste, check out the TCL QM6K, another Mini-LED TV that's currently on sale for a hair below $500. You can peruse our TCL QM6K review for a full report, but here's what I love about this TV: It's just bright enough for the average living room and it comes with Google TV baked right in. For most people shopping in this price range, Google TV is a great software suite to have in one's back pocket. It's easy to use and offers top-tier app support. If the inclusion of Fire TV scared you away from the Panasonic W95A, the 55-inch QM6K might be a better choice. The QM6K represents one of the most affordable ways to land a Mini-LED TV at the 55-inch size point. Google TV is available right out of the box, and the TV's relatively modest Mini-LED backlight keeps scenes visually appealing. It also comes with a handful of useful gaming features. Roku TVs tend to be laser-focused at the type of TV-shopper who just wants a dependable, easy-to-use smart TV, and the 65-inch Roku Plus Series is just that. Why do I love the Roku experience so much? There are three reasons: Its app support is among the best you'll find, there are minimal ads across the user interface and, as mentioned, it's incredibly easy to use. From a performance standpoint, this TV isn't as impressive as the previous two, but you are getting quantum dot-color for your troubles. The Roku Plus Series' superb software is the real selling point. The Roku Plus Series is a perfect fit for folks who just need an easy-to-use TV above all else. Thanks to Roku's excellent app support and minimal ad experience, the Plus Series is the most user-friendly TV on this list. If you passed on the aforementioned, 55-inch TCL QM6K because you're looking for a 65-inch model, why not go for the step-down QM5K? Full disclosure: We haven't tested the QM5K yet, but given its place in TCL's 2025 TV lineup and some of its specs, I'm confident that this set is worth a look. Like the QM6K, the QM5K arrives with Google TV. It also features Mini-LED backlighting (though it probably doesn't wring as much out of this feature as the higher-end QM6K). Still, it's a 65-inch TV for under $500, so it's worth checking out. The QM5K arrives with built-in Google TV features for all of your streaming needs, plus Dolby Vision support. Its handiest feature is its Mini-LED backlighting. If the 55-inch QM6K is too small, the 65-inch QM5K is a good compromise for around the same price.
