Adidas sandal uproar highlights fashion's long history of cultural controversy
The shoe features a thick black sole from a 1990s Adidas hiking shoe and a woven black top that resembles that of a huarache, the traditional sandal made by Zapotec artisans in Oaxaca, Mexico.
'This to me is such a hybrid between my work and Adidas, and it's just like the perfect combination,' he told the website Sneakers News last week.
'It's like literally one of the most classic Chicano references with the white sock.'
But when the shoe was released last week, political leaders in Mexico quickly accused Chavarria and Adidas of 'cultural appropriation'.
President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico displayed an image of a pair of Adidas Oaxaca Slip-Ons at a news conference Friday (Aug 8) and said that Adidas and other companies were 'usurping the creativity' of Indigenous communities.
She said that the government of Oaxaca had begun talks with Adidas aimed at reimbursing Indigenous communities for the use of their 'collective intellectual property' and that Mexico was prepared to take legal action.
Read more: Adidas fashion-collab sandals accused of stealing unique traditional design
Chavarria, the son of an Irish American mother and a Mexican American father, issued an apology Saturday (Aug 9), written in English and Spanish and addressed to 'the people of Oaxaca'.
'The intention was always to honor the powerful cultural and artistic spirit of Oaxaca and its creative communities – a place whose beauty and resistance have inspired me,' Chavarria said.
'The name 'Oaxaca' is not just a word – it's living culture, it's people, and it's history.'
'I am deeply sorry that the shoe was appropriated in this design and not developed in direct and meaningful partnership with the Oaxacan community,' he added.
'This falls short of the respect and collaborative approach that Oaxaca, the Zapotec community of Villa Hidalgo Yalalag and its people deserve.'
Hidalgo Yalalag is a Oaxacan village where huaraches are made.
Adidas said in a statement that it 'recognises and values the cultural richness of Mexico's Indigenous communities and the meaning of their artisanal heritage'.
'The Oaxaca Slip-On was inspired by a design from Oaxaca, rooted in the tradition of Villa Hidalgo Yalalag,' the company said.
'We offer a public apology and reaffirm our commitment to collaborate with Yalalag in a respectful dialogue that honours their cultural legacy.'
Adidas did not respond when asked if the shoe was still being sold.
Chavarria's work has often explored Mexican American culture, sexuality and immigration, drawing on his experience growing up in a farming community in California. His father was a migrant worker.
A former senior vice president at Calvin Klein, he told Sneaker News last week that he liked working with big brands such as Adidas because they helped him amplify his message of 'human dignity'.
'It makes me very proud to be working with a company that really respects and uplifts culture in the most real way,' he said.
Salomon Jara Cruz, the governor of Oaxaca, said the shoe represented cultural 'plagiarism'.
'The material and intangible cultural heritage of our people has to be recognised and respected,' he said on social media.
Mexican officials have a history of zealously defending traditional designs against what they consider inappropriate uses by outsiders.
Mexico's culture ministry said in 2019 that it was surprised to find that a colourful chair made by the fashion house Louis Vuitton featured the designs of Mexican artists in Hidalgo.
In response, Louis Vuitton said it was working with artisans in Hidalgo, 'with the perspective of collaborating together to produce this collection'.
Read more: What to know about the Prada 'sandal scandal' and India's Kolhapuri comeback
That same year, Alejandra Frausto, the cultural minister of Mexico at the time, wrote a letter to Carolina Herrera, the New York fashion brand, accusing it of using embroidery techniques and patterns from Mexican Indigenous communities in the brand's resort 2020 collection.
The clothing line featured floral and bird embroidery on strapless gowns, perforated leather coats and babydoll cocktail dresses.
In response, Wes Gordon, the creative director of the label, told The New York Times that the company was considering what actions to take.
'We are going through a big social shift in how we talk about gender, culture and identity,' Gordon said.
'These are important discussions to have. We take this very seriously.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Malaysia's civil service reforms boost global competitiveness ranking
PUTRAJAYA: Civil service reforms implemented over the past year have yielded measurable results, with Malaysia rising from 34th to 23rd position in the 2025 IMD World Competitiveness Ranking. Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Shamsul Azri Abu Bakar attributed this 11-place jump to improved government efficiency, which climbed eight spots to 25th globally. The Special Task Force on Agency Reform (STAR) platform played a pivotal role in driving these improvements by streamlining public service delivery. Shamsul Azri emphasised that reform timelines matter less than ensuring citizens experience tangible benefits, speaking after the 'Reform Is a Must' session marking the reforms' first anniversary. Key achievements include halving approval times at local authorities like Kulim Municipal Council from 22 to 11 months. The Bureaucratic Red Tape Reform initiative has implemented 160 improvement measures to date, directly benefiting citizens and businesses. The Public Service Reform Agenda focuses on five core areas: human capital development, ethical values, organisational dynamism, public-private collaboration and people-centric services. Shamsul Azri stressed reforms must reach target groups to have meaningful impact, noting the process requires continuous effort rather than fixed deadlines. Major milestones include enforcing the Commitment Act 2024 to review outdated regulations triennially. The Chief Secretary urged civil servants to view their roles as national responsibilities rather than just jobs, with reforms beginning at individual level before scaling nationwide. Training programmes like Malaysia MADANI and INTAN courses reinforce service ethics, while the Public Service Department regularly evaluates organisational structures. Despite financial constraints like the RM18 billion cost of salary revisions under SSPA, the government continues reviewing promotion pathways and career development opportunities. Shamsul Azri confirmed regular meetings with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to assess restructuring needs and develop action plans, ensuring reforms maintain momentum to benefit both civil servants and the public they serve. – Bernama
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Adidas sandal uproar highlights fashion's long history of cultural controversy
US fashion designer Willy Chavarria said he wanted to honour Mexican American culture when he created the Adidas Oaxaca Slip-On. The shoe features a thick black sole from a 1990s Adidas hiking shoe and a woven black top that resembles that of a huarache, the traditional sandal made by Zapotec artisans in Oaxaca, Mexico. 'This to me is such a hybrid between my work and Adidas, and it's just like the perfect combination,' he told the website Sneakers News last week. 'It's like literally one of the most classic Chicano references with the white sock.' But when the shoe was released last week, political leaders in Mexico quickly accused Chavarria and Adidas of 'cultural appropriation'. President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico displayed an image of a pair of Adidas Oaxaca Slip-Ons at a news conference Friday (Aug 8) and said that Adidas and other companies were 'usurping the creativity' of Indigenous communities. She said that the government of Oaxaca had begun talks with Adidas aimed at reimbursing Indigenous communities for the use of their 'collective intellectual property' and that Mexico was prepared to take legal action. Read more: Adidas fashion-collab sandals accused of stealing unique traditional design Chavarria, the son of an Irish American mother and a Mexican American father, issued an apology Saturday (Aug 9), written in English and Spanish and addressed to 'the people of Oaxaca'. 'The intention was always to honor the powerful cultural and artistic spirit of Oaxaca and its creative communities – a place whose beauty and resistance have inspired me,' Chavarria said. 'The name 'Oaxaca' is not just a word – it's living culture, it's people, and it's history.' 'I am deeply sorry that the shoe was appropriated in this design and not developed in direct and meaningful partnership with the Oaxacan community,' he added. 'This falls short of the respect and collaborative approach that Oaxaca, the Zapotec community of Villa Hidalgo Yalalag and its people deserve.' Hidalgo Yalalag is a Oaxacan village where huaraches are made. Adidas said in a statement that it 'recognises and values the cultural richness of Mexico's Indigenous communities and the meaning of their artisanal heritage'. 'The Oaxaca Slip-On was inspired by a design from Oaxaca, rooted in the tradition of Villa Hidalgo Yalalag,' the company said. 'We offer a public apology and reaffirm our commitment to collaborate with Yalalag in a respectful dialogue that honours their cultural legacy.' Adidas did not respond when asked if the shoe was still being sold. Chavarria's work has often explored Mexican American culture, sexuality and immigration, drawing on his experience growing up in a farming community in California. His father was a migrant worker. A former senior vice president at Calvin Klein, he told Sneaker News last week that he liked working with big brands such as Adidas because they helped him amplify his message of 'human dignity'. 'It makes me very proud to be working with a company that really respects and uplifts culture in the most real way,' he said. Salomon Jara Cruz, the governor of Oaxaca, said the shoe represented cultural 'plagiarism'. 'The material and intangible cultural heritage of our people has to be recognised and respected,' he said on social media. Mexican officials have a history of zealously defending traditional designs against what they consider inappropriate uses by outsiders. Mexico's culture ministry said in 2019 that it was surprised to find that a colourful chair made by the fashion house Louis Vuitton featured the designs of Mexican artists in Hidalgo. In response, Louis Vuitton said it was working with artisans in Hidalgo, 'with the perspective of collaborating together to produce this collection'. Read more: What to know about the Prada 'sandal scandal' and India's Kolhapuri comeback That same year, Alejandra Frausto, the cultural minister of Mexico at the time, wrote a letter to Carolina Herrera, the New York fashion brand, accusing it of using embroidery techniques and patterns from Mexican Indigenous communities in the brand's resort 2020 collection. The clothing line featured floral and bird embroidery on strapless gowns, perforated leather coats and babydoll cocktail dresses. In response, Wes Gordon, the creative director of the label, told The New York Times that the company was considering what actions to take. 'We are going through a big social shift in how we talk about gender, culture and identity,' Gordon said. 'These are important discussions to have. We take this very seriously.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Urgent action needed to protect indigenous land rights in Malaysia
AS THE world commemorates the 2025 International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples on Aug 9, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) joins the global community in reaffirming our commitment to protect the rights, dignity and heritage of Indigenous communities in Malaysia. This year's theme, 'Indigenous Peoples and AI: Defending Rights, Shaping Future,' reminds us that while technology holds promise, it must not deepen existing inequalities. Land - The soul of indigenous identity For Malaysia's Indigenous Peoples, the Orang Asli in Peninsular Malaysia and the natives of Sabah and Sarawak, land is not merely a resource. It is the life of their culture, identity and survival. Yet, in 2025, land dispossession continues to uproot communities and erode centuries of heritage. Despite legal protection in our Constitution, statutory provisions, and Malaysia's endorsement of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Indigenous communities continue to struggle for the recognition and protection of their customary territories. Article 26 of UNDRIP affirms that Indigenous Peoples have the right to the lands, territories, and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired. Article 27 further obligates states to establish impartial and transparent mechanisms for recognition and adjudication of Indigenous land claims, consistent with their customs, traditions and land tenure systems. Yet, implementation remains sorely lacking. From inquiry to action The 2013 National Inquiry into the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples, conducted by Suhakam, laid bare these injustices. Over 6,500 Indigenous individuals gave testimony through public consultations across 23 districts, 892 recorded statements and 57 submissions from indigenous organisations, government agencies, and civil society groups. The Inquiry gathered issues revolving around land encroachments, forced evictions, and a troubling absence of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) in developments affecting their lands. Eleven years on, the root problems persist. Without secure land, Indigenous communities lose access to forests, rivers, food, and spiritual spaces. The impacts extend beyond physical displacement, causing cultural loss, food insecurity, and disempowerment. Among the Inquiry's 18 recommendations were recognition of customary rights to land, establishing grievance mechanisms, mandating FPIC, and creating an independent National Commission on Indigenous Peoples. As of today, much of the report's spirit remains unfulfilled. Legal and policy gaps still persist Malaysia's legal framework, including the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 and the land codes in Sabah and Sarawak, does not adequately recognise Indigenous native customary land rights (NCR). Key concepts such as pemakai menoa, pulau galau and kawasan rayau remain unrecognised and uncodified in law. Despite favourable court decisions like Nor Nyawai, Sagong Tasi and Adong Kuwau, affirming recognition of NCR, the failure to integrate these rulings into administrative procedures has perpetuated legal uncertainty. Institutional gaps Institutions tasked with safeguarding the well-being of the Orang Asli, notably the Department of Orang Asli Development (JAKOA), are under-resourced, lack transparency, and have poor coordination between federal and state authorities. Indigenous land claims are frequently delayed, mishandled, or ignored altogether. Ignoring consent, ignoring rights One of the most significant findings of the inquiry was the widespread violation of the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC). Development projects, from plantations and logging to infrastructure expansion, have frequently proceeded without meaningful consultation or community consent. This undermines Indigenous Peoples' right to self-determination and violates Malaysia's commitment under international law, including the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which mandates the FPIC of indigenous peoples for any project affecting their territories. The consequences are devastating: environmental degradation, cultural erasure, and forced displacement. AI to empower, not to erase The denial of land rights has cascading impacts on the right to food, housing, and self-determination. Without land, Indigenous communities lose access to forests, rivers, and resources that are vital for their survival. Climate change, deforestation, and commercial encroachments are further threatening traditional food systems and eroding traditional knowledge, passed down through generations. As Malaysia embraces digitalisation, it is critical that these technologies are not used to further exclude Indigenous Peoples' voices or erase ancestral claims. AI-driven land mapping, and automation in land registries must be designed inclusively, respecting traditional knowledge and community participation. Technology must be harnessed to empower Indigenous communities, to document their histories, protect sacred sites, improve participatory land governance, and preserve culture and languages. A call to action Over a decade ago, Suhakam released the National Inquiry Report, and its findings remain as relevant and urgent as ever. Despite the Government's formal acceptance of 17 out of 18 recommendations, progress has been slow and fragmented, reflecting a wider lack of political will to place Indigenous rights at the forefront of national priorities. In commemorating this year's International Indigenous Peoples Day, Suhakam renews its call for the Government to: - Develop and implement a comprehensive National Action Plan on Indigenous Rights and enshrine constitutional recognition to safeguard the dignity, identity, and rights of the Indigenous Peoples; - Establish an Independent National Commission on Indigenous Peoples, as recommended under Recommendation 18 of the National Inquiry, with a mandate to advise on legislation, monitor development, and represent the voices of Indigenous communities; - Amend Article 153 of the Federal Constitution to explicitly recognise the Orang Asli as equal beneficiaries of constitutional protections and affirmative action measures alongside the Malays and the Natives of Sabah and Sarawak; and - Harmonise Federal and State-level laws and policies, especially regarding the gazettement and legal protection of ancestral and Indigenous customary lands. The protection of Indigenous land rights is not a matter of policy convenience; it is a question of justice, dignity, and survival. Governments have a moral and legal duty to safeguard the lands, resources, and cultures of Indigenous Peoples, in accordance with international human rights standards. As UNDRIP's Article 8(2) affirms: States must prevent and redress any actions that aim to dispossess Indigenous Peoples of their lands, territories, or resources. The time for action is now, before more of what is irreplaceable is lost forever. PAREMESWARI SUBRAMANIAM Principal Assistant Secretary, Policy Division, Suhakam
