What an incentivised or a punished Iran means for ME
Listen to article
The international system was always anarchic, but the current shift in the balance of global influence is making it more turbulent and uncertain. For good or for bad, the global geopolitical landscape is experiencing a shift, and the great responsibility of all stakeholders, including the state practitioners and policymakers, is to correctly read these changes and make sure that the choices they make enable the countries that they lead to stand on the right side of history.
Uncertainty of the international system is aptly described in how Iran, despite engaging in the fifth round of nuclear talks with the US, is not buoyed by the idea of reconciliation but is more concerned and threatened by the growing possibility of an Israeli air strike on its nuclear facilities.
No central authority, not even the US, can probably guarantee that no such military action will take place, thus making the international system so anarchic. China and Russia lead the change the world is witnessing in the global balance of influence. That change is well demonstrated in the way both these great powers view the uncertain times that Iran is experiencing.
The geopolitical positioning of Russia and China on Iran matters, and both the US and Israel would do well to correctly read their position before the game-changing decision about Iran is finally taken — integrating Iran in the global economy or taking a military action against it.
Russia is fighting a war in Ukraine, and ideally, it should be happy to see its main adversary preoccupied in the Middle East. This diversion of American attention suits Russia, and it is not merely the diversion of attention but also the diversion of American capabilities, as was evident in the aftermath of the October 7 attack by Hamas when the Biden administration provided additional batteries of Patriot Missiles to Israel, which Kyiv desperately needed.
Any war in the Middle East will drive up the prices of oil; and under Western sanctions, increased oil prices mean the generation of more revenue by the war-hit Russian economy. Russia's position on Syria is sensitive.
During his visit to Saudi Arabia, President Trump announced the lifting of sanctions on Syria — a long-time Russian satellite state. It has been acting as the Russian platform for projecting Russian power in the Eastern Mediterranean through the Russian air and naval bases there.
The Syrian president has also stated that, given the right conditions, Syria may one day consider joining the Abraham Accords. So one can easily say that the balance of influence in this strategically important country in the Middle East is shifting from the Russian to the American side.
This diminishing Russian influence in Syria also means bad news for Russia in other strategically important places. Russia's ability to export military influence and control to Libya and the Sahel, where it has an expanding presence, will also be affected. If a war erupts in the Middle East following an Israeli air strike on Iran, then geopolitically, Russia may find opportunities and the US and its allies, including Israel and the Arab states in the Persian Gulf, may only be exposed to increased risks and threats.
A war in the Middle East would be bad news for the Chinese economy. It is the economy that led China to broker the historic diplomatic normalisation between Iran and Saudi Arabia. China transports $280 billion worth of goods annually through the Bab al-Mandeb Strait in the Red Sea, which constitutes 20% of China's overall maritime trade.
The American myth that China is interested in fomenting global chaos to create American preoccupation in the troubled spots to undermine the American-led international order is based on a wrong assumption. The Chinese economy cannot afford global chaos, or more specifically, a war erupting in the Middle East. Strategically, CPEC and BRI are Chinese projects designed to avert such risks by building more diverse supply chains.
Iran is China's strategic partner, and without China's help, it would be difficult for Iran, under sanctions, to sustain its economy. China would neither want any external power to exercise dominance and control in the Indian Ocean region.
More a commercial than a war-fighting water body, China will do everything in its power to not allow the Indian Ocean to lose its globally accepted standing and status of being only a commercial water body.
Saudi Arabia, under MBS, also follows a consistent policy that states that the future of the Middle East should not be shaped by force. He is all set to safeguard his Vision 2030. MBS visions not ballistic missiles but tourists flying to and from countries in the Middle East.
The initiation of change in Saudi Arabia has its roots in how MBS took a huge political risk in sidelining his religious police and confronting the conservative backlash. He masterminded the change in the balance of influence in Saudi society by unshackling it from the age-long chains of religiosity.
There were political risks, but he took them. Today, Neom City, with over 50 luxury hotels being built along the Red Sea and the world's tallest building being built in Riyadh, is all a testimony to MBS's resolve to make Saudi Arabia part of the modern world.
If a nuclear deal between the US and Iran materialises, then after a gap of 45 years, it will open up the possibility of the restoration of diplomatic relations between the two countries. Such a scenario in itself is likely to bring huge geopolitical changes in the Middle East. Iranian proxies may no longer pursue goals that represented a defiant Iran.
Incentivised Iran will find it reasonable to withdraw support to all its proxies. Imagine the hope this gives to the innocent people residing in the Middle Eastern conflict zones. Like the 25 million people living in Yemen, a country so poor that it imports 90% of its food.
President Trump led a $1 billion bombing campaign against this country because the Houthis were executing drone attacks and firing missiles at ships, thus violating the freedom of navigation of ships in international waters. This is considered justified under international law, but criticised by those who read and understand international law, but cannot understand why the same is allowed to be violated in Gaza.
If Iran and the US strike a deal and base their future relationship on reconciliation, then the resumption of harmonious relations between the two will not be possible unless Israel fits into the equation. If peace is to be given a chance in the Middle East, then the US will have to reconsider its policy towards Israel. Surely, a US-Iran deal will only materialise after Iran can extract such a guarantee from the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
S&P affirms 'AA+' credit rating for US
S&P Global on Monday affirmed its "AA+" credit rating on the US, saying the revenue from President Donald Trump's tariffs will offset the fiscal hit from his massive tax-cut and spending bill. Trump signed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" into law in July after it was passed by the Republican-controlled Congress. The bill, which delivered new tax breaks, also made Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent. "At this time, it appears that meaningful tariff revenue has the potential to offset the deficit-raising aspects of the recent budget legislation," S&P said in a statement. The US reported a $21 billion jump in customs duty collections from Trump's tariffs in July, but the government budget deficit still grew nearly 20% in the same month to $291 billion. Interest on the public debt also continued to grow, hitting $1.013 trillion in the first 10 months of the fiscal year, an increase of 6%, or $57 billion, over the prior-year period due to slightly higher interest rates and increased debt levels. S&P, which became the first ratings agency to cut the pristine US government rating in 2011, said the outlook on the US rating remains stable. The ratings agency said it expects the Federal Reserve, which Trump has criticised this year for not cutting interest rates, "to navigate the challenges of lowering domestic inflation and addressing financial market vulnerabilities." It projected the country's general government deficit to average 6.0% of GDP during the 2025-2028 period, down from 7.5% in 2024 and from an average 9.8% of GDP in 2020-2023. S&P said it could lower the rating over the next two to three years if already high deficits increase.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan: retrospect and prospect—II
Gen Ziaul Haq promised elections within 90 days; they actually exceeded 1000 days. He put Bhutto to the gallows on trumped charges of conspiracy to murder. In a split decision of the Supreme Court, 4-3 verdict, he was still hanged. Zia knew Bhutto alive would be a danger to him, little did he know, that the ghost of Bhutto would continue to prevail over the politics of Pakistan. Gen Zia irrevocably damaged Pakistan. Gen Zia moved quickly to install himself as President while still donning the uniform of COAS. The decade of 1978-88 can best be described as the 'dark ages'. He ruthlessly ruled for 11 long years, destroying every single state institution. Fate and destiny removed him in August, 1988. The air crash was fatal. The Soviets had earlier invaded Afghanistan in 1979. We chose to become a frontline state. The consequences we continue to face. The social fabric of Pakistan was badly affected. We saw the rise of drugs and gun culture. The decade of 1988-98 gave to Pakistan a taste of sham democracy. Elections held regularly were engineered and stage managed. For the first time a female in Pakistan and the Islamic countries became the prime minister. Benazir Bhutto was a promise, a hope and an assurance. She fell victim to palace intrigues. During the entire decade Article 58-2B was liberally used by the President to dismiss elected government. The president seemed to be playing Russian roulette. Benazir and Nawaz Sharif alternated as prime minister with as many caretakers. All governments were dismissed on unproven charges of corruption. Pakistan: retrospect and prospect—I In October, 1999, in a suicidal move, the COAS was dismissed, by the Prime minister, while he was airborne on a flight from Colombo. The armed forces on ground in reaction enforced a military takeover, without the declaration of martial law. The Constitution was held in abeyance. The decade until 2008 was largely ruled by the military in accompaniment with a civilian facade. President Musharraf, who started off as Chief Executive, was elected President by the assembly. This period was where our economy grew by almost 7 percent every single year. The tragic event of 9/11 happened and the USA launched a full scale attack on Afghanistan in pursuit of Osama bin Laden. Pakistan again with little choice got embroiled in this war, that was to later become another Vietnam for the US. Just as in the period of Gen Zia, the reaction of the Jihadis targeted civilian areas of Pakistan. Suicide bombings was the order of the decade. Innocent lives were lost. President Musharraf opened up electronic media, more than 50 channels were launched. Freedom of press gained momentum. Privatisation took a spiral. Banks and other key industries were denationalised. After 3-4 years of economic stability, political turmoil set in through the lawyers' movement. President Musharraf was negotiating a political deal with popular Benazir Bhutto. The deal fell through. Elections were announced. In a public meeting at Rawalpindi, where earlier a serving prime minister was gunned down, she too fell victim to an assassin's bullet. A great tragedy had struck. She was a leader who was this time more mature than before to lead effectively. But nature had other designs. Her assassination led to postponement of elections, but once held, expectedly, PPP swept the elections. Pakistan remained on the see-saw of uncertainty but it gained political stability. The government completed its term. A lot of credit must go to President Zardari for his political sagacity and foresight in initiating the revocation and annulment of section 58-2B. The President's office was defanged. A triumph for parliamentary democracy. During 2008-2018, peaceful transitions happened inspite of all elections being declared as controversial by independent analysts. The Panama leaks led to the replacement of the prime minister. During this time, a third potent force emerged as threat to the two dominating political parties. The 2018 elections were an Imran Khan (IK) phenomenon. The elections yet again were found to be not fair and highly controversial. The government of Imran Khan was removed through political engineering; his government lost the vote of confidence. IK's government was marred by ineffective decision making. In fact all the ministers appeared to receiving on-the-job training. Leadership is not merely about personal excellence, it is more about the ability to put together a team of the competent and to give them a direction; a vision of shared goals and objectives. IK failed to do that in-spite of his best efforts and intentions. He paid a price for having mediocrity surrounding him from all directions. Pakistan wasn't prepared for a honest but incompetent leadership. Corruption and competence universally move in tandem, albeit regrettably. We are in the midst of the decade that started from 2018 and will last till 2028. The government installed following yet another controversial elections (of year 2024) has been beset with the task to improve the economy. We came to a near miss of getting to be classified as a nation on default. The economic policies now being pursued are aiming at long-term gains. Elected governments must not focus on next elections but must have a very long-term view and vision for the country. Our economy is fledgling. We are living on borrowed money. Borrowing can be dangerously intoxicating for individuals as well as nations. The quickly we realise to live within means the better. No country has become rich or self-sufficient based on borrowings, we will have to learn to earn revenue for ourselves before we start to spend. The deficit of all types keep gnawing at our future. The country needs to adopt a growth strategy that is housed in the growth of exports of goods and services. Inward remittances are holding us up but these aren't reliable and sustainable sources of funding. The Special Economic Zones must receive attention. We have to direct our energies by seeking investment from overseas. Aids and grants are not the answer. Foreign exchange must be earned to beef up FX reserves. Deposits from friends will make us all parasites. Entrepreneurs should be encouraged through policies for setting up industries for finding new business avenues, for exploring new markets, for introducing high speed technology into processes and systems. We have thus far ignored sub-Sahara markets. There is an imperative need to make inroads into unexplored markets. CPEC cannot remain a slave to slogans of being 'game changer', there is need to take action to make it profitable for us. Generally speaking, there should be greater empowerment for decision making alongside strict accountability standards. The process of accountability must remain above board and not be subjected to become a medium of political harassment. In these columns where the imagination has to restricted by the number of words, it is painfully difficult to present a full and comprehensive picture of how things are and how things should be. In a score plus two years, Insha Allah, Pakistan will celebrate the 100th anniversary of its founding. Our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will have to be different than us. Of course only for better. Hope is a great elixir of life. Optimism is not an option but a necessity. As a tail-piece, my son who recently watched an old PTV program of Neelam Ghar on YouTube asked me how come the audience was able then to answers tough questions from Islamic history, Urdu and English literature; how come the audience seemed more disciplined, and how come they were 'happy' to receive a 'Water cooler' for the right answers? As against this he remarked, in some TV program of recent days he said, people are given scooters for correctly remembering the multiplication table of two, three and four? He was baffled, he said. I am speechless, is all I said, in response. Do we have an answer? Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Toronto stocks rise as soft inflation data boosts rate cut hopes
TORONTO: Canada's main index edged up on Tuesday, helped by gains in industrials and telecom stocks, as cooler-than-expected domestic inflation data kept the door open for the Bank of Canada to cut interest rates. At 9:44 a.m. ET (1344 GMT), the Toronto Stock Exchange's S&P/TSX composite index was up 0.12% at 27,956.08 points, hovering near record levels. A Reuters poll released on Tuesday found the index is set to extend its record-setting run this year and next as lower borrowing costs and potential greater clarity on US tariffs offset expected pressure on corporate profits. Canada's annual inflation rate eased to 1.7% in July from 1.9% in the prior month as lower year-on-year gasoline prices kept the consumer price index low, but core measures of inflation stayed sticky, data showed on Tuesday. The annual rate of consumer price inflation moved further below the midpoint of the Bank of Canada's 1% to 3% target range. Two-year government bond yields, influenced by short-term policy expectations, were down about 3.5 basis points at 2.704%. Odds for a quarter-point rate cut by the BoC next month stood at about 40%, above 31.4% seen earlier in the day. Allan Small, senior investment advisor at Allan Small Financial Group with iA Private Wealth, said that the inflation being well below the BoC's target and hits to the economy due to tariffs support the case for a rate cut. Meanwhile, Air Canada rose 2% after its unionized flight attendants reached an agreement with the country's largest carrier to end a strike. Sector-wise, capped communications and industrials led the gains, rising 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively. Information technology and healthcare lost around 0.6% each. Heavyweight energy fell 0.2%, as crude prices fell on the rising chances of an end to sanctions on Russian crude.
