
EXCLUSIVE! Aamir Khan: I am loyal to cinema first, and then to theatres
Aamir Khan
Aamir Khan
Aamir Khan
Aamir Khan
1
2
Breaking the mould is second nature to him. Now, in a bold move that challenges the norms of a largely risk-averse industry,
Aamir Khan
has chosen the pay-per-view model on his YouTube channel for his latest film,
Sitaare Zameen Par (SZP)
, which had released in theatres in June.
This aligns with his decades-long pattern of being a disruptor – as an actor and filmmaker. In this freewheeling conversation with us, the superstar talks about access, affordability and the future of cinema beyond theatres.
Aamir also confesses that he's not fearless, unlike what most would assume, and tells us why, at 60, comfort is not an option — '
ab
comfort
hai hi nahi, toh kuch karna padega
.' Read on...
A still from Sitaare Zameen Par
How do you think the pay-per-view model gives more power and choice to both the audience and the producer?
You are aware that we are able to reach only 2-3% of our population in the theatrical business, and this is for the biggest hit. For a film like
Sitaare Zameen Par
, around one crore people would have watched it by the end of its theatrical run.
In the absence of enough theatres being built, this model is perhaps the only way to reach the vast majority of India, especially with rising internet penetration. In one stroke, this solves that problem for everyone. It's great for filmmakers because it strengthens them and empowers them to make better films.
To be able to watch a movie, access and affordability are key. Was this model born out of that philosophy – to make both these points a reality?
Today, cinemas in India, and here I am talking about the multiplexes, are trying to give a unique experience, but that costs money. So, over the years, theatres have evolved from the time when I started out with
Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak (QSQT)
.
Back then, the average ticket price was Rs 10. Today, the ticket prices are not affordable for a large section of society. And multiplexes, because of the high cost and heavy investment (in terms of rent, etc), have also started catering to an audience who can afford to come there. So, who will cater to the masses? This model caters straight to the masses.
Continues…
In every press conference prior to my film's release in the past 10 years, I would be asked, '
Aap
film
bana rahe ho, jo
masses
hai woh kaise dekhenge
?' The answer to this and the pricing of tickets is not in my hands. I can't tell theatre owners who have invested a lot of money to go into a loss. If this model works, it will dramatically change the way we distribute films. From an economical point of view, I had strong OTT offers for
SZP
, if I were to accept that, it would have been a safe bet.
I chose not to. I would rather earn Rs 100 from each Indian who watches my movie. Also, this is a great opportunity for younger filmmakers who are trying to break in and don't get a chance to showcase their work. It will give creative voices more freedom. It will give them the freedom to price their content the way they want to.
You are a theatre loyalist and have spoken about 'protecting our theatres'. What are some ways exhibitors and filmmakers can work together to reimagine cinema-going as a more inclusive, feasible experience?
Let me clarify, my loyalty is to cinema. Cinemas came first, then theatres came to serve cinema. Earlier, there was no theatre. Cinema
dikhane
ke liye pardah laga dete the
, and it would be shown through a projector.
Phir tent aaya, wahan dikhate the.
Then permanent theatres came about. Cinema is what I am protecting, and emotionally, I am very tied to theatres. I believe that the theatrical experience cannot be replaced by anything else. When you are sitting in that dark space with 300 people around you, it's a group experience where you laugh and cheer together. Imagine watching
Lagaan
, where the whole theatre is cheering...
abhi woh
experience
aapko ghar pe baithke apne
family
ke saath bhi nahin milega
.
I am loyal to cinema first, and then to theatres, clearly in that order. To answer your question, I think first of all, we need more theatres. In districts where there is no single screen, not even a single theatre, we should at least have one theatre. India needs many more theatres, but they should be economical theatres.
Do you believe that, at some point, the theatrical business will start thriving again?
Yes, of course. I really hope so.
Do you think that, as makers, focusing on tier-2 and tier-3 cities is key, as therein lies the scope for theatrical recovery in India?
Absolutely! I believe that we need theatres in tier-2 and tier-3 cities. The tier-2 cities have theatres, but as we go deeper, we don't. I also feel that it's not that people want to watch only action films in theatres – that was the feeling for some time. If that were the case,
SZP
wouldn't have done well, and
Saiyaara
wouldn't have been such a success. These are phases that keep coming and going. When I did
Ghajini
, everyone told me that you are doing an action film at a time when this genre was not working.
It worked. I think audiences are interested in watching films irrespective of the genre.
So, the genre of your film and how it fits with current trends and mood doesn't concern you?
No, it doesn't. Stories that inspire me and affect me the most are what I gravitate towards.
Stills from Ghajini and Dhoom 3
You've consistently been a disruptor — as an actor and a filmmaker. In an industry that often plays it safe, where does this creative fearlessness come from?
No, no, there is a lot of fear. There is fear every time I am doing a film, and unfortunately, my choices are also unusual, but I can't help but make them. When I was doing
Dangal
, I felt that
dus saal baad karte hain, abhi mein itna mota, buddha dikh raha hoon
. Just before that, I had done
PK
and
Dhoom 3
. People thought I am 30-35, they didn't know I am 55. I thought
yeh
film
karoonga toh meri asliyat saamne aa jayegi
(laughs). It was in my blood; I had to do it. I am not a fearless person. Before the release, you can't assume the film will work, at least my films. There were exceptions like
Ghajini
and
Dhoom 3
, where you could say
yeh kuch toh karegi
. But with the unusual ones, it's difficult to tell. I go with my instinct and my heart. So, I am not thinking about what the audience wants to see. I am thinking
mujhe kya banana hai.
There's still this restless energy about you. Does that fuel your creativity?
I suppose so. If the status quo is comfortable, I have no problem with it. But when it's not, then I want to do something to correct it. I am comfortable about being comfortable, but
ab
comfort
hai hi nahi, toh kuch karna padega, haath pair marna padega
, because in today's times it is difficult for creative people to make what they want to make. Unless you have a subscription model pre-sale, you can't greenlight a project. That's not a comfortable situation to be in for creative people.
A still from Talaash
Knowing the kind of connection and influence you have with audiences across generations, do you feel a certain sense of responsibility when you take on a film?
I do feel a sense of responsibility, so I don't do films that propagate any thoughts, views or ethos which are not mine. At the same time, I also believe in having my freedom as an artiste, as that's how I always operated from the beginning. I have selected films that I wanted to do. Some of them worked, some didn't. Fortunately, most of them did. I have tried not to take the unnecessary load,
ki meri har
film 300, 500
ya
600 crore
banayegi
.
I am not chasing that.
Mujhe Talaash ki
script
pasand aayi aur mujhe pata tha yeh
500 crore
ki
film
nahin hai, yeh
200 crore
ki bhi nahin hai.
In fact, I remember telling the team that I believe the film will do about 70 crores. It went on to do 95 crores. I did the film as I loved the story. Just because I knew it wouldn't break my
Ghajini
record, didn't mean I wouldn't do it. I can't think like that. This comes from my excitement as an artiste, and also because I can't keep doing the same kind of films again and again; I don't know how to do that.
You said that you feel a sense of fear every time you embark on something new. Can you recall what you felt on the first day first show of
QSQT
?
I still remember that moment – I remember the premiere show of the film. My uncle (Nasir Hussain) had booked the balcony, and the stall was for the paid audience for the first day, 6pm show. And Shammi (Kapoor) uncle had come, in fact, he was the only star my uncle had called from the film industry. I remember walking into the film with no one recognising me, and when the film got over and I walked out, I was mobbed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Son of Sardaar 2 is a reminder that audiences have grown up, Bollywood hasn't
Watching Son of Sardaar (2012) today feels like opening a time capsule to an era when audiences didn't question much, and comedy was often reduced to tripping over pickle oil or running into slapstick mehman nawazi. Back then, the Ajay Devgn–Sonakshi Sinha starrer, made on a reported budget of ₹40 crore, raked in over ₹140 crore worldwide. It even had a Salman Khan cameo and was considered a 'superhit.' But looking back, it's hard to ignore that its 'humour' was built on a wafer-thin plot and recycled gags. Riding on that misplaced confidence, the makers have returned after more than a decade with Son of Sardaar 2—only this time, the pandemic has changed the game. Audiences have grown sharper and far less forgiving. And judging by the box office struggle of this sequel, people are no longer willing to waste time or money on a weak, outdated script. In 7 days, the film reportedly made on a budget of Rs 150 crore, has earned Rs 32 crore. The sequel sets up Rabia (Mrunal Thakur), Saba (Roshni Walia), Mehwish (Kubra Sait), and Gul (Deepak Dobriyal) as Pakistanis. Ravi Kishan, replacing Sanjay Dutt due to visa issues, plays a UK citizen Raja who is fiercely Indian at heart, and has a soft corner for tales of Indian soldiers 'teaching a lesson' to Pakistanis. Mistaking Ajay Devgn for a soldier, he fixes his son Goggi's (Sahil Mehta) marriage to Jassi's (Ajay Devgn) fake daughter Saba. From the rishta-fixing day to the wedding, Raja, Tittu (Vindu Dara Singh), and Tony (the late Mukul Dev) 'test' Jassi's soldier skills—asking him to shoot bottles, operate a tank, and endure random mishaps. These set pieces are intended as comedy, but not a single scene manages to draw a genuine laugh. In fact, it made a family of six simply walk out of the theater. Not surprised. ALSO READ | Son Of Sardaar 2 movie review: Deepak Dobriyal runs away with Ajay Devgn-Mrunal Thakur's hare-brained comedy Ravi Kishan, known for his charm and comic timing, delivers lines like 'tits for ticks' and boasts, 'Maine 5 bhed se 15 lakh bhed kiye hai,' explaining his wealth. Even he cannot save the painfully bad writing by Jagdeep Singh Sindhu and Mohit Jain . Sanjay Mishra's character Bantu Pandey's transformation from hotel manager (in the first film) to milk vendor and lover of Ravi Kishan's wife, Premlata (Ashwini Kalsekar), makes no narrative sense. Chunky Panday's arc is equally bizarre—married to Rabia's sister, then to Rabia herself, and then abandoning her for a Russian woman, only to reappear for a few minutes at the end and be ridiculed for being Pakistani. Neeru Bajwa pops in at the start demanding a divorce, only to return at the climax to apologise—just in time for a random chandelier (or jhumar) to crash on her head, prompting audiences to mutter, 'Kuch bhi ho raha hai!' The film's humour mostly comes from watching talented actors like Ravi Kishan and Sanjay Mishra react to absurd situations rather than the situations themselves. Sharat Saxena, for example, loses his third wife in a pole-dance accident and quickly introduces a new girlfriend to his sons without skipping a beat. While the sequence makes no sense, Ravi Kishan's reaction does. The absurdity peaks with a cameo from Rohit Shetty, who appears after Ajay accidentally blows up his jeep in a residential UK neighbourhood, without any police or neighbourly interference. Shetty uses the moment to announce Golmaal 5, and the film wraps up as if that were the highlight. Son of Sardaar 2 isn't just a weak sequel—it's a reminder that audience sensibilities have evolved. What passed for comedy in 2012 now feels lazy, outdated, and painfully forced. Despite Ravi Kishan, Sanjay Mishra, and other seasoned actors doing their best, the film is dragged down by an incoherent plot, cringe-worthy jokes, and random events stitched together in the name of entertainment. If the first film proved people could laugh at anything, the second proves they won't laugh at just anything anymore. Jyothi Jha works as a Copy Editor at the Indian Express. She brings in more than 5 years of experience where she has covered Entertainment majorly for TV9, NDTV and Republic Media. Apart from Entertainment, she has been an anchor, copy editor and managed production team under the Politics and Daily News segment. She's passionate about Journalism and it has always been her first choice, she believes in what George Orwell had once said, " Journalism is printing what someone else does not want you to do, rest everything is public relations". ... Read More


Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
Japan Festival Fosters Cultural Exchange and Creativity at Ekya School Byrathi
Bengaluru: The Japan Festival- Kala Kabe, held at Ekya School Byrathi, brought together the vibrant cultures of India and Japan in a celebration of art, tradition, and collaboration. The centerpiece of the event was the India & Japan Children's Mural Project, a collaborative mural created by students from Ekya School, CMR NPS, and Japan, directed by renowned Japanese mural artist Teiko Nishimori, who is also the Founder of ICFA Japan. The mural was unveiled by Hokuto Kaya, Consulate-General of Japan in Bengaluru, in the presence of dignitaries including Dr. K.C. Ramamurthy,IPS (Retd) Chairman, CMR Group of Institutions and Former Member of Parliament Rajya Sabha, Dr. Sabitha Ramamurthy, President, CMR Jnanadhara Trust, Shri. Jayadeep KR Reddy, CEO, CMR Group of Institutions and Dr. Tristha Ramamurthy, Founder, Ekya Schools. Teiko Nishimori has been traveling the world for over 45 years, leading large-scale mural projects that bring children together to celebrate themes of friendship, peace, and the connection between people, animals, and nature. Her unique process involves engaging children in discussions, listening to their ideas, and working together to transform blank walls into vibrant stories. This project at Ekya Schools marks her very first mural in India, making it an especially meaningful journey. Speaking about the project, Nishimori said: 'Because of the friendship between Japanese and Indian students, we were able to finish this beautiful mural. I hope to continue this friendship and create more art together in the future.' Speaking at the event, Dr. Tristha Ramamurthy said, 'I would like to thank everyone who contributed to this incredible collaboration. This mural is not just an art piece but a permanent symbol of cultural exchange and creativity that will inspire generations on our campus.' The festival, organized by Miho Sakata Malhan, Founder, Muse Creation, Bengaluru, featured a day full of enriching activities, including performances, workshops on Origami and Haiku, a traditional Japanese Tea Ceremony, and art displays by students. The Muse Charity Bazaar presented sustainable products and gourmet treats, adding to the cultural experience of the day. Adding her perspective, Miho Sakata Malhan remarked, 'This mural reflects the nature, culture, history, nostalgia, and future of Japan and India. It is a true representation of the friendship between these two nations and their students.' The Japan Festival was a testament to how art and education can transcend boundaries, fostering creativity and building bridges between cultures. Attendees left inspired by the power of collaboration and cultural exchange.


Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Mahavatar Narsimha Box Office Collection Day 18: Ashwin Kumar's movie soars past ₹213 crore mark, despite 78% drop
Mahavatar Narsimha Box Office Collection Day 18: Ashwin Kumar directorial mythological animated movie saw 77.66 drop in earnings on third Monday after strong weekend. Portraying the powerful tales of Lord Vishnu's third and fourth avatars, the Sandalwood film emerged as the highest-grossing Indian animated film but now it seems to be losing momentum amid new releases. 'Mahavatar Narsimha' raked in ₹ 5.25 crore net in India on third on August 12, according to film industry tracker Sacnilk. Produced under the banner Kleem Productions, the animated movie did a business of ₹ 174.9 crore net at the domestic box office during its 18-day run in theatres. On its opening day, it collected ₹ 1.75 crore net in India, which is the least single day collection so far. Notably, the highest weekend collection came in the third week when it minted ₹ 44 crore net. Released on July 25, the Kannada movie did a worldwide business of ₹ 213 crore gross in 17 days, grossing ₹ 11 crore from the overseas market. Its presenter Homable Films in a post on X stated, '210 CRORES+ worldwide gross & counting…#MahavatarNarsimha continues the glorious run, shattering records and winning the love of millions worldwide.' Film trade analyst Sumit Kadel called the animated epic saga a 'blockbuster' and in a post on X stated, '#MahavatarNarsimha (Hindi) delivers a MIND BOGGLING ₹ 39 Cr nett in its third weekend, showing massive jump on Saturday over Friday, followed by another strong rise on Sunday.' Another film business analyst Taran Adarsh said, "HISTORIC RUN CONTINUES... #MahavatarNarsimha [#Hindi version] maintains its #Blockbuster momentum in Weekend 3... .Weekend 3 numbers [ ₹ 38.96 cr] are HIGHER than the *entire Week 1* [ ₹ 32.63 cr] and even *Weekend 2* [ ₹ 35.23 cr]... #MahavatarNarsimha shows no signs of slowing down... SENSATIONAL.