
The foods to eat to reduce inflammation — and those to avoid
Inflammation has been linked to the development of a host of life-threatening health conditions including heart disease, cancer, obesity, type 2 diabetes and dementia, and it plays a causal role in autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Reduce it, and the threat of these diseases has been shown to decline.
But how many of us know what inflammation is, why too much is so damaging, or what we can do to protect ourselves from it?
• Read more expert advice on healthy living, fitness and wellbeing
'Inflammation is a defence system,' says Dr James Kinross, a consultant surgeon and lecturer in colorectal surgery at Imperial College London. 'It is a process through which our body is able to detect harm and regenerate itself once it's sustained an injury.' Cut your finger or catch a cold, for example, and the damaged cells release chemicals that trigger a response to heal you. If all systems are in good order, the inflammation subsides once you are well. Inflammation becomes a risk, Kinross says, when that response isn't switched off again. It's designed to be acute, but not chronic or excessive.
'If it switches on for the wrong reasons or you lose that balance, it becomes problematic,' he says. 'The immune system will literally attack our body's cells and tissues.'
One of its biggest triggers is our modern environment and lifestyle, says the gastroenterologist Shilpa Ravella, the author of A Silent Fire: The Story of Inflammation, Diet and Disease. 'We've altered, among many things, our diet, physical activity, stress levels, sleep, social connections, the quality of the air we breathe, and our exposure to toxins from our household and other products,' she says.
We have never been exposed to so many factors that trigger inflammation in our bodies, and we know this owing to recent strides in molecular medicine. Danny Altmann, a professor of immunology at Imperial College London, says that doctors can now measure a range of biological markers, including cytokines, that increase with excessive inflammation and are signs of 'bad or unhealthy stuff going on'.
Age, for example, increases our susceptibility to inflammation, Altmann says. 'If you do all those biomarker measurements, they grow further and further off-kilter as you grow older, and contribute to poor health.'
In its early stages, persistent low-level inflammation can be silent and 'hidden, simmering quietly in the blood of ostensibly healthy people,' Ravella says. 'One thing to watch out for is belly fat, because it is a proxy for hidden 'visceral' fat that wraps around inner abdominal organs. And this type of fat is highly inflammatory, churning out inflammatory cytokines at all hours.'
She stresses that the risk is more closely related to lifestyle choices than how you look. Improving diet, reducing stress and exercising more frequently can reduce chronic, hidden inflammation 'even without a change in the amount of belly fat one has'. Similarly, you can look fit and slim but harbour silent inflammation if you don't have good lifestyle habits.
To make sense of this link, it helps to understand how the immune system works, says Kinross, who has written a book on the subject, Dark Matter: The New Science of the Microbiome.
Your immune system has two parts. Your innate immune system deals with day-to-day challenges and threats: if your body meets a pathogen, it mounts an immediate response. When your body meets the same pathogen again, the second part of the immune system, the adaptive part, learns how to make antibodies to fight it and creates a more precise strike.
• 14 foods you should eat every week (including chocolate)
'This is where the microbiome is so important,' Kinross says. 'You need bugs to educate and set up and teach that system friend from foe. You also need the right balance of microbes because they can speak to that immune system and say, 'Hey guys, you need to ramp up'. But they can also put the brake on.' So healthy gut bugs and a diverse microbiome make for a more efficient immune system.
Kinross believes that the huge rise in conditions that share a common thread of inflammation can be attributed partly to failing to programme our immune systems effectively in early life. The overuse of antibiotics, a diet of nutrient-poor and ultra-processed foods and exposure to pollution all negatively affect the microbiome.
Antonio Vidal-Puig, a professor of molecular nutrition and metabolism at the University of Cambridge, heads a team researching the mechanisms that link obesity with metabolic complications including insulin resistance, diabetes, fatty liver and heart disease. 'Obesity is also associated with neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, and also with cancer — such as colon, breast, prostate or gynaecological — as well as IBD and many other common diseases,' he says.'Inflammation is a key component in the story everywhere.'
We already know that losing weight cuts obesity-related cancer risk, but a study presented at the European Congress of Obesity in May suggested that losing weight through taking GLP-1 medication (such as Ozempic or Mounjaro) resulted in a 41 per cent greater reduction in risk than if one were to lose the same weight through bariatric surgery.
Obesity can cause chronic inflammation through metabolically abnormal fatty tissues releasing hormones and proteins that reduce anti-inflammatory immune cells across the body, as well as through imbalances in insulin and glucose, says Dr Matthew Harris, a Cancer Research UK clinical research fellow and lead author of PADRAIC, a project at the University of Manchester researching anti-obesity interventions to prevent adult cancers. However, it's likely that there are some direct effects of GLP-1 drugs on the immune system too, he adds. 'There are GLP-1 receptors all over the body — predominantly in the gut, brain and pancreas, but also on immune cells called T-cells that respond to inflammation. While it's likely that the anti-inflammatory effects of GLP-1 drugs are mostly due to a reduction in 'sick fat', it's speculated that there may also be some direct effects on the receptors.'
A Mediterranean-style diet enhances health because it contains fruit, leafy greens and other vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, spices and herbs, all of which have high anti-inflammatory potential, Ravella says. 'These foods contain a host of substances essential for regulating the immune system, like polyphenols, carotenoids and other phytochemicals, as well as unsaturated fats like omega-3s.'
• The 13 carbs you should eat
Our most anti-inflammatory nutrient? Fibre from plant sources. We should be eating 30g of fibre daily, but at least 90 per cent of UK adults are deficient in it. 'Fibre can manipulate all arms of the immune system,' Ravella says.
Ultra-processed foods full of additives, foods that contain an excess of sugar and salt, plus refined carbs and unhealthy animal foods including processed meats can all activate the immune system, stressing cells in the body and triggering inflammation, she says. Alcohol, too, is inflammatory, says Dr Federica Amati, a medical scientist and nutrition lead at Imperial College London.
Colourful fruit and veg and leafy greens 'Fruits and vegetables that are high in antioxidant polyphenols combat oxidative stress and lower inflammatory markers,' says Amati, who is also head nutritionist at the science and nutrition company Zoe and the author of Every Body Should Know This: The Science of Eating for a Lifetime of Health. Colourful fruits are particularly beneficial. Pomegranates, for example, contain specific polyphenols associated with reducing heart disease, she says. Beetroot is another deeply coloured antioxidant-rich plant that helps to reduce inflammation. And yellow-toned plants — papayas, oranges, mangos, apples, carrots and celery — contain the polyphenol apigenin, which has anti-inflammatory effects.
Fruits and vegetables are also high in fibre, which helps to maintain a healthy gut microbiome, and can create short-chain fatty acids, which are good for maintaining the integrity of the gut lining. Cruciferous vegetables such as cauliflower, broccoli and Brussels sprouts, and leafy greens including spinach, Swiss chard and cavolo nero, are particularly beneficial.
Legumes Black beans, chickpeas, lentils and edamame are high in fibre and polyphenols. 'Lentils contain plenty of fibre and plant protein, as well as micronutrients like iron. They are a nutritional powerhouse,' Amati says.
MushroomsMushrooms provide fibre, plant protein and polyphenols that are special to fungi, Amati says. 'Increasing your intake of mushrooms is associated with lower inflammation and if you sunbathe them on your windowsill, they will also contain vitamin D, which is great for immune health.'
Omega-3 fatty acids found in fishSalmon, sardines, anchovies, and mackerel are rich sources of omega-3 fatty acids, but so are flaxseeds, chia seeds and walnuts. Studies have found that they help cells to make more omega-3-derived metabolites which turn off the inflammatory response and work to improve the gut microbiome.
'They're known to have anti-inflammatory properties and are metabolised by the gut microbiome — our gut microbes love omega-3,' Amati says. 'They have properties that are important for reducing inflammation in the liver.'
• The ultra-processed foods the top nutritionist says are healthy
Wholegrains such as oats and speltSteel-cut oats, barley, quinoa, buckwheat and spelt contain a fibre called beta-glucan, which has anti-inflammatory properties, reduces cholesterol and helps with heart health.
Nuts and seeds As well as the omega-3 in flaxseeds, chia seeds and walnuts, other seeds and nuts, such as almonds and pumpkin seeds, contain healthy poly and monounsaturated fats. 'They also provide polyphenols of their own that help to lower inflammation,' Amati says.
Extra virgin olive oilThis is in a category of its own. 'It has a clear role in the Mediterranean diet, but as an ingredient itself, its particular polyphenols and fats have very strong anti-inflammatory effects that have been likened to the anti-inflammatory effects of ibuprofen,' Amati says.
Herbs, spices and fermented foodTurmeric, ginger and garlic have potent anti-inflammatory effects thanks to the specific polyphenols found in them, such as curcumin in turmeric and allicin in garlic.
Amati notes that a recent trial by scientists at Stanford University investigated how the gut microbiome and inflammatory modulation changed between a fibre-rich diet and a fermented food-rich diet. 'The high-fibre diet helped to improve immune system function, so it was better able to react appropriately to pathogens. The high fermented-food diet, containing yoghurt, kefir, sauerkraut and kimchi, helped to reduce systemic inflammation, specifically helping to modulate unnecessary inflammatory response.'
Bacon and processed meatsThese are high in salt and saturated fat, both of which cause inflammatory responses in the body and are linked to an increased risk of bowel cancer. 'We think this is due to a combination of the saturated fat and the way they are processed, along with the additives like nitrates and salt,' Amati says. 'They are also not good for the gut microbiome, which makes it easier for the inflammation to go up.'
Sweets and fizzy drinks Foods that are high in sugar will raise your blood sugar level rapidly, also increasing insulin levels, which promotes an inflammatory state in the body. 'Sugar is also absorbed quickly into the liver and the liver doesn't like that,' Amati says.
Factory-made pastries and cakesThese tend to be high in saturated fats and refined carbohydrates, as well as sugar. 'Research has shown that people who have a higher intake of refined carbs have higher inflammatory markers,' Amati says. 'Refined carbs are stripped of fibre, antioxidants and micronutrients during processing, which removes the naturally anti-inflammatory compounds. When sugar reacts with proteins or fats in the body, it forms AGEs [advanced glycation end-products], which accumulate in tissues and trigger immune cells to release inflammatory cytokines.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
MPs back bill changes to prevent medics raising assisted dying with under-18s
Medics would not be allowed to raise assisted dying as an option with under-18s, and advertising it would be banned under changes backed by MPs on Friday before a final vote expected next week. The Commons voted on amendments to the assisted dying bill, which would legalise the option for terminally ill adults in England and Wales who have been told they have fewer than six months to live. The final Commons vote is scheduled on 20 June, with support and opposition finely balanced – and growing scrutiny over timelines, loopholes and who would ultimately deliver the system. A majority of MPs approved a clause tabled by Labour MP Meg Hillier, an opponent of the bill, to ensure health professionals cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. A separate amendment from Hillier to bar health workers from bringing up assisted dying with adult patients before they have raised it themselves was voted down. There were impassioned interventions from both sides of the debate. Rupa Huq, the Labour MP for Ealing Central, said the cost-of-living crisis would make assisted dying 'quite attractive' to people who were struggling. 'We know that BAME communities have lower disposable household income than standard households, and you can just imagine relatives in a housing crisis wanting to speed up grandad's probate to get a foot on the ladder, or granny or nanny, ma or daddy even convincing themselves that, 'look, they'd be better off out of the way given the cost of care,'' Huq said. Caroline Voaden, the Liberal Democrat MP for South Devon, recalled the death of her husband, who she said had been 'in extreme pain' with terminal oesophageal cancer, and urged her colleagues to 'mind our language' after words like 'murder' were used. 'This is about helping people die in a civilised way and helping their families not go through a horrendous experience of watching a loved one die in agony,' Voaden said. MPs voted in favour of a proposal by Kim Leadbeater, who is sponsoring the bill, to ban advertisements about assisted dying. But they rejected a separate proposal from Labour MP Paul Waugh for tighter regulations which would have limited exceptions on Friday's amendments. Waugh said he hoped that 'enough MPs now realise that it is not fit for purpose'. The bill passed its first stage by a majority of 55 in November. Since then more than a dozen are thought to have switched sides to oppose the bill, though at least three have moved to support it. A number of other amendments were passed on Friday, including a provision for assisted dying deaths to not automatically be referred to a coroner and an attempt to regulate substances for use in assisted dying. Demonstrators for and against a change in the law gathered outside parliament to make their views known. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Opening the debate, Leadbeater said it was not about a choice between assisted dying or palliative care. 'Palliative and end-of-life care and assisted dying can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days,' she said. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines. The government is neutral on the legislation. Stephen Kinnock, a health minister, said there had been more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent debating the proposals so far, and more than 500 amendments had been considered at committee stage earlier this year.


The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘They entrusted me with their daughter's memory': Women's prize winner Rachel Clarke on her story of a life-saving transplant
To read Rachel Clarke's The Story of a Heart, which has won this year's Women's prize for nonfiction, is to experience an onslaught of often competing emotions. There is awed disbelief at the sheer skill and dedication of the medical teams who transplanted the heart of nine-year-old Keira, who had been killed in a head-on traffic collision, into the body of Max, a little boy facing almost certain death from rapidly deteriorating dilated cardiomyopathy. There is vast admiration for the inexhaustible compassion of the teams who cared for both children and their families, and wonder at the cascade of medical advances, each breakthrough representing determination, inspiration, rigorous work, and careful navigation of newly emerging ethical territory. And most flooring of all is the immense courage of two families, one devastated by the sudden loss of a precious child, the other faced with a diagnosis that threatened to tear their lives apart. Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion To write such a story requires special preparation. 'I was full of trepidation when I first approached Keira's family,' Clarke tells me the morning after she was awarded the prize. 'I knew that I was asking them to entrust me with the most precious thing, their beloved daughter Keira's story, her memory.' The former journalist trained as a doctor in her late 20s, and has spent most of her medical career working in palliative care. Subsequently, she has also become an acclaimed writer and committed campaigner, publishing three memoirs: Your Life in My Hands, Dear Life and Breathtaking. She turned to her medical training for guidance when writing The Story of a Heart. 'I said to myself, my framework will be my medical framework, so I would conduct myself in such a way that they would, I hoped, trust me in the same way that someone might trust me as a doctor. And if at any point they changed their mind, then they could walk away from the project.' Each family read the manuscript in its entirety, with Clarke determined that she would not publish if they had any qualms. On the morning that we speak, she has been in touch with them, and she reads me a message from Loanna, Keira's mother. It says simply: 'Keira really has made such a difference to so many people. She is just incredible.' Loanna, she goes on to tell me, now visits schools to tell children about Keira; Max's mother, Emma, is an 'indefatigable' ambassador for the NHS's organ donation programme. Nobody who reads the book could forget the almost superhuman fortitude of Keira's father, Joe, or her sisters, all of whom not only consented but pressed forward with donating her organs, even as Loanna and Keira's brother were gravely injured. There, too, is the bravery of Max's father, Paul, supporting his desperately ill son through the pain and trauma of treatment; and Max's brother, Harry, now finishing his second year at medical school. It is because of these people that in 2020, Max and Keira's Law entered the statute books, ruling that adults would be presumed to have given consent to organ donation, rather than having to opt in, an enormously important step in addressing the scarcity of donor organs. For Clarke, it was also important to shine a light on the care with which the medical teams treat those who, in death, are giving someone else the chance of life; from the 'moment of honour' that precedes all surgery to retrieve donor organs, in which all fall silent to consider the patient, to the last offices of washing and dressing performed by nurses. 'It's the patient that's the important person,' she explains. 'And I think that says something very profound about us as a species, doesn't it?' Clarke, who is the mother of two teenagers, spends half her time working with patients, and half on 'other things'; not only writing books, but shining a light on the challenges her profession – and by extension all of us – are facing. At the moment, she is furious about the government's recent decision to stop issuing visas to foreign care workers, because what they do is regarded as unskilled labour. With a shortage of 100,000 care workers, the result is patients unable to be discharged from hospital: 'A direct consequence of that is I will see more patients on trolleys dying outside an A&E that they can't even get into because we don't have enough care workers. I will look them in the eye. Keir Starmer won't. Wes Streeting won't. But I will, and I will try to give them the best care I can in a corridor where there isn't even a curtain to draw around them for dignity.' She has, she says, always been torn between the arts and science, but that medicine is 'the perfect marriage of hard science and beautiful, messy humanity. And I try to write books that represent medicine accurately in that sense. You are not a good doctor if you're just a scientist and you're not a good doctor if you're just about emotion and feeling: you have to marry the two.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Fears assisted dying bill could be defeated as MPs warn ‘tide is turning'
There are growing fears Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill could be defeated when it returns to the Commons next week, as MPs claim confidence in it is rapidly being lost. The warning comes as Ms Leadbeater suffered her first major defeat on Friday, after MPs voted to introduce new safeguards to prevent health professionals raising the subject of assisted dying with children. They voted 259 in favour and 216 against an amendment tabled by Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier stating 'no health professional shall raise assisted dying with a person under 18'. It is understood Ms Leadbeater didn't support the amendment because she agrees with the British Medical Association, which has said doctors should not be put in the position where they are barred from raising it with patients. It comes amid concerns that if people under 18 with terminal illnesses are unable to get the advice they want from their doctor, they will turn to the internet, where they are more likely to be subject to misinformation. Labour MP Paul Waugh told The Independent that today's voting shows the bill has 'rapidly lost the confidence of MPs', adding that the 'strong momentum against it is now clear'. 'It had a Commons majority of 56 last November. That was cut to 36 last month on a key amendment. Today, we saw a further cut of the majority to 21 and 26 on amendments. And the final vote - a big defeat for the proposer of the bill by 43 votes - just underlined how uncomfortable MPs are.' Mr Waugh added: 'The more the scrutiny of this particular bill, the more MPs have deep concerns about its lack of safeguards for the vulnerable.' But sources close to Ms Leadbeater insisted there is no reason to believe momentum is being lost, pointing out that the decline in majorities came as a result of fewer MPs attending the debate overall. It is understood that Ms Leadbeater is confident that support for it remains strong. Kit Malthouse, who supports the bill said: "The evidence from today is that our numbers held strong. Our majority proportionally was the same. On one vote, where a fine judgment was required, obviously views of colleagues differed. But if anything, that would probably strengthen their conviction to vote for the bill, having supported us in other votes.' Danny Kruger, who has been a vocal opponent of the bill, said he is 'increasingly hopeful' it will be voted down next week. 'The tide is turning on the Assisted Suicide Bill', he said. While he described the success of the amendment to prevent health professionals from raising the subject of assisted dying with children as a 'big victory', he warned that the bill is 'still way too open to abuse'. Rachael Maskell, who is against the bill, added: 'It is clear that now MPs are engaging in the detail of the Bill that they can see the cracks and are losing confidence'. 'A very different picture was painted today to when the Bill passed with 56 votes in the autumn to an amendment passing by 43 votes today against the will of the Bill's sponsor. MPs now need to engage with the evidence which clearly sets out why this particular Bill is not fit for purpose', she told The Independent. But pro-assisted dying sources pointed out that people on both sides of the debate voted to support the extra safeguards for children. Debating the amendment, Dr Neil-Shastri-Hurst MP, a medical doctor, said: 'Those who have had the privilege of meeting a young person living with a terminal illness will know that they often display a maturity and a depth of understanding far beyond their years. 'To deny them the opportunity of a considered conversation about their future upon reaching adulthood is not an act of compassion, in my view; it is to abandon them. 'It is to leave them isolated, navigating a complex and deeply personal journey through the filter of online forums, rather than in dialogue with trusted, qualified professionals. We owe them better than that.' Opinion in the medical community has been divided over the bill, with the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) expressing concern, while some MPs who are doctors are among the Bill's strongest supporters. Seven RCPsych members, including a former president and vice president, have written to MPs to distance themselves from their college's concern, instead describing the Bill as 'workable, safe and compassionate' with a 'clear and transparent legal framework'. Meanwhile, Claire Macdonald, director of My Death, My Decision said 'no-one should be forced to suffer, and the British public wants politicians to change the law on assisted dying'. In a letter to MPs this week, Ms Leadbeater said supporters and opponents appear in agreement that 'if we are to pass this legislation, it should be the best and safest Bill possible'. She added: 'I'm confident it can and will be.' The proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.