EU chief von der Leyen heads to Scotland for trade talks with Trump
Trump, in Scotland for a few days of golfing and bilateral meetings, told reporters upon his arrival on Friday evening that he was looking forward to meeting with von der Leyen, calling her a "highly respected" leader.
He repeated his view that there was a 50-50 chance that the U.S. and the 27-member European Union could reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to "make a deal very badly".
If it happened, he said it would be the biggest trade agreement reached yet by his administration, surpassing the $550 billion accord agreed with Japan earlier this week.
The White House has released no details about the planned meeting or the terms of the emerging agreement.
The European Commission on Thursday said a negotiated trade solution with the United States was within reach, even as EU members voted to approve counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods in case the talks collapse.
To get a deal, Trump said the EU would have to "buy down" that tariff rate, although he gave no specifics.
EU diplomats say a possible deal between Washington and Brussels would likely include a broad 15% tariff on EU goods imported into the U.S., mirroring the U.S.-Japan deal, along with a 50% tariff on European steel and aluminum.
The broad tariff rate would be half the 30% duties that Trump has threatened to slap on EU goods from August 1.
It remains unclear if Washington will agree to exempt the EU from sectoral tariffs on automobiles, pharmaceuticals and other goods that have already been announced or are pending.
Combining goods, services and investment, the EU and the United States are each other's largest trading partners by far. The American Chamber of Commerce in Brussels warned in March that any conflict jeopardized $9.5 trillion of business in the world's most important commercial relationship.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
Uncertainty over tariffs halts oil shipments from Brazil to US, says lobby group
RIO DE JANEIRO, July 30 (Reuters) - Energy companies operating in Brazil suspended oil shipments to the United States after President Donald Trump announced 50% tariffs against the South American country, Roberto Ardenghy, president of oil lobby group IBP, told Reuters on Wednesday. Oil is Brazil's top export to the U.S. and was exempt from the 10% April tariff imposed on Brazilian exports, but it is unclear whether the commodity will remain exempt under the new 50% tariff set to come into effect on Friday. "This time we have no way of knowing," said Ardenghy. IBP represents oil companies in Brazil, such as Petrobras ( opens new tab, Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab, TotalEnergies ( opens new tab, ExxonMobil (XOM.N), opens new tab and Equinor ( opens new tab. "Business involving cargo that has to leave Brazil for the U.S. is suspended," Ardenghy said. Instead of shipping their product to the United States, companies are storing oil on floating production vessels or on cargo ships, Ardenghy said. Because it takes around 21 days for a shipment to reach the U.S. from Brazil, oil shipments were stopped once it became impossible to reach their destination before Aug. 1, he said. If there is no exemption, Brazil is likely to redirect shipments to Europe and India, he said. "But, for now, everything is on hold, waiting for what will come on August 1st," he added. In 2024, Brazil exported a total of 1.78 million barrels per day (bpd), of which 243,000 bpd went to the U.S., according to government data compiled by consultancy group StoneX. Petrobras, Brazil's state-run oil firm and a top oil producer and exporter, has sent about 8% of its oil exports in the second quarter, the firm said in a filing on Tuesday. Earlier this month, Petrobras Chief Executive Magda Chambriard told Reuters that the company may redirect the oil it sells to the U.S., sending more to Asia and Pacific markets if the higher U.S. tariffs for Brazil come into effect.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump hits ‘too late' Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve keeps interest rates steady despite two board dissenters
President Donald Trump on Wednesday continued his attacks on Federal Reserve Board of Governors chair Jerome Powell as the American central bank again rebuffed his demand for lower interest rates, keeping them steady for at least another month. Speaking in the Roosevelt Room during a bill signing ceremony, the president hit out at Powell, who he has blamed for decisions made by the bank's powerful Open Markets Committee, using the derisive nickname he assigned him when he began to demand lower rates months earlier. 'We should be the lowest interest rate. And we're not. We're ... number 38 because of the Fed. It's all because of the Fed. He's done a bad job. Now. He's got a meeting today, but I call him too late. You know, he's always too late, even if he does it today, probably won't. I hear they're going to do it in September, not today,' Trump said. In a statement, the bank justified the decision to keep rates steady by noting that while employment and economic growth remain steady after Trump's first half-year in office, the rate of inflation remains "somewhat elevated." Powell offered some further explanation during remarks announcing the decision in which he stressed that Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" have led to some increased inflation around goods, the long-term economic effects of tariffs remain to be seen. The Fed's decision to keep interest rates stagnant comes the same day that the Bureau of Economic Analysis released its report showing that GDP grew by 3 percent in the last economic quarter between April and June. This came after the previous quarter where GDP actually shrank, which Trump blamed on his predecessor Joe Biden. The decision comes after weeks of bullying and browbeating of Powell by Trump and his allies, including top officials at the Office of Management and Budget and the Federal Housing Finance Administration, who have seized on long-running renovations at the Fed's headquarters as a possible pretext under which Trump would fire Powell, who he appointed to lead the Fed during his first term.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
White House claims that the uproar over the Epstein files has slowed
Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox Get our free Inside Washington email Get our free Inside Washington email Email * SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice White House officials say much of the public criticism over the administration's handling of the Epstein Files is slowing down, and only a 'very small segment' of President Donald Trump's base remains disgruntled over it. Weeks after the president attempted to divert attention away from the Epstein Files and the Department of Justice and FBI released a memo shutting down any long-held conspiracy theories about Jeffrey Epstein, the White House is now thinking about its next step in the saga. Officials and Trump's top allies outside of the administration had been fielding angry phone calls from supporters, but that has mostly ceased now, according to the Washington Post 'I wouldn't say it's blown over,' an unnamed senior White House official told the Post on Wednesday. 'It's one of those things where, with a certain segment of the base, a very small segment of the base, it's never going to die down, no matter what.' However, a new poll by by The Economist and YouGov this month suggests that 46 percent of Americans believe Trump 'was involved in crimes allegedly committed' by Epstein, compared to 32 percent who say they don't think the president was criminally linked to Epstein and 23 percent who said they're not sure. open image in gallery President Donald Trump's supporters appear to be moving on from the Epstein Files fallout, a White House official said ( Getty Images ) Initially, after the administration did a 180° from promising to release undisclosed information about Epstein, a convicted sex offender who was accused of trafficking women and girls in a decades-long scheme, Trump's loyal MAGA base was outraged. Even some of the more prominent MAGA supporters, who had long bolstered conspiracy theories about Epstein, were irritated with the administration and called for Trump to release the files. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, ultra-conservative pundit Steve Bannon, influencer Charlie Kirk, and more had initially expressed dissatisfaction with the administration's quick claim that no 'client list' existed and Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while in federal jail. But an unnamed Trump ally told the Post that the Wall Street Journal article claiming Trump sent a 'bawdy' 50th birthday letter to Epstein actually helped the situation by taming supporters' outrage because it prompted Trump to take action. After the article reignited concerns about Trump's relationship with Epstein, Trump denied ever sending the birthday card and sued the Journal for $10 billion. He also directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to request grand jury testimony from the government's investigation into Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche also made a public show by going to Florida, where Maxwell is serving a 20-year-to-life sentence for sex trafficking, to interview her about others who may have been involved in Epstein's crimes. The unnamed Trump ally said it was 'enough of a bone to stop people from freaking out.' The Independent has asked the White House for comment. Trump has denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein. Being named in the files does not suggest any wrongdoing and Trump has not been accused, or charged with any crime related to the Epstein case. The White House also dubbed the WSJ report 'fake news.' Even some of those who initially were angry at the administration appear to have backed Trump after the Journal article. Kirk, who initially called for Trump to release the files, quickly backed the president, claiming he did not believe the Journal's report was genuine. open image in gallery Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein ( US District Court for the Southern District of New York ) Bannon, who also called for an investigation into the files, rallied behind Trump for 'striking back' against the Journal. The White House appears cognizant that the drama around the Epstein Files has not disappeared completely – and that the small number of outraged supporters still matters. Recent polling from the Post and Quinnipiac University shows that a majority of Americans believe the president should release the Epstein Files. Among those who self-identified MAGA Republicans, 82 percent said Trump should release the files. 'We're not just sitting on our hands,' the unnamed senior White House official told the Post. 'There are things happening that are not public. Just because they're not public doesn't mean things aren't happening.'
