‘Flight to crap': US meme stock fever is spreading like it's 2021
It's not 2021, and the shares of the moment aren't GameStop, AMC Entertainment Holdings or the now-bankrupt Bed Bath & Beyond. In 2025's meme stock mania, the companies du jour are Opendoor Technologies and Kohl's Corp.
The similarities are clear: Like the episode four years ago, amateur traders are piling into heavily shorted companies with low share prices in a bid to strike quick riches. And, as was the case back then, it comes at a time of broad market euphoria: the S&P 500 is at an all-time high, Bitcoin has doubled in less than year and blank-cheque companies are all the rage again.
'I've been seeing signs of a 'flight to crap' recently,' said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers. 'The recent rally, which was largely powered in its initial phase by individual investors buying large cap stocks and major indices, has emboldened many to engage in more risky types of investing.'
The latest day-trader darling is Kohl's. The retailer's share price more than doubled at one point on July 22, coming after tech-powered home flipper Opendoor skyrocketed last week. The Campbell's Co., Aehr Test Systems, Polaris and Wendy's, which also have relatively high short interest, are also attracting buyers.
Yet unlike the pandemic era, when stimulus cheques shored up household finances and Covid restrictions limited spending options, traders could face a tougher backdrop this time around. Just three months ago, stocks were plunging as President Donald Trump unveiled his new tariff plan, and many everyday Americans are still struggling under higher prices and a brutal housing market.
And those who do have money to burn have no shortage of alternatives that weren't as readily available just a few years ago, from sports betting to a bevy of new crypto investment options to prediction markets like Kalshi.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business Singapore's digital banks finding their niche in areas like SMEs as they narrow losses in 2024
World Trump says US will charge 19% tariff on goods from Philippines, down from 20%
Singapore Two found dead after fire in Toa Payoh flat
Singapore 2 foreigners arrested for shop theft at Changi Airport
Opinion Most companies onboard wrong – here's how to get it right
Sport AC Milan's Rafael Leao gives Singapore fan an unforgettable birthday
Life Ozzy Osbourne, Black Sabbath's bat-biting frontman turned reality TV star, dies aged 76
Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving
Despite all the risks, both professional and amateur traders are in full risk-on mode, leaving some experts worried about irrational exuberance creating a bubble that's destined to pop. It's a fear that's only gaining in credibility as so-called 'dumb money' floods back into risky companies with little to no profitability.
'The meme stock enthusiasm tends to overlap with crypto enthusiasm,' said Michael O'Rourke, chief market strategist at JonesTrading. 'There's been significant crossover from the crypto market into equities, with many shell companies converting their business models into digital asset treasury companies. Now the fever is spreading to meme stocks.'
FOMO market
The frenzy has been building in recent weeks. The S&P 500 reached another record this week, Bitcoin remains near US$120,000, while special purpose acquisition companies, or Spacs, are having their busiest year of initial public offerings since 2021.
'New highs feed into the fear of missing out,' said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Investment Management. 'Certainly there seems to be a fair amount of liquidity blowing into the market.'
Retail traders are now a key component of the US stock market, comprising 20.5 per cent of total volume. On top of that, trading activity in names priced below US$5 makes up more than 26 per cent of the overall trading volume, according to Jefferies Electronic Trading Solutions.
Looming concerns
Of course, piling money into shoddy equities isn't for the faint of heart. While many retail traders brag about striking it big, others tell tales of epic wipeouts. The all-or-nothing gamble was somewhat more tolerable back in 2021, when stimulus cheques from the federal government helped shore up Americans' savings and any losses could be written off as the cost of having fun.
These days, the job market is weaker, interest rates are higher and mandatory student loan payments have resumed. That has some analysts predicting this meme stock rally will fade much more quickly.
Others see the return of meme stocks as a natural release for investors who were spooked earlier this year by sharp market losses after Mr Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement. Since he paused those rates from taking effect – ushering in the so-called TACO trade, based on the idea that 'Trump Always Chickens Out' – the equity market has seen its fastest-ever recovery from a bear-market drawdown. That's padded the wealth of investors big and small.
Mr Arone at State Street draws comparisons to 1998, when financial crises in Asia and Russia rattled markets.
'It was an incredibly volatile year, yet it also ended up being a very strong year for markets,' he said. 'And I think that's where we may end up in 2025. So I'm uncomfortably bullish.' BLOOMBERG
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US cancels India trade talks scheduled for August, NDTV Profit says
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Trade talks between New Delhi and Washington collapsed after five rounds of negotiations. A planned visit by US trade negotiators to New Delhi from Aug 25 to Aug 29 has been cancelled, delaying talks on a proposed bilateral trade agreement, Indian business and financial news network NDTV Profit reported on Aug 16, citing people familiar with the matter. The current round of negotiations for the proposed bilateral trade agreement is now likely to be deferred to another date, the report said, dashing hopes of some relief before the Aug 27 deadline for the additional tariff on Indian goods kicks in. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods , citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil in a move that sharply escalated tensions between the two nations. The new import tax, which will come into effect from Aug 27, will raise duties on some Indian exports to as high as 50 per cent – among the highest levied on any US trading partner. Trade talks between New Delhi and Washington collapsed after five rounds of negotiations over disagreement on opening India's vast farm and dairy sectors and stopping Russian oil purchases. India's foreign ministry has said the country is being unfairly singled out for buying Russian oil while the United States and European Union continue to purchase goods from Russia. REUTERS

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Companies are pouring billions into AI. It has yet to pay off.
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Corporate spending on artificial intelligence is surging as executives bank on major efficiency gains. So far, they report little effect to the bottom line. Nearly four decades ago, when the personal computer boom was in full swing, a phenomenon known as the 'productivity paradox' emerged. It was a reference to how, despite companies' huge investments in new technology, there was scant evidence of a corresponding gain in workers' efficiency. Today, the same paradox is appearing, but with generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI). According to recent research by McKinsey & Co, nearly eight in 10 companies have reported using Gen AI, but just as many have reported 'no significant bottom-line impact'. AI technology has been racing ahead with chatbots such as ChatGPT, fuelled by a high-stakes arms race among tech giants and super-rich startups, and prompting an expectation that everything from back-office accounting to customer service will be revolutionised. But the payoff for businesses outside the tech sector is lagging behind, plagued by issues including an irritating tendency by chatbots to make stuff up. That means that businesses will have to continue to invest billions to avoid falling behind – but it could be years before the technology delivers an economy-wide payoff, as companies gradually figure out what works best. Call it the 'gen AI paradox,' as McKinsey did in its research report. Investments in Gen AI by businesses are expected to increase 94 per cent in 2025 to US$61.9 billion (S$79.5 billion), according to IDC, a technology research firm. But the percentage of companies abandoning most of their AI pilot projects soared to 42 per cent by the end of 2024, up from 17 per cent the previous year, according to a survey of more than 1,000 technology and business managers by S&P Global, a data and analytics firm. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore I want to divorce my husband and be a single mother: More victims speaking up on emotional abuse World Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit Singapore Buying hope: Inside S'pore's love affair with the lottery Singapore She won big in Genting, but getting $240k winnings back to Singapore was dicey Opinion Confessions of a born-again Singaporean Business Manage your household finances like a business for clarity, say entrepreneurs Business Silence does not work when dealing with job loss blues Singapore Singapore congratulates Indonesia on 80th Independence Day Projects failed not only because of technical hurdles, but often also because of 'human factors' like employee and customer resistance or lack of skills, said S&P Global senior analyst Alexander Johnston. Gartner, a research and advisory firm that charts technological 'hype cycles', predicts that AI is sliding towards a stage it calls 'the trough of disillusionment'. The low point is expected next year, before the technology eventually becomes a proven productivity tool, said Gartner chief forecaster John-David Lovelock. That was the pattern with past technologies such as personal computers and the internet – early exuberance, the hard slog of mastering a technology, followed by a transformation of industries and work. The winners so far have been the suppliers of AI technology and advice. They include Microsoft, Amazon and Google, which offer AI software, while Nvidia is the runaway leader in AI chips. Executives at those companies have bragged how AI is reshaping their own workforces, eliminating the need for some entry-level coding work and making other workers more efficient. AI will eventually replace entire swaths of human employees, many predict, a perspective that is being widely embraced and echoed in the corporate mainstream. At the Aspen Ideas Festival in June, Mr Jim Farley, chief executive of Ford Motor, said: 'Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the US.' Whether that type of revolutionary change occurs, and how soon, depends on the real-world testing ground of many businesses. 'The raw technological horsepower is terrific, but it's not going to determine how quickly AI transforms the economy,' said Mr Andrew McAfee, a principal research scientist and co-director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's (MIT) Initiative on the Digital Economy. Still, some businesses are finding ways to incorporate AI – although in most cases the technology is still a long way from replacing workers. One company where AI's promise and flaws are playing out is USAA, which provides insurance and banking services to members of the military and their families. After several pilot projects, some of which it closed down, the company introduced an AI assistant to help its 16,000 customer service workers provide correct answers to specific questions. USAA is tracking its AI investments, but does not yet have a calculation of the financial payoff, if any, for the call centre software. But the response from its workers, the company said, has been overwhelmingly positive. While it has software apps for answering customer questions online, its call centres field an average of 200,000 calls a day. 'Those are moments that matter,' said Mr Ramnik Bajaj, the company's chief data analytics and AI officer. 'They want a human voice at the other end of the phone.' That's similar to an AI app developed more than a year ago for fieldworkers at Johnson Controls, a large supplier of building equipment, software and services. The company fed its operating and service manuals for its machines into an AI program that has been trained to generate a problem summary, suggest repairs and deliver it all to the technician's tablet computer. In testing, the app has trimmed 10 to 15 minutes off a repair call of an hour or more – a useful efficiency gain, but hardly a workplace transformation on its own. Fewer than 2,000 of the company's 25,000 field service workers have access to the AI helper, although the company is planning an expansion. 'It's still pretty early days, but the idea is that over time, everyone will use it,' said Mr Vijay Sankaran, the chief digital and information officer at Johnson Controls. The long-term vision is that companies will use AI to improve multiple systems, including sales, procurement, manufacturing, customer service and finance, he said. 'That's the game changer,' said Mr Sankaran, who predicts that shift will take at least five years. Two years ago, JPMorgan Chase, the nation's largest bank, blocked access to ChatGPT from its computers because of potential security risks. Only a few hundred data scientists and engineers were allowed to experiment with AI. Today, about 200,000 of the bank's employees have access to a general-purpose AI assistant – essentially a business chatbot – from their work computers for tasks such as retrieving data, answering business questions and writing reports. The assistant, tailored for JPMorgan's use, taps into ChatGPT and other AI tools, while ensuring data security for confidential bank and customer information. Roughly half of the workers use it regularly and report spending up to four hours less a week on basic office tasks, the company said. The bank's wealth advisers are also employing a more specialised AI assistant, which uses bank, market and customer data to provide wealthy clients with investment research and advice. The bank says it retrieves information and helps advisers make investment recommendations nearly twice as fast as they could before, increasing sales. Ms Lori Beer, the global chief information officer at JPMorgan, oversees a worldwide technology staff of 60,000. Has she shut down AI projects? Probably hundreds in total, she said. But many of the shelved prototypes, she said, developed concepts and code that were folded into other, continuing projects. 'We're absolutely shutting things down,' Ms Beer said. 'We're not afraid to shut things down. We don't think it's a bad thing. I think it's a smart thing.' Mr McAfee, the MIT research scientist, agreed. 'It's not surprising that early AI efforts are falling short,' said Mr McAfee, who is a founder of Workhelix, an AI consulting firm. 'Innovation is a process of failing fairly regularly.' NYTIMES


Independent Singapore
3 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘Is this a red flag?' — Man shocked after learning company he applied to expects employees to be ‘on standby even when on leave'
SINGAPORE: A man was stumped when he learned that one of the companies he applied to expects all their employees to 'be on standby even when on leave.' He shared his disbelief in a Reddit post on Friday (Aug 15), explaining that when the HR representative called to discuss the 'container operations role' he had applied for, he was told the role would require him to be on standby '24/7, 365 days a year, even while on medical, annual, or childcare leave.' The man said that after hearing about the unusual policy, he asked the HR representative, 'What is the point of being on leave if you are still expected to work when needed?' to which the HR reportedly responded, 'It's expected by the company, and that is how it is.' He then contrasted this with his current job at a small-to-medium enterprise (SME). 'I am currently in a similar position in an SME, which respects my leave, and my colleague will cover for me when I am on leave — which I then cover for him when he goes on leave,' he wrote. 'Yet this MNC, with thousands of employees globally, can't or does not wish to do so. It just leaves a bad taste in my mouth that they think it is OK. It's just a basic expectation to have a work-free period during leave.' Though the man didn't mention the name of the company, he hinted that this is 'one of the largest shipping companies in the world.' Seeking advice from other forum members, he asked if this policy was indeed a 'red flag.' 'Shipping industry is like that.' Convinced he would have a rough time at the company, some users urged the man to reject the role. One said, 'Red flag. If they're one of the largest shipping container companies in the world, they should be able to sort it out without reaching to people on AL. They have thousands of employees, and the success of the business doesn't rest on one person.' Another added, 'Epic red flag, just reject.' Others, however, told the man that many companies in the shipping industry operate this way. One user shared, 'Shipping industry is like that. I don't do containers, but my shipping ops is also expected to take calls 24/7 unless they are big enough to have cover from another overseas office. Most of the time, no one will call you unless there is a major issue la. I take calls on leave all the time, even when I am travelling overseas.' Another commented, 'I heard shipping industry is like this, expected to be on standby 24hrs. But in return, they are paid very well. I have heard of 1-year bonuses. So if you're gonna take up such a job, make sure you are handsomely rewarded.' A few users also advised the man to 'gather more details about the role' before deciding to reject it. One wrote, 'You should ask more questions regarding it pertaining to your role, like what kind of standby are we talking about (need to answer call/ or need to be physically present). In the past few years, how often has it been necessary for someone in your same role. Ask for real-life examples of such cases, etc.' In other news, a 28-year-old local has confessed on social media that he is on the verge of giving up on his career in UI/UX design after more than a year of job hunting. Posting on Reddit's singaporefi forum on Wednesday (Aug 13), he explained that, aside from the fact that the industry feels 'completely saturated,' most companies seem to be hiring only for senior roles that demand years of experience—positions that, in his view, 'no one can realistically fulfil.' Read more: 'I'm exhausted': Local UI/UX designer on the brink of giving up after a year-long job hunt