Tariff-related fears ignite commodities selloff
Business Editor
US President Trump has imposed the steepest and harshest American tariffs in a century on all its major counterparts, sparking threats of retaliation and a broad selloff around the world on concerns that a global trade war on this scale and magnitude will drive an economic slowdown — not least in the US, where inflation forecasts have spiked, and sentiment among consumers and businesses has fallen sharply during the past couple of months.
This was stated by Ole Hansen, Head of Commodity Strategy, Saxo Bank, during an exclusive interview with Gulf Today.
'There is a general understanding of why Trump wants to reshape the global economy, with his primary goal being the reversal of a two-decade trend of US companies moving production overseas to capitalise on cheaper labour costs, which, in turn, has boosted their stock prices but contributed to domestic job losses and economic stagnation in certain sectors and parts of the nation.' Ole added.
'This shift has had significant impacts on American manufacturing and the broader economy, as well as its ability to be self-sufficient in key materials.'
Economic implications:
short-term pain, long-term uncertainty: 'However, it is crucial to recognise that reversing such long-standing trends is a complex and time-consuming process. It cannot be achieved overnight — let alone in four years — and will inevitably involve trade-offs and temporary setbacks for both the US and its trading partners. What Trump delivered on this so-called 'Liberation Day' was an economic war declaration likely to cause chaos across global supply chains, while in the short term raising the risk of an economic fallout, hurting demand for key commodities, with energy and industrial metals being the sectors most at risk. Financial markets responded strongly to the tariff announcement, with the USD, equity markets, and US Treasury yields all seeing sharp declines.'
Energy and industrial metals among the hardest hit 'Commodities suffered broad declines, with the Bloomberg Commodities Index trading down around 1.2% since Monday, with losses led by the growth- and demand-dependent sectors of energy and industrial metals.
'At this stage, however, the weakness has not triggered any major technical breakdown, potentially limiting selling pressures from momentum-focused traders. In addition, the USD trades sharply lower, and together with rising inflation expectations, the risk of a major correction seems limited at this stage.
'Metals tariffs were largely left unchanged, with steel and aluminium at 25%, and no tariff yet on copper while the Section 232 investigation continues. Prices nevertheless fell, with growth risks weighing on prices — not least in China, the world's top exporter and consumer of raw materials — as it faces tariffs of at least 54%, with the threat of another 25% on top for buying Venezuelan oil.'
HG copper futures in New York briefly slumped to $4.825 before stabilising around $4.935, with the tariff-related premium over LME prices in London still elevated around 13%, highlighting a market where trades — as opposed to a deflated premium in gold and silver — still expect tariffs to be introduced. However, uncertainty about the level of tariffs will continue to create a great deal of volatility in the COMEX-LME spread.
Gold's haven credentials on display despite deleveraging risks Gold trades a tad softer on the day after briefly hitting a fresh record high overnight at $3,167 — a move that was supported by geopolitical and economic tensions, as well as the weaker USD and rising inflation expectations driving down US real yields. However, while these supportive factors will continue to underpin bullion prices, a current rush to deleverage amid spiking volatility will also be felt in gold — not least given its recent record run of gains. What will determine the depth of a potential correction hinges on the investor base, and a battle between short-term, technical-focused traders and long-term accumulators from real money allocators, high-net-worth individuals, and central banks. Given how far gold has travelled in the past three months, a correction to $3,000 — let alone $2,960 — would not trigger any major alarm bells.
Silver slump as COMEX tariff premium evaporates Silver and platinum, two semi-industrial metals, have both suffered sharp corrections once again as wrong-footed longs head for the exit. The weakness has been led by selling in the New York futures market after a fact sheet distributed by the White House stated that bullion (gold) and 'other certain minerals that are not available in the United States' should not be subject to reciprocal tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Ukraine President Zelensky returns to site of stunning Oval Office shouting match
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky returns to the Oval Office on Monday for the first time since a spectacularly tense exchange with Donald Trump saw their talks cut short and question marks raised over future US support. At the February 28 meeting, Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated Zelensky on live television, accusing him of being ungrateful for US aid provided since Russia's invasion three years prior, and pressing for quick negotiations to end the war. The hostile confrontation marked a turning point in Kyiv-Washington relations, which had been warm under former president Joe Biden, and raised fears that Trump would cut off US military support. Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels. The scene quickly devolved at the end of a long question-and-answer session with the press. Vance accused Zelensky of being "disrespectful" and displaying ingratitude for Trump's diplomatic efforts, after the Ukrainian leader expressed skepticism that Russian President Vladimir Putin could be trusted given his repeated violations of earlier agreements. As Zelensky defended his position in his non-native English, Trump was enraged by the Ukrainian leader's suggestion that while the United States was currently far from the fighting, "you will feel it in the future" if they appeased Putin. "You don't know that. You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel," railed Trump, before adding: "You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now." As tempers flared, Vance demanded Zelensky thank the United States for the billions provided to Kyiv in military aid. "Have you said 'thank you' once?" he asked. When Zelensky attempted to respond, he was silenced by Trump. "No, no. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble," said Trump, cutting Zelensky off. The Ukrainian leader left the White House shortly after, without signing a mineral rights deal that was a key reason for his visit. In the ensuing days, the United States temporarily cut off military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, heightening European fears that Trump would side with Putin in trying to end the conflict. Shifting tides Much water has since flowed under the bridge, however. Trump, who has in the past expressed his admiration for Putin, began to lose patience with the Russian leader, as Moscow kept up its military offensive even as US special envoy Steve Witkoff engaged in feverish diplomacy to achieve a ceasefire. In April, Trump met with Zelensky at the Vatican, and accused Putin of "tapping me along" without delivering on promises. Days later, Ukraine and the United States finally signed a minerals deal, which Trump had earlier referred to as compensation for US aid. The two leaders also met face-to-face in June on the sidelines of the NATO summit at The Hague. On Friday, Trump met with Putin in Alaska to discuss the Ukrainian conflict, promising to run any proposals by both Ukraine and its European allies before agreeing to a deal. Shortly after the Putin summit, Trump invited Zelensky to the Oval Office. Perhaps wary of the contours of the previous diplomatic dust-up, Zelensky quickly said he was "grateful for the invitation." European leaders will join Zelensky in Washington on Monday, seeking above all else to prevent another Oval Office meltdown — but also to coordinate on the path toward peace negotiations, especially on how to prevent any future Russian invasion. On the latter front, the Trump administration says it is now open to providing Ukraine security guarantees, a shift hailed Sunday by Ukrainian and European leaders. Zelensky is expected to first meet one-on-one with Trump, before they are joined by European leaders, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, a European government source said. According to US broadcaster CNN, Zelensky's former sparring partner — Vice President Vance — will also be present.
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Ukraine's Zelensky arrives in Washington for talks with US President Trump
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said all sides seek a rapid end to the war, and called for lasting peace as he arrived in Washington on Sunday night ahead of talks with the US president. "We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably," Zelensky posted on social media. He will meet Donald Trump on Monday alongside a cohort of European leaders. On Friday, Trump met with Putin in Alaska to discuss the Ukrainian conflict, promising to run any proposals by both Ukraine and its European allies before agreeing to a deal. Shortly after the Putin summit, Trump invited Zelensky to the Oval Office. Perhaps wary of the contours of the previous diplomatic dust-up, Zelensky quickly said he was "grateful for the invitation." European leaders will join Zelensky in Washington on Monday, seeking above all else to prevent another Oval Office meltdown — but also to coordinate on the path toward peace negotiations, especially on how to prevent any future Russian invasion. On the latter front, the Trump administration says it is now open to providing Ukraine security guarantees, a shift hailed Sunday by Ukrainian and European leaders. Zelensky is expected to first meet one-on-one with Trump, before they are joined by European leaders, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, a European government source said.
Gulf Today
3 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Zelensky knows he risks another White House ambush
Sam Kiley, The Independent The free world's most celebrated president is showing some mettle in agreeing to a meeting with the leader of the free world. When Volodymyr Zelensky walks into the Oval Office on Monday, he knows he's risking another ambush. The Ukrainian president is prepared to gamble that he'll get another White House schoolyard bullying session, because there's a slim chance that Donald Trump may finally have tired of being played by the Kremlin. It is now conceivable, just, that Trump is prepared to consider security guarantees for Ukraine that reflect Nato's Article 5, which could mean that if Ukraine signed up to a peace deal then its long-term future sovereignty and security would be protected, by force of arms, by allies including the US. Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, spoke with Trump and went public with the idea (that had been hers in the first place) suggesting that the US president had bought into the concept. "The crucial point remains security guarantees to prevent new Russian invasions, and this is the aspect where the most interesting developments were recorded in Anchorage," Meloni said. Meloni said Trump had highlighted an earlier Italian proposal for security guarantees for Ukraine "inspired by Nato's Article 5". "The starting point of the proposal is the definition of a collective security clause that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the USA, ready to take action in case it is attacked again," said Meloni. After his Friday summit with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Trump said that the two presidents were close to an agreement. He didn't mention "peace" or a "ceasefire" and admitted that there's no deal until there is a full deal. Sources have since confirmed to The Independent that Putin demanded that Ukraine give Luhansk and Donetsk provinces to Russia in return for a "freeze" on the front lines elsewhere. Zelensky, they said, would seek "clarity" on the proposal — which could only be agreed after a referendum in Ukraine. "We had an extremely productive meeting and many points were agreed to. There are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there," Trump said. That "one" significant sticking point with Russia might well be that Ukraine and Europe have persuaded Trump that there can be no enduring peace for Ukraine if a ceasefire, or peace deal, is just a pause in fighting while the Kremlin prepares for a renewed conflict. Putin's demand that Ukraine cede two provinces in return for a pause in the killing are certain to be rejected by Europe and Ukraine as they make no commitment to ending Putin's long-term desire to take the rest of the counrty. So far this year Trump has echoed and accepted almost all of Russia's conditions for peace. He has endorsed Putin's demand that Ukraine can never join Nato. He has accepted that Moscow should keep the Ukrainian lands it has already captured. He has blamed the west for provoking the war with Russia in the first place and has even questioned the legitimacy of the Zelensky presidency itself. Diplomatic sources very close to the European and Ukrainian talks, which followed the Trump-Putin meeting, said that while there was relief that Trump now understood the need for Ukrainian security guarantees. But details of how it would work — and what concessions Ukraine would be asked to make, are critical. "The question is — how can, or will, this work?" one senior source said. If, on arrival in the Oval Office, Trump tells him to accept that he must give away Ukraine's east, including Crimea, forever abandon fantasies of joining the EU and Nato and hold elections while his country is occupied (all Russian demands) — then any "security guarantees" will be meaningless. They will have been part of a Russian effort to see Zelensky enfiladed in the White House, as he was in February.
