Why Arun Kumar of FundsIndia backs investment styles others are avoiding
In an interaction with
Mint
for the Guru Portfolio series, Kumar shared his contrarian approach when it comes to picking mutual funds for his portfolio. 'I like it when certain investment styles or investment approaches are not doing well," he says.
I have always been equity-heavy. Currently, my portfolio is 90% equity, and the remaining 10% is in debt and arbitrage funds. I'm comfortable with this because my wife and I have active income and contribute 10-15% of the portfolio value each year.
Even during bear markets, we contribute to the portfolio. However, as our portfolio grows over time, our savings might not catch up with it. There will be a time when our portfolios will become so big that we'll not be able to add meaningfully (less than 5%) to our portfolios. At that time, I will shift to a more conservative portfolio and keep it 70% equity, 15% gold, and 15% debt and debt-like investments.
A chunk of my portfolio, 55%, is in four funds. I have a natural bias towards value investing as a style and have invested in funds that fund managers manage with a value bias. It's split across Sankaran Naren's ICICI India Opportunities, Rajeev Thakkar's
PPFAS FlexiCap
, Kenneth Andrade's Old Bridge focused equity fund, and HDFC FlexiCap, which Prashant Jain earlier managed.
Another 15% of our portfolio is to make slightly concentrated bets. I am bullish on banking as a sector and put all this portion in one banking stock. I feel that the NPA cycle has been cleaned up, and the credit growth cycle is about to start. Banks also have a strong balance sheet because they had over-prepared for covid, but the impact wasn't as bad as we thought. Banking is a good sector going through a bad time with decent valuations, and I'm hoping for a reversal in the future.
The other 15% is spread across the globe. I had taken a bet in Chinese tech through Mirae's Hang Seng Tech ETF two years ago. It didn't do well for some time, but started playing out in the last one year. I also had an SIP in a Nasdaq fund. When the markets crashed in 2022, I built up my position in a FAANG [Meta (formerly Facebook), Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Alphabet (formerly Google)]
stock, which was part of that index. That stock has gone up 4x, leading to slightly skewed exposure.
The remaining 5% is allocated to mid- and small-cap funds. I did not have any allocation to mid- and small-cap before and missed the whole rally. The only exposure I had was indirectly through flexi-cap funds that had some exposure to such companies. I was already too much into equities and didn't want to get too aggressive. Over time, the plan is to gradually start building the small and mid-cap exposure.
Also Read:
Why Marcellus' Saurabh Mukherjea has 40% global weight
I had missed the whole small and mid-cap rally. I did not have any funds from that category, and the only allocation I had was through my flexi cap. Learning from this experience, I have now put in place a framework to play small caps. SIP can also be a simple way to build exposure.
I like it when certain investment styles or investment approaches are not doing well. Lately, momentum-oriented funds have not been doing great, and I am looking at it, although I haven't made up my mind. We also didn't have many options before, but now we have plenty of them.
Quality is another style that has dramatically underperformed in the last four years, and I see some early signs of a turnaround. I am now looking at quality schemes and will slowly build up exposure there. That is what I'll focus on for the next few months.
Everyone wants high-quality companies with high ROCE (return on capital employed), low debt, consistent earnings, high earnings growth potential, and good management at decent valuations. It's very difficult to get all of these in one stock. So, quality fund managers usually end up compromising on the valuations front. This overpaying has come to bite them in the past four years.
When the markets rebounded, it was a broad-based recovery where all stocks, regardless of their quality, were growing their earnings at a rapid pace, and so there was no need to pay an exorbitant price for quality. But when the market starts going through a tough phase, and only a few good quality companies are winning, that's when quality starts performing.
While it's tough to time styles, the recent underperformance and the moderating growth environment with a lot of uncertainty thrown in augurs well for quality. Overall, it seems like a good place for quality to start working again. When the tide turns is anybody's guess, but at least it's crucial to remain consistent with our process.
Also Read:
Look who's making a comeback: Quality vs value investing
I like UTI Flexi cap for sticking to its quality investment style even when it has fallen out of favour.
I have hardly sold any of my funds since I started seriously investing in 2015. I have redeemed a few small allocations here and there to clean my portfolio. However, I've kept all my core holdings. I buy funds mostly by looking at the fund manager. As long as the same fund manager runs the fund, I don't mind even if it's underperforming. HDFC Flexi cap is one scheme that I bought due to Prashant Jain, but he left HDFC in 2022. However, I continued holding that scheme because the current manager, Roshi Jain, manages the fund reasonably well.
As a thumb rule, I would contemplate selling when the fund manager changes or there is a significant change or dilution from the stated investment approach. Another aspect is on the performance front. If the returns deteriorate and I am not able to understand the reason behind it, then that can be an issue. But let's say a fund manager who follows a quality style is underperforming, and all others with the same style and index are also struggling; then it's okay.
In this case, underperformance is not an issue. In fact, I bought most of my schemes when the fund manager was underperforming. In contrast, if you're following a certain style and are performing poorly when others following the same style are doing well, then that's a sign to sell out.
Also Read:
Sachet-sized mutual funds can still be difficult for the house help as an investment option
Keeping it simple works: Fewer decisions, fewer funds, and more patience. Backing good fund managers during tough phases: Buying into skilled fund managers who are going through challenging times—but sticking to their proven approach—often pays off.
The magic of compounding also becomes truly meaningful once the portfolio reaches a reasonable size. It's also important to track incremental savings. It helps in two ways: identifying where you can get a bigger bang for your buck and deciding how much time and effort to allocate between increasing savings versus chasing higher returns.
It also brings the focus back to what truly matters: growing the overall portfolio through a combination of steady savings and returns.
Lastly, behaviour beats brilliance: Sticking to the plan is hard because of the three S:
Scare you
: The equity market tries to scare you into selling through ABCD (all-time highs; bad news; crash predictions; cash calls by experts; declines)
Slow you down with entry anxiety:
Waiting for a 10% correction to deploy funds—as it always feels like markets will fall further.
Seduce you with ABCD
: Temptations to go all in; borrow to invest; chase performance and concentrate heavily; derivatives and day trading.
Mint's Guru Portfolio series features leaders in the financial services industry who share their money management secrets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Qualifications that techies Mark Zuckerberg has hired personally at $100 million-plus pay packages have: Degree in ...
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, is aggressively recruiting top AI talent for his new superintelligence lab, using a curated document known as 'The List' to target the industry's brightest minds. According to the Wall Street Journal, "The recruits on 'The List' typically have PhDs from elite schools like Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon. As a report in WSJ said, "The recruits on 'The List' typically have Ph.D.s from elite schools like Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon. They have experience at places like OpenAI in San Francisco and Google DeepMind in London. They are usually in their 20s and 30s—and they all know each other. They spend their days staring at screens to solve the kinds of inscrutable problems that require spectacular amounts of computing power." Zuckerberg has personally spearheaded the recruitment, diving into technical papers and strategizing with two Meta executives in a group chat dubbed 'Recruiting Party' to discuss hundreds of candidates and outreach methods, such as email, text, or WhatsApp. The List prioritizes candidates with PhDs in AI-related fields, experience at leading labs, and significant contributions to AI breakthroughs. Meta's recent hire, an algorithm design enthusiast, exemplifies the profile. The people who get notes from Zuckerberg reportedly have a few things in common: They need to know calculus, linear algebra and probability theory, like one of Meta's recent hires, who says he's fascinated by algorithm design. The AI community is tight-knit, with researchers forming Slack and Discord groups to share and discuss job offers, often leveraging competing offers to boost their value. Two sources familiar with these groups confirmed this practice. Meta has targeted dozens of OpenAI researchers, intensifying the Silicon Valley talent race. Leading Zuckerberg's superintelligence team is 28-year-old Alexandr Wang, a New Mexico native and son of Chinese immigrant physicists. Meta recently invested $14 billion in Wang's company, Scale AI, making him one of the most expensive hires in history. Meta has also reportedly made offers to dozens of researchers at OpenAI. This is said to have forced OPenAI to change its compensation structure. Not just this, the company's CTO also sent an open letter to employees asking them not to fall for Zuckerberg's offer. The company also shut down for almost a week. OpenAI's ex-CTO Mira Murati too has said that Mark Zuckerberg has also offered engineers in her company multi-million-dollar packages, but not even a single employee has so far accepted the offer. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump attack on Intel's CEO could compound factory struggles
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills At the end of July, Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio said Intel 's chief executive was "very, very optimistic" about the company's plans to build multibillion-dollar semiconductor factories in his state. Last week, President Donald Trump attacked the tech executive, and a Republican senator called for an investigation into delays surrounding Intel's massive construction project outside demanded Thursday that Lip-Bu Tan, Intel's new CEO, resign over his past ties to Chinese companies, adding to the woes of a company that DeWine and other senior figures in Ohio's Republican Party had said would help create a manufacturing boom and turn the state into a "Silicon Heartland."To help build its Ohio factories, Intel received commitments worth roughly $1.5 billion in federal funding in recent years, as well as a $2 billion incentive package from the project has been badly delayed, and the chipmaker said this year that the factories would not be operational until at least company's challenges in Ohio highlight the risks that federal and state officials took when they financially backed Intel, a once-powerful force in chip manufacturing, an industry now dominated by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing situation is also indicative of the struggles the Trump administration will face as it tries -- through the pressure of tariffs and threats from the White House -- to shift the bulk of semiconductor production to the United States from Asia. When the Biden administration offered financial incentives through the CHIPS Act, Intel was one of the few American companies that it made sense to whether by stick or carrot, forcing this transition could prove extraordinarily difficult, as the delays around the Ohio project demonstrate."It's pretty obvious that Intel has failed to meet the commitments it made to the people of Ohio," Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, wrote on social media Thursday. "Now we find out its new CEO is deeply conflicted with ties to the CCP," he said, referring to the Chinese Communist Party."The CEO must immediately resign, the project completed, and a fraud investigation should be initiated by Ohio," Moreno factories are extremely expensive and complicated to build. Intel has struggled to find enough customers to stay afloat as it poured money into construction. After posting an $18.8 billion loss in 2024 in its foundry division, the company ousted its CEO in December, cut 15,000 jobs and appeared to be exploring other strategies, including the possible sale of its manufacturing business to TSMC Asked for comment, a spokesperson for Intel referred to its most recent earnings report from July, in which the company said it was committed to completing the project in Ohio but had slowed construction to match customer Tierney, press secretary for DeWine, said Friday that the governor remained optimistic about the project."We expect chips to be made in that facility," Tierney said. He added that the company had already invested $7 billion in the construction project in Ohio, more than three times the amount of the state's incentive package, which involves some tax credits that have yet to be paid incentive package is tied to job creation by the end of 2028, so the earliest that the state would attempt to claw back any money is 2029, Tierney for the allegations against Tan, he said, DeWine is concerned about any allegation of involvement with the Chinese Communist Party that is detrimental to the national interest but is not rushing to judgment."We don't have all the facts, and we will need to see what facts come out," Tierney stakes are high for Intel and Ohio. Semiconductor chips, which are used in everything from cellphones to fighter jets, have recently become a particular focus for Trump, as they were for former President Joe Biden. Both presidents viewed domestic production as critical to national security, especially as more than 90% of the world's most advanced chips were produced in Taiwan, an island claimed by 2022, under Biden, Congress passed a bill with bipartisan support that aimed to remedy that vulnerability by pouring billions of dollars into subsidies for semiconductor companies to build facilities in the United States. Intel, the only American-owned maker of advanced logic chips, was awarded up to $7.9 billion to build factories in the United States. (Only about $2 billion of that has been disbursed.)Trump has criticized the subsidy approach, arguing that tariffs are a more effective tool to bring manufacturing back to the United States. He threatened last week to impose a 100% duty on many imported who took over Intel in March, has been hailed as a savior of the struggling American chipmaker. He is a longtime Silicon Valley investor who focused on semiconductor startups, even during eras when venture capital money seemed to be pouring into software and July 28, a company that Tan once ran pleaded guilty to transferring technology that was under U.S. export controls to Chinese entities. Though the plea agreement with the Justice Department did not name Tan, Sen. Tom Cotton , R-Ark., wrote to the chair of Intel's board of directors Tuesday, raising questions about what Tan may have known about the illicit a statement Thursday, Tan, an American citizen who was born in Malaysia, said that "misinformation" was circulating about his past roles and that he fully shared "the president's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security.""I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Tan said. He added that he was engaging with the administration "to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts."The questions surrounding Tan could create yet another hurdle in the attempt to bring the manufacturing of advanced semiconductors to Jon Husted , R-Ohio, was among the lawmakers who supported public funding for the Intel semiconductor factory. He posted a message on social media saying the company had promised to "respond promptly" to Cotton's letter."The facts have not changed: We need an American company to make American chips on American soil," Husted wrote. "Producing the world's most advanced high-tech chips in the U.S. is not just economic policy -- it's a national security imperative. Every day we are not doing that, we are putting our country at risk."Husted did not respond to a request for Sen. Bill DeMora, a Democrat representing Columbus, said Ohio Republicans were using Trump's attack on Tan to distract from the fact that they sank public money into a project that has who has long called the project a boondoggle, said in an interview Friday that Ohio Republicans "did all this hoopla and pageantry" to hype the Intel project. "Now they want the Intel president to step down because he has ties to China," he said. "That's their excuse."He said construction had continued with a fraction of the workers the company had promised to hire. He predicted that the site would never become a semiconductor factory."Intel is never going to make a chip there," he said.
Economic Times
5 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump attack on Intel's CEO could compound factory struggles
NYT News Service FILE -- Utility infrastructure under construction in Johnstown, Ohio, to support a planned Intel chip manufacturing plant, Jan. 3, 2025. Intel's challenges in Ohio highlight both the risks that federal and state officials took in financially backing Intel, and the struggles the Trump administration will face in trying to shift more semiconductor production from Asia to the U.S. (Brian Kaiser/The New York Times) At the end of July, Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio said Intel's chief executive was "very, very optimistic" about the company's plans to build multibillion-dollar semiconductor factories in his state. Last week, President Donald Trump attacked the tech executive, and a Republican senator called for an investigation into delays surrounding Intel's massive construction project outside Columbus. Trump demanded Thursday that Lip-Bu Tan, Intel's new CEO, resign over his past ties to Chinese companies, adding to the woes of a company that DeWine and other senior figures in Ohio's Republican Party had said would help create a manufacturing boom and turn the state into a "Silicon Heartland." To help build its Ohio factories, Intel received commitments worth roughly $1.5 billion in federal funding in recent years, as well as a $2 billion incentive package from the state. The project has been badly delayed, and the chipmaker said this year that the factories would not be operational until at least 2030. The company's challenges in Ohio highlight the risks that federal and state officials took when they financially backed Intel, a once-powerful force in chip manufacturing, an industry now dominated by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Intel's situation is also indicative of the struggles the Trump administration will face as it tries -- through the pressure of tariffs and threats from the White House -- to shift the bulk of semiconductor production to the United States from Asia. When the Biden administration offered financial incentives through the CHIPS Act, Intel was one of the few American companies that it made sense to back. But whether by stick or carrot, forcing this transition could prove extraordinarily difficult, as the delays around the Ohio project demonstrate. "It's pretty obvious that Intel has failed to meet the commitments it made to the people of Ohio," Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, wrote on social media Thursday. "Now we find out its new CEO is deeply conflicted with ties to the CCP," he said, referring to the Chinese Communist Party. "The CEO must immediately resign, the project completed, and a fraud investigation should be initiated by Ohio," Moreno added. Semiconductor factories are extremely expensive and complicated to build. Intel has struggled to find enough customers to stay afloat as it poured money into construction. After posting an $18.8 billion loss in 2024 in its foundry division, the company ousted its CEO in December, cut 15,000 jobs and appeared to be exploring other strategies, including the possible sale of its manufacturing business to TSMC. Asked for comment, a spokesperson for Intel referred to its most recent earnings report from July, in which the company said it was committed to completing the project in Ohio but had slowed construction to match customer demand. Dan Tierney, press secretary for DeWine, said Friday that the governor remained optimistic about the project. "We expect chips to be made in that facility," Tierney said. He added that the company had already invested $7 billion in the construction project in Ohio, more than three times the amount of the state's incentive package, which involves some tax credits that have yet to be paid out. The incentive package is tied to job creation by the end of 2028, so the earliest that the state would attempt to claw back any money is 2029, Tierney said. As for the allegations against Tan, he said, DeWine is concerned about any allegation of involvement with the Chinese Communist Party that is detrimental to the national interest but is not rushing to judgment. "We don't have all the facts, and we will need to see what facts come out," Tierney said. The stakes are high for Intel and Ohio. Semiconductor chips, which are used in everything from cellphones to fighter jets, have recently become a particular focus for Trump, as they were for former President Joe Biden. Both presidents viewed domestic production as critical to national security, especially as more than 90% of the world's most advanced chips were produced in Taiwan, an island claimed by China. In 2022, under Biden, Congress passed a bill with bipartisan support that aimed to remedy that vulnerability by pouring billions of dollars into subsidies for semiconductor companies to build facilities in the United States. Intel, the only American-owned maker of advanced logic chips, was awarded up to $7.9 billion to build factories in the United States. (Only about $2 billion of that has been disbursed.) Trump has criticized the subsidy approach, arguing that tariffs are a more effective tool to bring manufacturing back to the United States. He threatened last week to impose a 100% duty on many imported chips. Tan, who took over Intel in March, has been hailed as a savior of the struggling American chipmaker. He is a longtime Silicon Valley investor who focused on semiconductor startups, even during eras when venture capital money seemed to be pouring into software and apps. On July 28, a company that Tan once ran pleaded guilty to transferring technology that was under U.S. export controls to Chinese entities. Though the plea agreement with the Justice Department did not name Tan, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., wrote to the chair of Intel's board of directors Tuesday, raising questions about what Tan may have known about the illicit activity. In a statement Thursday, Tan, an American citizen who was born in Malaysia, said that "misinformation" was circulating about his past roles and that he fully shared "the president's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security." "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Tan said. He added that he was engaging with the administration "to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts." The questions surrounding Tan could create yet another hurdle in the attempt to bring the manufacturing of advanced semiconductors to Ohio. Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, was among the lawmakers who supported public funding for the Intel semiconductor factory. He posted a message on social media saying the company had promised to "respond promptly" to Cotton's letter. "The facts have not changed: We need an American company to make American chips on American soil," Husted wrote. "Producing the world's most advanced high-tech chips in the U.S. is not just economic policy -- it's a national security imperative. Every day we are not doing that, we are putting our country at risk." Husted did not respond to a request for comment. State Sen. Bill DeMora, a Democrat representing Columbus, said Ohio Republicans were using Trump's attack on Tan to distract from the fact that they sank public money into a project that has stalled. DeMora, who has long called the project a boondoggle, said in an interview Friday that Ohio Republicans "did all this hoopla and pageantry" to hype the Intel project. "Now they want the Intel president to step down because he has ties to China," he said. "That's their excuse." He said construction had continued with a fraction of the workers the company had promised to hire. He predicted that the site would never become a semiconductor factory. "Intel is never going to make a chip there," he said. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. BlackRock returns, this time with Ambani. Will it be lucky second time? The airport lounge war has begun — and DreamFolks is losing End of an era: The Maggi Man who rebuilt Nestlé India bows out India's last cement IPO did not work. Can JSW Cement break that curse? Is Shadowfax closing in on its closest rival? Stock Radar: APL Apollo Tubes stock fails to hold momentum after hitting highs in June; what should traders do? Buy, Sell or Hold: Avendus trims target on Titan Company; Motila Oswal maintains buy on Jindal Stainless These large- and mid-cap stocks may give more than 25% return in 1 year, according to analysts
