logo
Takeaways from Trump's latest interview and how his bill plays in the states: From the Politics Desk

Takeaways from Trump's latest interview and how his bill plays in the states: From the Politics Desk

NBC News11-07-2025
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail.
In today's edition, Adam Edelman looks at the blue states seeking quick action to adjust their budgets following the passage of President Donald Trump's big domestic policy legislation. Plus, Kristen Welker analyzes the key takeaways from her interview with Trump.
— Scott Bland
Blue-state leaders weigh new laws to deal with financial fallout from Trump's big bill
By Adam Edelman
State lawmakers are scrambling to deal with the expected financial fallout from President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, with many in blue states demanding special legislative sessions they say are necessary to shore up funding for health care and food assistance programs affected by the new law.
Democratic governors in at least five states are weighing such special sessions, and Democratic lawmakers in several more are urging their governors to convene them to address expected funding shortfalls.
In Colorado, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis' Office of State Planning and Budgeting has projected that the state would receive about $500 million less in revenue yearly — and could see about the same amount in additional costs — because of the new law's impact on Medicaid and food assistance.
Democratic state Sen. Iman Jodeh said a special session is 'absolutely necessary' to deal with the state's new financial landscape, predicting that it was 'imminent' that Polis convenes one.
'We have to do it,' said Jodeh, a member of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee. 'Our budget just cannot absorb the backfill, the shortfall, the cuts.'
Polis spokesperson Shelby Wieman said in email that Polis 'has previously indicated we may need to reconvene the General Assembly to deal with the terrible impacts from the bill — and we are still reviewing the impacts of this new law to evaluate next steps, including a potential special session.'
Jodeh said that because of Colorado's unique Taxpayer Bill of Rights — a 1992 measure that effectively limits how much the state can raise taxes — it will be exceedingly difficult for Democrats, despite their control of the governorship and both legislative chambers, to avoid mostly cutting and freezing social programs to address the expected shortfalls.
'We're all incredibly scared about how we can possibly navigate this,' she said. 'What are those programs that we're going to have to freeze or defund or do away with altogether? Those will be the questions that we're going to have to answer during the special session.'
Analysis by Kristen Welker
I spoke with President Donald Trump yesterday in a wide-ranging 20-minute phone call, where we discussed his approach to tariffs, his response to the devastating floods in Texas, his views of the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, and more.
One key takeaway from our conversation is that the president signaled he is looking to pivot from policy to politics now that his sweeping tax and spending proposal, which he dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill, has become law.
I asked Trump if he plans to hit the road to talk about the measure and he said 'a little bit,' later adding, 'But honestly, it's been received so well I don't think I have to, but a little bit. And certainly before midterms we'll be doing a lot but a little bit.'
That focus on next year's midterm elections underscores the tough fight ahead for the GOP as it tries to hold onto its narrow majorities in both chambers. Democrats need to net just three seats to flip the House and four seats to take control of the Senate — a tougher task given the general lean of the states holding Senate races next year. And Democrats plan to campaign on the sweeping tax and spending measure, emphasizing cuts to Medicaid.
But the president did not seem overly concerned that his party would lose seats in Congress.
'They said that about 2024 too. They said, 'We're going to win seats,'' Trump said of Democrats. 'They didn't. They said — we're going to do great in the presidency, and I won all seven swing states, won the popular vote by millions, etc. So you know, they always say that. They've lost their way. They've lost their minds, and they've lost their way, not necessarily in that order.'
Meanwhile, the president is walking a fine line with his MAGA supporters, who Republicans need to turn out in droves to hold onto control of Congress next year.
These voters have more isolationist views of foreign policy, creating some tension when it comes to assistance to Ukraine. Trump made some news on that front yesterday, when he stressed that NATO, not the U.S., would be covering the cost of additional weapons for Ukraine.
'We're sending weapons to NATO, and NATO is paying for those weapons, 100%,' Trump told me. 'So what we're doing is the weapons that are going out are going to NATO, and then NATO is going to be giving those weapons and NATO is paying for those weapons.'
'We are not paying for any more weapons,' the president later added.
The details of that agreement with NATO are still unclear, though the president did tease a 'major statement' on Russia coming on Monday.
NATO spokesperson Allison Hart responded to Trump's comments in a statement on Friday. 'Allies continue to work to ensure Ukraine has the support they need to defend themselves against Russia's aggression. This includes urgent efforts to procure key supplies from the United States, including air defence and ammunition,' she said.
We'll delve more into all of this on Sunday's 'Meet the Press,' where I'll speak to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Republican Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming, and Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear of Kentucky.
✉️ Mailbag: When do the provisions of Trump's new law go into effect?
Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's reader question, from Cindy Scruggs, is about how Trump's big domestic policy law will be implemented.
'Knowing that many of the cuts will be put into effect after the 2026 elections, what parts of the bill or associated fallout (if any) will occur before the midterms?'
One of our Congress experts, senior national political reporter Sahil Kapur, provided an answer:
This is an important and somewhat complicated question.
The short answer is that Republicans backloaded the most significant cuts under Medicaid, SNAP and the Affordable Care Act until after the 2026 election.
That was a deliberate effort to manage political pain — hard-right Republicans wanted the Medicaid work requirements to take effect right away, but the party reached a deal to trigger them on the last day of 2026, just weeks after the midterms.
Some GOP lawmakers have told us they believe (or hope) this will insulate them in the 2026 elections.
Beyond that, many of the law's cutbacks are phased in over the coming decade. As KFF health policy expert Larry Levitt put it to me, 'There's not going to be a day where we wake up and there are suddenly millions more people without health insurance.'
That said, some effects will still be felt beforehand. There are already reports of at least one hospital in Nebraska shutting down, citing the 'anticipated federal budget cuts to Medicaid,' a huge source of funding for hospitals.
Sometimes, anticipation of an unpopular law taking effect can make for effective politicking: Republicans made Democrats paid a heavy political price in the 2010 midterms for the then-unpopular Affordable Care Act, even though it hadn't kicked in yet. In 2018, vast swaths of voters barely felt the benefits of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Trump sold as the greatest tax cut in history, and House Democrats won 40 seats in that year's midterm election.
Finally, the impacts of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' will certainly be felt by the 2028 presidential election, and if this law takes effect as designed, Democrats are sure to make that an issue.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sydney Sweeney's voter registration emerges amid uproar over controversial American Eagle jeans ad
Sydney Sweeney's voter registration emerges amid uproar over controversial American Eagle jeans ad

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Sydney Sweeney's voter registration emerges amid uproar over controversial American Eagle jeans ad

Sydney Sweeney registered as a Republican in Florida several months before President Donald Trump won his second term, it has been revealed, as the actor faces backlash over her provocative American Eagle campaign, which some critics have deemed 'racist.' The 27-year-old Euphoria actress has been a registered voter with the Republican Party in Florida since June 2024, according to public voting records. Sweeney's party affiliation was first confirmed by Buzzfeed News on Saturday, after a post on X claiming she was 'an actual registered member of the republican party' went viral. The post quickly gained traction as critics were already piling on the White Lotus and Madame Web actress for her American Eagle Outfitters campaign, which came with the tagline: ' Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' The ad starts with Sweeney saying, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color' before she adds: 'My jeans are blue.' While the ad appeared to be making a pun about denim – changing the word 'genes' to 'jeans' – it sparked outrage online over the phrases 'good genes' and 'great genes.' Critics say the two phrases, paired with Sweeney's references to her hair and eye color, echo the sentiments of eugenics, the discredited, racist belief once popularized by the Nazis that the human race can be improved genetically by selective breeding. In a statement, American Eagle spoke out about the campaign and defended Sweeney. ''Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans,' the company wrote in a statement on Instagram. 'Her jeans. Her story.' 'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way,' the statement continued. 'Great jeans look good on everyone.' Meanwhile, the White House and conservative media jumped to Sweeney's defense, with President Trump's communications director Steven Cheung calling the negative reaction to the ad 'cancel culture run amok.' The controversy surrounding the advertisement has also been featured on Fox News 28 more times than the Jeffrey Epstein saga this past week. According to a study by liberal media watchdog Media Matters for America, the network has spent over 85 minutes across at least 20 segments through Thursday afternoon discussing the commercial and the discourse surrounding it. After right-wing media came to Sweeney's defense, Daily Show correspondent and guest host Desi Lydic called out conservatives for their apparent hypocrisy in gushing over the campaign. 'This is such bulls***. Blond women have had constant representation, OK? In entertainment, in fashion, in letter-turning,' Lydic said. 'It's not that they want to see more white women, it's that they want to see none of anyone else. For a story about boobs, it sure has a hell of a lot of assholes.' Lydic specifically called out former Fox News host Megyn Kelly for her sudden switch-up in attitude toward Sweeney, after Kelly suggested a month ago that Sweeney was the 'new toast of the town' only because of her 'amazing breasts,' HuffPost reported. 'Yeah, yeah! That's right, women, you listen to Megyn Kelly and hide your sexuality unless your body makes liberals mad, in which case it's a kickass body! Hell, yeah! Go, girl!' Lydic joked. 'You motorboat those liberals here but not so much that it threatens Megyn or, so help me God, she will destroy you, ho bags!'

Switzerland could revise offer on Trump tariffs, business minister says
Switzerland could revise offer on Trump tariffs, business minister says

Reuters

time18 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Switzerland could revise offer on Trump tariffs, business minister says

ZURICH, Aug 3 (Reuters) - The Swiss government is open to revising its offer to the United States in response to planned heavy tariffs, Business Minister Guy Parmelin said, as experts warned the 39% import duties announced by President Donald Trump could trigger a recession in Switzerland. Switzerland was left stunned on Friday after Trump hit the country with one of the highest tariffs in his global trade reset, with industry associations warning of tens of thousands of jobs being put at risk. The country's cabinet will hold a special meeting on Monday to discuss its next steps, with Parmelin telling broadcaster RTS that the government would move quickly before the U.S. tariffs are imposed on August 7. "We need to fully understand what happened, why the U.S. president made this decision. Once we have that on the table, we can decide how to proceed," Parmelin said. "The timeline is tight, it may be hard to achieve something by the 7th, but we'll do everything we can to show goodwill and revise our offer," he added. Parmelin said Trump was focused on the U.S. trade deficit with Switzerland, which stood at 38.5 billion Swiss francs ($48 billion) last year, with Switzerland buying U.S liquefied natural gas (LNG) among the options under consideration. Another option could be further investments by Swiss companies in the United States, Switzerland's biggest export market for its pharmaceuticals, watches and machinery. "Look at the European Union, they promised to buy LNG. Switzerland imports LNG too — maybe that's one path," Parmelin said. "Maybe more investments. But to be sure it's a strong enough basis for continuing talks, we have to fully understand what the U.S. expects." Both Parmelin and Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter were also ready to travel to Washington to pursue talks if necessary, he added. Swiss officials rejected reports that the higher than expected tariffs were imposed after a bad-tempered telephone call between Keller-Sutter and Trump late on Thursday. "The call was not a success, there was not a good outcome for Switzerland," a government source told Reuters. "But there was not a quarrel. Trump made it clear from the very beginning that he had a completely different point of view, that 10% tariffs were not enough. "We are working hard to find a solution and are in contact with the American side," the source added. "We hope we can find a solution before August 7." Tariffs would have a huge impact on Switzerland's export-orientated economy and raised the risk of a recession, said Hans Gersbach, an economist at ETH, a university in Zurich. Swiss economic output would be reduced by 0.3% to 0.6% if the 39% tariff was imposed, a figure which could rise to above 0.7% if pharmaceuticals - which are currently not covered by the U.S. import duties - were included. Prolonged disruptions could shrink Swiss GDP by more 1%, Gersbach said. "There would be a risk of a recession," Gersbach said. Swiss shares are expected to be hit by the tariffs news when the stock market reopens on Monday after being closed during the Swiss National Day holiday on Friday. The tariffs could also see the Swiss National Bank cut interest rates in September, said Nomura. "We expect one more 25bp policy rate cut from the SNB in September, which would take the rate to -0.25%," the bank said. "A hit to growth from U.S. tariffs on exports would likely weaken economic growth and cause further deflation pressures, adding to the likelihood of easing to a negative policy rate."

Senate confirms Trump ally Jeanine Pirro as top federal prosecutor for DC
Senate confirms Trump ally Jeanine Pirro as top federal prosecutor for DC

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Senate confirms Trump ally Jeanine Pirro as top federal prosecutor for DC

The US Senate has confirmed Jeanine Pirro – a former Fox News host and staunch Donald Trump ally who boosted lies that he lost the 2020 presidential race because of electoral fraudsters – as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital. Pirro – a former New York state district attorney and county judge who joined Fox News in 2011 – was confirmed on Saturday in a 50-45 vote along party lines. In a statement issued by Pirro after the vote, the Republican said she was 'blessed' to have been confirmed as the US attorney for Washington DC. 'Get ready for a real crime fighter,' said Pirro's statement, which called the US attorney's office she had been confirmed to lead the largest in the country. Before her media career, Pirro spent over a decade as a Republican district attorney in Westchester county, New York, and also served as a county judge. She hosted her own Fox show Justice with Judge Jeanine. And more recently, she became a co-host on the Fox show The Five. Pirro used her time at Fox News in part to publicly support the baseless claims that Trump lost his first presidency to Joe Biden in 2020 because of voter fraud. In 2021, she was among several Fox News hosts named in the defamation lawsuit against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems, which accused the network of knowingly airing false claims about the company's voting machines after the previous year's election. Fox ultimately settled the lawsuit for $787.5m and has acknowledged that the fraud claims were false. Pirro has been serving as the interim US attorney since May, when her fellow Republican Trump nominated her to the post months into his second presidency. She was nominated after Trump withdrew the nomination of conservative activist Ed Martin, his first choice for the role. A key Republican senator, North Carolina's Thom Tillis, had said he would not support Martin's nomination. In announcing Pirro's nomination in May, Trump praised her record, and said that she was a 'powerful crusader for victims of crime' and someone who 'excelled in all ways'. 'Jeanine is incredibly well qualified for this position,' the president added. The US attorney general, Pam Bondi, on Saturday published a statement exalting Pirro as 'a warrior for law and order'. At the end of his first presidency, Trump pardoned Pirro's former husband, Albert Pirro Jr, after he had been convicted in 2000 on federal charges of fraud and tax evasion. Pirro is one of a number of Trump loyalists with ties to Fox who have joined the president's administration. Other prominent ones include her fellow ex-Fox News host Pete Hegseth, the embattled defense secretary, and the former Fox Business personality Sean Duffy, the embattled transportation secretary. In June, US senator Adam Schiff accused Pirro of 'blind obedience to Donald Trump is nearly unrivaled among his ardent supporters'. 'For an important prosecutorial position like this one, the country has a right to demand a serious and principled public servant,' Schiff said. 'Jeanine Pirro is not it.' Despite Pirro's confirmation, the US Senate left Washington DC on Saturday night for its monthlong August recess without a deal to advance dozens of Trump nominees despite days of contentious, bipartisan negotiations. An irate Trump went on social media and told Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to 'GO TO HELL!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store