Lang arrives ahead of Napoli medical in 25m plus add-ons transfer
The attacking wide man just turned 26 last month and had been pushing for the move to the Stadio Diego Armando Maradona.
Noa Lang è atterrato in Italia: sarà un nuovo giocatore del @sscnapoli pic.twitter.com/ZVaOkTqzIj
— Gianluca Di Marzio (@DiMarzio) July 14, 2025
As confirmed by Alfredo Pedullà for Football Italia earlier this month, the deal was done for €25m plus add-ons and a 10 per cent cut of the future sale fee.
Advertisement
Lang deal never in doubt for Napoli
EINDHOVEN, NETHERLANDS – MARCH 04: Noa Lang of PSV Eindhoven shoots during the warm up prior to the UEFA Champions League 2024/25 UEFA Champions League 2024/25 Round of 16 first leg match between PSV and Arsenal FC at PSV Stadion on March 04, 2025 in Eindhoven, Netherlands. (Photo by)
There were some minor delays caused by the issue of image rights between a company representing the player and his agents, but that was resolved.
The Dutch international has 14 senior caps for the Netherlands and came up through the Ajax youth academy.
Following loans at FC Twente and Club Brugge, Lang was sold to the Belgians for €6m, then moved on to PSV Eindhoven for €12.5m in the summer of 2023.
He represents one of several big investments for Antonio Conte's side, who won the Serie A title last season, as Sam Beukema is also set to complete his move from Bologna later this week.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Why Forest shouldn't feel bad about taking Crystal Palace's Europa League place
Steve Parish has been talking a lot in the last few days. And he's not been happy. The Crystal Palace chairman's unhappiness is partly fuelled by an understandable sense of injustice at his club's demotion to the Conference League from the Europa League, after being found in breach of UEFA's multi-club ownership rules. Advertisement In one of his interviews, Parish speculated that Nottingham Forest, the club who are set to benefit from this punishment, surely don't actually want to benefit from it. 'I know Forest are a fantastic club,' he told Sky Sports. 'They have a black swan event that got them into the European Cup. They won it. That enabled them to qualify again and win it again. These things have an incredible effect on football teams. 'You get your one shot. This is our one shot at the Europa League in 164 years. I can't believe that a football club with that story, with that history, very similar to ours, would really want to be a part of taking this away from us. 'A lot of Forest fans have reached out to me and said they don't want to get access to the tournament this way. 'I genuinely feel most right-minded football supporters would think that the right thing is for us to be in the competition.' While there's no reason to doubt that Parish has heard from some magnanimous Forest supporters, who do believe that entry into the higher competition for their side would feel hollow, it's probably fair to say they're in the minority. And if any of those fans are feeling pangs of guilt, or that they have unfairly benefited from another club's misfortune and will somehow not be able to enjoy a potential Europa League campaign because it hasn't been 'earned'… well, they shouldn't worry about that. It's tough not to feel enormous sympathy for the Crystal Palace fans, who may have been dreaming of trips to Rome and Porto and booking hotels for the final in Istanbul, and who haven't experienced European football since the Intertoto Cup in 1999. This won't spoil the glorious day when they beat Manchester City and won the FA Cup back in May, but it takes the edge off. Equally, the Crystal Palace coaching staff and players, who worked hard to achieve the greatest moment in the club's history, but also the greatest moment in most of their careers. Again, this won't spoil that day, but part of the reward has been taken away: it's a little like getting a promotion at work but not the pay rise. Advertisement But the more Parish speaks, the less and less sympathy you have for him, the others in charge of the club, and perhaps even Palace as an institution. One of the reasons Palace are in this mess is that, by Parish's own admission, they missed several emails from UEFA reminding them of the rules. That's pretty laughable, even before you consider that the address they provided to receive crucial updates about rules and regulations was 'info@ That's the address you give to cranks complaining there's 13 per cent less meat in the pies than last season, or to journalists whose irritating questions you don't actually want to answer. Not for anything, you know, important. Furthermore, the football finance writer Kieran Maguire reported last week that the Premier League had circulated details to all club secretaries regarding the change in regulations, as far back as October 2024, specifically referencing multi-club ownership considerations. This email was sent by the Football Association to all Premier League club secretaries in October 2024 advising them of changes to rules relating to UEFA Multi Club ownership rules. It would be difficult for a Premier Leagueclub to deny they receive emails from the FA. — Kieran Maguire (@KieranMaguire) July 13, 2025 Of course it 'feels' unfair that the Palace players, coaches and fans will be denied something that they have earned on the pitch. It is unfortunate timing that Palace qualified for Europe in the year that UEFA belatedly decided to enforce their rules more stridently, having also expelled Irish Cup winners Drogheda United for similar reasons. It is a nonsense that UEFA can say, with a straight face, that it's fine for Red Bull Salzburg and RB Leipzig to play each other but not Lyon and Palace. Equally, had Forest and Olympiacos been in the same competition, it's ludicrous that owner Evangelos Marinakis placing his shares in a 'blind trust' would have convinced anyone that he wasn't in charge of both clubs. But at the same time, it highlights how easy it was for Palace and Parish to avoid all of this. It's not Forest's problem that they can't keep up with their admin. It's not the first time that one team has benefited from another being kicked out of a competition. At the most extreme end, Denmark won the European Championship in 1992 after Yugoslavia were expelled from the competition. Clearly, the reason for the disqualification in that case — a devastating civil war — cannot be compared to this situation. Advertisement But there have been more comparable examples. In the FA Cup last season, Barnsley beat Horsham in the first round but were subsequently expelled for fielding an ineligible player: Horsham did not sheepishly decline the chance to go through in their place. LAFC weren't among the initial qualifiers for this year's Club World Cup, but gladly took their spot (via a playoff) when Club Leon were barred over multi-club ownership violations. Going back a little way, to the 1996-97 Premier League, Middlesbrough would have avoided relegation were it not for a three-point penalty imposed for not fulfilling a fixture. Coventry City, the team who survived as a result, presumably did not feel too bad about benefiting. This is all subject to a prospective appeal from Palace to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, which is expected to come at some point soon. If that succeeds and Palace are restored to the higher competition, it would be tricky for Forest to complain too much. But if things remain as they are, any sense that Forest should feel bad about stepping up as a result of Palace's carelessness is misguided.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Aston Villa's rebirth – and what I learned from writing a book about it
'When we met Nassef Sawiris in Madrid, he was a little bit sick,' says Aston Villa's director of football operations, Damian Vidagany, as he recalls how the club's executive chairman convinced Unai Emery to join as manager in 2022. 'His wife told him to stay at home but he insisted on holding the meeting because it was about the future of Aston Villa. Nassef was very clever in this meeting because he explained what the club was, the aims and how he would be investing. Then he said to Unai about a blank piece of paper: 'This is what I want, fill this paper and build me the club you have in mind'. The approach from Nassef was perfect.' Advertisement This meeting brought together two of the most important people in Aston Villa's recent history, and who ended up being central characters in my book Waking the Giant, which reveals how the club was revived and is published on Thursday. Sawiris is the leading force at the club, the man who — alongside co-owner, Wes Edens — was inspirational in saving Villa from financial ruin in 2018. Emery, meanwhile, is the mastermind manager who added elite-level coaching to the structure and was given the freedom to redesign the football department with his own people. Without them Villa's journey from the Championship to the Champions League would not have been possible. Yet the adventure has taken many other twists and turns, and as the Villa reporter for The Athletic between 2019 and 2024, and before that for the local Birmingham Mail newspaper, it felt like a good time to pull it all together alongside Matt Maher, who works for another local paper, the Express & Star. So what did I learn from writing the book? First, that it is Sawiris and Edens, both ambitious and hugely wealthy individuals, who have set the tone ever since they first walked through the doors of Villa's Bodymoor Heath training ground. Qualifying for the Champions League was their dream, spelled out in their first meeting with supporters, at a time when the very notion appeared pure fantasy following the mismanagement under former owner Tony Xia. It is their determination, and most crucially their continued financial backing, which has also made it possible, and if Profit and Sustainability rules (PSR) feel relevant now, then be assured Sawiris and Edens, who were previously supported by the savvy Christian Purslow during his time as CEO, were thinking outside the box right from the start. There's a chapter dedicated to this in order to explain why selling Villa Park back to a subsidiary company controlled by the owners was a vital move in 2019 and how, ironically, it was bitter rivals Birmingham City who provided assistance in helping Villa balance their books just weeks after promotion was secured. Advertisement Like any sporting success story, it has also required a different kind of fortune; the fates conspiring when a big decision needed to be made. None more so than when former Arsenal and France striker Thierry Henry turned down the head coach's job in 2018, paving the way for the appointment of boyhood supporter Dean Smith, who would lead the club to promotion and consolidation back in the Premier League. That's one of the more well-known topics, but it was the deeper conversations with players and staff, both past and present, that unearthed so much more. Tyrone Mings, for example, explains how close he came to joining Villa's local rivals, West Bromwich Albion, and Jed Steer reveals he nearly left the club completely, eight months before he was the hero in a crucial penalty shoot-out win which helped alter the course of club history. There are stories about Prince William's visits to the club and inside details about transfer deals and failed pursuits. Would James Milner returning to Villa have helped Steven Gerrard, for example? Jack Grealish also opens up candidly about his reasons for leaving his boyhood club and joining Manchester City while captain John McGinn explains in detail how he was almost forced into a move away. 'I am not saying it had anything to do with Steven Gerrard, either, but the club were looking to see if anyone was interested,' McGinn says in the book. 'I did have a lot of interest at that time, several clubs but probably West Ham mostly at that point. There was a chance I could be away. It was a bit strange. I had prepared myself for leaving and as a footballer you get used to these things because sometimes you have to get used to moving on.' Perhaps the most revealing conversations were with the former owner Tony Xia, who was in charge when Villa were threatened with a winding-up order after failing to pay a tax bill in 2018. Xia sold the club to Sawiris and Edens and was last seen by anyone connected to Villa at Wembley in 2019 when he sat in the stands watching the play-off final win over Derby County as a spectator, a year after the club lost to Fulham at the same stage. Advertisement Although still the co-chairman at that point, he was no longer a person of significant control after failing to match the cash injections made by Sawiris and Edens, but letting go of the connection with the club was difficult for him. After tracking Xia down, it is revealed in the book that weeks after Villa had secured promotion, he submitted a written offer to buy the club back from Sawiris and Edens. The Chinese businessman also describes what happened in the years after Villa, including six months spent in a detention centre in China. For Villa to recover from such a turbulent period under his control and rebuild so quickly was remarkable in many ways. Purslow was a figure at the centre of most of it and he discusses his five years at the club for the first time since his exit, including the process of hiring and firing managers and rebuilding the club so it was equipped for the future. 'The regime prior to our regime had bet everything on getting promoted and betting everything in football terms means retaining a high wage bill when turnover has dropped dramatically,' he says. 'It was literally a formula that means if you lose the play-off final you will be filing for administration unless you are rescued. And that is the story of Aston Villa in one sentence.' It's Purslow's take on the mess he inherited when he first joined that highlights the magnitude of the transformation and everything that has since happened with Emery at the helm and Villa competing in Europe. 'Nassef and Wes' willingness to step in and fund the club through that period saved it because it would have been bankrupted, liquidated, finished,' Purslow adds. 'It was truly a rescue takeover.' Every journalist craves a good story and at Villa there have been plenty.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Tottenham's transfer policy will please Danny Rose, but will it get results?
It used to be said of Tottenham Hotspur that they were so keen on finding value in the transfer market they would ignore players who were right under their noses. When Spurs full-back Danny Rose famously told UK newspaper The Sun in 2017 that he wanted them to sign players he did not 'have to Google', it struck a chord with the fanbase for a reason. This was an era when the club's transfer business was necessarily constrained by the new-stadium build, a huge billion-plus project they had to pay for themselves, with no hand-outs from anyone else. Advertisement What is so striking about Tottenham's transfer business in this window is how commonplace it is for them to target players who require far less research. Of course, there is still a hunt for bargains, for young unknowns who can develop and then shine at Tottenham. That was the case when Fabio Paratici was in charge of their recruitment, and even more so now Johan Lange is technical director. The recent purchase of Kota Takai from Japan's Kawasaki Frontale — not a player many of us had heard of — is the perfect example of this type of signing. A highly-rated youngster with great data who Spurs could beat the competition to. Antonin Kinsky, the goalkeeper signed from Slavia Prague in January, was another example of a similar trend. Go back slightly further, and the likes of Pape Matar Sarr and Lucas Bergvall, though highly regarded by those well-versed in global youth football, were hardly household names before arriving in north London. Both ended the 2024-25 season having played a huge role in the club's Europa League triumph. But while Tottenham continue to go for players such as Takai and Kinsky — ones you can be forgiven for needing to Google — they have also made a habit of adding players who require no introduction. Which is what we have seen this month with the arrival of Mohammed Kudus from West Ham United for £55million, and the attempt — still unresolved — to sign Morgan Gibbs-White from Nottingham Forest for £60m. Take a step back, and this is perhaps the defining trend in Spurs' transfer business in the past few years. And it is not the behaviour of a club shy about making their presence felt in the market. When Rose made those famous comments eight years ago, it was not quite true that Tottenham never bought from other Premier League sides. For example, they signed Southampton midfielder Victor Wanyama in summer 2016 for £11million. He made an instant impact in elevating the level of the team. Which is what you want when you buy an established player from a team in the same division. And a few weeks after Rose's intervention, Spurs signed Fernando Llorente from Swansea City for £12m, although in truth the Spanish striker was always a high-level Plan B during his time at the club rather than a guaranteed starter. Advertisement After Llorente, however, Tottenham did not sign another player from a fellow Premier League side for another three years. (When Ryan Sessegnon and Jack Clarke were bought in summer 2019, from Fulham and Leeds United respectively, those sides were in the second-tier Championship.) It was not until 2020, when they added Pierre-Emile Hojbjerg from Southampton and Matt Doherty of Wolves, that they started to buy from their own division again. And neither of those deals involved a big fee either, with each player costing roughly £15million. It was only really in summer 2022 that Spurs started to behave like they routinely do now. Remember that this was after one full season of post-pandemic football. Antonio Conte wanted some more experienced additions to his team after finishing in fourth and sealing Champions League football. It was no secret that Everton needed to sell Richarlison before the Premier League's profit and sustainability rules (PSR) reporting deadline of June 30. Spurs managed to get him for a deal of £50million, plus a potential £10m more in add-ons. It was one of the biggest deals in Tottenham's history, and a clear change in policy. Later that summer, they signed Yves Bissouma from Brighton & Hove Albion for £25m. The next summer, when Ange Postecoglou came in as manager, Spurs went again to sign established top-flight players for significant fees. Leicester City had just been relegated, but Tottenham had been tracking their midfielder James Maddison for years. They persuaded him to join and bought him for £40million in late June. At the end of the window, they targeted Brennan Johnson of Nottingham Forest, another club who needed to sell for PSR reasons, and landed him for £47.5m. In Postecoglou's second (and last) summer, Spurs broke their transfer record with another big Premier League purchase. Bournemouth were not in quite the same situation as Everton in 2022 or Forest in 2023, but Dominic Solanke had two years left on his deal, and it was their last chance to make money on him. Tottenham picked him up for an initial £55million, with another £10m in potential add-ons. Advertisement Put those four deals together — Richarlison, Maddison, Johnson and Solanke — and it establishes a clear pattern. Spurs are not afraid to pay fees that used to be far beyond them for proven Premier League talent. Especially when they know the selling club, for whatever reason, are not in much of a position to resist. While it may be tempting to suggest these players (and Bissouma) have sometimes flattered to deceive at Tottenham, it is worth remembering all bar Maddison started that Europa League final, and all played a part in that long-overdue trophy win. Remember too that there is precedent for a strategy like this. Liverpool — the Premier League's best case study in how to spend money smartly — built some of the foundations for their recent successes on the signings of players who had been relegated from the Premier League: Georginio Wijnaldum from Newcastle United in 2016, Andy Robertson from Hull City the year after. Sadio Mane — who Spurs also wanted — came in from mid-table Southampton. But given what we have seen from Tottenham in the past three years, it should perhaps be no surprise that they started their summer by targeting Kudus, given how valuable that money would be to West Ham in the market. And even the move for Gibbs-White, if unexpected, was still consistent with that strategy. Of course, they certainly might have added more established players than they did last summer, and the struggles of the team to compete on multiple fronts can be attributed in part to the fact that Solanke was their only experienced signing. And transfer fees are not the same thing as wage bills, and it is in salary terms that Spurs have lost ground relative to their rivals in recent years. Even though the club has spent more on fees than ever before, some observers have pointed to the reduced wage bill as being at least as important. Maybe this window is an attempt to make up for all that, to give new head coach Thomas Frank the tools to compete on multiple fronts. And to give the fans players they do not need to look up in advance. (Top photo of Gibbs-White and Kudus;)
