Chargesheet filed in Tangra triple murder case, minor son ‘provided key testimony'
The Kolkata Police have filed a chargesheet against two brothers, Prasun Dey and Pranay Dey, in connection with the February triple murder of three female members of their family. According to sources, police are relying heavily on the testimony of Pranay's minor son, who was in the car when the brothers allegedly crashed into a pillar near Abhishikta More on Kolkata's EM Bypass on February 19.
The chargesheet, submitted Thursday, invokes sections 103(1) (murder) and 109(1) (attempt to murder) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and comes months after a car crash culminated in the discovery of three bodies in a multi-storeyed apartment building.
According to police sources, the chargesheet shows that investigators have relied heavily on the testimony of Pranay's minor son – while still undergoing treatment at a local hospital, the boy allegedly gave a detailed statement about an 'attempted strangulation and a wrist injury', which the police are using as a key piece of evidence, officials said.
After the car crash on February 19, Pranay allegedly made a startling confession: that the brothers had intentionally crashed the car and that three others – his wife Romi Dey, Prasun's wife Sudeshna and his minor daughter – had died by suicide at their home in Tangra.
While an FIR initially booked some unidentified individuals for murder. However, investigation allegedly revealed that the brothers had killed the others before attempting suicide, with the police linking the entire episode to some financial losses the family suffered in their leather business.
Sweety Kumari reports from West Bengal for The Indian Express. She is a journalist with over a decade of experience in the media industry. Covers Crime, Defence, Health , Politics etc and writes on trending topics.
With a keen eye for investigative and human-interest stories. She has honed her craft across diverse beats including aviation, health, incidents etc. Sweety delivers impactful journalism that informs and engages audiences.
Sweety Kumari is a graduate of Calcutta University with an Honors degree in Journalism from Jaipuria College and a PG in Mass Communication from Jadavpur University. Originally from Bihar, she is brought up in Kolkata and completed her education from Kendriya Vidyalaya SaltLake. Multilingual, Sweety is fluent in English, Hindi, Bengali, and Maithili. She started her career as an Entertainment and lifestyle journalist with a newsportal in Kolkata. She is working with The Indian Express for 8 years now. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"Justice has been served," says BJP's Suvendu Adhikari after Sharmistha Panoli gets interim bail
Kolkata (West Bengal) [India], June 5 (ANI): After Calcutta High Court granted interim bail to law student Sharmistha Panoli, West Bengal Assembly Leader of Opposition and BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari on Thursday said, 'justice has been served today'. In a post on X, Suvendu Adhikari said, 'Justice has been served today - Sharmistha Panoli, a law student, aged about 22 years, has been released on interim bail by the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta.' He called her arrest 'police atrocities' and said she was wrongly arrested for exercising her right to free speech. He accused Kolkata Police of acting to please political leaders. 'This is a case of police atrocities as an innocent young lady, for using her freedom of speech and expression, has been illegally arrested by the Kolkata Police and was sent to judicial custody. This is yet another example of police overzealousness and eagerness to please their political masters,' the post reads. The court directed her to cooperate with the investigation, not leave the country, and furnished bail on a personal bond of Rs 10,000. The court also ordered appropriate police protection for her. Meanwhile, BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul and West Bengal BJP Legal Cell member Sanjukta Samanta filed an FIR against Wazahat Khan, who filed an FIR against Sharmistha Panoli, at two Police Stations, Ballygunje Police Station, Kolkata and Howrah Police Station. Paul said there should be equal rights and rules for every community. Speaking to ANI, Agnimitra Paul said, 'Yes, I have filed a police complaint against Wazahat Khan, who filed a police complaint against Sharmistha Panoli. I believe that Dr BR Ambedkar Ji's constitution is applicable in West Bengal, and there should be equal rights and rules for every Khan, who complained against Sharmistha Panoli, had posted an abusive post against our goddess Maa Kamakhya and Lord Krishna. If a Muslim is insulting my god and goddess, the same action needs to be taken for Wazahat Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma has sent his police force to arrest Wazahat Khan, Mamata Banerjee's police, because of her Muslim appeasement, have been hiding and shielding Wazahat Khan...' The 22-year-old law student from Pune, Sharmistha Panoli, was arrested by Kolkata Police in Gurugram on May 30, for allegedly hurting religious sentiments with a video on Operation Sindoor. The Instagram clip was reportedly derogatory towards a particular religion. However, Panoli had deleted the video and issued an apology on May 15. (ANI)
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Bengaluru Police pinning blame of stampede on RCB, organiser, reveal FIR details
An FIR filed by the Bengaluru police names Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) as the prime accused in the June 4 stampede that left 11 people dead and many injured during a celebratory event at M Chinnaswamy DNA Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) were named as second and third FIR SAYS ABOUT CROWD SURGEAs per details of the FIR accessed by India Today, crowds began gathering on June 3, the day RCB won the final, near East Chinnaswamy Stand, MG Road, and Vittal Mallya Road to celebrate the victory. A high-level coordination meeting was held with senior police officials, including the Additional Commissioner of Police (ACP), Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP Traffic), and other relevant officials. Guidelines were issued regarding traffic, public safety, and crowd control, the FIR next day, despite police coordination and planning, the turnout for the felicitation event swelled beyond control as fans surged toward the stadium between 4 pm and 5.30 PLANNING, MISMANAGEMENT ALLEGEDThe police report alleges that organisers failed to set up adequate barricades or crowd-control measures, both inside and outside the stadium. This led to a stampede-like situation at multiple AND INJURIESadvertisementThe FIR confirms that 11 people died in the chaos and 64 others, including police personnel, were injured. It blames the organisers for negligence, despite prior warnings from the police about crowd control FILED BY POLICE INSPECTORThe complaint was filed by Girish AK, an inspector from the Cubbon Park Police Station. He submitted the report on June 5 at 11.15 am, stating that the organisers' actions violated public safety protocols and resulted in serious CHARGES IN FIRThe FIR lists sections of the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Section 105 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), Section 125 (acts that endanger human life or personal safety), Section 118 (1,2) (causing hurt or grievous hurt with dangerous weapons or means), Section 190 (liability of members of an unlawful assembly for offences committed in pursuit of a common object), among Karnataka government said that the case has now been transferred to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). A Special Investigation Team (SIT) will be constituted within the CID to ensure a robust probe into the stampede took place during a public event on Wednesday to felicitate the RCB team following their maiden Indian Premier League title win. As per top sources who spoke to India Today, the Karnataka government went ahead with the felicitation ceremony the day after RCB's victory, despite Bengaluru Police recommending it be held on Sunday for logistical and security Watch IN THIS STORY#Karnataka
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Granting interim bail to Sharmishta Panoli, HC directs West Bengal cops to give her protection
She later deleted the video and issued an apology on 15 May, but the Kolkata Police took her into custody, saying she and her family 'absconded,' and attempts to serve notices to appear for questioning were not successful. On Saturday, Sharmishta was produced before the Alipore Court in Kolkata, which remanded her in judicial custody for 14 days. Panoli was arrested by Kolkata police from Gurugram, Haryana, last week in connection with an FIR filed at Kolkata's Garden Reach police station over an Instagram video on Operation Sindoor in which she allegedly made controversial remarks about Prophet Muhammed. New Delhi: Calcutta High Court Thursday granted interim bail to 22-year-old law student and influencer Sharmishta Panoli. The court directed Panoli to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 while instructing the police to provide her with protection if she faces any threats. The arrest had triggered a political fallout with leaders from both the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress accusing the West Bengal police and the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) of overreach and stifling freedom of speech. Before the court directed the state police to ensure her safety if she were to face any potential threats, Advocate General Kishore Datta, representing the state, argued in front of Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury that Panoli evaded police and was arrested outside West Bengal; hence, regular bail had not been granted earlier, reported Live Law. The state contended that the appropriate course of action was to apply for regular bail, not to move the high court under Article 226 of the Constitution. In response, the high court sought details of the FIR from the case diary. The Advocate General contended that Panoli's remarks led to public disturbances and also urged that the case be transferred to a regular bench. At this point, the judge noted that simply because a different judge was hearing the matter did not invalidate prior observations by a coordinated bench. Challenging the state's argument, Senior Advocate D.P. Singh, appearing for Panoli, argued that the arrest was improper as no prior notice had been served. He said Panoli had approached the high court instead of seeking regular bail because her fundamental rights were at stake. Drawing comparisons with the Supreme Court's grant of interim bail to Ashoka University Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad on 21 May in an FIR lodged by Haryana Police over his social media post on 'Operation Sindoor', Singh argued that the FIR did not disclose a cognizable offence, submitting that 'blasphemy is not part of Indian law'. He also argued that Panoli had deleted the controversial video the very next day and issued an apology. The court took into account that her college details were revealed in the complaint, which allegedly led to threats against her. Considering these factors, the court held that custodial interrogation was not necessary any longer and granted Panoli interim bail. This is an updated version of the report (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: Sharmishta Panoli arrest brings Congress's Karti, BJP's Suvendu on same page; Dutch MP also chimes in
