
Why has India vowed to protect its farmers in the face of tariff threats?
MUMBAI (REUTERS)US President Donald Trump on Thursday slapped a 25% tariff on Indian goods after prolonged talks that got bogged down over access to India's labour-intensive agricultural sector, which New Delhi has pledged to protect.
Why is India opposing the products the US is lobbying for? The United States is pressing India to open its markets to a wide range of American products, including dairy, poultry, corn, soybeans, rice, wheat, ethanol, fruits and nuts. While India is willing to provide greater access for US dry fruits and apples, it is holding back on corn, soybeans, wheat, and dairy products.A key reason for this resistance is that most US corn and soybeans are genetically modified (GM), and India does not permit the import of GM food crops.GM crops are widely perceived in India as harmful to human health and the environment, and several groups affiliated with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) are opposing their introduction. The commercial cultivation of a high-yielding GM mustard variety that India developed itself is currently not allowed due to an ongoing legal battle.Like GM crops, dairy is also a highly sensitive issue, as it provides a livelihood for millions of farmers, including many who are landless or smallholders. The dairy industry helps sustain farmers even during erratic monsoon seasons, which can cause significant fluctuations in crop production.In India, where a large proportion of the population is vegetarian, food choices are strongly influenced by cultural and dietary preferences. Indian consumers are particularly concerned that cattle in the U.S. are often fed animal by-products - a practice that conflicts with Indian food habits.India is self-sufficient in most farm goods, with the exception of vegetable oils. After liberalising cooking oil imports over three decades ago, the country now has to import nearly two-thirds of its supply to meet demand. India does not want to repeat this mistake with other basic foods, which account for nearly half of its consumer price index.Though agriculture makes up just 16% of India's nearly $3.9 trillion economy, it is the lifeblood for nearly half the country's 1.4 billion people. Four years ago, this powerful voting bloc forced Modi's government into a rare retreat on a set of controversial farm laws.Some in power fear a flood of cheaper US imports would bring down local prices. New Delhi is also worried that a trade deal with the US could force it to open its agricultural sector to other countries.
How does farming in India and the US differ? The vast disparity in the scale of farming makes it difficult for Indian farmers to compete with their US counterparts.The average Indian farm is 1.08 hectares (2.67 acres), compared to 187 hectares in the US. For dairy farmers, the difference is even more dramatic - a small herd of two or three animals versus hundreds or more in the US.Many Indian farmers also rely on traditional, unmechanised techniques, while American agriculture has developed into a highly efficient, tech-driven industry.
Why is India hesitant to use US ethanol in its biofuel programmeOne of India's key goals with its Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) programme is to reduce energy imports and support domestic farmers by using sugarcane and corn for biofuel production. Indian companies have invested heavily in new distilleries, and farmers have expanded corn cultivation to meet the rising demand. India recently achieved its ambitious target of a 20% ethanol blend in petrol.
With state assembly elections approaching in Bihar - a major corn-producing state in the east - allowing US ethanol imports would lower local corn prices. This would probably anger farmers and also undermine the growing distillery sector.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US envoy says he is working on plan to end Israel's war on Gaza
President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy told families of captives being held by Hamas on Saturday that he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza. Steve Witkoff is visiting Israel as its government faces mounting pressure over the deteriorating humanitarian conditions in the enclave. In a recording of the meeting, reviewed by Reuters, Witkoff is heard saying: "We have a very, very good plan that we're working on collectively with the Israeli government, with Prime Minister Netanyahu ... for the reconstruction of Gaza. That effectively means the end of the war." Witkoff also said that Hamas was prepared to disarm in order to end the war, though the group has repeatedly said it will not relinquish "armed resistance" unless an "independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital" is established.


Khaleej Times
4 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump envoy meets Israeli hostage families, says he has 'very good plan' to end Gaza war
US President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy told families of hostages being held by the Palestinian group Hamas on Saturday that he was working with the Israeli government on a plan that would effectively end the war in Gaza. Trump has made ending the conflict a major priority of his administration, though negotiations have faltered. Steve Witkoff is visiting Israel as its government faces mounting pressure over the deteriorating humanitarian conditions in the enclave. In a recording of the meeting, reviewed by Reuters, Witkoff is heard saying: "We have a very, very good plan that we're working on collectively with the Israeli government, with Prime Minister Netanyahu ... for the reconstruction of Gaza. That effectively means the end of the war." Witkoff also said that Hamas was prepared to disarm in order to end the war, though the group has repeatedly said it will not lay down its weapons. In response to the reported remarks, Hamas, which has dominated Gaza since 2007 but has been militarily battered by Israel in the war, said it would not relinquish "armed resistance" unless an "independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital" is established. Indirect negotiations between Hamas and Israel aimed at securing a 60-day ceasefire in the Gaza war and a deal for the release of half the hostages ended last week in deadlock. On Saturday, Hamas released its second video in two days of Israeli hostage Evyatar David. In it, David, skeletally thin, is shown digging a hole, which, he says in the video, is for his own grave. Witkoff met with Netanyahu on Thursday. Afterwards, a senior Israeli official said an understanding between Israel and Washington was emerging that there was a need to move from a plan to release some of the hostages to a plan to release all the hostages, disarm Hamas and demilitarise the Gaza Strip, echoing Israel's key demands for ending the war. Witkoff arrived in Israel with Netanyahu's government facing a global outcry over devastation in Gaza and the starvation growing among its 2.2 million people. The crisis has also prompted a string of Western powers to announce they may recognise a Palestinian state. On Friday, Witkoff visited a US-backed aid operation in southern Gaza, which the United Nations has partly blamed for deadly conditions in the enclave, saying he sought to get food and other aid to people there. Dozens have died of malnutrition in recent weeks after Israel cut off all supplies to the enclave for nearly three months from March to May, according to Gaza's health ministry. It said on Saturday that it had recorded seven more fatalities, including a child, since Friday. Israel blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza and says it is taking steps for more aid to reach its population, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas, air drops and announcing protected routes for aid convoys. UN agencies have said that airdrops of food are insufficient and that Israel must let in far more aid by land and quickly ease access to it.


Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Private equity investment in Indian real estate declines in H1 of 2025
Private equity (PE) investment in Indian real estate during the first half (H1) of 2025 reflects a market at an inflection point. Not only have the volumes receded sharply, but the very assumptions underpinning investor decision-making are undergoing a foundational rethink, according to Knight Frank India survey on the trends in PE investments in Indian real estate during H1 2025. After a robust showing in 2024 with $4.9 billion in inflows, PE investments in H1 2025 dropped by 41% YoY to $1.7 billion. The number of deals also fell steeply, from 24 in H1 2024 to just 12 in H1 2025. This slowdown is not merely due to cyclical caution; rather, it reflects a structural recalibration in the cost of capital, return expectations, and comparative risk appetite among global investors and domestic institutions. However, India's real estate fundamentals remain intact. Residential sales volumes have held firm, and office absorption has been underpinned by demand from GCCs and technology occupiers. However, the capital market's response has been more cautious. Investors have shown a clear preference for structured equity, credit-backed instruments, and platform-level transactions with predictable exit. In H1 2025, Mumbai led PE inflows with $467.5 million, closely followed by Bengaluru at $452.5 million. Hyderabad with $258.6 million and Pune with $134 million also attracted meaningful capital, while Chennai received $50 million. Together the South Indian cities captured over 60% of the total investments, underscoring a sustained regional shift in institutional investor preference. Private equity investment in the India office real estate sector in H1 2025 reflects a measured optimism shaped by asset quality, market positioning, and long-term tenancy profiles. In H1 2025, the office sector attracted $706 million in PE investments across three transactions, up 22% YoY in comparison to $579 million received in H1 2024. The underlying nature of these transactions points to concentrated, strategic capital allocations rather than broadbased market retrenchment. Another key shift in H1 2025 is the near parity between investments in ready and under-construction assets. Of the $706 million deployed, roughly 50% was directed toward underconstruction developments up from just 23% in H1 2024. Private equity (PE) investments in India's residential real estate sector during H1 2025 reflects a cautious yet selective deployment approach. At $500 million across six transactions, investment volumes fell by 41% YoY from H1 2024 levels. However, the overall trajectory should not be read as weakening sentiment, but rather a sharpening of focus on risk-mitigated, structured entry routes in mid-income and premium segments. H1 2025 saw a distinct reversal to debt-heavy structures, with 60% of capital deployed in debt as compared to 40% in H1 2024. Following a sustained run of high investor interest, the Indian warehousing sector entered a period of reflection in H1 2025. Capital inflows dropped to a decade low of $50 million, with only one transaction recorded during the first half marking a dramatic 97% decline compared to $1.5 billion H1 2024. While such sharp fluctuations are not uncommon in a sector dominated by platform-level deals, the current slowdown also signals a temporary reassessment of growth assumptions amid a shifting capital landscape. In contrast to H1 2024, which was dominated by large-scale acquisition of ready assets ($1.5 billion), H1 2025's sole transaction was in the new development category, valued at just $50 million. No deals were recorded in the ready or under- construction categories this half-year, which underlines a pause in brownfield capital deployment and a return to early-stage underwriting. After a prolonged lull, India's retail real estate sector staged a meaningful comeback in H1 2025, with private equity inflows reaching $480 million, a sharp recovery from zero deal activity in 2023 and 2024. The decline in PE investments in Indian real estate during H1 2025 is down 41% YoY. As global capital turns more selective, decisions are now governed by nuanced assessments of currency risk, post-tax returns, governance clarity, and exit possibilities. I plan to invest in partnership firm promoted by my relative in Ahmedabad. Can an NRI invest in partnership firm planning real estate development? Sanjay Gupta, Sharjah. An NRI can invest in the capital of a firm on non-repatriation basis. However, the Indian firm should not be engaged in any agricultural/plantation or real estate business or print media sector. But a firm can invest in real estate development activity like residential or commercial development. The amount invested shall not be eligible for repatriation outside India. However, you can seek prior permission of Reserve Bank for investment in firm with repatriation option. While gifting immovable property, when does the receiver gets it legally in his possession? Prakash Leema, Dubai. Gifts should be accompanied with a registered gift deed. Once registered along with a gift deed, the receiver of the gift will get the legal ownership and right to possession of such property.