logo
Stocks making the biggest moves midday: T-Mobile, Alphabet, Tesla, Intel, SAIA and more

Stocks making the biggest moves midday: T-Mobile, Alphabet, Tesla, Intel, SAIA and more

CNBC25-04-2025
Check out the companies making headlines in midday trading. T-Mobile — Shares pulled back 11% after the company's wireless subscribers for the first quarter missed Wall Street estimates. T-Mobile reported 495,000 postpaid phone additions in the first-quarter, while analysts polled by StreetAccount were looking for 504,000. Alphabet — The Google-parent company gained about 2% on the heels of better-than-expected first-quarter results . Alphabet reported $2.81 per share on revenue of $90.23 billion, while analysts polled by LSEG forecast $2.01 per share and $89.12 billion in revenue. Skechers — Shares fell 4.8% after the footwear maker posted weaker-than-expected revenue for the first quarter and withdrew its 2025 guidance due to " macroeconomic uncertainty stemming from global trade policies ." The company's earnings for the quarter came in above analyst estimates, however. Gilead Sciences — The biopharmaceutical stock fell 2.5% after first-quarter revenue came in at $6.67 billion, missing the consensus forecast of $6.81 billion from analysts polled by LSEG. However, the company earned $1.81 per share, excluding items, in the quarter, beating Wall Street's estimate of $1.79 a share. SAIA — Shares of the shipping company fell 31% after first-quarter results missed estimates and showed a slowdown in March. SAIA reported $1.86 in earnings per share on $787.6 million of revenue. Analysts surveyed by FactSet were expecting $2.76 per share on $812.8 million of revenue. BMO Capital Markets downgraded the stock to market perform from outperform and said the issues were "company specific." Intel — The chipmaker declined 7% after Intel's current quarter missed investors expectations. Intel forecast revenue in the June quarter of $11.8 billion at the midpoint, while consensus forecasts called for $12.82 billion, per LSEG. Management anticipates that earnings will break even. Intel also announced plans to reduce both its operational and capital expenses. Boston Beer — The Samuel Adams brewer were more than 1% higher after better-than-expected first-quarter results. Boston Beer notched earnings per share of $2.16 on revenue of $453.9 million, while analysts polled by FactSet were looking for 56 cents per share on revenue of $435.6 million. Boston Beer cautioned that tariffs could hurt full-year earnings. Tesla — The Elon Musk-helmed electric vehicle company surged 10%. Shares have advanced more than 17%r this week, as the broader market tries to recover from a steep sell-off for much of April. — CNBC's Jesse Pound, Alex Harring and Sean Conlon contributed reporting Get Your Ticket to Pro LIVE Join us at the New York Stock Exchange! Uncertain markets? Gain an edge with CNBC Pro LIVE , an exclusive, inaugural event at the historic New York Stock Exchange. In today's dynamic financial landscape, access to expert insights is paramount. As a CNBC Pro subscriber, we invite you to join us for our first exclusive, in-person CNBC Pro LIVE event at the iconic NYSE on Thursday, June 12. Join interactive Pro clinics led by our Pros Carter Worth, Dan Niles and Dan Ives, with a special edition of Pro Talks with Tom Lee. You'll also get the opportunity to network with CNBC experts, talent and other Pro subscribers during an exciting cocktail hour on the legendary trading floor. Tickets are limited!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

David Sacks' "Goldilocks" scenario
David Sacks' "Goldilocks" scenario

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

David Sacks' "Goldilocks" scenario

David Sacks — famed tech founder & investor, co-host of the "All-In Podcast" ("The Rainman") and now White House special adviser for AI & crypto — declared Saturday on X that "Doomer narratives were wrong" about AI. Why it matters: The big takeaway from Sacks' post is that the fear of one AI frontier model dominating all now looks far-fetched, since high-performing competing models are diffusing power. "The AI race is highly dynamic so this could change," Sacks wrote. "But right now the current situation is Goldilocks": "We have 5 major American companies vigorously competing on frontier models. This brings out the best in everyone and helps America win the AI race." "So far, we have avoided a monopolistic outcome that vests all power and control in a single entity." "There is likely to be a major role for open source. These models excel at providing 80-90% of the capability at 10-20% of the cost. This tradeoff will be highly attractive to customers who value customization, control, and cost over frontier capabilities. China has gone all-in on open source, so it would be good to see more American companies competing in this area, as OpenAI just did. (Meta also deserves credit.)" "There is likely to be a division of labor between generalized foundation models and specific verticalized applications. Instead of a single superintelligence capturing all the value, we are likely to see numerous agentic applications solving 'last mile' problems. This is great news for the startup ecosystem." "There is also an increasingly clear division of labor between humans and AI. Despite all the wondrous progress, AI models are still at zero in terms of setting their own objective function. Models need context, they must be heavily prompted, the output must be verified, and this process must be repeated iteratively to achieve meaningful business value. Reality check: Though there's plenty of competition, as Sacks notes, the administration has worked closely with OpenAI on the Stargate Project. And as Axios' Scott Rosenberg noted recently, the history of tech shows that early dominant players could still fall to a competitor not yet born: Google came along to dominate what seemed like a well-established search industry in the early dot-com era. The bottom line: The "current state of vigorous competition is healthy," Sacks concluded. "It propels innovation forward, helps America win the AI race, and avoids centralized control. This is good news — that the Doomers did not expect."

Google Data Breach — August 8 Email Warnings Now Confirmed
Google Data Breach — August 8 Email Warnings Now Confirmed

Forbes

time2 hours ago

  • Forbes

Google Data Breach — August 8 Email Warnings Now Confirmed

Google confirms it has now notified victims of hack. SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images It has been quite a week for Google users: first came the confirmation that the technology giant had been hacked and Google user data breached, quickly followed by news of another hack attack, this time impacting Google Cloud customers. The release of the Chrome 139 security update following the disclosure of multiple vulnerabilities, a spike in Google account attacks, and three email warnings from Google seemed somewhat tame by comparison. But it's confirmation of official email warnings that is the latest development in the Google data breach saga. Here's what we know. Forbes Emergency Microsoft Security Warning Confirmed — Act Now, CISA Says By Davey Winder The Google Threat Intelligence Group first alerted the world to a successful hack attack against Google on August 5, when it confirmed that a database had been accessed by attackers thought to be associated with the ShinyHunters ransomware and extortion group, also more formally known as UNC6040, leading to the compromise of user data. The database, a Salesforce instance, was used 'to store contact information and related notes for small and medium businesses,' the Google announcement stated. The full extent of the breach is still to be confirmed. Google has so far said that the stolen data comprised 'basic and largely publicly available business information, such as business names and contact details.' Now Google has updated that confirmation with another. This time, answering a question that had been on the lips of many in the cybersecurity industry, as well as Google users themselves. That question being whether impacted organizations had been informed of the attack and the data that had been stolen. 'This could mean these organisations are only finding out about the breach now,' William Wright, CEO of Closed Door Security told me at the time, 'meaning the criminals could have held on to the data, unknown to victims, for almost two months.' The August 8 update by Google provides some closure in that it first confirmed 'Emails are actively being sent to those affected by this incident,' and shortly after that, 'Google has completed its email notifications to those affected by this incident.' It has not been made clear what the precise content of those Google data breach notification emails might be, but if you have received one, I would be more than happy if you were to forward it to me. I will update this article with further information should I get hold of an email, suitably redacted, of course. Forbes Microsoft Windows Security Bypass — Hello Hackers Use Own Faces By Davey Winder

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store