
‘Not Today' — Taiwan strives to give Xi Jinping second thoughts about attacking its island neighbour
There is a widespread belief in Taiwan that Chinese President Xi Jinping wants to invade Taiwan by 2027, the centenary of the creation of the Chinese army, and the year that Xi's current term will end.
China's President Xi Jinping wakes up every day, looks at himself in the mirror as he shaves and says, 'Okay, I want to be the greatest emperor of China. I want to conquer Taiwan. Okay, it is my job. It is my will. It is the reason [for] my existence.
'I want to conquer Taiwan. But today is not a good day. I cannot do that.'
That, at least, is the scene in Xi's bathroom that Taiwan's Deputy Foreign Minister François Chihchung Wu imagines. The vision animates Taiwan's Not Today Policy, which he says is to keep ensuring Xi has second thoughts every day about the wisdom of invading China's tiny island neighbour, which it regards as a mere 'renegade province of the People's Republic of China (PRC).
The Not Today policy largely rests on military deterrence and strong military alliances, especially with the United States, and persuading the world that Taiwan is indispensable.
Walking the streets of Taipei, it is hard to imagine why any deterrent is needed. One senses no fear of imminent attack. And why would anyone want to destroy this country of 23 million friendly, vibrant, industrious people and its flourishing, sophisticated economy, the 22nd largest in the world, with a nominal GDP of $814.44-billion, according to the International Monetary Fund?
A recent survey by Taiwan's Institute for National Defense and Security Research (INDSR) found that while 60% of Taiwanese believe China is the most important threat facing Taiwan (versus energy shortage, the plummeting birth rate, and so on), only one quarter expected an invasion during the next five years.
Liang Wen-chieh, Deputy Minister of the Mainland Affairs Council, says the Taiwanese people have been living under military threat since the country was founded in 1949, and so have grown used to it. This, though, is a double-edged sword, he says. On the good side, it allows people to 'dedicate themselves to the economy'. It also avoids causing public alarm, says INDSR research fellow Ming-shih Shen.
But Liang also suggests it has made the Taiwanese complacent, though the military authorities take the threat very seriously and remain on full alert. The Mainland Affairs Council has a mandate to negotiate with the mainland. But Beijing has terminated talks.
Ordinary Taiwanese tell you that the extent of war preparedness is basically that if the government sounds an alarm, they must stay indoors until further notice. The government did, however, conduct a whole-of-society exercise in March in Tainan city, rehearsing medical and other responses to an invasion.
Xi's perceived deadline
But if ordinary people seem a bit blasé, one gathers from officials, journalists and analysts a widespread belief that Xi would like to invade Taiwan by 2027.
Wu says that is because 2027 will be the centenary of the creation of the Chinese army, and Xi wants to use the occasion to demonstrate that it has become the best army in the world, by conquering Taiwan. Liang, on the other hand, believes 2027 is the key date because that is when Xi's current term as president will end. 'So in order to stay in power, Xi will have to possibly use force against Taiwan.'
Certainly, China has been amping up the military pressure lately. Last year, it conducted two major military exercises around Taiwan. In April this year, a third called 'Strait Thunder' was conducted with 38 naval ships, including an aircraft carrier strike group.
China's military tactics included live-fire drills into the East China Sea. A Chinese military spokesperson said the drills involved 'precision strikes on simulated targets of key ports and energy facilities'.
China also launched scores of sorties by its warplanes into Taiwan's airspace. Taiwanese officials say these sorties have increased from 380 in 2020 to 3,080 last year, with a likely increase this year.
The intensified military exercises are one reason why some believe the long-feared Chinese attack against Taiwan could be 'closer than you think', as The Economist predicted in its cover story earlier this month.
It also posited that greater uncertainty about whether the isolationist and unpredictable Donald Trump would rush to Taiwan's defence and Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te's failure to decisively raise defence spending (because of opposition from the China-appeasing KMT party which has more votes in parliament than Lai's Democratic Progress Party) could very well persuade Xi, if not to invade, then at least to strangle the island into submission by a blockade or economic sanctions and quarantines.
Washington 'ambiguity'
The US has long pursued a policy of 'strategic ambiguity' towards Taiwan. This means not explicitly declaring that it would come to Taiwan's defence.
The idea is to discourage Taiwan from declaring formal independence from China, which would almost certainly provoke an immediate attack. But ex-President Joe Biden nonetheless made it clear that the US would defend Taiwan.
Trump has been far more ambiguous. Da-nien Liu, deputy director at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research in Taipei, told visiting international journalists last week that he was 'shocked' when Trump declared recently, after the US and China ended their trade war, that this truce would be good for 'peace and unification'. Liu said that made Taiwanese suspect that Trump would not defend them.
Liang observes that Taiwan is still trying very hard to understand the real attitude of the Trump administration towards Taiwan and China. Taipei is concerned that Trump 'is actually turning the past allies into foes', referring to his threats to annex Canada, for example
On the other hand, Taipei notes that top US officials such as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are 'more aligned with the Biden administration' (ie ready to defend Taiwan).
Taiwan's pillars of deterrence
Deputy Foreign Minister Wu, however, says that despite all the indications that Xi wishes to invade by 2027, this will not happen because of Taiwan's 'Not Today Policy'. He says it rests on three pillars of deterrence.
The first is that Taiwan is increasing its defence spending significantly. It now constitutes more than 16% of the national budget – greater, proportionately, than that of the US, whose defence spending constitutes 12% of its budget. Wu says Lai has already announced that defence spending will increase from 2.45% to 3% of GDP – or 20% of the national budget.
The second pillar is the deterrence provided by Taiwan's military allies, notably the US. He says that the US, Germany, France, Canada, Italy, Japan, Turkiye, Australia, New Zealand and the Netherlands have all sent warships to Taiwan in recent years. For Japan, that was the first time since World War 2.
That in part is because about half of global trade passes through the narrow Taiwan Strait between Taiwan and China, and these countries don't want that thoroughfare to be interrupted by war.
The third pillar, Wu says, is that Taiwan is trying hard to show the world that it is vital to the international community and so should be allowed to join international organisations.
Wu notes that Taiwan alerted the World Health Organisation (WHO) as early as December 2019 to the Covid-19 pandemic brewing in China.
The WHO ignored the warning because Taiwan was not a member, allowing the pandemic to take off before it was eventually officially acknowledged.
To these deterrents, the 'silicon shield' should be added: Taiwan's global superiority in manufacturing semiconductors, or advanced computer chips, which are vital to almost every industry, including motor vehicles and weapons.
Wu says about 60% of all semiconductors and 95% of advanced chips are made in Taiwan, while 100% of the even more sophisticated chips are manufactured in his country. He says most of the most advanced chips in America's frontline fighter jet, the F-35, are made in Taiwan.
Last week, many Western nations attended the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain Forum in Taipei, underscoring the importance of the country to their hi-tech manufacturing industries.
For Wu and Liang, though, the dominant factor determining whether China will invade Taiwan 'is a clear calculation on whether they can secure victory rapidly, before interference from the US', as Liang says.
'So now we know that the reason why Putin decided to invade Ukraine was because he thought that he could take Ukraine and end the war within seven to 10 days.
'And if China thinks this way, then there is a high possibility that there would be a war.
'So what we are trying to do is to prevent China from thinking this way.'
China justified its recent military drills off Taiwan as 'a stern warning to and powerful deterrent against separatist forces agitating for Taiwan independence.'
Some still believe that the ruling Democratic Progress Party is more likely to provoke a Chinese attack than a government led by the opposition KMT, which is less vocal about independence.
Liang disagrees. He notes that while Xi's predecessors were content to leave Taiwan alone as long as it did not declare independence, Xi is very different, because he is striving to achieve the unification of the two Chinas, regardless.
Asymmetrical warfare
Ming-shih Shen, research fellow at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, says that Taiwan is no match for China militarily, even though Taipei is trying to upgrade rapidly by acquiring more modern fighter jets and other weapons. But he says Taiwan is pursuing a strategy of asymmetrical warfare, concentrating on defensive weaponry such as anti-aircraft, anti-ship and other missiles, drones and submarines.
He notes that China is also still too short of vital equipment such as landing craft, and its marine corps is too weak to conduct a full-scale invasion now.
Like most analysts, he believes that Taiwan's reliance on outside energy sources is its Achilles heel. That would probably enable it to withstand an invasion or blockade for no more than two weeks. However, he notes that Taiwan has signed a supply contract with a US company to supply liquid natural gas to Taiwan.
'If the United States can send its coast guard or navy ships to protect this liquid gas ship, no problem.'
Otherwise, he also says plans are under way to build a gas pipeline from Alaska via Japan to Taiwan.
There are a lot of ifs in all of that, but Wu nonetheless concludes that 'with this Not Today Policy, 2027 will not be the year that China will be able to conquer Taiwan, even if they want to'. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
US faces vape shortage as China tariffs, seizures hit Geek Bar
Shipments of vapes from China to the U.S. ground to a near halt in May from a year ago, official data shows, hit by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and a crackdown on unauthorised e-cigarettes in the world's biggest market for smoking alternatives. That includes Geek Bar, a brand of flavoured vapes that is not authorised to sell in the U.S. but which had been widely available due to porous import controls. One retailer, who asked not to be named because their business sells unauthorised vapes, told Reuters that one of the store's vape suppliers normally receives 100 boxes of Geek Bar vapes per week, but is now getting just ten. Another supplier imposed unprecedented purchase limits. 'There were a lot of supply chain issues' during COVID-19, the person said. 'But I've never seen this.' The U.S. supplier limited purchases to five boxes at a time due to 'tariff-related price increases and limited market availability', an undated notice to customers seen by Reuters showed. Trump's decision to impose steep tariffs on China, now at 30% after peaking at 145% in April, as well as blockbuster seizures of unauthorised vapes, have constrained the supply of Chinese-owned vape brands and Geek Bar in particular, according to five industry sources and notices from U.S. Geek Bar wholesalers reviewed by Reuters. Between May 1 and May 28 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recorded just 71 shipments of products labelled as e-cigarettes or vapes from China, compared with nearly 1,200 over the same period last year. Such imports had fallen between 40% and 60% in February, March and April, after Trump came into office, but collapsed in May, the data show. 'Due to increased tariffs, rising production costs, and reduced supply chain capacity, the manufacturer has informed us that they will be reducing supply volume in the near-term,' one U.S. regional Geek Bar wholesaler wrote to customers on April 22 in an email shared with Reuters. 'WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NICOTINE HERE' In the meantime, vape distributors expect prices to go in one direction. 'With tariffs, it'll definitely go up,' said one U.S. vape distributor who asked not to be named. But that might not impact sales much. Unauthorised vape manufacturers enjoy hefty margins, and so can eat some of the cost of tariffs, Luis Pinto, a spokesperson for British American Tobacco's BATS.L U.S. subsidiary, said. Meanwhile, consumers hooked on vapes tend to keep buying, even as the price goes up. 'If the price goes up, the price goes up. We're talking about nicotine here,' the vape distributor said, adding unlike other products, addicted users need their fix. Vapes like Geek Bar – priced around $20 currently – would still be good value even with a $5 increase, the person said. Geek Bar manufacturer, Guangdong Qisitech, did not respond to a request for comment sent to its general email address. Pinto agreed the tariffs will increase prices but probably not to the point 'where it is a barrier to usage'. Many of the vapes landing on U.S. shelves are manufactured in Shenzhen, which meets the majority of the world's demand for vapes. Some factories there make devices for large tobacco companies with the legal licence to sell their products in the United States, such as Japan Tobacco International 2914.T. Others fuel a booming market for unregulated devices that U.S. authorities say are illegal to import or sell. To mitigate tariffs, illicit vape producers can mislabel or undervalue their shipments or spoof their origin entirely to make it look like they came from a lower-tariff country like Indonesia, Vietnam or Mexico, Pinto said. Vapes from China are often smuggled into the U.S. disguised as other items entirely, such as shoes or toys, to evade officials hunting for unauthorised vapes at the border, according to public statements from the FDA and Customs and Border Protection. Geek Bar was by far the most popular unauthorised vape brand in the U.S. last year, accounting for around a quarter of sales tracked by market research company Circana in 2024 despite lacking a licence to sell from the FDA, which has struggled to contain illegal imports from China. The brand, as well as thousands of other labels often made in China and lacking FDA permission, are stocked by wholesalers and retailers around the country, often sold alongside authorised labels from big tobacco companies like BAT and Altria MO.N. PANIC BUYING U.S. tariffs have driven panic buying of vapes by U.S. buyers, higher shipping costs and increased risks at the border, the distributor, a former distributor and a person who used to work for a major Chinese vape company said. Substantial vape seizures were also a big driver of Geek Bar supply issues, two of the sources said. The FDA announced a large seizure in Chicago in February, and new FDA commissioner Marty Makary has pledged to crack down on unauthorised vapes. Government notices on seized goods show further vape seizures in March and April. The growth of Geek Bar and other unregulated vape brands have eaten into the market share of cigarette companies like Altria and BAT, which estimates unauthorised e-cigarettes accounted for some 70% of all U.S. vape sales last year. Altria CEO Billy Gifford told investors in April that he hoped tariffs would lead to 'much more enforcement' of vapes at the border. Trump's trade war with China has also seen China-U.S. air freight and shipping capacity collapse limiting shipping capacity for cargo including vapes. The FDA's data only captures shipments properly declared as vapes. As a result, it has recorded declining vape shipments since 2020 even as industry sales have grown. An FDA spokesperson said the agency expects the number of shipments it captures to increase as it ramps up efforts to ensure compliance and prevent illegal imports. Unauthorised vape makers have also been moving production to Indonesia – a shift that prolonged tariffs on China would likely accelerate, the former employee said. Vape makers are 'highly adaptable', the person said. 'Whatever happens in the U.S., the industry will survive.'


eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
US trade gap plummets as Trump tariffs take hold
The US trade deficit more than halved in April as President Donald Trump's global tariffs reversed an import surge that preceded the new duties. The White House is likely to frame the smaller deficit as a win, noting a report of its expected boost to GDP growth, although analysts warn that businesses had likely paused further imports while waiting for countries to strike deals. The world's biggest economy logged a trade gap of $61.6 billion in the same month that Trump unveiled 10 percent levies on almost all trading partners. This was down by 55.5 percent from March, the largest decrease on record, said the Commerce Department. In March, the overall US trade deficit widened to $138.3 billion as businesses sought to get ahead of Trump's promised duties. But imports slumped by 16.3 percent in April to $351 billion as the blanket tariffs on US allies and competitors alike kicked in. Goods imports in particular fell by the most on record as well. Apart from the 10 percent levy, Trump also announced -– before swiftly pausing –- higher rates on dozens of economies including the European Union and Japan. This halt, which allowed room for trade negotiations to take place, is due to expire in early July. Goods from China were the biggest target of Trump's during the month as the world's two biggest economies engaged in a tit-for-tat escalation that took both sides' levies on each other's products to three digits. This brought many shipments from China to a halt before the countries reached a temporary deal to de-escalate the situation. For now, all eyes are on talks between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, amid hopes that both leaders can help bring about a longer-lasting truce. But the state of a trade deal between both countries remains uncertain as Trump last week accused Beijing of violating the terms of their temporary agreement -- which China denied. After a phone call with Xi on Thursday, Trump said there had been a "very positive conclusion for both countries." Both April exports and imports involving China were the lowest since early 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic, according to the Commerce Department. - 'Hit pause' - "The economy has essentially hit pause on discretionary imports and is now working off inventories as businesses and consumers delay spending and wait for clarity on tariffs," said Nationwide financial markets economist Oren Klachkin. He added in a statement that the sharp drop in goods imports, stronger goods exports and larger services surplus narrowed the total April trade gap by the most on record. With imports plummeting, GDP growth in the second quarter is set to rebound, said Oxford Economics senior US economist Matthew Martin. But he warned in a note that headline growth figures "will overstate the true health of the economy." Overall in April, US imports dropped by 16.3 percent to $351 billion on a retreat in goods shipments. In particular, imports of consumer goods fell by $33 billion, data showed, with pullbacks in pharmaceuticals and cell phones. US exports ticked up by 3 percent to $289.4 billion, helped by goods exports such as those of industrial supplies. But US exports of autos and parts dropped by $3.3 billion. Besides wide-ranging tariffs targeting different countries, businesses have also been contending with sector-specific duties that Trump has rolled out in recent months. In March and April, the president slapped tariffs on imports of steel, aluminum and automobiles and he has since doubled the duties on both metals this month. The overall US deficit was the smallest since 2023, according to government figures. By Beiyi Seow

TimesLIVE
8 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
BYD to nearly triple its South African dealer network by next year
Chinese electric vehicle (EV) giant BYD plans to nearly triple its dealership network in South Africa by next year as it looks to grow its market share in the country, a senior executive told Reuters. BYD's move comes while competition in Africa's largest automotive market is growing, where sales of new energy vehicles are rising and other Chinese companies — such as GAC, Chery and GWM — are also making inroads. Launched in 2023, with its BYD battery electric ATTO 3 vehicle, the carmaker has about 13 dealerships. 'By the end of the year we will have about 20 dealerships around the country. The aim is to expand that to about 30, 35 the next year,' Steve Chang, GM of BYD Auto South Africa told Reuters in an interview on Wednesday. BYD offers six models in the South African market, with its plug-in hybrid Shark pickup, hybrid SEALION 6 and pure electric SEALION 7 SUV models launched in April, completing its hybrid and electric dual-powertrain strategy. The dealership expansion will help BYD become a known brand and capture more buyers in a country slowly transitioning to EVs. In 2024, sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs) — a term that describes battery-powered fully electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid cars — rose to 15,611 units from 7,782 units in 2023, according to data from automotive industry body Naamsa. While the share of NEVs to total car sales is still low, BYD is hoping to capture the market early on, in preparation for a meaningful transition, Chang said. 'We want to educate and cultivate the market of South Africa and make sure South African consumers can catch up with the rest of the world.' The uptake of EVs and investment in Africa is slow relative to emerging market peers due to limited charging infrastructure, unstable power supply and high import duties compared with fossil-fuelled cars. But BYD sees potential. 'South Africa is one of the most important automotive markets in the southern hemisphere. It's probably the biggest market in Africa, so it's a market we have to look at and see how we can develop the market,' Chang said.