Bangladesh Plans Massive Solar Push to Tackle Energy Woes
Energy
The government's rooftop solar programme will see all government offices, schools, colleges and hospitals installed with panels immediately, a statement issued late June 26 said.
Bangladesh's caretaker leader has ordered all government institutions including ministry buildings and schools to install solar panels to ease chronic power problems in a country regularly hit by deadly heatwaves.
The nation of 170 million people has set itself a target of generating 20% of its power from renewable energy by 2030 – a four-fold increase – and rising to 30% by 2040, the government said in a statement.
"Bangladesh is lagging far behind its neighbouring countries", the statement issued by the office of interim leader Muhammad Yunus read.
"Only 5.6% of our total requirement is currently met from renewable sources," it added, noting that in neighbouring India, it is 24% and in Sri Lanka, nearly 40%.
The government's rooftop solar programme will see all government offices, schools, colleges and hospitals installed with panels immediately, the statement issued late June 26 said.
The micro-finance pioneer said the panels would be installed and operated by private sector companies, unlike the largely failed push by since-ousted former prime minister Sheikh Hasina to install panels by using government power agencies.
"The private sector will handle overall maintenance and keep the systems operational for their own business interests", the statement said.
"The government will only provide them with rooftop access".
The government has also initiated tender processes for 55 solar power plants with a total 5,238 megawatts capacity.
Bangladesh relies heavily on importing cross-border power from neighbouring India, as well from Nepal, especially when demand soars during the blistering heat when consumers rely on energy-hungry air conditioners to keep cool.
Dhaka also began construction of the Russia-backed nuclear plant at Rooppur in 2017.
The much-delayed 2,400-megawatt project will be Bangladesh's largest power station by generating capacity once fully operational.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Trump dominates NATO summit: 3 takeaways from the meeting
United States President Donald Trump dominated the discussions during this year's NATO summit, which concluded on Wednesday (June 25). He returned to Washington after what he saw as a symbolic victory — the NATO members agreement on increasing their defence spending to 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP). Here are key takeaways from the summit. The 5% defence spending target Trump called the summit 'a very historic milestone' as Nato allies (the member nations) made the ambitious 5% GDP defence spending target. He said the consensus was 'something that no one really thought possible. And they said: 'You did it, sir, you did it'. Well, I don't know if I did it … but I think I did.' Of the 5% figure, 3.5% would be achieved entirely through core defence spending and weapons. The remaining 1.5% can be put towards 'defence-related expenditure', broadly referring to such infrastructural spending to 'protect our critical infrastructure, defend our networks, ensure our civil preparedness and resilience, unleash innovation, and strengthen our defence industrial base'. Allies (NATO members) would need to submit plans to meet the 5% figure annually and follow a 'credible, incremental path', with a review on progress expected after the 2029 US presidential election. The 3.5% core defence spending target itself will be out of reach for several NATO countries, which have hovered around the previous 2% target. The US spent 3.2% of its GDP on defence spending in 2024, according to NATO estimates. Only three countries exceeded this share – Poland (4.1%), Estonia (3.4%) and Latvia (3.4%). Spain, which had allocated 1.24% of its GDP in 2024 to defence spending, announced it would not adhere to this target, earning Trump's ire and the potential for Spain-specific trade sanctions. Article 5 in the spotlight Article 5, or the collective defence clause, serves as the bedrock of NATO's existence. It says an attack against even one of the members would be considered an attack against all members. It also says that in the event of such an attack, each member would individually and collectively take 'such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.'' This 'One for All, All for One' principle has helped the organisation attract more members over the years. As the Russia-Ukraine War broke out in 2022, the historically neutral nations of Finland and Sweden made a bid to join it. During his presidential campaign, Trump revived his criticism of the organisation, saying the US under his presidency would choose not to defend a member under attack if it spends less than the agreed targets. On Wednesday, he was among the NATO allies who underlined their 'ironclad commitment' to come to each other's aid if attacked. 'They want to protect their country, and they need the United States, and without the United States, it's not going to be the same,' he told reporters. 'I left there saying that these people really love their countries. It's not a rip-off. And we're here to help them protect their country,' he said. Focus away from Ukraine Since 2022, every NATO summit has committed to aiding Ukraine in its war against Russia. Most NATO countries view Russia as a direct and immediate threat. The 2024 summit saw Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy be feted by then-US President Joe Biden and secure an assurance from NATO President Mark Rutte that Ukraine's path to NATO membership was 'irreversible'. This policy has been largely upended by Trump's return to the White House this January. Since his first term (2017-21), Trump has remained cordial with Russian President Vladimir Putin, reversing decades-long animosity between the US and Russia. In his second term, the Trump administration has ruled out the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO, lashed out against Zelenskyy for being 'ungrateful', and has paused US military aid to Ukraine in its war against Russia. This set the stage for the NATO summit, as the Ukraine issue was relegated to the backseat. Unlike last year, when the NATO declaration took note of Russia's 'brutal war of aggression', the statement this year mentioned 'long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security' without specifically condemning Russia.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Temple Demolished In Dhaka, India Urges Bangladesh To Protect Hindus
The demolition of a Durga Temple in Dhaka had led to a sharp response from India over the treatment of minorities in Bangladesh. Authorities in Bangladesh have justified the move, calling it a 'makeshift structure', built illegally. Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, "We understand that extremists were clamouring for the demolition of the Durga temple in Khilkhet, Dhaka. The interim government, instead of providing security to the temple, projected the episode as a case of illegal land use and allowed the destruction of the temple today." "This has resulted in damage to the deity before it was relocated. We are dismayed that such incidents continue to recur in Bangladesh. Let me underline that it is the responsibility of the interim government of Bangladesh to protect Hindus, their properties, and their religious institutions," Mr Jaiswal said. India has repeatedly voiced concern about the targeting of minorities in Bangladesh under the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus. Prime Minister Narendra Modi raised the issue with Mr Yunus during the meeting between the two leaders on the sidelines of the BIMSTEC summit in Bangkok. Prime Minister Modi had also underlined India's concerns related to the safety and security of minorities in Bangladesh, including Hindus, and expressed his expectation that the Government of Bangladesh would ensure their security, including by thoroughly investigating the cases of atrocities committed against them, during the meeting with Muhammad Yunus. The temple, which seems to be a makeshift structure, was demolished within days of demands from extremists to tear it down. The demolition occurred within three days of a mob demanding the temple's removal. The demolition was carried out by authorities from Bangladesh Railway, assisted by police and military personnel, and visuals from the demolition site showed bulldozers bringing the structure down with the Durga idol still inside the structure. The officials are seen ignoring appeals from devotees to spare the temple. The Bangladesh Railway authorities say the Khilkhet Sarbojanin Shri Shri Durga Mandir was demolished as it had been built illegally on railway land.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Why Johns Hopkins, the top-funded US university, is now losing billions in research aid
Johns Hopkins University, the top recipient of federal research funding in the United States, is facing an unprecedented financial crisis as the Trump administration aggressively cuts billions in aid flowing to American higher education institutions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While not directly named in official government actions, Johns Hopkins is reeling from a political wave aimed at defunding universities that conservatives claim have become ideologically biased and fiscally bloated. The institution, which receives roughly $4.2 billion annually in federal research support, has already lost $800 million in funding and laid off over 2,000 employees. According to The New York Times, these cuts have impacted both international and domestic research, jeopardizing critical public health and scientific projects worldwide. The political rationale behind the cuts The Trump administration has framed the move as a response to what it calls the ideological drift of elite universities. As reported by The New York Times, administration officials argue that major research institutions have evolved into "bastions of leftism hostile to conservative thought," using taxpayer money to promote what they label as radical agendas. Russell T. Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, stated that current government spending was "contrary to the needs of ordinary working Americans" and too heavily tilted toward institutions aligned with gender and climate ideologies, which he called "antithetical to the American way of life. " This broad criticism has translated into sweeping budget proposals. A Trump-backed initiative could cut the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget by nearly 40%, directly impacting Johns Hopkins, which received over $1 billion in NIH grants this year alone. The National Science Foundation and other federal bodies have also reduced or canceled grants—around 90 totaling $50 million, according to The New York Times. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Massive losses in international and domestic programs Johns Hopkins has long been a global leader in international health and development. But the US Agency for International Development, which had partnered closely with the university, saw its funding gutted. The school lost 2,200 jobs, including 250 in the US. Programs to prevent cervical cancer in Madagascar, diagnose tuberculosis in Uganda, and build healthcare systems in Bangladesh were either paused or terminated. Domestically, the impact is equally severe. Canceled NIH grants had supported projects to reduce HIV among transgender women, enhance STEM education for autistic high schoolers, and improve Covid vaccination rates among low-income Latino populations. Endowment, overhead, and local impact under pressure Despite having a $13 billion endowment, Johns Hopkins officials argue that those funds are largely restricted and cannot fill the gap. Still, under current proposals, the university may face a 7% tax on endowment income under the House plan, or 4% under the Senate version. Ronald J. Daniels, president of Johns Hopkins, has expressed concern that such taxes would undermine student financial aid—especially generous donations like the $1.8 billion gift from Michael Bloomberg. In addition, proposed federal reductions to indirect cost reimbursements—funds that help cover lab space, staff, and infrastructure—could drain another $300 million from the university. As The New York Times reported, the Heritage Foundation called these reimbursements a way universities "bilk taxpayers." A threat to America"s research leadership Faculty members have warned that the disruption could unravel decades of scientific progress. "We had these shining institutions that contributed so much to human knowledge, and there are explicit steps being taken to undermine them," said physics professor N. Peter Armitage, as quoted by The New York Times . Beyond the university, the consequences are rippling through Baltimore. The school has spent more than $1 billion on local business partnerships since 2016. Alicia Wilson, vice president for civic engagement, told The New York Times , "As goes Hopkins, so goes Baltimore." Daniels, who once warned in his 2021 book What Universities Owe Democracy that authoritarian regimes often target universities, has acknowledged the institution must adapt. In a campus-wide message, he revealed that new federal awards were down by nearly two-thirds and announced hiring freezes, delayed raises, and construction pauses. Even with its storied past and groundbreaking achievements in science and medicine, Johns Hopkins now stands as a symbol of what is at stake in a national shift away from funding academic research.
